EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 2174
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
| ||
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On January 22 2014 09:23 EvilTeletubby wrote: Actually, I didn't even see the Moonbear comment until AFTER I banned him. Just made me even more certain I'd made the right call. to be fair, until I looked more closely I also thought it was for questioning the moonbear ban (I think it was perfectly good). | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On January 22 2014 07:54 lichter wrote: Finally someone banned sam. He was not worth having around. Sure he seemed more intelligent than the average poster and had controversial opinions that sparked discussion, but he was also an asshole. I was just discussing with Shellbot yesterday that I eagerly await the hero that finally pulls the trigger. Yeah, intelligent posts are completely wasted if they sound like they're being written by a jerkwad who's already decided he's right. Then you're not really sparking any sort of discussion or sharing ideas in a constructive manner, you're just flamebaiting. The fact that sam didn't bother to tone down his posts after so many warnings speaks rather ill of him (i.e. he just wanted to hear himself talk and chastise people rather than actually enlighten people or whatever he was on about half the time). | ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
 | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
On January 22 2014 09:22 Roe wrote: I didn't see the problem. Enlighten me, if you wish See: On January 22 2014 09:25 babylon wrote: Yeah, intelligent posts are completely wasted if they sound like they're being written by a jerkwad who's already decided he's right. Then you're not really sparking any sort of discussion or sharing ideas in a constructive manner, you're just flamebaiting. The fact that sam didn't bother to tone down his posts after so many warnings speaks rather ill of him (i.e. he just wanted to hear himself talk and chastise people rather than actually enlighten people or whatever he was on about half the time). | ||
|
Shiragaku
Hong Kong4308 Posts
 | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
Did nunez really "request" the ban or is that reason just tongue-in-cheek? | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
On January 22 2014 09:30 babylon wrote: Lol, IgnE. This is entertaining. Did nunez really "request" the ban or is that reason just tongue-in-cheek? He wrote in the "had been banned for this post" redtext himself. So another mod treated it like a request and actually DID temp ban him.  Failed attempt to martyr, I guess. | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
| ||
|
Shock710
Australia6097 Posts
On January 22 2014 06:26 Aerisky wrote: Oof. holy crap ur an archon :O | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On January 22 2014 06:04 packrat386 wrote: I knew Sam had a history, and I had kind of prepared myself for his eventual perm. Still, sad to see him go. You told me he was going to get banned a couple of weeks ago. And now it happened. But when we can see it that far out, they should to or learn by touching the stove. Over and over and over. | ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On January 22 2014 09:28 dAPhREAk wrote: triple kill. fixed | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On January 22 2014 10:15 BigFan wrote: Saw TheKefka's post in that wedding thread, figured it was just satire or w/e, not that it wasn't a bit odd but moved on. Who would've known that was the final straw lol. Can't say much for sam since I haven't had to interact with him but he has quite the reputation around ABL in terms of bans so I guess that's not surprising. Either way, best of luck to them! fixed I think nunez's was the best. not only did he have an incoherent rant but he put red text in himself. | ||
|
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
| ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
 | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32132 Posts
| ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
As a reply to a genuine Help thread in SC2 Strat: On November 21 2011 13:03 sam!zdat wrote: 1: Make expansion 2: Defense it User was warned for this post In a blog that was entitled "1+1= -3" but had absolutely nothing to do with math: On April 19 2012 01:55 sam!zdat wrote: If you doubt that 1+1=2 I recommend this book: http://www.amazon.com/Principia-Mathematica-Volume-Set-1-3/dp/052106791X User was temp banned for this post. Apparently an insult: Still in the President Obama Re Elected thread: we'll frighten them off with our faggotry User was temp banned for this post. US Politics megathread is a cesspool On March 02 2013 06:31 sam!zdat wrote: fweeeeeeep! Meaningless relativism, ten yard penalty User was warned for this post Of course there was this famous quote from Globalization: the elephants in the room thread: On March 16 2013 02:08 sam!zdat wrote: everything you say is like a chimpanzee howlong in puerile triumph after discovering its first erection User was temp banned for this post. I have no idea what this means On April 02 2013 06:21 sam!zdat wrote: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://www.esdproducts.biz/ESD_Grounding/Garment_Table/Lab_Coat/Labcoat.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.mckaychurchgoods.com/3643.jpg) User was warned for this post (edit: spoilered image) That post came after this one, in Will Science unlock immortality On April 02 2013 06:12 sam!zdat wrote: walks like a religion, talks like a religion, promises immortality like a religion... grand narratives are grand narratives, my friend, no bones about it edit: you can't use this "in the past, people would have been surprised at how things have changed, so now things are also going to keep changing." what's going to REALLY surprise US is when things STOP changing. that would be the analogy here. "in the past, people used to think that they lived in a state of perpetual change. then it turned out that some things never change. surprise!" Changed the text he quoted to antagonize This made me laugh when it was originally posted here: On April 12 2013 04:49 sam!zdat wrote: anyone who thinks of themselves as a "consumer" deserves to be fucked. what an undignified appellation User was temp banned for this post. In a thread trying to discuss faith and Christianity in IronManSC's blog On September 19 2013 11:05 sam!zdat wrote: jesus is clearly a queer, what else do you think that 'disciple whom jesus loved' stuff is about. The medievals knew it, ever see those paintings of the last supper and stuff with the prettyboy next to him? User was warned for this post edit: for the record 'queer' is not an offensive word, that's what the queers call themselves when they want to study queer things. I should know, I live with two of them. US Politics megathread as usual: On September 26 2013 11:47 sam!zdat wrote: too liberal! Clintons just a bunch of running dog liberals like the rest of them! Fuck clintons and their dynastic ambition User was warned for this post I don't understand. I think I might be gone again soon guys. Have fun without me. Back to IronManSC's blog, where he just couldn't stop posting despite... On October 04 2013 07:48 sam!zdat wrote: it's true I'm an asshole. But I think his thinking is dangerous and should be fought with mockery. I'll try to stay away from here, but on the other hand, posting this thread in the first place is obvious gadfly bait and I think you shouldn't complain when gadflies arrive. User was warned for this post A bunch of other reported posts were non anctioned until On October 05 2013 17:28 sam!zdat wrote: you think the spiritual content of christianity is some ridiculous myth about how jesus is the son of god and is going to make you live forever because you believe this absurd thing? that's what you think is the sum total of the value of your tradition? god, that's so disrespectful the historical context that you ignore is THE ENTIRE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE ENTIRE ANCIENT WORLD none of this stuff is real. if you are going to make it matter in the modern world, if you ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT YOUR FAITH, you are going to need to make it matter EVEN THOUGH IT IS NOT REAL. otherwise it is useless and you are nothing but a delusional fanatic of a dying cult User was temp banned for this post. On October 31 2013 03:20 sam!zdat wrote: nunc est futandum. Numquam cunctare uictoriam fecit. Aleam iacias, stulte! Nihil tibi quod amittas. User was warned for this post edit: lol that's dumb. According to my research, sam sincerely believed that he was a good posters because a bunch of people were glad to have him back, despite his history of foul mannered posting. lol Classic sam, adding insults to all of his posts when explaining something and being mostly right should have sufficed On December 09 2013 07:58 sam!zdat wrote: it's not a suggestion. I'm just saying that when you say "there have always been financial crises in every society" you are being stupid in a very obvious way Bitcoins are a big deal apparently On December 09 2013 07:54 sam!zdat wrote: haha ok mr anthropologist how about before they invented financial instruments? lots of financial crises in those societies I bet but yeah you're right this conversation will likely not go anywhere. I'm sure whatever you do on a daily basis is very important and helpful for humanity but then the producers go out of business because everybody already has their thing This was a nice exchange: On December 09 2013 05:31 Shival wrote: That's not inherent to capitalism but rather of society itself. Communism has it fair share of shady dealings in history, not to mention economic collapse. On December 09 2013 05:46 sam!zdat wrote: ah yes, the two great options On December 09 2013 06:05 Shival wrote: Any great example that worked so far then? I dare say none have worked, and none will ever work unless you somehow manage to subdue human nature. On December 09 2013 06:08 sam!zdat wrote: you're right Mrs. Thatcher By this point, he had accumulated 23 mod reports: On January 12 2014 08:40 sam!zdat wrote: it's not touchy feely reasons, it's deeply unsustainable and is operating on borrowed time. i am not a touchy feely person, remember, I am a stalinist as far as your last line, let me repeat: you are an idiot and need to go read your adam smith These are merely the action'd posts that I could find in mod reports. He had a lot of other posts that were action'd before even being reported. It was his way to mingle insults and a foul superiority complex in all his posts. Intelligence does not excuse belligerence. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32132 Posts
| ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On January 22 2014 11:17 lichter wrote: Well since people don't seem to see why sam was banned, I decided to go through his reported posts: + Show Spoiler + As a reply to a genuine Help thread in SC2 Strat: On November 21 2011 13:03 sam!zdat wrote: 1: Make expansion 2: Defense it User was warned for this post In a blog that was entitled "1+1= -3" but had absolutely nothing to do with math: On April 19 2012 01:55 sam!zdat wrote: If you doubt that 1+1=2 I recommend this book: http://www.amazon.com/Principia-Mathematica-Volume-Set-1-3/dp/052106791X User was temp banned for this post. Apparently an insult: Still in the President Obama Re Elected thread: we'll frighten them off with our faggotry User was temp banned for this post. US Politics megathread is a cesspool On March 02 2013 06:31 sam!zdat wrote: fweeeeeeep! Meaningless relativism, ten yard penalty User was warned for this post Of course there was this famous quote from Globalization: the elephants in the room thread: On March 16 2013 02:08 sam!zdat wrote: everything you say is like a chimpanzee howlong in puerile triumph after discovering its first erection User was temp banned for this post. I have no idea what this means On April 02 2013 06:21 sam!zdat wrote: + Show Spoiler + User was warned for this post (edit: spoilered image) That post came after this one, in Will Science unlock immortality On April 02 2013 06:12 sam!zdat wrote: walks like a religion, talks like a religion, promises immortality like a religion... grand narratives are grand narratives, my friend, no bones about it edit: you can't use this "in the past, people would have been surprised at how things have changed, so now things are also going to keep changing." what's going to REALLY surprise US is when things STOP changing. that would be the analogy here. "in the past, people used to think that they lived in a state of perpetual change. then it turned out that some things never change. surprise!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhDUuEWgMcA Changed the text he quoted to antagonize This made me laugh when it was originally posted here: On April 12 2013 04:49 sam!zdat wrote: anyone who thinks of themselves as a "consumer" deserves to be fucked. what an undignified appellation User was temp banned for this post. In a thread trying to discuss faith and Christianity in IronManSC's blog On September 19 2013 11:05 sam!zdat wrote: jesus is clearly a queer, what else do you think that 'disciple whom jesus loved' stuff is about. The medievals knew it, ever see those paintings of the last supper and stuff with the prettyboy next to him? User was warned for this post edit: for the record 'queer' is not an offensive word, that's what the queers call themselves when they want to study queer things. I should know, I live with two of them. US Politics megathread as usual: On September 26 2013 11:47 sam!zdat wrote: too liberal! Clintons just a bunch of running dog liberals like the rest of them! Fuck clintons and their dynastic ambition User was warned for this post I don't understand. I think I might be gone again soon guys. Have fun without me. Back to IronManSC's blog, where he just couldn't stop posting despite... On October 04 2013 07:48 sam!zdat wrote: it's true I'm an asshole. But I think his thinking is dangerous and should be fought with mockery. I'll try to stay away from here, but on the other hand, posting this thread in the first place is obvious gadfly bait and I think you shouldn't complain when gadflies arrive. User was warned for this post A bunch of other reported posts were non anctioned until On October 05 2013 17:28 sam!zdat wrote: you think the spiritual content of christianity is some ridiculous myth about how jesus is the son of god and is going to make you live forever because you believe this absurd thing? that's what you think is the sum total of the value of your tradition? god, that's so disrespectful the historical context that you ignore is THE ENTIRE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE ENTIRE ANCIENT WORLD none of this stuff is real. if you are going to make it matter in the modern world, if you ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT YOUR FAITH, you are going to need to make it matter EVEN THOUGH IT IS NOT REAL. otherwise it is useless and you are nothing but a delusional fanatic of a dying cult User was temp banned for this post. On October 31 2013 03:20 sam!zdat wrote: nunc est futandum. Numquam cunctare uictoriam fecit. Aleam iacias, stulte! Nihil tibi quod amittas. User was warned for this post edit: lol that's dumb. According to my research, sam sincerely believed that he was a good posters because a bunch of people were glad to have him back, despite his history of foul mannered posting. lol Classic sam, adding insults to all of his posts when explaining something and being mostly right should have sufficed On December 09 2013 07:58 sam!zdat wrote: it's not a suggestion. I'm just saying that when you say "there have always been financial crises in every society" you are being stupid in a very obvious way Bitcoins are a big deal apparently On December 09 2013 07:54 sam!zdat wrote: haha ok mr anthropologist how about before they invented financial instruments? lots of financial crises in those societies I bet but yeah you're right this conversation will likely not go anywhere. I'm sure whatever you do on a daily basis is very important and helpful for humanity but then the producers go out of business because everybody already has their thing This was a nice exchange: On December 09 2013 05:31 Shival wrote: That's not inherent to capitalism but rather of society itself. Communism has it fair share of shady dealings in history, not to mention economic collapse. On December 09 2013 05:46 sam!zdat wrote: ah yes, the two great options On December 09 2013 06:05 Shival wrote: Any great example that worked so far then? I dare say none have worked, and none will ever work unless you somehow manage to subdue human nature. On December 09 2013 06:08 sam!zdat wrote: you're right Mrs. Thatcher By this point, he had accumulated 23 mod reports: On January 12 2014 08:40 sam!zdat wrote: it's not touchy feely reasons, it's deeply unsustainable and is operating on borrowed time. i am not a touchy feely person, remember, I am a stalinist as far as your last line, let me repeat: you are an idiot and need to go read your adam smith These are merely the action'd posts that I could find in mod reports. He had a lot of other posts that were action'd before even being reported. It was his way to mingle insults and a foul superiority complex in all his posts. Intelligence does not excuse belligerence. holy examples batman. in all seriousness though he was a pretty bad poster and should have learned better. i guess people are just surprised to see someone well known get banned | ||
| ||
