|
On January 14 2012 00:36 rgTheSchworz wrote:
I will not edit ANY further posts .Sorry TL mafia for my newbie mistake.
if you spelled something wrong and it's so bad that you think people won't get what you tried to say just quote yourself, hightlight what was wrong in your initial post (within your quote of course) somehow (like a [b] tag or whatever) and copy&past the corected thing right beneath your quote.
Happens all the time to us not-native english speakers and as long as you deal with it by making another post it's fine. Noone cared about double or trippleposts here as long as you're not doing that on purpose.
|
I have a slight headache and I am heading to the teather in a couple of hours, also I am tired a bit, so my activity will be quite low.
Though, Thou shall continue discussing important things and not get distracted, that's all I can say for now.
Pain is weakness leaving the body - Team Fortress 2 Soldier
Unless You've got backstabbed. Then pure embarassment is flowing out.
BL-- I mean Kurumi the Town out.
Why would someone create a campaign for someone else without seeing him post ever?
|
/confirm
risk.nuke says he is" a serious person, a person who you will always know where he is at".Ok, its good to be confident and positive but its not enough.Also his first words are weird: "I'm not the best townie here".I don't think he is a noteworthy person.
I will post my thoughts about the next candidates soon.
|
I think that DT(s) should check people who ran for mayor, but didn't get the position. Vigilantes should probably save their hits untlil they are almost certain someone is scum.
|
On January 14 2012 00:51 igabod wrote:
I think that DT(s) should check people who ran for mayor, but didn't get the position. Vigilantes should probably save their hits untlil they are almost certain someone is scum.
How about no?
|
On January 14 2012 00:38 kitaman27 wrote:
KJ's bodyguards should claim plan is incredibly poor. So is Jackal's. Even if the scum team did subsititute all three bodyguards, they still have to worry about a electoral official being a vet, which would cost them 3 scum or that one of the bodyguards wasn't jailed, which would also cost them 3 scum.
First, there are only 2 Bodyguards.
Second, I agree with you about Jackal's comment about lynching a Bodyguard.
Third, you're actually agreeing with me in essence. I'm saying that if they sneak in a Bodyguard, it will be risky to take out the elected officials. However, to make it harder for them, they should be revealed from the beginning. What if both elected officials are killed and we have 0 clue as to who the Bodyguards were? Are you okay with that risk?
Finally, are you stating for the record that if you were elected, you would not reveal your Bodyguards?
|
Else he is just a bad townie with a big ego
Biggest reason is that I think you're red.Lynching scum is good.Lynching bad townies is middle-to-bad. Lynching townies who really think well is bad. Lynching blues is terribad.
Really,I have a big mouth and am not afraid to admit it.
So i start pointing fingers.
So far i see that you have returned my accusation against me.I could counter-argue that you make me a wordbender when I quoted your post word for word. I can't make anything out of a mayoral campaign that says''Vote me.I am bad at playing scum, I am very good at getting scum lynched''.That is generic. We want a mayor that comes up with sensible,spot-on
accusations, not Vagueness.
Like others also said, there is bound to be scum trying for mayor.That combined with your post which showsreturned accusations, like you would need to defend by attacking another.Do you feel guilty?
|
On January 14 2012 00:38 kitaman27 wrote:
Macpo's first post was rather lackluster. Hopefully he is more confident and less apologetic in the future.
.
I just feel that being confident in my claims on day 1 is kind of stupid, as there is almost no rational basis for being so. Most of stories up to now, in my opinion, are just random talk with absolutely no base whatsoever. They are just like the 100 players of a lottery feeling confident that they are the one having just picked up the right number.
Now, I try a different way, i.e. to gather little pieces of information, and present my perceptions in a constructive way, with the hope that the ongoing debate will create some sort of more rational agreement. Is that so bad and newbish  ? just tell me if I am heading the wrong direction...
|
I assume Mafia can kill their own members?
|
On January 14 2012 00:53 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 00:51 igabod wrote:
I think that DT(s) should check people who ran for mayor, but didn't get the position. Vigilantes should probably save their hits untlil they are almost certain someone is scum. How about no?
I concur with Poland
|
On January 14 2012 01:15 Kurumi wrote:
I assume Mafia can kill their own members?
Indeed
|
On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2012 14:26 Ciryandor wrote:
/confirm
LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot.
I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again. I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign.
Hey I agree with this guy, so I'm voting him. I am very much a fan of killing Ciryandor.
|
On January 14 2012 00:59 rgTheSchworz wrote: Biggest reason is that I think you're red.Lynching scum is good.Lynching bad townies is middle-to-bad. Lynching townies who really think well is bad. Lynching blues is terribad. Really,I have a big mouth and am not afraid to admit it. So i start pointing fingers. So far i see that you have returned my accusation against me.I could counter-argue that you make me a wordbender when I quoted your post word for word. I can't make anything out of a mayoral campaign that says''Vote me.I am bad at playing scum, I am very good at getting scum lynched''.That is generic. We want a mayor that comes up with sensible, spot-on
accusations, not Vagueness. Like others also said, there is bound to be scum trying for mayor.That combined with your post which showsreturned accusations, like you would need to defend by attacking another.Do you feel guilty?
Who are you and what is your mafia history?
|
On January 14 2012 01:18 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote:On January 13 2012 14:26 Ciryandor wrote:
/confirm
LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot.
I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again. I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign. Hey I agree with this guy, so I'm voting him. I am very much a fan of killing Ciryandor.
What is it with Ciryandor? Palmar, are you now trolling us? I agree with Toadesstern that a) you are mafia and dont care about the game or b) you have a special tactic, but randomly accusing him does not help ..
Wiggles: Does your post mean you are stepping down as candidate?
On that topic, could all people that are serious in their campaign make it clear? For me, right now there are: BC, BM(?), kitaman and risk.nuke. I think the number of candidates has to be limited to enable a clearer choice.
|
I have no history, I am a player who stumbled on the mafia forum, and, having played RL mafia, decided to sign in in TL mafia L
|
On January 14 2012 01:18 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote:On January 13 2012 14:26 Ciryandor wrote:
/confirm
LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot.
I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again. I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign. Hey I agree with this guy, so I'm voting him. I am very much a fan of killing Ciryandor.
Is the Ciryandor quote the classic "scumslip" or am I mistaken, since "waiting for Wiggles" then "Wiggles has the best campaign?" besides,
<generic things>
<vote for me>
is not good enough to earn a vote.
|
On January 14 2012 00:53 kingjames01 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 00:38 kitaman27 wrote:
KJ's bodyguards should claim plan is incredibly poor. So is Jackal's. Even if the scum team did subsititute all three bodyguards, they still have to worry about a electoral official being a vet, which would cost them 3 scum or that one of the bodyguards wasn't jailed, which would also cost them 3 scum. First, there are only 2 Bodyguards. Second, I agree with you about Jackal's comment about lynching a Bodyguard. Third, you're actually agreeing with me in essence. I'm saying that if they sneak in a Bodyguard, it will be risky to take out the elected officials. However, to make it harder for them, they should be revealed from the beginning. What if both elected officials are killed and we have 0 clue as to who the Bodyguards were? Are you okay with that risk? Finally, are you stating for the record that if you were elected, you would not reveal your Bodyguards?
And what is wrong with the threat of a lynch on a BG? If you don't think scum aren't going to try to sub in at least 1 of them as a BG you're being quite unrealistic. Just leave the threat of it out there.
|
sure looks to me like it is
|
On January 14 2012 01:27 Chaosquo wrote:
a) you are mafia and dont care about the game
Prove it.
|
On January 14 2012 01:29 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 00:53 kingjames01 wrote:On January 14 2012 00:38 kitaman27 wrote:
KJ's bodyguards should claim plan is incredibly poor. So is Jackal's. Even if the scum team did subsititute all three bodyguards, they still have to worry about a electoral official being a vet, which would cost them 3 scum or that one of the bodyguards wasn't jailed, which would also cost them 3 scum. First, there are only 2 Bodyguards. Second, I agree with you about Jackal's comment about lynching a Bodyguard. Third, you're actually agreeing with me in essence. I'm saying that if they sneak in a Bodyguard, it will be risky to take out the elected officials. However, to make it harder for them, they should be revealed from the beginning. What if both elected officials are killed and we have 0 clue as to who the Bodyguards were? Are you okay with that risk? Finally, are you stating for the record that if you were elected, you would not reveal your Bodyguards? And what is wrong with the threat of a lynch on a BG? If you don't think scum aren't going to try to sub in at least 1 of them as a BG you're being quite unrealistic. Just leave the threat of it out there.
We should not make Bodyguards claim.
Good to know that someone actually reads my posts Palmar, if You were given ability to kill someone right now, who would it be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
