|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On July 24 2013 08:20 Paljas wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more. i thought that this whole story few years ago (it was tdot, afair) was just fake and a "troll".
didn't stephano make jokes about abusing/molesting (whatever the translation) an underage girl, and then get suspended? funny, because he is a featured streamer.
|
United States43464 Posts
Wasn't him. It was some ex warcraft 3 progamer with the id King.Crimson or AlexDeLarge.
|
On July 24 2013 08:32 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 08:20 Paljas wrote:On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more. i thought that this whole story few years ago (it was tdot, afair) was just fake and a "troll". didn't stephano make jokes about abusing/molesting (whatever the translation) an underage girl, and then get suspended? funny, because he is a featured streamer.
He was suspended from EG for the time, so they sent him to Korea to train lol
|
On July 24 2013 08:38 KwarK wrote:
Wasn't him. It was some ex warcraft 3 progamer with the id King.Crimson or AlexDeLarge.
what are you referring to?
|
United States43464 Posts
On July 24 2013 08:48 Paljas wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 08:38 KwarK wrote:
Wasn't him. It was some ex warcraft 3 progamer with the id King.Crimson or AlexDeLarge. what are you referring to?
He made a post about how he had a funny story about the time he raped a girl. He was removed from the tl community as an undesirable. Just an example of a ban for something off of tl, if you show yourself as an undesirable then whether or not it was on tl doesn't really matter.
|
On July 24 2013 07:09 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 06:56 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 06:54 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:44 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 06:24 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:14 DeepElemBlues wrote:There's been bans for behavior outside of TL where the behavior of the person banned at TL itself was also dodgy and the outside TL shenanigans pushed it over the edge into bannination, KwarK has had a few of those I think. But bantage particularly or exclusively for being an asshole on B.Net or somewhere I don't think that has happened except for the examples phreak mentions. On July 24 2013 06:12 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 05:15 TotalBiscuit wrote:On July 24 2013 03:09 AgentW wrote:On July 24 2013 03:00 kmillz wrote:
[quote]
Why is that? Is there an "ELO Hell" for SC2? lol No, it's just the thing where people go "I'm gold, but if not for cheese, then I'd be masters" or "I have the understanding of a GM player but mechanics have me stuck in diamond." From the "Blizzard being dumb" thread, after flaming TB (lol): theking1 was just temp banned for 1 week by MoonBear.
That account was created on 2013-06-06 22:55:49 and had 341 posts.
Reason: You were banned only 10 days ago for being unable to debate in a civil way. Here you are being a repeat offender. Either learn to manner up or get off TL. I can't decide if he and the other idiot in there with his location listed as Romania are the same guy or not and it's some elaborate trolling scheme where he aggressively debates both sides of the argument. Thoughts? http://i.imgur.com/YvwROey.png < That's him, you can safely say he's just a shitty troll and won't be here for long. He needs some serious help. Yeah that's some volcano-rage craziness right there. Like Kwark banned people or WAS banned? Kwark has had a few people that harassed him outside of TL I believe. @Above poster ...no, just no... The other way around would have been so much more interestering. On July 24 2013 06:42 Eufouria wrote:On July 24 2013 05:33 TotalBiscuit wrote:On July 24 2013 05:32 AgentW wrote:On July 24 2013 05:18 farvacola wrote:
Wow, I don't know how you publically visible folk can even use twitter with people like that around. Completely agree. I'm sure this isn't the first one like that TB has received either. This is a daily thing, it's toothless bullshit from people whose only courage comes from sitting behind a keyboard. Wow, in general I'm against the idea of "making trolling illegal" and the recent crackdown there's been on it in the UK, but imo people who send messages like this just making personal attacks on others do deserve to be punished. My ideal punishments would be 1) Going round to their house and film them squirming as I explain who I am and then uploading it to reddit for the world to see what a coward they are. and 2) Contacting their parents and explaining what their child has been doing on the internet But no. 3 would be having them go to court and end up paying a fine or doing community service. Can't agree with 1 and 3, maybe #2 though if it's a child and what he or she has done was very severe. And get the parents concerned about a stalker on the internet or something? No thanks... I think when you show a parent screenshots about their child daily insulting a certain guy on twitter/youtube/whatever then they won't think "OH MY GOD MY CHILD INSULTS HIM EVERY DAY IN HORRIBLY DISGUSTING WAYS, HE CLEARLY STALKS THE LITTLE BOY!" Since the guy talked about "ideal punishment" it may not even be him showing up at the parent's doorstep, but maybe the police.
No... I mean... how in the world did you get their phone number/etc. to contact them? They won't have any idea who you are so they may assume stalker. And if the 'insults' are from both ways...
just has the potential to create a lot of complications that aren't necessary.
|
On July 24 2013 08:51 3FFA wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 07:09 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:56 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 06:54 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:44 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 06:24 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:14 DeepElemBlues wrote:There's been bans for behavior outside of TL where the behavior of the person banned at TL itself was also dodgy and the outside TL shenanigans pushed it over the edge into bannination, KwarK has had a few of those I think. But bantage particularly or exclusively for being an asshole on B.Net or somewhere I don't think that has happened except for the examples phreak mentions. On July 24 2013 06:12 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 05:15 TotalBiscuit wrote:On July 24 2013 03:09 AgentW wrote:
[quote]
No, it's just the thing where people go "I'm gold, but if not for cheese, then I'd be masters" or "I have the understanding of a GM player but mechanics have me stuck in diamond."
From the "Blizzard being dumb" thread, after flaming TB (lol):
[quote]
I can't decide if he and the other idiot in there with his location listed as Romania are the same guy or not and it's some elaborate trolling scheme where he aggressively debates both sides of the argument. Thoughts? http://i.imgur.com/YvwROey.png < That's him, you can safely say he's just a shitty troll and won't be here for long. He needs some serious help. Yeah that's some volcano-rage craziness right there. Like Kwark banned people or WAS banned? Kwark has had a few people that harassed him outside of TL I believe. @Above poster ...no, just no... The other way around would have been so much more interestering. On July 24 2013 06:42 Eufouria wrote:On July 24 2013 05:33 TotalBiscuit wrote:On July 24 2013 05:32 AgentW wrote:On July 24 2013 05:18 farvacola wrote:
Wow, I don't know how you publically visible folk can even use twitter with people like that around. Completely agree. I'm sure this isn't the first one like that TB has received either. This is a daily thing, it's toothless bullshit from people whose only courage comes from sitting behind a keyboard. Wow, in general I'm against the idea of "making trolling illegal" and the recent crackdown there's been on it in the UK, but imo people who send messages like this just making personal attacks on others do deserve to be punished. My ideal punishments would be 1) Going round to their house and film them squirming as I explain who I am and then uploading it to reddit for the world to see what a coward they are. and 2) Contacting their parents and explaining what their child has been doing on the internet But no. 3 would be having them go to court and end up paying a fine or doing community service. Can't agree with 1 and 3, maybe #2 though if it's a child and what he or she has done was very severe. And get the parents concerned about a stalker on the internet or something? No thanks... I think when you show a parent screenshots about their child daily insulting a certain guy on twitter/youtube/whatever then they won't think "OH MY GOD MY CHILD INSULTS HIM EVERY DAY IN HORRIBLY DISGUSTING WAYS, HE CLEARLY STALKS THE LITTLE BOY!" Since the guy talked about "ideal punishment" it may not even be him showing up at the parent's doorstep, but maybe the police. No... I mean... how in the world did you get their phone number/etc. to contact them? They won't have any idea who you are so they may assume stalker. And if the 'insults' are from both ways... just has the potential to create a lot of complications that aren't necessary.
Silly boy, have you never heard of the almighty cyberpolice?
|
On July 24 2013 08:50 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 08:48 Paljas wrote:On July 24 2013 08:38 KwarK wrote:
Wasn't him. It was some ex warcraft 3 progamer with the id King.Crimson or AlexDeLarge. what are you referring to? He made a post about how he had a funny story about the time he raped a girl. He was removed from the tl community as an undesirable. Just an example of a ban for something off of tl, if you show yourself as an undesirable then whether or not it was on tl doesn't really matter.
well, its still not exactly the same to ban someone for a post he made on TL (like alexdelarge) or for something he said/did outside of TL.
but i dont really care, so whatever
|
On July 24 2013 09:19 Paljas wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 08:50 KwarK wrote:On July 24 2013 08:48 Paljas wrote:On July 24 2013 08:38 KwarK wrote:
Wasn't him. It was some ex warcraft 3 progamer with the id King.Crimson or AlexDeLarge. what are you referring to? He made a post about how he had a funny story about the time he raped a girl. He was removed from the tl community as an undesirable. Just an example of a ban for something off of tl, if you show yourself as an undesirable then whether or not it was on tl doesn't really matter. well, its still not exactly the same to ban someone for a post he made on TL (like alexdelarge) or for something he said/did outside of TL. but i dont really care, so whatever
I don't think it matters where it comes out that you have a heavily flawed character, if the people in charge (/the community) don't want that kind of character around.
|
On July 24 2013 09:31 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 09:19 Paljas wrote:On July 24 2013 08:50 KwarK wrote:On July 24 2013 08:48 Paljas wrote:On July 24 2013 08:38 KwarK wrote:
Wasn't him. It was some ex warcraft 3 progamer with the id King.Crimson or AlexDeLarge. what are you referring to? He made a post about how he had a funny story about the time he raped a girl. He was removed from the tl community as an undesirable. Just an example of a ban for something off of tl, if you show yourself as an undesirable then whether or not it was on tl doesn't really matter. well, its still not exactly the same to ban someone for a post he made on TL (like alexdelarge) or for something he said/did outside of TL. but i dont really care, so whatever I don't think it matters where it comes out that you have a heavily flawed character for it to matter, if the people in charge don't want that kind of character around.
his point was that the guy was banned for something he did on tl.net. he wrote a post about rape generally, threw in a "funny" anecdote about how he raped a girl and then later attempted to justify it when people justifiably called him out for it.
i should note though that tl.net has a no tolerance policy for hackers. they are routinely banned from the site once discovered regardless of activity on the site.
|
On July 24 2013 09:05 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 08:51 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 07:09 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:56 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 06:54 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:44 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 06:24 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:14 DeepElemBlues wrote:There's been bans for behavior outside of TL where the behavior of the person banned at TL itself was also dodgy and the outside TL shenanigans pushed it over the edge into bannination, KwarK has had a few of those I think. But bantage particularly or exclusively for being an asshole on B.Net or somewhere I don't think that has happened except for the examples phreak mentions. On July 24 2013 06:12 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 05:15 TotalBiscuit wrote:[quote] http://i.imgur.com/YvwROey.png < That's him, you can safely say he's just a shitty troll and won't be here for long. He needs some serious help. Yeah that's some volcano-rage craziness right there. Like Kwark banned people or WAS banned? Kwark has had a few people that harassed him outside of TL I believe. @Above poster ...no, just no... The other way around would have been so much more interestering. On July 24 2013 06:42 Eufouria wrote:On July 24 2013 05:33 TotalBiscuit wrote:On July 24 2013 05:32 AgentW wrote:On July 24 2013 05:18 farvacola wrote:
Wow, I don't know how you publically visible folk can even use twitter with people like that around. Completely agree. I'm sure this isn't the first one like that TB has received either. This is a daily thing, it's toothless bullshit from people whose only courage comes from sitting behind a keyboard. Wow, in general I'm against the idea of "making trolling illegal" and the recent crackdown there's been on it in the UK, but imo people who send messages like this just making personal attacks on others do deserve to be punished. My ideal punishments would be 1) Going round to their house and film them squirming as I explain who I am and then uploading it to reddit for the world to see what a coward they are. and 2) Contacting their parents and explaining what their child has been doing on the internet But no. 3 would be having them go to court and end up paying a fine or doing community service. Can't agree with 1 and 3, maybe #2 though if it's a child and what he or she has done was very severe. And get the parents concerned about a stalker on the internet or something? No thanks... I think when you show a parent screenshots about their child daily insulting a certain guy on twitter/youtube/whatever then they won't think "OH MY GOD MY CHILD INSULTS HIM EVERY DAY IN HORRIBLY DISGUSTING WAYS, HE CLEARLY STALKS THE LITTLE BOY!" Since the guy talked about "ideal punishment" it may not even be him showing up at the parent's doorstep, but maybe the police. No... I mean... how in the world did you get their phone number/etc. to contact them? They won't have any idea who you are so they may assume stalker. And if the 'insults' are from both ways... just has the potential to create a lot of complications that aren't necessary. Silly boy, have you never heard of the almighty cyberpolice?
The ones that backtrace you when you dun goofed?
|
On July 24 2013 09:35 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 09:31 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 09:19 Paljas wrote:On July 24 2013 08:50 KwarK wrote:On July 24 2013 08:48 Paljas wrote:On July 24 2013 08:38 KwarK wrote:
Wasn't him. It was some ex warcraft 3 progamer with the id King.Crimson or AlexDeLarge. what are you referring to? He made a post about how he had a funny story about the time he raped a girl. He was removed from the tl community as an undesirable. Just an example of a ban for something off of tl, if you show yourself as an undesirable then whether or not it was on tl doesn't really matter. well, its still not exactly the same to ban someone for a post he made on TL (like alexdelarge) or for something he said/did outside of TL. but i dont really care, so whatever I don't think it matters where it comes out that you have a heavily flawed character, if the people in charge don't want that kind of character around. his point was that the guy was banned for something he did on tl.net. he wrote a post about rape generally, threw in a "funny" anecdote about how he raped a girl and then later attempted to justify it when people justifiably called him out for it. i should note though that tl.net has a no tolerance policy for hackers. they are routinely banned from the site once discovered regardless of activity on the site.
I know what his point was, I was there when the guy was banned.
My point was that there's no reason to care wether he did it on TL or not, the point stands that such people shouldn't be here.
For clarification:
well, its still not exactly the same to ban someone for a post he made on TL (like alexdelarge) or for something he said/did outside of TL.
Malum est malum.
On July 24 2013 09:40 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 09:05 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 08:51 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 07:09 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:56 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 06:54 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:44 3FFA wrote:On July 24 2013 06:24 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 24 2013 06:14 DeepElemBlues wrote:There's been bans for behavior outside of TL where the behavior of the person banned at TL itself was also dodgy and the outside TL shenanigans pushed it over the edge into bannination, KwarK has had a few of those I think. But bantage particularly or exclusively for being an asshole on B.Net or somewhere I don't think that has happened except for the examples phreak mentions. On July 24 2013 06:12 3FFA wrote:
[quote]
He needs some serious help. Yeah that's some volcano-rage craziness right there. Like Kwark banned people or WAS banned? Kwark has had a few people that harassed him outside of TL I believe. @Above poster ...no, just no... The other way around would have been so much more interestering. On July 24 2013 06:42 Eufouria wrote:On July 24 2013 05:33 TotalBiscuit wrote:On July 24 2013 05:32 AgentW wrote:On July 24 2013 05:18 farvacola wrote:
Wow, I don't know how you publically visible folk can even use twitter with people like that around. Completely agree. I'm sure this isn't the first one like that TB has received either. This is a daily thing, it's toothless bullshit from people whose only courage comes from sitting behind a keyboard. Wow, in general I'm against the idea of "making trolling illegal" and the recent crackdown there's been on it in the UK, but imo people who send messages like this just making personal attacks on others do deserve to be punished. My ideal punishments would be 1) Going round to their house and film them squirming as I explain who I am and then uploading it to reddit for the world to see what a coward they are. and 2) Contacting their parents and explaining what their child has been doing on the internet But no. 3 would be having them go to court and end up paying a fine or doing community service. Can't agree with 1 and 3, maybe #2 though if it's a child and what he or she has done was very severe. And get the parents concerned about a stalker on the internet or something? No thanks... I think when you show a parent screenshots about their child daily insulting a certain guy on twitter/youtube/whatever then they won't think "OH MY GOD MY CHILD INSULTS HIM EVERY DAY IN HORRIBLY DISGUSTING WAYS, HE CLEARLY STALKS THE LITTLE BOY!" Since the guy talked about "ideal punishment" it may not even be him showing up at the parent's doorstep, but maybe the police. No... I mean... how in the world did you get their phone number/etc. to contact them? They won't have any idea who you are so they may assume stalker. And if the 'insults' are from both ways... just has the potential to create a lot of complications that aren't necessary. Silly boy, have you never heard of the almighty cyberpolice? The ones that backtrace you when you dun goofed?
^he's a sharp one
|
I was born in 1992, it be an honor to be banned now for 2 days, preferably by manifesto to bump his counter up because it's unacceptable for me that he was surpassed by Nyovne! 
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Germany25657 Posts
On July 24 2013 10:02 Kamais Ookin wrote:I was born in 1992, it be an honor to be banned now for 2 days, preferably by manifesto to bump his counter up because it's unacceptable for me that he was surpassed by Nyovne! User was temp banned for this post.
Hehehehe.
|
Thanks Plexa for the perm!
|
On July 24 2013 10:13 KadaverBB wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 10:02 Kamais Ookin wrote:I was born in 1992, it be an honor to be banned now for 2 days, preferably by manifesto to bump his counter up because it's unacceptable for me that he was surpassed by Nyovne! User was temp banned for this post. Hehehehe.
Kinda expected Nyovne to take that one.
DAMN YOU KADAVER!
|
On July 24 2013 10:15 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
Thanks Plexa for the perm!
I almost thought you were asking Plexa for a perm...
...then I re-read it.
Kadaver why so ban-greedy?
|
|
|
On July 24 2013 08:50 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2013 08:48 Paljas wrote:On July 24 2013 08:38 KwarK wrote:
Wasn't him. It was some ex warcraft 3 progamer with the id King.Crimson or AlexDeLarge. what are you referring to? He made a post about how he had a funny story about the time he raped a girl. He was removed from the tl community as an undesirable. Just an example of a ban for something off of tl, if you show yourself as an undesirable then whether or not it was on tl doesn't really matter.
Maybe you should add the requirements of sending a CV along a TL registration. Then, prospective users will be required to undergo a personal interview over teamspeak, psychological evaluation and play a game of their choice from what TL covers with an admin, to show if their playstyle fits the specifications.
I now regret that I have made all my online identitites easily linkable by a common username. Even though most of the thoughtcrime I have commited is not in English, translating options exist, so mods may easily find out that I do often use facebook to swear, rant angrily and express opinions against political correctness, feminism, religion and positive discrimination of pseudoracial minorities. Given that my real name is easy to find, a dedicated stalker can easily realize that I have been under investigation for libelous behaviuour on the internet. In fact, there is a whole webpage partly dedicated to expressing how big of an asshole I am (not kidding). Excuse me now while I crumble under fear.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.
I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
16608
1010
93
EPT
