• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:17
CEST 00:17
KST 07:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams7Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 724 users

The Automated Ban List - Page 1994

Forum Index > TL Community
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 3166 Next
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here.

Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue.

Keep it civil.

NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-24 17:34:09
July 24 2013 17:31 GMT
#39861
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

On July 25 2013 02:28 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


His point is that they never agreed to give you any rights, with or without money, nor did they force you anywhere to pay. In fact they tell you up front that you can still be banned like regular users.

they did agree to give you rights. it is irrelevant whether your payment was voluntary or involuntary; your legal rights dont change. they can ban you for tl.net rules; they cant ban you arbitrarily. they have to justify the revocation of the license; arbitrariness is against the law normally.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42653 Posts
July 24 2013 17:33 GMT
#39862
On July 25 2013 02:31 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

I don't believe we're in the business of selling licenses, no matter how much you keep repeating it.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-24 17:36:07
July 24 2013 17:35 GMT
#39863
On July 25 2013 02:29 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.

I'm not a lawyer but my understanding is that we ban tl+ members just as freely as we ban anyone else because nothing we sold guarantees posting. Fortunately we do have lawyers on tl who aren't me. You could ask them if you want, website feedback for example.
As part of the TL+ launch, we clearly stated:
So if I buy this, I can repeatedly insult the unwashed masses of normal users without fear of being banned?
No, you jerk. TL+ users will largely be moderated the same way as normal users, and will be held to the same posting standards. The TL+ private forums however may have slightly less strict moderation when it comes to thread and post content. If you buy TL+ for yourself or gift it to others, you are just purchasing some added features and access while supporting TL. It is not a get-out-of-ban free card or a way to feel superior to others.

You're probably more likely to be given a second chance/third chance/more lenient ban by being a TL+ member but this is not a hard and fast rule and does not mean we won't perm people if they are sufficiently detrimental to the community. If you wish to discuss the relationship between TL+ and being banned on TL then I suggest you post in website as opposed to the ABL thread.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-24 17:38:04
July 24 2013 17:36 GMT
#39864
On July 25 2013 02:33 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:31 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

I don't believe we're in the business of selling licenses, no matter how much you keep repeating it.

it is a license. not sure your legal training on the subject.

On July 25 2013 02:35 Plexa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:29 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.

I'm not a lawyer but my understanding is that we ban tl+ members just as freely as we ban anyone else because nothing we sold guarantees posting. Fortunately we do have lawyers on tl who aren't me. You could ask them if you want, website feedback for example.
As part of the TL+ launch, we clearly stated:
Show nested quote +
So if I buy this, I can repeatedly insult the unwashed masses of normal users without fear of being banned?
No, you jerk. TL+ users will largely be moderated the same way as normal users, and will be held to the same posting standards. The TL+ private forums however may have slightly less strict moderation when it comes to thread and post content. If you buy TL+ for yourself or gift it to others, you are just purchasing some added features and access while supporting TL. It is not a get-out-of-ban free card or a way to feel superior to others.

You're probably more likely to be given a second chance/third chance/more lenient ban by being a TL+ member but this is not a hard and fast rule and does not mean we won't perm people if they are sufficiently detrimental to the community. If you wish to discuss the relationship between TL+ and being banned on TL then I suggest you post in website as opposed to the ABL thread.

i said you cant be banned arbitrarily. the normals rules still apply.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42653 Posts
July 24 2013 17:36 GMT
#39865
On July 25 2013 02:36 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:33 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:31 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

I don't believe we're in the business of selling licenses, no matter how much you keep repeating it.

it is a license. not sure your legal training on the subject.

None at all.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 24 2013 17:37 GMT
#39866
On July 25 2013 02:33 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:31 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

I don't believe we're in the business of selling licenses, no matter how much you keep repeating it.

You are accepting money for features that are not available to free users. I am not sure what a judge would call TL+, but their relationship to TL is different that a menmber who does not have TL+, legally speaking. Everything changes once you start accepting peoples money, no matter what you call it.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42653 Posts
July 24 2013 17:40 GMT
#39867
On July 25 2013 02:36 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:33 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:31 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

I don't believe we're in the business of selling licenses, no matter how much you keep repeating it.

it is a license. not sure your legal training on the subject.

Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:35 Plexa wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:29 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.

I'm not a lawyer but my understanding is that we ban tl+ members just as freely as we ban anyone else because nothing we sold guarantees posting. Fortunately we do have lawyers on tl who aren't me. You could ask them if you want, website feedback for example.
As part of the TL+ launch, we clearly stated:
So if I buy this, I can repeatedly insult the unwashed masses of normal users without fear of being banned?
No, you jerk. TL+ users will largely be moderated the same way as normal users, and will be held to the same posting standards. The TL+ private forums however may have slightly less strict moderation when it comes to thread and post content. If you buy TL+ for yourself or gift it to others, you are just purchasing some added features and access while supporting TL. It is not a get-out-of-ban free card or a way to feel superior to others.

You're probably more likely to be given a second chance/third chance/more lenient ban by being a TL+ member but this is not a hard and fast rule and does not mean we won't perm people if they are sufficiently detrimental to the community. If you wish to discuss the relationship between TL+ and being banned on TL then I suggest you post in website as opposed to the ABL thread.

i said you cant be banned arbitrarily. the normals rules still apply.

All bans on tl are arbitrary and always have been. You do not need to be shown to be in breach of a specific rule to be banned, the rules are to help the users understand the conduct we wish from them and the community of tl, they are not an aid to moderation. Bans happen because a moderator has decided that you should be banned.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-24 17:44:04
July 24 2013 17:41 GMT
#39868
On July 25 2013 02:36 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:33 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:31 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

I don't believe we're in the business of selling licenses, no matter how much you keep repeating it.

it is a license. not sure your legal training on the subject.

Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:35 Plexa wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:29 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.

I'm not a lawyer but my understanding is that we ban tl+ members just as freely as we ban anyone else because nothing we sold guarantees posting. Fortunately we do have lawyers on tl who aren't me. You could ask them if you want, website feedback for example.
As part of the TL+ launch, we clearly stated:
So if I buy this, I can repeatedly insult the unwashed masses of normal users without fear of being banned?
No, you jerk. TL+ users will largely be moderated the same way as normal users, and will be held to the same posting standards. The TL+ private forums however may have slightly less strict moderation when it comes to thread and post content. If you buy TL+ for yourself or gift it to others, you are just purchasing some added features and access while supporting TL. It is not a get-out-of-ban free card or a way to feel superior to others.

You're probably more likely to be given a second chance/third chance/more lenient ban by being a TL+ member but this is not a hard and fast rule and does not mean we won't perm people if they are sufficiently detrimental to the community. If you wish to discuss the relationship between TL+ and being banned on TL then I suggest you post in website as opposed to the ABL thread.

i said you cant be banned arbitrarily. the normals rules still apply.

We don't ban users on TL "arbitrarily". We ban them for good reason. If you feel like this is not the case then, again, website feedback is the way to go.
On July 25 2013 02:40 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:36 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:33 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:31 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
[quote]

I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

I don't believe we're in the business of selling licenses, no matter how much you keep repeating it.

it is a license. not sure your legal training on the subject.

On July 25 2013 02:35 Plexa wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:29 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.

I'm not a lawyer but my understanding is that we ban tl+ members just as freely as we ban anyone else because nothing we sold guarantees posting. Fortunately we do have lawyers on tl who aren't me. You could ask them if you want, website feedback for example.
As part of the TL+ launch, we clearly stated:
So if I buy this, I can repeatedly insult the unwashed masses of normal users without fear of being banned?
No, you jerk. TL+ users will largely be moderated the same way as normal users, and will be held to the same posting standards. The TL+ private forums however may have slightly less strict moderation when it comes to thread and post content. If you buy TL+ for yourself or gift it to others, you are just purchasing some added features and access while supporting TL. It is not a get-out-of-ban free card or a way to feel superior to others.

You're probably more likely to be given a second chance/third chance/more lenient ban by being a TL+ member but this is not a hard and fast rule and does not mean we won't perm people if they are sufficiently detrimental to the community. If you wish to discuss the relationship between TL+ and being banned on TL then I suggest you post in website as opposed to the ABL thread.

i said you cant be banned arbitrarily. the normals rules still apply.

All bans on tl are arbitrary and always have been. You do not need to be shown to be in breach of a specific rule to be banned, the rules are to help the users understand the conduct we wish from them and the community of tl, they are not an aid to moderation. Bans happen because a moderator has decided that you should be banned.

This is also true. It's not how I would look at it, but you can see things this way. Our bans are always motivated by some action(s) users have conducted, as such I don't think they are arbitrary in the sense that we're randomly banning users. But at the same time they are arbitrary because, as Kwark said, we don't have to illustrate that a user has broken any particular rule to ban.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-24 17:43:06
July 24 2013 17:42 GMT
#39869
i am going to listen to plexa.

edit: well i was, until this gem came up.

On July 25 2013 02:41 Plexa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:36 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:33 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:31 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
[quote]

I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

I don't believe we're in the business of selling licenses, no matter how much you keep repeating it.

it is a license. not sure your legal training on the subject.

On July 25 2013 02:35 Plexa wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:29 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.

I'm not a lawyer but my understanding is that we ban tl+ members just as freely as we ban anyone else because nothing we sold guarantees posting. Fortunately we do have lawyers on tl who aren't me. You could ask them if you want, website feedback for example.
As part of the TL+ launch, we clearly stated:
So if I buy this, I can repeatedly insult the unwashed masses of normal users without fear of being banned?
No, you jerk. TL+ users will largely be moderated the same way as normal users, and will be held to the same posting standards. The TL+ private forums however may have slightly less strict moderation when it comes to thread and post content. If you buy TL+ for yourself or gift it to others, you are just purchasing some added features and access while supporting TL. It is not a get-out-of-ban free card or a way to feel superior to others.

You're probably more likely to be given a second chance/third chance/more lenient ban by being a TL+ member but this is not a hard and fast rule and does not mean we won't perm people if they are sufficiently detrimental to the community. If you wish to discuss the relationship between TL+ and being banned on TL then I suggest you post in website as opposed to the ABL thread.

i said you cant be banned arbitrarily. the normals rules still apply.

We don't ban users on TL "arbitrarily". We ban them for good reason. If you feel like this is not the case then, again, website feedback is the way to go.

On July 25 2013 02:40 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:36 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:33 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:31 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:26 SilentchiLL wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
[quote]

I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.


How do people get banned in World of Warcraft?

PS: http://www.teamliquid.net/tou/

they get banned for violating the terms of service. tl.net can do the same here. i never said they couldnt ban people. i said they cant ban people for arbitrary rules (at least legally). those terms you cited me are pre-tl+ by the way. different rules apply when you sell licenses.

I don't believe we're in the business of selling licenses, no matter how much you keep repeating it.

it is a license. not sure your legal training on the subject.

On July 25 2013 02:35 Plexa wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:29 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:22 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 25 2013 02:09 KwarK wrote:
On July 25 2013 01:52 dAPhREAk wrote:
On July 24 2013 23:37 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.


I think in general people tend to forget that while the forum is public and open for registration, being a member is still a privilege and not a right.


actually, its a right now for those carrying tl+. they commercialized it and the same arbitrary rules cant apply to paying members.

On July 24 2013 20:17 marvellosity wrote:
On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


I agree with this, I'm surprised others don't. This is TL's house after all, they choose who enters and stays.

the problem is with the enforcement. this has already been abused once, and then overturned by an admin.

Not the case actually. Tl+ membership entitles you to read the tl+ forums, report other users, PM multiple people at once and a few other things. Nowhere in there is the right to post sold. A banned account can still read the forums and I believe still report people. Tl+ members have not bought the right to post with their membership and can be banned just as freely as anyone else.
Furthermore there isn't a rule saying you can be banned for something outside of tl because there doesn't need to be one because you don't have to break a specific rule to have your posting rights revoked. The moderation team are entrusted with using their judgement as they see fit to keep this community the way they feel it should be. Rules are a useful way of communicating what that vision is but certainly do not bind the moderation team. This isn't a court and you don't have rights, we don't need to prove that you've broken the tl contract because there is no tl contract, you do not own tl nor have any rights to it.

i hope you're not legal counsel to tl.net. you don't get to do whatever you want once you start offering paid memberships. the argument that you can revoke their posting privileges because its not part of tl+ is lame, and i would love to see someone argue that in a court of law. the tl+ benefits are in addition to what people already have. you cant say "i'll let you keep the 'filter' button but i am going to prevent you from posting or looking at our website other than what is specifically laid out in the tl+ post."

some of us are customers now, and are entitled to additional rights beyond that which normal users are entitled. if tl.net wants to join the real world of commercialization, it should learn the rules.

edit: i shouldnt say tl.net, because this is not tl.net speaking, its just you.

I'm not a lawyer but my understanding is that we ban tl+ members just as freely as we ban anyone else because nothing we sold guarantees posting. Fortunately we do have lawyers on tl who aren't me. You could ask them if you want, website feedback for example.
As part of the TL+ launch, we clearly stated:
So if I buy this, I can repeatedly insult the unwashed masses of normal users without fear of being banned?
No, you jerk. TL+ users will largely be moderated the same way as normal users, and will be held to the same posting standards. The TL+ private forums however may have slightly less strict moderation when it comes to thread and post content. If you buy TL+ for yourself or gift it to others, you are just purchasing some added features and access while supporting TL. It is not a get-out-of-ban free card or a way to feel superior to others.

You're probably more likely to be given a second chance/third chance/more lenient ban by being a TL+ member but this is not a hard and fast rule and does not mean we won't perm people if they are sufficiently detrimental to the community. If you wish to discuss the relationship between TL+ and being banned on TL then I suggest you post in website as opposed to the ABL thread.

i said you cant be banned arbitrarily. the normals rules still apply.

All bans on tl are arbitrary and always have been. You do not need to be shown to be in breach of a specific rule to be banned, the rules are to help the users understand the conduct we wish from them and the community of tl, they are not an aid to moderation. Bans happen because a moderator has decided that you should be banned.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42653 Posts
July 24 2013 17:44 GMT
#39870
I believe we're using arbitrarily differently. My final sentence clarifies my point.
"Bans happen because a moderator has decided that you should be banned."
That basically agrees with Plexa, that if a moderator feels he has reason to ban you then you get banned. Mods have the power to judge you.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
July 24 2013 17:44 GMT
#39871
Our ideas are compatible, just depends on your definition/application of arbitrary. Read my edit.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
July 24 2013 17:52 GMT
#39872
On July 25 2013 02:44 KwarK wrote:
I believe we're using arbitrarily differently. My final sentence clarifies my point.
"Bans happen because a moderator has decided that you should be banned."
That basically agrees with Plexa, that if a moderator feels he has reason to ban you then you get banned. Mods have the power to judge you.

I think dAPhREAk, who is an attorney, is trying to politely tell you that standard would not hold up in court. When you start accepting money, you create a contract of some sort and there are things are and are not allowed in a contract. I am not a huge expert on what makes a contract invalid, but in general you can’t deny someone a service they paid for “because someone on our staff said so”. I know you folks have other reasons for banning people and he is saying you should stick to the one expressly stated in the terms of using the site, rather than a moderators decision that the person “doesn’t fit”.

As someone who works for attorneys all day, if they say something is a bad idea, it is generally a good idea to listen to them on the subject. I don’t think it will ever be an issue for TL, since the amounts of money are so small.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
SilentchiLL
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany1405 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-24 17:58:37
July 24 2013 17:57 GMT
#39873
On July 25 2013 02:52 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2013 02:44 KwarK wrote:
I believe we're using arbitrarily differently. My final sentence clarifies my point.
"Bans happen because a moderator has decided that you should be banned."
That basically agrees with Plexa, that if a moderator feels he has reason to ban you then you get banned. Mods have the power to judge you.

I think dAPhREAk, who is an attorney, is trying to politely tell you that standard would not hold up in court. When you start accepting money, you create a contract of some sort and there are things are and are not allowed in a contract. I am not a huge expert on what makes a contract invalid, but in general you can’t deny someone a service they paid for “because someone on our staff said so”. I know you folks have other reasons for banning people and he is saying you should stick to the one expressly stated in the terms of using the site, rather than a moderators decision that the person “doesn’t fit”.

As someone who works for attorneys all day, if they say something is a bad idea, it is generally a good idea to listen to them on the subject. I don’t think it will ever be an issue for TL, since the amounts of money are so small.


So in the end he's right if no reason in the rules can be used to ban somebody because he got banned for something not in the rules?
Solution?
Just state in the terms of use and in the tl+ conditions that behaviour deemed unacceptable by an admin can result in a ban even if no rule was directly broken, that should cover behaviour in- and outside of TL.

Problem solved, time to post this and chuckle
[image loading]
:D

EDIT: I hate the fact that I keep on laughing about my own jokes, but this was even funnier than the first time it was posted, for me.
possum, sed nolo - Real men play random. ___ "Who the fuck is Kyle?!" C*****EX
ComaDose
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Canada10357 Posts
July 24 2013 18:02 GMT
#39874
I bet you could get banned for sueing teamliquid.
good.
BW pros training sc2 is like kiss making a dub step album.
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11320 Posts
July 24 2013 18:32 GMT
#39875
On July 25 2013 03:02 ComaDose wrote:
I bet you could get banned for sueing teamliquid.
good.


You probably would.
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
Oukka
Profile Blog Joined September 2012
Finland1683 Posts
July 24 2013 18:53 GMT
#39876
So I come to TL and see 120+ posts in ABL and then I see this thread. 1+1=2 doesn't it?

Apparently not, I think there was only two bans in the whole thread.

I'm interested in what got this "i zig zag around you" guy nuked, as I see only this temp ban here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422475&currentpage=5#96

I guess the final reason was some PM with moderation, but there is also a PBUish feel in him, seeing how he's had the account for 3 weeks and posts in places where I would not dare to venture after such a short membership.
I play children's card games and watch a lot of dota, CS and HS
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11320 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-24 19:02:31
July 24 2013 19:02 GMT
#39877
On July 25 2013 03:53 Oukka wrote:
So I come to TL and see 120+ posts in ABL and then I see this thread. 1+1=2 doesn't it?

Apparently not, I think there was only two bans in the whole thread.

I'm interested in what got this "i zig zag around you" guy nuked, as I see only this temp ban here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422475&currentpage=5#96

I guess the final reason was some PM with moderation, but there is also a PBUish feel in him, seeing how he's had the account for 3 weeks and posts in places where I would not dare to venture after such a short membership.


Trolling would be my guess? He's pretty much trying with every post to start something.
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
KadaverBB
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany25657 Posts
July 24 2013 19:09 GMT
#39878
He sent me some rather funny (terribly stupid) PM's and also had a bunch of alternate accounts which are now banned as well.
AdministratorLaws change depending on who's making them, but justice is justice
packrat386
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States5077 Posts
July 24 2013 19:11 GMT
#39879
On July 25 2013 04:09 KadaverBB wrote:
He sent me some rather funny (terribly stupid) PM's and also had a bunch of alternate accounts which are now banned as well.

Oh the joys of TL trolls.
dreaming of a sunny day
MasterOfPuppets
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Romania6942 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-07-24 19:16:39
July 24 2013 19:16 GMT
#39880
On July 25 2013 03:53 Oukka wrote:
So I come to TL and see 120+ posts in ABL and then I see this thread. 1+1=2 doesn't it?

Apparently not, I think there was only two bans in the whole thread.

I'm interested in what got this "i zig zag around you" guy nuked, as I see only this temp ban here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422475&currentpage=5#96

I guess the final reason was some PM with moderation, but there is also a PBUish feel in him, seeing how he's had the account for 3 weeks and posts in places where I would not dare to venture after such a short membership.


Looks like you haven't read those 120+ posts. But it's ok, here's the most important part regarding zig zag:

On July 24 2013 08:15 KwarK wrote:
If you show that you're not the kind of person we'd like to have here at tl then I see absolutely no reason why we'd keep you here just because you didn't do it on tl itself. We either want you here or you don't, there's no "don't want you but technically we can't do anything". A few years ago there was a guy recounting how he raped a girl on tl, the fact that the rape happened in real life didn't make him any less distasteful or make me want him on the website more.


Him on Twitter
"my shaft scares me too" - strenx 2014
Prev 1 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 3166 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12h 43m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 215
StarCraft: Brood War
ivOry 10
Dota 2
monkeys_forever809
League of Legends
Dendi917
syndereN152
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1537
Stewie2K1005
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken54
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu598
Other Games
summit1g8099
FrodaN3245
tarik_tv1803
C9.Mang0208
PPMD37
ViBE10
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 56
• davetesta49
• musti20045 39
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 48
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade579
Other Games
• imaqtpie1592
• Shiphtur408
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
12h 43m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
15h 43m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 11h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
CSO Cup
1d 17h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.