EPTdo you think the fantasy system in their heads functions in "actual fact" to reform them? despite Euphorbus choosing when and how to follow the rules as he pleases? or is that the game here? you want them to think they've won. because the connotation of your post suggested to me that you thought that they were ridiculous for thinking that. or is it even higher level than that? you want them to think they've won so that they become ridiculous.
The Automated Ban List - Page 2911
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
do you think the fantasy system in their heads functions in "actual fact" to reform them? despite Euphorbus choosing when and how to follow the rules as he pleases? or is that the game here? you want them to think they've won. because the connotation of your post suggested to me that you thought that they were ridiculous for thinking that. or is it even higher level than that? you want them to think they've won so that they become ridiculous. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18132 Posts
| ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 04 2017 07:57 Acrofales wrote: You sound like opisska. Except with more italics. He sounds like opisska would if he was taking a correspondence course on psychology (and was doing poorly on it). | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On June 04 2017 08:03 ZigguratOfUr wrote: He sounds like opisska would if he was taking a correspondence course on psychology (and was doing poorly on it). i am going to identify some projection here | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On June 04 2017 08:03 ZigguratOfUr wrote: He sounds like opisska would if he was taking a correspondence course on psychology (and was doing poorly on it). So he sounds like opisska? Anyways, before reading it I coulda sworn right now looked timely for Testie's ban to be a perm (in terms of previous ban patterns rather than his history specifically). Instead he gets off quite easy. | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On June 04 2017 08:45 LegalLord wrote: So he sounds like opisska? Anyways, before reading it I coulda sworn right now looked timely for Testie's ban to be a perm (in terms of previous ban patterns rather than his history specifically). Instead he gets off quite easy. The bar to ban him is much higher than usual due to his Starcraft career, so it's hard to compare. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
tofucakeisshit was just banned by KwarK. That account was created on 2017-06-04 09:31:54 and had 1 posts. Reason: Previously banned user. tofu, how does this make you feel? | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37044 Posts
Honestly, he should feel good. When you have haters, you know you've made it in this world. | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50586 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
 | ||
|
AbouSV
Germany1278 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On June 04 2017 09:34 ZigguratOfUr wrote: The bar to ban him is much higher than usual due to his Starcraft career, so it's hard to compare. Staff, forum veterans and players usually have a higher ban bar as you mentioned. It's highly dependent on the individual and their history so there's no one size fits all like LL seems to be thinking. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
RoomOfMush
1296 Posts
On June 04 2017 07:25 IgnE wrote: I'm not asking why they think they were banned. I am asking why you think you ban. Why bother with permanent bans if they are always in effect temporary bans? Same reason why we have prisons and other forms of punishment. The punishment is used as a deterrent for others and to make sure you remember to follow the rules next time. | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37044 Posts
On June 06 2017 01:46 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Testie's ban seems...really lenient. Like really lenient. The reason alone sounds like, "sorry but we can't handle you right now, but don't worry, we still love you. It's not you, it's me" Oh believe me... If it had been up to me, it would have been a longer temp ban. I was in the middle of discussing what to do with KBB when BigFan just went and pulled the trigger. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
Anyone have the Scip post/discussion in question? Don't know him but too many adbots make any actual person getting actioned notable. | ||
|
brian
United States9633 Posts
lol what a particularly ridiculous post. i'm surprised something like this gets actioned before til the '[s] button on a post is for spoiler and not strike through | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18132 Posts
| ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On June 06 2017 04:03 Seeker wrote: Oh believe me... If it had been up to me, it would have been a longer temp ban. I was in the middle of discussing what to do with KBB when BigFan just went and pulled the trigger. you should know my reasoning already for the ban length. On June 06 2017 04:44 Acrofales wrote: Especially weird because kwark hadn't even said anything about anything in that thread or the UK politics thread. from my understanding, he was targeting Kwark for an older conversation that they had. | ||
| ||
