|
Yup...I like it. I like the case against Wiggles. He seems more interested in the SK roles than scumhunting, and he's certainly disappeared from thread meaning he's either busy in his quicktopic or talking to who he thinks are the other SKs in PM land. You know what I like more? The case against RoL. He decries lurking more than any other Team Liquid player. And he's one of the most lurky characters in this game. Why so lurky bro? And why try and encourage the newbs to post if you're not going to participate in their discussion? Sounds like a really poorly designed play for town-cred to me.
I like the redFF wagon. That looks like its going places. His nonconstructive 1-liners are a boon to town and only posting content to defend himself looks very scummy to me. However, the wagon is driven at present by Palmar, so it's inevitably wrong. <3
In conclusion, I like some of the candidates, but I like one the mostest of all. The one I like mostest of all is RebirthOfLegenD. So my vote will go back on him.
##Vote: RebirthOfLegenD
Also where the eff is Node? He's usually RIGHT ON replacing out if he can't finish a game or play actively...yet here he is, zero posts and zero content to analyze. Is anyone in contact with him PM stylie?
|
On July 20 2011 01:34 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Did no one else actually think about the set-up at all? And stop calling me third party, or Palmar will try to shoot me tonight.
I want to shoot half of town anyway.
|
On July 20 2011 01:41 VisceraEyes wrote: Yup...I like it. I like the case against Wiggles. He seems more interested in the SK roles than scumhunting, and he's certainly disappeared from thread meaning he's either busy in his quicktopic or talking to who he thinks are the other SKs in PM land. You know what I like more? The case against RoL. He decries lurking more than any other Team Liquid player. And he's one of the most lurky characters in this game. Why so lurky bro? And why try and encourage the newbs to post if you're not going to participate in their discussion? Sounds like a really poorly designed play for town-cred to me.
I like the redFF wagon. That looks like its going places. His nonconstructive 1-liners are a boon to town and only posting content to defend himself looks very scummy to me. However, the wagon is driven at present by Palmar, so it's inevitably wrong. <3
In conclusion, I like some of the candidates, but I like one the mostest of all. The one I like mostest of all is RebirthOfLegenD. So my vote will go back on him.
##Vote: RebirthOfLegenD
Also where the eff is Node? He's usually RIGHT ON replacing out if he can't finish a game or play actively...yet here he is, zero posts and zero content to analyze. Is anyone in contact with him PM stylie?
You scummedy scum scum, why do you keep scumming up my thread, scum?
|
A) Not your thread B) I'm not scum C) contentless post is contentless.
kthxbai
|
I really don't think we should be voting for redFF today. Most of the evidence against him has to do with supersoft, therefore lynching supersoft first will give us more information on him, and whether or not the lynch will be worth it.
|
*cue the senseless VE bandwagon driven by a wrong again Palmar* <3
|
On July 20 2011 01:54 Nisani201 wrote: I really don't think we should be voting for redFF today. Most of the evidence against him has to do with supersoft, therefore lynching supersoft first will give us more information on him, and whether or not the lynch will be worth it.
No, there's a whole case against redFF regardless of what supersoft flips.
Who else do you find suspicious?
|
On July 20 2011 01:59 Curu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2011 01:54 Nisani201 wrote: I really don't think we should be voting for redFF today. Most of the evidence against him has to do with supersoft, therefore lynching supersoft first will give us more information on him, and whether or not the lynch will be worth it. No, there's a whole case against redFF regardless of what supersoft flips. Who else do you find suspicious?
I find Wiggles and RoL to be suspicious as well.
|
Unless there's something I've missed (which is unlikely because I read through the thread 3x as slowly as I input everything into my node graph), the only evidence against redFF that isn't related to supersoft is the fact that he posts a lot of spam, which isn't enough to warrant a lynch at all.
|
On July 20 2011 02:09 Nisani201 wrote: Unless there's something I've missed (which is unlikely because I read through the thread 3x as slowly as I input everything into my node graph), the only evidence against redFF that isn't related to supersoft is the fact that he posts a lot of spam, which isn't enough to warrant a lynch at all.
Lynching supersoft, doesn't really tell us a ton about redFF though, so that argument isn't very good.
If supersoft flips town: RedFF could be a scum just trying to defend him for town-cred If supersoft flips scum: RedFF could have been trying to save a scum-buddy, enter WIFOM
|
I don't think a scum would take the risk of randomly defending his scumbuddy based on no evidence. If supersoft flips scum then I doubt redFF is scum, otherwise he is just trying to earn town cred and in that case I would have no problem lynching him.
|
lynching anyone at this point gives no information about anyone
although lynching rol will show us who tried to specifically save him and gives lurkers a reason to be SCARED
|
On July 20 2011 02:12 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2011 02:09 Nisani201 wrote: Unless there's something I've missed (which is unlikely because I read through the thread 3x as slowly as I input everything into my node graph), the only evidence against redFF that isn't related to supersoft is the fact that he posts a lot of spam, which isn't enough to warrant a lynch at all. Lynching supersoft, doesn't really tell us a ton about redFF though, so that argument isn't very good. If supersoft flips town: RedFF could be a scum just trying to defend him for town-cred If supersoft flips scum: RedFF could have been trying to save a scum-buddy, enter WIFOM So what you're saying is redFF is scum no matter how supersoft flips?
|
On July 20 2011 02:26 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2011 02:12 Mr. Wiggles wrote:On July 20 2011 02:09 Nisani201 wrote: Unless there's something I've missed (which is unlikely because I read through the thread 3x as slowly as I input everything into my node graph), the only evidence against redFF that isn't related to supersoft is the fact that he posts a lot of spam, which isn't enough to warrant a lynch at all. Lynching supersoft, doesn't really tell us a ton about redFF though, so that argument isn't very good. If supersoft flips town: RedFF could be a scum just trying to defend him for town-cred If supersoft flips scum: RedFF could have been trying to save a scum-buddy, enter WIFOM So what you're saying is redFF is scum no matter how supersoft flips?
No? I'm saying that I think he's scum, and if you think he's scum, then flipping supersoft for "information", is stupid. supersoft's flip doesn't tell us anything about redFF.
If redFF were town
If supersoft flips town: redFF randomly decided to defend someone based on 0 evidence If supersoft flips scum: redFF randomly decided to defend someone based on 0 evidence
supersoft's flip tells us nothing about redFF, in my opinion. Lynching for "information" is silly.
|
Ok, so it seems like I have to defend myself.
So firstly, it seems like since there is no bandwagon against Supersoft anymore, you have all come to the same conclusion I came to 20 pages ago. Congratulations!
I think I should explain why I think he is town.
On July 18 2011 17:16 supersoft wrote: hi guys, I am Blackgate Criminal. I was told to lynch everyone of the Asylums employees as well as batman moblike style. It was his first post of the game, kenpachi says he is vt every game, he started off the game with a joke, nulltell.
As for the whole pm thing, maybe it's his first game and he considers exchanging a few pm's with someone as active in pm land? A few people basically jumped at nothing, started tunneling the shit out of him, and called the one person who realised they were idiots scum. Great job!
Now as to me, as far as i can tell the reason for voting me is because i defended supersoft, who is now thought of as town, and because i spam? Curu is one of the spammiest players i have ever seen, kurumi is doing nothing and just making tf2 jokes and shitty one liners, please spare me.
So i'm scum for defending an obvious townie! k!
On July 19 2011 18:58 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On July 19 2011 18:49 TheAwesomeAll wrote: Supersoft how do you feel about redFF and Pyo? Okay I repeat it in the thread, you also can read my thoughts in the chat between me an Kavdragon, we had about 12 hours ago. redFF PMed me and told me, that he thinks I am innocent. At the same time he told me that Lucidity is suspicious. a few minutes after that, prplhz posted and big post where he accused Lucidity. ________ I think that this connection between these two is suspicous. Now I want to know whether they had contact and if so, i want to read the PMs. I don't know what to say to that lol, suggesting that that is a scumtell is ridiculous.
Now on to who I'm voting for.
My vote on Curu was one done in haste. I thought the bandwagon was terrible and he was filling up the thread with shitty contentless posts and not letting anyone else get their thoughts across. Now i was right, but that's not scum.
Curu strikes me as overzealous townie/asshole. They are a common product of Epicmafia.com. For another example of this see gtrsrs.
Also notice that Curu's whole attack on me is basically one long omgus because i disagreed with him about the supersoft bandwagon and voted him. Apparently if you notice shitty bandwagons and try and stop them you are scum.
So ##unvote I still dunno who i'm gonna vote yet, probably lucidity, i'll make a post later on why.
|
On July 20 2011 02:26 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2011 02:12 Mr. Wiggles wrote:On July 20 2011 02:09 Nisani201 wrote: Unless there's something I've missed (which is unlikely because I read through the thread 3x as slowly as I input everything into my node graph), the only evidence against redFF that isn't related to supersoft is the fact that he posts a lot of spam, which isn't enough to warrant a lynch at all. Lynching supersoft, doesn't really tell us a ton about redFF though, so that argument isn't very good. If supersoft flips town: RedFF could be a scum just trying to defend him for town-cred If supersoft flips scum: RedFF could have been trying to save a scum-buddy, enter WIFOM So what you're saying is redFF is scum no matter how supersoft flips?
It looks like it yes. He's right, flipping redFF gives us a lot more information about parties involved while flipping supersoft will only continue to leave redFF in suspicion.
I think the evidence in the pm's is evidence enough. Who defends a random townie and accuses random townies with no reasons? Defending supersoft put him at risk because he did not give a good reason for doing so and at the time it was against the bandwagon. He's posted in this thread already and he still doesn't give an inkling of a reason at all. He's STILL being suspicious even after it's been brought up.
|
i now believe redff is town
i honestly can't see any scum being THAT bad he's so indecisive and posts so many one liners i just, i don't think i've ever seen scum play like that, it just doesn't make sense
it looks more like drazerk back in his first game or two when he used to martyr himself for no reason
VOTE ROL SCUM
|
On July 20 2011 02:33 redFF wrote:Ok, so it seems like I have to defend myself. So firstly, it seems like since there is no bandwagon against Supersoft anymore, you have all come to the same conclusion I came to 20 pages ago. Congratulations! I think I should explain why I think he is town. Show nested quote +On July 18 2011 17:16 supersoft wrote: hi guys, I am Blackgate Criminal. I was told to lynch everyone of the Asylums employees as well as batman moblike style. It was his first post of the game, kenpachi says he is vt every game, he started off the game with a joke, nulltell. As for the whole pm thing, maybe it's his first game and he considers exchanging a few pm's with someone as active in pm land? A few people basically jumped at nothing, started tunneling the shit out of him, and called the one person who realised they were idiots scum. Great job! Now as to me, as far as i can tell the reason for voting me is because i defended supersoft, who is now thought of as town, and because i spam? Curu is one of the spammiest players i have ever seen, kurumi is doing nothing and just making tf2 jokes and shitty one liners, please spare me. So i'm scum for defending an obvious townie! k! Show nested quote +On July 19 2011 18:58 supersoft wrote:On July 19 2011 18:49 TheAwesomeAll wrote: Supersoft how do you feel about redFF and Pyo? Okay I repeat it in the thread, you also can read my thoughts in the chat between me an Kavdragon, we had about 12 hours ago. redFF PMed me and told me, that he thinks I am innocent. At the same time he told me that Lucidity is suspicious. a few minutes after that, prplhz posted and big post where he accused Lucidity. ________ I think that this connection between these two is suspicous. Now I want to know whether they had contact and if so, i want to read the PMs. I don't know what to say to that lol, suggesting that that is a scumtell is ridiculous. Now on to who I'm voting for. My vote on Curu was one done in haste. I thought the bandwagon was terrible and he was filling up the thread with shitty contentless posts and not letting anyone else get their thoughts across. Now i was right, but that's not scum. Curu strikes me as overzealous townie/asshole. They are a common product of Epicmafia.com. For another example of this see gtrsrs. Also notice that Curu's whole attack on me is basically one long omgus because i disagreed with him about the supersoft bandwagon and voted him. Apparently if you notice shitty bandwagons and try and stop them you are scum. So ##unvote I still dunno who i'm gonna vote yet, probably lucidity, i'll make a post later on why.
But it's strange that you did it so unconditionally against an entire bandwagon. Why would do that without explaining yourself initially to clear yourself? And, if the reason is that you think Lucidity is the better scum, then why haven't we heard anything about that while you were defending supersoft (as I'm sure it would have come in handy since you are so absolutely sure on Lucidity).
|
On July 20 2011 00:09 Jackal58 wrote: However the last game I was in with RoL where he just schlepped along and posted the absolute minimum he was scummy scum scum. He managed to last until until day 4 or so. I have no desire to see his encore performance. He's much better than this. My vote goes on RoL.
What game was this?
|
God damn yongminii, it's like you have ADHD. Your opinions and votes switch so much lol.
redFF, you called me terrible first. Don't play the victim here, you're not. My attack on you was based on your reaction to supersoft, but the case against you doesn't even have anything to do with him anymore.
What do you propose we do day 1 then? Sit on our ass till someone says "Hey I'm Mafia come get me!" Of course I'm going to attack the scummiest looking player so far. It gets things done. Not sitting around shouting CUZ UR BAD or SILENCE NEWB oneliners. Each one of my "shitty contentless posts" did more than any of yours.
|
|
|
|