|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On March 13 2012 08:30 neoghaleon55 wrote:hahahah! I love it when players get in trouble with the mods around here. *wags finger at incontrol (making fun of people's English in a serious topic) Show nested quote +On March 13 2012 05:19 iNcontroL wrote: i is except for what said you by
User was warned for this post yeah, inc gets a justified warning and then about 15 people get justified bans for bashing HIM people just don't get it sometimes!
|
On March 13 2012 03:33 HelloSon wrote: did you make a shitty OP just to be the first one to post this?
User was temp banned for this post.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=320134
i think he actually has a valid point here, it is so annoying that people rush to create a topic if something new appears and don't meet the tl requirements of providing a good OP but it anyway stays open because it's big news.
So why did this guy get a ban? I rather would understand if the OP would have been warned for providing a bad OP and the banned guy getting a warning for "possible derailing" but a ban for this statement seems a bit too much.
|
On March 13 2012 11:33 idonthinksobro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2012 03:33 HelloSon wrote: did you make a shitty OP just to be the first one to post this?
User was temp banned for this post. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=320134i think he actually has a valid point here, it is so annoying that people rush to create a topic if something new appears and don't meet the tl requirements of providing a good OP but it anyway stays open because it's big news. So why did this guy get a ban? I rather would understand if the OP would have been warned for providing a bad OP and the banned guy getting a warning for "possible derailing" but a ban for this statement seems a bit too much.
Backseat moderating? Pointlessly being an ass? Posting just as uselessly as the OP? Zero content-one-line posting?
Take your pick.
And I would bet on him having a number of previous warnings, mods don't just temp ban people who don't have some warnings/should know better unless they do something really stupid. I think the bigger question is why are you defending this ass hat? He was only 2-dayed. That's the TL ban equivalent of a slap on the wrists.
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
On March 13 2012 11:33 idonthinksobro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2012 03:33 HelloSon wrote: did you make a shitty OP just to be the first one to post this?
User was temp banned for this post. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=320134i think he actually has a valid point here, it is so annoying that people rush to create a topic if something new appears and don't meet the tl requirements of providing a good OP but it anyway stays open because it's big news. So why did this guy get a ban? I rather would understand if the OP would have been warned for providing a bad OP and the banned guy getting a warning for "possible derailing" but a ban for this statement seems a bit too much.
always a good idea to look at his post history if the ban doesn't add up.
|
On March 13 2012 11:33 idonthinksobro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2012 03:33 HelloSon wrote: did you make a shitty OP just to be the first one to post this?
User was temp banned for this post. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=320134i think he actually has a valid point here, it is so annoying that people rush to create a topic if something new appears and don't meet the tl requirements of providing a good OP but it anyway stays open because it's big news. So why did this guy get a ban? I rather would understand if the OP would have been warned for providing a bad OP and the banned guy getting a warning for "possible derailing" but a ban for this statement seems a bit too much. I'm surprised that this got a ban, too. Maybe the guy has a bad history? In any case, I think the criticism of the OP was justified: The thread started off completely contentless except for a link and "SEEMS BIG", then he later copy/pasted some actual contents in. Which would also tend to make me think that the guy just threw together the fastest possible post so that he could have the honor of opening the first thread on the topic.
|
On March 13 2012 17:29 AmericanUmlaut wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2012 11:33 idonthinksobro wrote:On March 13 2012 03:33 HelloSon wrote: did you make a shitty OP just to be the first one to post this?
User was temp banned for this post. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=320134i think he actually has a valid point here, it is so annoying that people rush to create a topic if something new appears and don't meet the tl requirements of providing a good OP but it anyway stays open because it's big news. So why did this guy get a ban? I rather would understand if the OP would have been warned for providing a bad OP and the banned guy getting a warning for "possible derailing" but a ban for this statement seems a bit too much. I'm surprised that this got a ban, too. Maybe the guy has a bad history? In any case, I think the criticism of the OP was justified: The thread started off completely contentless except for a link and "SEEMS BIG", then he later copy/pasted some actual contents in. Which would also tend to make me think that the guy just threw together the fastest possible post so that he could have the honor of opening the first thread on the topic. the alternative obviously being 4 different people seeing the article, searching TL to check that no-one else has posted and then meticulously putting together 4 different beautiful OPs and all posting them within a minute, then the mods having to close 3 of them.
the system works, if he never adds content he gets banned, but as long as he keeps the thread up to date there's no problem.
|
^^I agree. The "hit and run" thread starters should get punished (the ones that start a thread and then never update or post in it) but the ones that keeps updating and/or contribute to the thread I see no problem with. Posting quickly so people can see and then adding more content I don't see as a major issue.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
Kamais Ookin was just temp banned for 2 days by zatic.
That account was created on 2012-01-18 16:07:12 and had 408 posts.
Reason: Really no way to talk to people in TLHF, or TL generally for that matter.
Why Kamais why.... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
What does TLHF mean?
|
Sooner or later it would have happened anyway. Nothing surprising.
TL Health & Fitness
|
On March 13 2012 20:21 blubbdavid wrote: Sooner or later it would have happened anyway. Nothing surprising.
TL Health & Fitness Yeah, you could tell from the way he posted something was bound to happen at some point.
|
Kira__ was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-04-18 02:39:27 and had 2249 posts.
Reason: Egburgerman is not a nice way to refer to incontrol
Banned from my ipad Isn't that a reference to something Nestea said on SOTG? That Incontrol looked like a burgerman?
The post itself isn't particularly nasty or anything, it's just making light of Geoff's trolling in the Verdi thread.
|
On March 10 2012 02:57 marttorn wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2012 01:53 TheToast wrote:-edit: SolidMustard was just temp banned for 2 days by semioldguy.
That account was created on 2011-05-15 23:18:34 and had 827 posts.
Reason: "might get banned for this"
Doesn't matter what you have to say, if you say that you'll get banned whether what you say after is bannable or not.
If you think you might get banned for something... why would you post it? Am I the only one who thinks this guy has a terrible username? When I hear "solid mustard" I think of the old, dry, crusty old mustard that collects on the top of the bottle and dries..... In Norway we have a word for that; "snerk". It's a really disgusting sounding word, describing a really disgusting thing. I'm sure any other Norwegian you meet can attest to this. By the way, I noticed three bans for martyring today (and seeing as i'm too lazy to check), was this just a coincidence or was one particular thread just a big martyr-magnet?
Snerk... I like it, too bad I already used the new name change, I might wanna change my name to that XD.
|
demitap was just temp banned for 1 week by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-11-30 05:45:52 and had 58 posts.
Reason: You do not have good history, and now you ask for restreams?
Off with you, when you come back, I expect stellar behavior
demitap was just temp banned for 2 weeks by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-11-30 05:45:52 and had 65 posts.
Reason: That was less than stellar.
Do not flame, especially with your history.
Nice followup ban
|
On March 14 2012 01:38 bonifaceviii wrote:Show nested quote +Kira__ was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-04-18 02:39:27 and had 2249 posts.
Reason: Egburgerman is not a nice way to refer to incontrol
Banned from my ipad Isn't that a reference to something Nestea said on SOTG? That Incontrol looked like a burgerman? The post itself isn't particularly nasty or anything, it's just making light of Geoff's trolling in the Verdi thread. The "Banned from my ipad" part made me chuckle.
|
|
|
On March 14 2012 01:38 bonifaceviii wrote:Show nested quote +Kira__ was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-04-18 02:39:27 and had 2249 posts.
Reason: Egburgerman is not a nice way to refer to incontrol
Banned from my ipad Isn't that a reference to something Nestea said on SOTG? That Incontrol looked like a burgerman? The post itself isn't particularly nasty or anything, it's just making light of Geoff's trolling in the Verdi thread.
I wonder if that comment was where this "iNcontrol is fat" meme started. It may be that I knew he's a powerlifter from the first intro I heard for him, but to me the guy's always looked like a heavyweight powerlifter.
|
On June 20 2009 15:46 Harem wrote: Ban list is one of the greatest threads on TL.
However, website feedback is usually where the best hidden gems are.
Could it be..?
Harem, is your avatar the one, righteous, and almighty.....
![[image loading]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-DLNCKc3Mfkg/TXZ1_is533I/AAAAAAAACHw/b24mThSmXzE/s1600/ban-hammer-featured1.jpg)
User was warned for this post
|
On March 14 2012 05:24 TheKefka wrote: Whos Kamais?I forgot..
Ah, I am tempted to compile a snappy post titled "A Brief History of Ookin" but at this very moment, I feel the effort required is out of my reach.
Short version: He has well over 15 bans and warnings on his old account, which eventually got perma banned (by Nazgul, no less)
He returned, and this is his first ban on his new account. Dare I say, one of several to come (although I can't control/or know that he will be banned, it's just judging from his history)
The truth is that ever since he made a slightly snarky post towards me when I was banned like 500 ABL pages ago, i've hated him with the intense passion of a thousand burning suns I find him an interesting, yet undervalued specimen of ABL history.
Edit: Rollin' Out!
|
On March 14 2012 05:38 Hug-A-Hydralisk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 20 2009 15:46 Harem wrote: Ban list is one of the greatest threads on TL.
However, website feedback is usually where the best hidden gems are. Could it be..? Harem, is your avatar the one, righteous, and almighty..... + Show Spoiler + You must be new here.
Link
I don't think that in the mean time Manifesto has fallen behind, but I don't have more recent statistics at hand. I think there are new ones compiled though.. somewhere..
Edit: latest update in that same thread. Perhaps Nyovne comes out ahead now? Haven't been keeping up. Watch out Mani!!
|
|
|
|