|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Inimic was just temp banned for 2 days by JBright.
That account was created on 2013-03-12 08:07:48 and had 153 posts.
Reason: Not an appropriate response to a warning.
Well he got mad: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=426777
This is the warning: On August 25 2013 03:42 Inimic wrote:
So scarlett has to play perfectly for 30 minutes to win, but 2 good widow mine hits and she loses? Who designed this shit.
User was warned for this post
|
That suicide lol.
Fuck you.
Could he get anymore original?
|
On August 25 2013 04:08 KaiserKieran wrote:
That suicide lol.
Fuck you.
Could he get anymore original?
Well he could've just typed 'FU'
|
On August 25 2013 03:57 Crownlol wrote:
Widow mines hard to use.
User was temp banned for this post.
I'm surprised. He seemed like a relatively intelligent poster most other times that I saw him.
|
On August 25 2013 03:29 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
Gotta say in my limited experience with TL articles (stopped reading them because of this very fact actually), they happen to be almost as inaccurate as Artosis when it comes to making predictions.
Poor guy took a chance and got unlucky. RIP. ;;
They weren't this bad during BW. They just can't resist picking foreigners to win in SC2. But hey, whenever you gamble you can lose. At least the guy only bet a 2 week ban.
|
On August 25 2013 04:49 Undead1993 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 04:46 Vash_SC2 wrote:On August 25 2013 04:36 Heavenlee wrote:On August 25 2013 04:30 Vash_SC2 wrote:On August 25 2013 04:09 Heavenlee wrote:On August 25 2013 04:04 BronzeKnee wrote:On August 25 2013 04:03 Heavenlee wrote:On August 25 2013 03:57 BronzeKnee wrote:On August 25 2013 03:52 ssxsilver wrote:On August 25 2013 03:49 BronzeKnee wrote:
[quote]
That is exactly why people are complaining!
Bomber did an amazing job, had a nice lead, but then two Widow Mine hits ended the game! Those hits didn't showcase his skills. But those two widow mines were pretty insignificant in the grand scheme of things. Bomber getting his third up so fast while containing Scarlett on two bases with no creep spread is what won it. It was an insane lead. You're right. But it is like this: Imagine a football game where one side (I'll call them Bombers) has the lead, but the last time the teams played it looks similar, and the other side (Scarletts) made an awesome comeback and won. In fact, they are 2-2 in recent history. So the Bombers have the lead, but Scarletts have a great quarterback capable of making a comeback, we know that because it happened last game. Tense game, very exciting. Then the Scarletts quarterback trips over a linemen and breaks his ankle. Bombers finish out of the game for an easy victory. That is what happened, and it was anti-climatic. It was a great series though, Scarlett made one mistake, which cost her the game because units exist that can punish someone like that. Did you miss the part where Bomber had 3/3 and a fully saturated fourth orbital when Scarlett had barely anything at her fourth? "trips over a linemen and breaks his ankle". It was over within a minute or two anyways. She got outplayed, stop crying and deal with it. Maybe. How many people said GG in this thread after Bomber roasted all the Drones in Game 4? And that's the point. It could have been more epic and showcased skill. But instead the game ended in a silly way. And I had no horse in this race man. I like Bomber and hope he wins it all. Then Scarlett should've played better and showcased more skill. Don't miss the SCV your overlord passed over, don't detonate your banelings against rocks, don't run your mutas over where you should know widowmines are or split better against them. Why are people so obsessed with blaming everyone and everything but the players for their loss? It was Scarlett's fault and only Scarlett's fault that she went over those mines. Bomber lost his engagements because he failed to micro properly against Scarlett's banes. One bane often took out like 8-10 marines. His fault, not Blizzard's, not terran's or zerg's, not the cruel universe's. Dude we get it, you like mircoless units. Dude we get it, you like to complain about units that force you to intelligently position yourself and micro to avoid damage. User was temp banned for this post. Holy poop you're way too upset. What's up with TL kids being so mad even though they suck at SC2? You guys might be worse than Reddit. User was temp banned for this post. ok, nice display of your intelligence, you are truly the superior human being User was temp banned for this post.
Wow, triple kill.
|
28100 Posts
On August 25 2013 05:03 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 04:49 Undead1993 wrote:On August 25 2013 04:46 Vash_SC2 wrote:On August 25 2013 04:36 Heavenlee wrote:On August 25 2013 04:30 Vash_SC2 wrote:On August 25 2013 04:09 Heavenlee wrote:On August 25 2013 04:04 BronzeKnee wrote:On August 25 2013 04:03 Heavenlee wrote:On August 25 2013 03:57 BronzeKnee wrote:On August 25 2013 03:52 ssxsilver wrote:
[quote]
But those two widow mines were pretty insignificant in the grand scheme of things. Bomber getting his third up so fast while containing Scarlett on two bases with no creep spread is what won it. It was an insane lead. You're right. But it is like this: Imagine a football game where one side (I'll call them Bombers) has the lead, but the last time the teams played it looks similar, and the other side (Scarletts) made an awesome comeback and won. In fact, they are 2-2 in recent history. So the Bombers have the lead, but Scarletts have a great quarterback capable of making a comeback, we know that because it happened last game. Tense game, very exciting. Then the Scarletts quarterback trips over a linemen and breaks his ankle. Bombers finish out of the game for an easy victory. That is what happened, and it was anti-climatic. It was a great series though, Scarlett made one mistake, which cost her the game because units exist that can punish someone like that. Did you miss the part where Bomber had 3/3 and a fully saturated fourth orbital when Scarlett had barely anything at her fourth? "trips over a linemen and breaks his ankle". It was over within a minute or two anyways. She got outplayed, stop crying and deal with it. Maybe. How many people said GG in this thread after Bomber roasted all the Drones in Game 4? And that's the point. It could have been more epic and showcased skill. But instead the game ended in a silly way. And I had no horse in this race man. I like Bomber and hope he wins it all. Then Scarlett should've played better and showcased more skill. Don't miss the SCV your overlord passed over, don't detonate your banelings against rocks, don't run your mutas over where you should know widowmines are or split better against them. Why are people so obsessed with blaming everyone and everything but the players for their loss? It was Scarlett's fault and only Scarlett's fault that she went over those mines. Bomber lost his engagements because he failed to micro properly against Scarlett's banes. One bane often took out like 8-10 marines. His fault, not Blizzard's, not terran's or zerg's, not the cruel universe's. Dude we get it, you like mircoless units. Dude we get it, you like to complain about units that force you to intelligently position yourself and micro to avoid damage. User was temp banned for this post. Holy poop you're way too upset. What's up with TL kids being so mad even though they suck at SC2? You guys might be worse than Reddit. User was temp banned for this post. ok, nice display of your intelligence, you are truly the superior human being User was temp banned for this post. Wow, triple kill.
lol yeah. I saw those 3 reports and I was going to handle it then suddenly Moonbear goes ham.
|
On August 25 2013 02:13 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 02:12 Cokefreak wrote:He whined about manner mules: On August 25 2013 01:45 Sated wrote:
Manner MULEs...
Such a bad mannered ass.
-_-
User was temp banned for this post. Oh yeah, he was *that* guy. How sad...
Was that during the Taeja v Rain series? I was in ZZZ land at the time and missed it.
Pretty sure Sated would have been bummed by the 3-0, but hey, sometimes you've got to take the Manner Mules.
|
On August 25 2013 05:09 aZealot wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 02:13 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On August 25 2013 02:12 Cokefreak wrote:He whined about manner mules: On August 25 2013 01:45 Sated wrote:
Manner MULEs...
Such a bad mannered ass.
-_-
User was temp banned for this post. Oh yeah, he was *that* guy. How sad... Was that during the Taeja v Rain series? I was in ZZZ land at the time and missed it. Pretty sure Sated would have been bummed by the 3-0, but hey, sometimes you've got to take the Manner Mules.
He's one of the people that bitches and cries every time manner mules / manner nexus / whatever happens... you know, as if it actually mattered. Or as if it was actually representative of what the person doing those actions thinks/feels.
I think I've said this before, but I think he would've flipped a table and destroyed some property if he were around during the old BW days before Kespa in-game / game lobby regulations, back when BoxeR used to psychologically destroy his opponents. 
|
I like Sated but yeah, I don't get that. I enjoy that aspect of SC2 - Mules raining down, dancing Stalkers etc.
Maybe he does not play or get competitive sport? IMO, it's little different (just more amusing) to a send-off (e.g. in cricket) when you've triumphed over your opponent. It's all in the game and gives a bit of an edge to proceedings.
In any case, in SC2, I think it more funny than anything else.
|
On August 25 2013 05:05 TheEmulator wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 05:03 Cokefreak wrote:On August 25 2013 04:49 Undead1993 wrote:On August 25 2013 04:46 Vash_SC2 wrote:On August 25 2013 04:36 Heavenlee wrote:On August 25 2013 04:30 Vash_SC2 wrote:On August 25 2013 04:09 Heavenlee wrote:On August 25 2013 04:04 BronzeKnee wrote:On August 25 2013 04:03 Heavenlee wrote:On August 25 2013 03:57 BronzeKnee wrote:
[quote]
You're right. But it is like this:
Imagine a football game where one side (I'll call them Bombers) has the lead, but the last time the teams played it looks similar, and the other side (Scarletts) made an awesome comeback and won. In fact, they are 2-2 in recent history.
So the Bombers have the lead, but Scarletts have a great quarterback capable of making a comeback, we know that because it happened last game. Tense game, very exciting.
Then the Scarletts quarterback trips over a linemen and breaks his ankle. Bombers finish out of the game for an easy victory.
That is what happened, and it was anti-climatic. It was a great series though, Scarlett made one mistake, which cost her the game because units exist that can punish someone like that.
Did you miss the part where Bomber had 3/3 and a fully saturated fourth orbital when Scarlett had barely anything at her fourth? "trips over a linemen and breaks his ankle". It was over within a minute or two anyways. She got outplayed, stop crying and deal with it. Maybe. How many people said GG in this thread after Bomber roasted all the Drones in Game 4? And that's the point. It could have been more epic and showcased skill. But instead the game ended in a silly way. And I had no horse in this race man. I like Bomber and hope he wins it all. Then Scarlett should've played better and showcased more skill. Don't miss the SCV your overlord passed over, don't detonate your banelings against rocks, don't run your mutas over where you should know widowmines are or split better against them. Why are people so obsessed with blaming everyone and everything but the players for their loss? It was Scarlett's fault and only Scarlett's fault that she went over those mines. Bomber lost his engagements because he failed to micro properly against Scarlett's banes. One bane often took out like 8-10 marines. His fault, not Blizzard's, not terran's or zerg's, not the cruel universe's. Dude we get it, you like mircoless units. Dude we get it, you like to complain about units that force you to intelligently position yourself and micro to avoid damage. User was temp banned for this post. Holy poop you're way too upset. What's up with TL kids being so mad even though they suck at SC2? You guys might be worse than Reddit. User was temp banned for this post. ok, nice display of your intelligence, you are truly the superior human being User was temp banned for this post. Wow, triple kill. lol yeah. I saw those 3 reports and I was going to handle it then suddenly Moonbear goes ham.
He's so nice until someone awakens him from his slumber....
|
|
|
On August 25 2013 07:00 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 05:49 aZealot wrote:
I like Sated but yeah, I don't get that. I enjoy that aspect of SC2 - Mules raining down, dancing Stalkers etc.
Maybe he does not play or get competitive sport? IMO, it's little different (just more amusing) to a send-off (e.g. in cricket) when you've triumphed over your opponent. It's all in the game and gives a bit of an edge to proceedings.
In any case, in SC2, I think it more funny than anything else. Didn't watch the Taeja va Rain series. Was Taeja being a little annoying with the manner mules? (Like doing them every game)
Hmm, I wasn't paying full attention to it, but I'm fairly sure he only did manner mules in the final map of the series.
|
On August 25 2013 07:02 Kasaraki wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 07:00 Emzeeshady wrote:On August 25 2013 05:49 aZealot wrote:
I like Sated but yeah, I don't get that. I enjoy that aspect of SC2 - Mules raining down, dancing Stalkers etc.
Maybe he does not play or get competitive sport? IMO, it's little different (just more amusing) to a send-off (e.g. in cricket) when you've triumphed over your opponent. It's all in the game and gives a bit of an edge to proceedings.
In any case, in SC2, I think it more funny than anything else. Didn't watch the Taeja va Rain series. Was Taeja being a little annoying with the manner mules? (Like doing them every game) Hmm, I wasn't paying full attention to it, but I'm fairly sure he only did manner mules in the final map of the series.
Yep, and only dropped one mule.
It was quite anti-taeja taking into account how much he dominated Rain. But i guess that the smirk triggers people to go nuts about it.
|
your Country52798 Posts
On August 25 2013 05:49 aZealot wrote:
I like Sated but yeah, I don't get that. I enjoy that aspect of SC2 - Mules raining down, dancing Stalkers etc.
Maybe he does not play or get competitive sport? IMO, it's little different (just more amusing) to a send-off (e.g. in cricket) when you've triumphed over your opponent. It's all in the game and gives a bit of an edge to proceedings.
In any case, in SC2, I think it more funny than anything else.
It's funny because Sated is the guy that invented the jaedong-sheep-with-head-cut-off thing.
|
On August 25 2013 08:08 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 05:49 aZealot wrote:
I like Sated but yeah, I don't get that. I enjoy that aspect of SC2 - Mules raining down, dancing Stalkers etc.
Maybe he does not play or get competitive sport? IMO, it's little different (just more amusing) to a send-off (e.g. in cricket) when you've triumphed over your opponent. It's all in the game and gives a bit of an edge to proceedings.
In any case, in SC2, I think it more funny than anything else. It's funny because Sated is the guy that invented the jaedong-sheep-with-head-cut-off thing.
Interesting, I guess in-game "bm" isn't the only thing that makes him butthurt. :D
Although I'm not against the decapitated sheep. It makes things more interesting.
|
On August 25 2013 08:08 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 05:49 aZealot wrote:
I like Sated but yeah, I don't get that. I enjoy that aspect of SC2 - Mules raining down, dancing Stalkers etc.
Maybe he does not play or get competitive sport? IMO, it's little different (just more amusing) to a send-off (e.g. in cricket) when you've triumphed over your opponent. It's all in the game and gives a bit of an edge to proceedings.
In any case, in SC2, I think it more funny than anything else. It's funny because Sated is the guy that invented the jaedong-sheep-with-head-cut-off thing.
I'm afraid to ask....
|
your Country52798 Posts
On August 25 2013 09:19 3FFA wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 08:08 The_Templar wrote:On August 25 2013 05:49 aZealot wrote:
I like Sated but yeah, I don't get that. I enjoy that aspect of SC2 - Mules raining down, dancing Stalkers etc.
Maybe he does not play or get competitive sport? IMO, it's little different (just more amusing) to a send-off (e.g. in cricket) when you've triumphed over your opponent. It's all in the game and gives a bit of an edge to proceedings.
In any case, in SC2, I think it more funny than anything else. It's funny because Sated is the guy that invented the jaedong-sheep-with-head-cut-off thing. I'm afraid to ask....
Uh.. I think it was during a dreamhack, Jaedong lost to a protoss and Sated posted a picture of the Jaedong fluffy rainbow sheep with its head cut off. Waxangel (?) made a thread in TL+ that linked the post and demanded someone else give Sated TL+ because he was too cheap.
|
On August 25 2013 09:44 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 09:19 3FFA wrote:On August 25 2013 08:08 The_Templar wrote:On August 25 2013 05:49 aZealot wrote:
I like Sated but yeah, I don't get that. I enjoy that aspect of SC2 - Mules raining down, dancing Stalkers etc.
Maybe he does not play or get competitive sport? IMO, it's little different (just more amusing) to a send-off (e.g. in cricket) when you've triumphed over your opponent. It's all in the game and gives a bit of an edge to proceedings.
In any case, in SC2, I think it more funny than anything else. It's funny because Sated is the guy that invented the jaedong-sheep-with-head-cut-off thing. I'm afraid to ask.... Uh.. I think it was during a dreamhack, Jaedong lost to a protoss and Sated posted a picture of the Jaedong fluffy rainbow sheep with its head cut off. Waxangel (?) made a thread in TL+ that linked the post and demanded someone else give Sated TL+ because he was too cheap.
jd losing te final to hyun iirc.
|
your Country52798 Posts
On August 25 2013 19:49 Paljas wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2013 09:44 The_Templar wrote:On August 25 2013 09:19 3FFA wrote:On August 25 2013 08:08 The_Templar wrote:On August 25 2013 05:49 aZealot wrote:
I like Sated but yeah, I don't get that. I enjoy that aspect of SC2 - Mules raining down, dancing Stalkers etc.
Maybe he does not play or get competitive sport? IMO, it's little different (just more amusing) to a send-off (e.g. in cricket) when you've triumphed over your opponent. It's all in the game and gives a bit of an edge to proceedings.
In any case, in SC2, I think it more funny than anything else. It's funny because Sated is the guy that invented the jaedong-sheep-with-head-cut-off thing. I'm afraid to ask.... Uh.. I think it was during a dreamhack, Jaedong lost to a protoss and Sated posted a picture of the Jaedong fluffy rainbow sheep with its head cut off. Waxangel (?) made a thread in TL+ that linked the post and demanded someone else give Sated TL+ because he was too cheap. jd losing te final to hyun iirc.
Oh I thought it was earlier.. yeah that's it
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
