EPTTL Mafia XLVII - Page 203
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
xtfftc
United Kingdom2343 Posts
Are we relying on BC to protect Sandroba tonight, so that the medics can try to spread out better instead of overheal him? | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On November 30 2011 08:41 Mattchew wrote: Risen is no longer a target (I still think hes scum) but my vote will be rendered useless if its on a candidate that isn't actually going to be lynched. Therefore I picked the greater of 2 evils in Palmer over BC. I think BC is less scummy than Palmer Is retarded logic. Just because your vote won't kill someone, you don't have to remove it and vote on someone who is likely to die. He is also one of the "stealth votes". + Show Spoiler + On November 30 2011 08:58 Mattchew wrote: BC or PALMAR is going to be lynched... why not vote the one who i believe is scummier? so I can sit back and watch BC flip town and be pissed that we woulda shoulda coulda voted Palmar? No. This doesnt make sense. He explicitly stated that he didn't want neither BC nor Palmar dead, yet he voted on Palmar "because I want my vote to count". There has been as much info on scum BC as there has been on scum Palmar(possibly a bit more to one side or another). Also, I want people to keep this one on the back of their mind: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690¤tpage=178#3555 coming out of nowhere trying to save zeks. One could argue that a scum wouldn't do that because that's attracting attention, but then one argues that mafia knows that and that's why he did it, and then it's WIFOM. Still, I feel forced to think this is very scummy. ~2 cents | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
According to one of the people screaming for my lynch there wasn't even a case on me. This was based purely on the fact that Palmar, wherebugsgo and sandroba all suddenly decided to yell at me and they never wrote anything even though I repeatedly asked them to. There was a layabout analysis but it was pretty terrible and wherebugsgo also acknowledges this when he totally forgets about it two pages after it happened. Then people jump me because I've gone to bed. wherebugsgo keeps lying about me, he says that I am lying when I say that I feel that one of my strongest sides compared to the better players is that I can distinguish newbie from scum. Look at Mini Mafia X where I am the only one fighting against the lynch of two newbies. He says that my play has improved drastically in the last two games. This is not true, my second to last game was Steamship where I was town and got lynched day2 because I sucked, and Mini Mafia X where I was townie and mafia won. How would you say that this is drastically improving or are you just lying to make me look bad? You want to lynch me because I am careful with my posts, I am trying to change how I post because I usually get lynched early on because I am not careful with my posts. Look at what I write instead of using shitty meta. On November 30 2011 14:31 wherebugsgo wrote: these 7: Sprungjeezy Kenpachi Serejai vaderseven Ciryandor ey215 voted in the vote thread at the last minute and should be killed just based on that. That's why they are all first on my vig list. prplhz Hier Benjef Steveling These four based on analysis, and voting palmar. AmericanUmlaut Soap these two for voting me, and voting palmar. Also uselessness. Coagulation Lemonwalrus Both for being useless. Vigilantes, take my list and shoot into it based on your position in the player list. This will ensure that shots do not overlap. Medics please protect me. This post: what the fuck. The first 6 names are self evident kills. If vigs/banes aren't hitting these tonight they should stop playing mafia. The rest of the list is full of shit and downright lying when you say that you are basing my lynch off analysis. Can you link me this supposed analysis? No you can't. You have 5% of the posts in this game but your insane activity doesn't make you any more town Will wherebugsgo ever post an analysis on me or are you just going to listen to him because he has a fuckton of posts? wherebugsgo is my strongest scum read at this time. His activity doesn't mean anything, but he is lying his ass off to get whatever he wants while trying to appear a lot more pro-town than his actions really are. That list up there consists of 6 people who will get shot by any person with a brain and the rest of the list is very questionable. He claims some are backed up by analysis, which is untrue in my case at least, and the rest of them is based on who voted Palmar and who voted for wherebugsgo. This is shitty beyond anything. wherebugsgo also has sandroba's support but don't trust that for one second. sandroba promised on day1 during his campaign that he would be very active, but we see now that he is lazy and he is even admitting that he isn't really putting a lot of effort into this game. Why the hell would a townie run for office on a platform partially based on his own activity and then not be very active? This only makes sense from a scum point of view, he could get into office and then he could just /afk for the rest of the game while scum could control how many double lynches they wanted town to have. Also, sandroba has shown in Mini Mafia X that he has absolutely no conception about wherebugsgo's alignment. On November 30 2011 15:07 sinani206 wrote: Since I'm probably gonna die tonight for that analysis on wbg, I might as well claim. I was a detective and I got guilty on wbg. I claimed vet earlier to keep from dying n1. I doubt that I'm paranoid/insane or that he was framed because of his truly scummy play. So, gg all. I doubt that this guy is scum but holy fuck he's playing terrible. He is piling WIFOM while in the end no scum would ever hit him no matter his role because he's just so chaotic that town will never benefit from anything he says. I'm going to say that he's probably vet after all, just frantically trying to get scum to shoot him. Stop trying to be pro-town by lying 'cause it's not going to work. On November 30 2011 19:03 deconduo wrote: LOL Dunno how you think I could still be scum after I switched WBG  Though as much as it pains me to say it, you are pretty town right now. Also I don't see how BC could be mafia if they went through that much effort to try to get him lynched over zeks. Scum Sheriff >>> Random Goon thats gonna die anyway.Also take a good look at the people defending Zeks saying 'Don't rely on clues, they won't be obvious' Can you explain why wherebugsgo is painfully town right now? 'cause I don't see it. Can you tell me why it pains you that he is pretty town right now? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On November 30 2011 21:21 prplhz wrote: Okay I go to bed 2.5 hours before deadline and then suddenly everybody piles votes on me based on what? According to one of the people screaming for my lynch there wasn't even a case on me. This was based purely on the fact that Palmar, wherebugsgo and sandroba all suddenly decided to yell at me and they never wrote anything even though I repeatedly asked them to. There was a layabout analysis but it was pretty terrible and wherebugsgo also acknowledges this when he totally forgets about it two pages after it happened. Then people jump me because I've gone to bed. wherebugsgo keeps lying about me, he says that I am lying when I say that I feel that one of my strongest sides compared to the better players is that I can distinguish newbie from scum. Look at Mini Mafia X where I am the only one fighting against the lynch of two newbies. He says that my play has improved drastically in the last two games. This is not true, my second to last game was Steamship where I was town and got lynched day2 because I sucked, and Mini Mafia X where I was townie and mafia won. How would you say that this is drastically improving or are you just lying to make me look bad? You want to lynch me because I am careful with my posts, I am trying to change how I post because I usually get lynched early on because I am not careful with my posts. Look at what I write instead of using shitty meta. This post: what the fuck. The first 6 names are self evident kills. If vigs/banes aren't hitting these tonight they should stop playing mafia. The rest of the list is full of shit and downright lying when you say that you are basing my lynch off analysis. Can you link me this supposed analysis? No you can't. You have 5% of the posts in this game but your insane activity doesn't make you any more town Will wherebugsgo ever post an analysis on me or are you just going to listen to him because he has a fuckton of posts? wherebugsgo is my strongest scum read at this time. His activity doesn't mean anything, but he is lying his ass off to get whatever he wants while trying to appear a lot more pro-town than his actions really are. That list up there consists of 6 people who will get shot by any person with a brain and the rest of the list is very questionable. He claims some are backed up by analysis, which is untrue in my case at least, and the rest of them is based on who voted Palmar and who voted for wherebugsgo. This is shitty beyond anything. wherebugsgo also has sandroba's support but don't trust that for one second. sandroba promised on day1 during his campaign that he would be very active, but we see now that he is lazy and he is even admitting that he isn't really putting a lot of effort into this game. Why the hell would a townie run for office on a platform partially based on his own activity and then not be very active? This only makes sense from a scum point of view, he could get into office and then he could just /afk for the rest of the game while scum could control how many double lynches they wanted town to have. Also, sandroba has shown in Mini Mafia X that he has absolutely no conception about wherebugsgo's alignment. I doubt that this guy is scum but holy fuck he's playing terrible. He is piling WIFOM while in the end no scum would ever hit him no matter his role because he's just so chaotic that town will never benefit from anything he says. I'm going to say that he's probably vet after all, just frantically trying to get scum to shoot him. Stop trying to be pro-town by lying 'cause it's not going to work. Can you explain why wherebugsgo is painfully town right now? 'cause I don't see it. Can you tell me why it pains you that he is pretty town right now? Because he's play is pro-town. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On November 30 2011 21:26 prplhz wrote: How is his play pro-town, he is posting a list of people who will 100% be shot tonight for obvious reasons, and then he is trying to cram in a bunch of other people with hardly any reasons for why they should be killed. He is straight up lying about me being on that list based on analysis, because he has never posted any analysis of me other than "u scum", but that doesn't really count now does it? wbg has nailed scum by just going 'u scum' before. I trust him. *looks at Steamship Liquidia, he was the one to actually find me* | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On November 30 2011 21:32 Zephirdd wrote: wbg has nailed scum by just going 'u scum' before. I trust him. *looks at Steamship Liquidia, he was the one to actually find me* This is just plain dumb. You trust him based on stuff he's done in this game, not because he found a scum in another game. Jesus christ, you don't really want to play do you? You just want to play follow-the-leader until you die or everybody else is dead, right? | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
The fact you want wbg dead is enough for me to find him safe.I really think you're scum. | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On November 30 2011 21:36 prplhz wrote: This is just plain dumb. You trust him based on stuff he's done in this game, not because he found a scum in another game. Jesus christ, you don't really want to play do you? You just want to play follow-the-leader until you die or everybody else is dead, right? So you mean that to not 'follow-the-leader' I should follow you? nah, I trust him more. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On November 30 2011 21:41 hyshes wrote: @prplhz: The fact you want wbg dead is enough for me to find him safe.I really think you're scum. And can you tell me why I am scummy? I filtered you and all you say is "because I voted Palmar", but a lot of people voted Palmar, are they all scummy? What makes me especially scummy? Before I voted for Palmar I said that in order for anyone to vote for Palmar two premises had to be fulfilled: Palmar had to be more scummy and BloodyC0bbler had to be more townie. Subsequently, Palmar acted very weird with his martyr poem and his OMGUSing all around, and I reread BloodyC0bbler's filter and I couldn't find anything that made me think that he was scum. I thought that it was important to take a stand in the entire Palmar/BloodyC0bbler thishitng and I voted for Palmar just for these reasons. Do you think I predicted Palmar's behavior would turn shit and I just put up the premises before he did because I'm an evil genius? wherebugsgo can confirm that I'm not a genius, even though it seems like he'd call me a genius any day just to get people to listen to whatever he is pushing just this moment. Your play is way more scummy than me, no analysis, no logic, just spouting random nonsense while lurking. Tell me: what the fuck? | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
Town still doesn't have this prerogative, yesterday 1 scum was killed and 2 other scum were caught for sure but this game is far from over. I demand an analysis on me before vigilantes waste their shot on me just because wherebugsgo is spouting nonsense and random newbies are trusting him for no reasons stated. Vigilantes can't speak for themselves and they shouldn't just shoot in the dark because some dude has made a list of people who were going to get shot anyway and then put in several other people while lying about why they're on the list. It is hilarious that town is this bad: wherebugsgo puts me on a list because of an analysis - there is no analysis - wherebugsgo must be right because he was right in another game. What kind of logic is this? | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
I did say that wbg caught mafia that way before, sorry if I implied that he was right about prplhz. At this point most of the mafia are sitting back and watching; except for some who I'll make a case on later. | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
At this point most of the mafia are sitting back and watching based on previous experience and current state of the game | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
I know prpl (scum) is one of them. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On November 30 2011 21:55 prplhz wrote: Okay I give up, apparently the newbies will randomly trust a guy just because he is the loudest and they saw him some other game. No case needed: he's probably town lets just do whatever he says. Town still doesn't have this prerogative, yesterday 1 scum was killed and 2 other scum were caught for sure but this game is far from over. I demand an analysis on me before vigilantes waste their shot on me just because wherebugsgo is spouting nonsense and random newbies are trusting him for no reasons stated. Vigilantes can't speak for themselves and they shouldn't just shoot in the dark because some dude has made a list of people who were going to get shot anyway and then put in several other people while lying about why they're on the list. It is hilarious that town is this bad: wherebugsgo puts me on a list because of an analysis - there is no analysis - wherebugsgo must be right because he was right in another game. What kind of logic is this? And with newbies you mean who exacly? | ||
| ||
