EPT
On January 22 2014 15:08 packrat386 wrote:
I was trying to answer your question of "why hasn't he been permed yet" since the answer was that he sort of already was. He came back after a period of time (as veterans do occasionally) and eventually got permed for real.
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 13:50 BigFan wrote:
it's not even that though. If you want to post and make it sound complicated or intelligent, by all means go ahead and present your point in any way you like but there is never a need to insult someone over something. Aside from that, some of his posts like in the TL strat section are poorly done. Not sure what he was expecting considering you can't just write bad posts in the strat section and get away with it. I dunno, just seems odd that he does this especially after he decided to come back from his perm request that you mentioned. My thoughts at least
On January 22 2014 13:41 packrat386 wrote:
He got a 90 day a while back, requested a perm, and then later decided to come back to TL. I think this was his final form.
On January 22 2014 13:40 BigFan wrote:
wow, that's quite the mod history. I can never understand people who feel the need to insult over anything. Being right or wrong doesn't exclude you from a ban if you disrespect another forum member. I'm surprised he wasn't permed much sooner tbh.
On January 22 2014 11:17 lichter wrote:
Well since people don't seem to see why sam was banned, I decided to go through his reported posts:
+ Show Spoiler +
As a reply to a genuine Help thread in SC2 Strat:
In a blog that was entitled "1+1= -3" but had absolutely nothing to do with math:
Apparently an insult:
How's the sand down there?
User was warned for this post
Still in the President Obama Re Elected thread:
US Politics megathread is a cesspool
Of course there was this famous quote from Globalization: the elephants in the room thread:
I have no idea what this means
That post came after this one, in Will Science unlock immortality
Changed the text he quoted to antagonize
This made me laugh when it was originally posted here:
In a thread trying to discuss faith and Christianity in IronManSC's blog
US Politics megathread as usual:
Back to IronManSC's blog, where he just couldn't stop posting despite...
A bunch of other reported posts were non anctioned until
According to my research, sam sincerely believed that he was a good posters because a bunch of people were glad to have him back, despite his history of foul mannered posting. lol
Classic sam, adding insults to all of his posts when explaining something and being mostly right should have sufficed
Bitcoins are a big deal apparently
This was a nice exchange:
By this point, he had accumulated 23 mod reports:
These are merely the action'd posts that I could find in mod reports. He had a lot of other posts that were action'd before even being reported. It was his way to mingle insults and a foul superiority complex in all his posts. Intelligence does not excuse belligerence.
Well since people don't seem to see why sam was banned, I decided to go through his reported posts:
+ Show Spoiler +
As a reply to a genuine Help thread in SC2 Strat:
On November 21 2011 13:03 sam!zdat wrote:
1: Make expansion
2: Defense it
User was warned for this post
1: Make expansion
2: Defense it
User was warned for this post
In a blog that was entitled "1+1= -3" but had absolutely nothing to do with math:
On April 19 2012 01:55 sam!zdat wrote:
If you doubt that 1+1=2 I recommend this book: http://www.amazon.com/Principia-Mathematica-Volume-Set-1-3/dp/052106791X
User was temp banned for this post.
If you doubt that 1+1=2 I recommend this book: http://www.amazon.com/Principia-Mathematica-Volume-Set-1-3/dp/052106791X
User was temp banned for this post.
Apparently an insult:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2012 02:51 xDaunt wrote:
The problem with your argument is that we're not near the point where the natural resources of our planet will seriously constrain our growth to the point where capitalism is the zero-sum game that you're talking about.
On August 14 2012 02:43 sam!zdat wrote:
You are still assuming natural resources fall from the sky
there is not an identity between capacity for production and benefit to society
(and you spend all that effort doing something useless, when you could have been enjoying your life or becoming more educated. That would be good for society)
You are still assuming natural resources fall from the sky
there is not an identity between capacity for production and benefit to society
(and you spend all that effort doing something useless, when you could have been enjoying your life or becoming more educated. That would be good for society)
The problem with your argument is that we're not near the point where the natural resources of our planet will seriously constrain our growth to the point where capitalism is the zero-sum game that you're talking about.
How's the sand down there?
User was warned for this post
Still in the President Obama Re Elected thread:
we'll frighten them off with our faggotry
User was temp banned for this post.
User was temp banned for this post.
US Politics megathread is a cesspool
On March 02 2013 06:31 sam!zdat wrote:
fweeeeeeep! Meaningless relativism, ten yard penalty
User was warned for this post
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 06:15 LaughingTulkas wrote
You, and the poster above you, are making judgement calls about "what is reasonable" and applying it to both positions as if it is established fact.
You, and the poster above you, are making judgement calls about "what is reasonable" and applying it to both positions as if it is established fact.
fweeeeeeep! Meaningless relativism, ten yard penalty
User was warned for this post
Of course there was this famous quote from Globalization: the elephants in the room thread:
On March 16 2013 02:08 sam!zdat wrote:
everything you say is like a chimpanzee howlong in puerile triumph after discovering its first erection
User was temp banned for this post.
everything you say is like a chimpanzee howlong in puerile triumph after discovering its first erection
User was temp banned for this post.
I have no idea what this means
On April 02 2013 06:21 sam!zdat wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
![[image loading]](http://www.esdproducts.biz/ESD_Grounding/Garment_Table/Lab_Coat/Labcoat.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.mckaychurchgoods.com/3643.jpg)
User was warned for this post
(edit: spoilered image)
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 06:18 Danglars wrote:
Yes. I am suggesting some introspection for the posters here. Step back and consider what you accuse every religion on the planet of doing. Now, look at what you're typing now, in this thread. Maybe your superiority over the blind faith masses isn't quite as stark as it would seem.
On April 02 2013 06:12 sam!zdat wrote:
walks like a religion, talks like a religion, promises immortality like a religion...
grand narratives are grand narratives, my friend, no bones about it
On April 02 2013 05:55 Tobberoth wrote:
Still, comparing it to religion might be taking it a bit far.
Still, comparing it to religion might be taking it a bit far.
walks like a religion, talks like a religion, promises immortality like a religion...
grand narratives are grand narratives, my friend, no bones about it
Yes. I am suggesting some introspection for the posters here. Step back and consider what you accuse every religion on the planet of doing. Now, look at what you're typing now, in this thread. Maybe your superiority over the blind faith masses isn't quite as stark as it would seem.
+ Show Spoiler +
User was warned for this post
(edit: spoilered image)
That post came after this one, in Will Science unlock immortality
On April 02 2013 06:12 sam!zdat wrote:
walks like a religion, talks like a religion, promises immortality like a religion...
grand narratives are grand narratives, my friend, no bones about it
edit: you can't use this "in the past, people would have been surprised at how things have changed, so now things are also going to keep changing."
what's going to REALLY surprise US is when things STOP changing. that would be the analogy here. "in the past, people used to think that they lived in a state of perpetual change. then it turned out that some things never change. surprise!"
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 05:55 Tobberoth wrote:
Still, comparing it to religion might be taking it a bit far.
Still, comparing it to religion might be taking it a bit far.
walks like a religion, talks like a religion, promises immortality like a religion...
grand narratives are grand narratives, my friend, no bones about it
edit: you can't use this "in the past, people would have been surprised at how things have changed, so now things are also going to keep changing."
what's going to REALLY surprise US is when things STOP changing. that would be the analogy here. "in the past, people used to think that they lived in a state of perpetual change. then it turned out that some things never change. surprise!"
Changed the text he quoted to antagonize
On April 12 2013 03:58 sam!zdat wrote:
fixed it
User was warned for this post
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2013 03:58 ThomasjServo wrote:
but at some point the cow that made your burger was tortured so you could have it. I eat meat and recognize this fact.
but at some point the cow that made your burger was tortured so you could have it. I eat meat and recognize this fact.
fixed it
User was warned for this post
This made me laugh when it was originally posted here:
On April 12 2013 04:49 sam!zdat wrote:
anyone who thinks of themselves as a "consumer" deserves to be fucked. what an undignified appellation
User was temp banned for this post.
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2013 04:46 dAPhREAk wrote:
legislators
campaign contributions by public interest groups
public interest groups funded by big ag corps
big ag corps making money off consumer purchases
consumers.
fuck the consumers!
On April 12 2013 04:41 Barrin wrote:
FOLLOW THE MONEY
FOLLOW THE MONEY
legislators
campaign contributions by public interest groups
public interest groups funded by big ag corps
big ag corps making money off consumer purchases
consumers.
fuck the consumers!
anyone who thinks of themselves as a "consumer" deserves to be fucked. what an undignified appellation
User was temp banned for this post.
In a thread trying to discuss faith and Christianity in IronManSC's blog
On September 19 2013 11:05 sam!zdat wrote:
jesus is clearly a queer, what else do you think that 'disciple whom jesus loved' stuff is about. The medievals knew it, ever see those paintings of the last supper and stuff with the prettyboy next to him?
User was warned for this post
edit: for the record 'queer' is not an offensive word, that's what the queers call themselves when they want to study queer things. I should know, I live with two of them.
jesus is clearly a queer, what else do you think that 'disciple whom jesus loved' stuff is about. The medievals knew it, ever see those paintings of the last supper and stuff with the prettyboy next to him?
User was warned for this post
edit: for the record 'queer' is not an offensive word, that's what the queers call themselves when they want to study queer things. I should know, I live with two of them.
US Politics megathread as usual:
On September 26 2013 11:47 sam!zdat wrote:
too liberal! Clintons just a bunch of running dog liberals like the rest of them! Fuck clintons and their dynastic ambition
User was warned for this post
I don't understand. I think I might be gone again soon guys. Have fun without me.
too liberal! Clintons just a bunch of running dog liberals like the rest of them! Fuck clintons and their dynastic ambition
User was warned for this post
I don't understand. I think I might be gone again soon guys. Have fun without me.
Back to IronManSC's blog, where he just couldn't stop posting despite...
On October 04 2013 07:48 sam!zdat wrote:
it's true I'm an asshole. But I think his thinking is dangerous and should be fought with mockery. I'll try to stay away from here, but on the other hand, posting this thread in the first place is obvious gadfly bait and I think you shouldn't complain when gadflies arrive.
User was warned for this post
it's true I'm an asshole. But I think his thinking is dangerous and should be fought with mockery. I'll try to stay away from here, but on the other hand, posting this thread in the first place is obvious gadfly bait and I think you shouldn't complain when gadflies arrive.
User was warned for this post
A bunch of other reported posts were non anctioned until
On October 05 2013 17:28 sam!zdat wrote:
you think the spiritual content of christianity is some ridiculous myth about how jesus is the son of god and is going to make you live forever because you believe this absurd thing? that's what you think is the sum total of the value of your tradition? god, that's so disrespectful
the historical context that you ignore is THE ENTIRE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE ENTIRE ANCIENT WORLD
none of this stuff is real. if you are going to make it matter in the modern world, if you ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT YOUR FAITH, you are going to need to make it matter EVEN THOUGH IT IS NOT REAL. otherwise it is useless and you are nothing but a delusional fanatic of a dying cult
User was temp banned for this post.
you think the spiritual content of christianity is some ridiculous myth about how jesus is the son of god and is going to make you live forever because you believe this absurd thing? that's what you think is the sum total of the value of your tradition? god, that's so disrespectful
the historical context that you ignore is THE ENTIRE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF THE ENTIRE ANCIENT WORLD
none of this stuff is real. if you are going to make it matter in the modern world, if you ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT YOUR FAITH, you are going to need to make it matter EVEN THOUGH IT IS NOT REAL. otherwise it is useless and you are nothing but a delusional fanatic of a dying cult
User was temp banned for this post.
On October 31 2013 03:20 sam!zdat wrote:
nunc est futandum. Numquam cunctare uictoriam fecit. Aleam iacias, stulte! Nihil tibi quod amittas.
User was warned for this post
edit: lol that's dumb.
nunc est futandum. Numquam cunctare uictoriam fecit. Aleam iacias, stulte! Nihil tibi quod amittas.
User was warned for this post
edit: lol that's dumb.
According to my research, sam sincerely believed that he was a good posters because a bunch of people were glad to have him back, despite his history of foul mannered posting. lol
Classic sam, adding insults to all of his posts when explaining something and being mostly right should have sufficed
On December 09 2013 07:58 sam!zdat wrote:
it's not a suggestion. I'm just saying that when you say "there have always been financial crises in every society" you are being stupid in a very obvious way
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2013 07:57 Shival wrote:
Trade has always happened... and even if there were no trade in those societies, you think we can go back to that? That's a laughable suggestion.
On December 09 2013 07:54 sam!zdat wrote:
haha ok mr anthropologist
how about before they invented financial instruments? lots of financial crises in those societies I bet
On December 09 2013 07:50 Shival wrote:
Financial crisis is prevalent in every social form so far tried and likely in every probable social theory so far proposed.
On December 09 2013 06:45 sam!zdat wrote:
financial crises are not prevalent in every social form, don't be thick. i'm not talking about all the sins of the human race here
rather than wasting time with inane cliches about human nature, why don't you put some effort into thinking about our problems and how we might go about solving them
financial crises are not prevalent in every social form, don't be thick. i'm not talking about all the sins of the human race here
rather than wasting time with inane cliches about human nature, why don't you put some effort into thinking about our problems and how we might go about solving them
Financial crisis is prevalent in every social form so far tried and likely in every probable social theory so far proposed.
haha ok mr anthropologist
how about before they invented financial instruments? lots of financial crises in those societies I bet
Trade has always happened... and even if there were no trade in those societies, you think we can go back to that? That's a laughable suggestion.
it's not a suggestion. I'm just saying that when you say "there have always been financial crises in every society" you are being stupid in a very obvious way
Bitcoins are a big deal apparently
On December 09 2013 07:54 sam!zdat wrote:
haha ok mr anthropologist
how about before they invented financial instruments? lots of financial crises in those societies I bet
but yeah you're right this conversation will likely not go anywhere. I'm sure whatever you do on a daily basis is very important and helpful for humanity
but then the producers go out of business because everybody already has their thing
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2013 07:50 Shival wrote:
Financial crisis is prevalent in every social form so far tried and likely in every probable social theory so far proposed.
On December 09 2013 06:45 sam!zdat wrote:
financial crises are not prevalent in every social form, don't be thick. i'm not talking about all the sins of the human race here
rather than wasting time with inane cliches about human nature, why don't you put some effort into thinking about our problems and how we might go about solving them
financial crises are not prevalent in every social form, don't be thick. i'm not talking about all the sins of the human race here
rather than wasting time with inane cliches about human nature, why don't you put some effort into thinking about our problems and how we might go about solving them
Financial crisis is prevalent in every social form so far tried and likely in every probable social theory so far proposed.
haha ok mr anthropologist
how about before they invented financial instruments? lots of financial crises in those societies I bet
but yeah you're right this conversation will likely not go anywhere. I'm sure whatever you do on a daily basis is very important and helpful for humanity
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2013 07:52 Mstring wrote:
A super high quality good depreciates very slowly thus earning the producer a great deal of currency and costs the consumer very little to upkeep.
A super high quality good depreciates very slowly thus earning the producer a great deal of currency and costs the consumer very little to upkeep.
but then the producers go out of business because everybody already has their thing
This was a nice exchange:
On December 09 2013 05:31 Shival wrote:
That's not inherent to capitalism but rather of society itself. Communism has it fair share of shady dealings in history, not to mention economic collapse.
That's not inherent to capitalism but rather of society itself. Communism has it fair share of shady dealings in history, not to mention economic collapse.
On December 09 2013 05:46 sam!zdat wrote:
ah yes, the two great options
ah yes, the two great options
On December 09 2013 06:05 Shival wrote:
Any great example that worked so far then? I dare say none have worked, and none will ever work unless you somehow manage to subdue human nature.
Any great example that worked so far then? I dare say none have worked, and none will ever work unless you somehow manage to subdue human nature.
On December 09 2013 06:08 sam!zdat wrote:
you're right Mrs. Thatcher
you're right Mrs. Thatcher
By this point, he had accumulated 23 mod reports:
On January 12 2014 08:40 sam!zdat wrote:
it's not touchy feely reasons, it's deeply unsustainable and is operating on borrowed time.
i am not a touchy feely person, remember, I am a stalinist
as far as your last line, let me repeat: you are an idiot and need to go read your adam smith
Show nested quote +
On January 12 2014 08:30 ziggurat wrote:
I don't think our agricultural production is fucked. I think it's amazing! We have more choice that at any time in history, and at lower prices than ever. There are just a lot of silly privileged people who have problems with it for various touchy-feely reasons which I personally don't care about.
Also, your talk about how there is very little private property these days is transparent nonsense.
On January 12 2014 06:02 sam!zdat wrote:
gmos are only one facet of a deeply problematic regime of industrial agriculture, the problem here is just that the public discourse about it is myopic
is our agricultural production deeply fucked? yes. is it deeply fucked entirely and unequivocally because of gmo? no
edit: also, while I'm thinking about it, I want to address something from a couple of weeks ago. after some idiot banned me, most of the responses to me were based on mocking me for beliefs I do not hold (the main way that people respond to me here). I just want to put forth that I believe 100 percent in private property and that I think one of the main problems with our society today is that there is very little private property. a joint stock corporation is not private property, it is a form of absentee landlordism, which is the antithesis of private property. late capitalism is NOT a system based on private property, there is basically no private property in the capitalist system today. equities are not private property. your mortgaged house is not private property. securities are not private property. anyone who doesn't understand this is an idiot and needs to go read their adam smith
gmos are only one facet of a deeply problematic regime of industrial agriculture, the problem here is just that the public discourse about it is myopic
is our agricultural production deeply fucked? yes. is it deeply fucked entirely and unequivocally because of gmo? no
edit: also, while I'm thinking about it, I want to address something from a couple of weeks ago. after some idiot banned me, most of the responses to me were based on mocking me for beliefs I do not hold (the main way that people respond to me here). I just want to put forth that I believe 100 percent in private property and that I think one of the main problems with our society today is that there is very little private property. a joint stock corporation is not private property, it is a form of absentee landlordism, which is the antithesis of private property. late capitalism is NOT a system based on private property, there is basically no private property in the capitalist system today. equities are not private property. your mortgaged house is not private property. securities are not private property. anyone who doesn't understand this is an idiot and needs to go read their adam smith
I don't think our agricultural production is fucked. I think it's amazing! We have more choice that at any time in history, and at lower prices than ever. There are just a lot of silly privileged people who have problems with it for various touchy-feely reasons which I personally don't care about.
Also, your talk about how there is very little private property these days is transparent nonsense.
it's not touchy feely reasons, it's deeply unsustainable and is operating on borrowed time.
i am not a touchy feely person, remember, I am a stalinist
as far as your last line, let me repeat: you are an idiot and need to go read your adam smith
These are merely the action'd posts that I could find in mod reports. He had a lot of other posts that were action'd before even being reported. It was his way to mingle insults and a foul superiority complex in all his posts. Intelligence does not excuse belligerence.
wow, that's quite the mod history. I can never understand people who feel the need to insult over anything. Being right or wrong doesn't exclude you from a ban if you disrespect another forum member. I'm surprised he wasn't permed much sooner tbh.
He got a 90 day a while back, requested a perm, and then later decided to come back to TL. I think this was his final form.
it's not even that though. If you want to post and make it sound complicated or intelligent, by all means go ahead and present your point in any way you like but there is never a need to insult someone over something. Aside from that, some of his posts like in the TL strat section are poorly done. Not sure what he was expecting considering you can't just write bad posts in the strat section and get away with it. I dunno, just seems odd that he does this especially after he decided to come back from his perm request that you mentioned. My thoughts at least
I was trying to answer your question of "why hasn't he been permed yet" since the answer was that he sort of already was. He came back after a period of time (as veterans do occasionally) and eventually got permed for real.
oh ok fair enough. I guess I'm still puzzled why he came back if he was planning to resort to the same old posting style that used to get him banned in the first place. On a side note, what is it about that politics thread that gets people so riled up? Is stating then forcing your opinion on someone really that important to people? I guess I would just post my point, maybe reply to another posts to it then eventually leave the thread once the discussion turns sour.
