EPT+ Show Spoiler +
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/b9KgQKO.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/skze9ey.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/iTrW0oq.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/TMFtsDf.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/oiwN1Bm.jpg)
I have swans too but for some reason imgur hates ALL of my swan pictures.
The Automated Ban List - Page 2910
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + I have swans too but for some reason imgur hates ALL of my swan pictures. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
Most of the birds I have on my phone are pretty boring. Go figure. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18278 Posts
On June 01 2017 02:25 opisska wrote: A sparrow, Mallards, a Canada Goose and a sillouethe of a hummingbird, all apparently taken on a phone? That's pretty weak, but maybe someone could use those to find where exactly you live and stalk you a bit? Heh, I don't think a selection of some of the most common birds in the world are going to help pinpoint his location. Even if anybody is mad enough to want to. I guess the hummingbird proves conclusively that he isn't in Britain. Although the photo is blurry enough that it might just be a hummingbird moth... and then he *could* be English after all! | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On June 01 2017 02:32 Acrofales wrote: Heh, I don't think a selection of some of the most common birds in the world are going to help pinpoint his location. Even if anybody is mad enough to want to. I guess the hummingbird proves conclusively that he isn't in Britain. Although the photo is blurry enough that it might just be a hummingbird moth... and then he *could* be English after all! I was thinking about the surroundings, silly. You need to up your stalking game. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On June 01 2017 01:04 Cascade wrote: I'm not certain how went from the top of this screen shot to the rest of it. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Xz0l3Bn.png) the topic is birds, so this is all on topic. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
| ||
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On June 04 2017 00:36 LegalLord wrote: So, we clearly got another Euphorbus alt on our hands. Their lifespan seems to be about 50 posts (pretty long for someone who is an unwelcome PBU) but I guess we need our edgelords every once in a while. haha someone else who noticed (no 100% proof here). He really needs to work on his posting habit to hide himself better. Some people never learn -_- | ||
KwarK
United States43959 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10314 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/523542-justice-for-arb#1 ^ Contains link to original thread where said inconsistency occurred. #justiceforarb | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On June 04 2017 00:48 KwarK wrote: I'm always confused when PBUs try to get one over on us by making a new account and strictly following our forum rules and only doing good posting so they stay under the radar. It's like they think we had something against them personally and that by getting back in at the price of changing all the things they were doing they've beaten us. Why do you think you ban them in the first place then? If I were going to make 500 rules abiding posts after making a bannable post why ban me at all in the interim? | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 04 2017 07:12 IgnE wrote: Why do you think you ban them in the first place then? If I were going to make 500 rules abiding posts after making a bannable post why ban me at all in the interim? Because without the ban you'd make a lot more bannable posts? | ||
|
KwarK
United States43959 Posts
On June 04 2017 07:12 IgnE wrote: Why do you think you ban them in the first place then? If I were going to make 500 rules abiding posts after making a bannable post why ban me at all in the interim? They post like shit, they get banned, they assume we have something against them personally and not their posting and so they come back, change the posting to conceal their identity, and think that they've won because we failed in our personal vendetta against them. If you take the ban out of that system then it doesn't work. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On June 04 2017 07:16 KwarK wrote: They post like shit, they get banned, they assume we have something against them personally and not their posting and so they come back, change the posting to conceal their identity, and think that they've won because we failed in our personal vendetta against them. If you take the ban out of that system then it doesn't work. I'm not asking why they think they were banned. I am asking why you think you ban. Why bother with permanent bans if they are always in effect temporary bans? | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On June 04 2017 07:15 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Because without the ban you'd make a lot more bannable posts? Not necessarily. | ||
|
KwarK
United States43959 Posts
On June 04 2017 07:25 IgnE wrote: I'm not asking why they think they were banned. I am asking why you think you ban. Why bother with permanent bans if they are always in effect temporary bans? because if you take the ban out of that system then it doesn't work. | ||
| ||
