The Automated Ban List - Page 1455

On October 17 2012 05:58 dAPhREAk wrote:

there is a delay with search. it takes awhile (i think around 15 minutes) before you can search for someone's recent posts.

On October 17 2012 06:07 BlasterCannons wrote:


Well TL obviously didn't teach you to spell....its "overreacting" not "overacting".

Also not every thing that has a learning curve is worth learning.....Only a loser would think learning how to interact with other losers on a website that facilitate losers at life is a worthwhile thing to learn.....Go learn how to be a mechanic or an engineer or something........fuck me but you guys are just beyond pathetic, implying that its an accomplishment to overcome "the learning curve" to posting properly on TL.....fuck that, I'll post how I want. "Posting properly" has no rewards and its fuckin boring. Get a life man.

On October 17 2012 06:07 BlasterCannons wrote:


Well TL obviously didn't teach you to spell....its "overreacting" not "overacting".

Also not every thing that has a learning curve is worth learning.....Only a loser would think learning how to interact with other losers on a website that facilitate losers at life is a worthwhile thing to learn.....Go learn how to be a mechanic or an engineer or something........fuck me but you guys are just beyond pathetic, implying that its an accomplishment to overcome "the learning curve" to posting properly on TL.....fuck that, I'll post how I want. "Posting properly" has no rewards and its fuckin boring. Get a life man.

On October 17 2012 05:44 jdseemoreglass wrote:

A GOP candidate? What the hell are you talking about? lol.

On October 17 2012 06:32 turdburgler wrote:


you, you flip flop harder than anyone on TV then make 'sarcastic' posts defending 'merica.

On October 17 2012 06:25 dAPhREAk wrote:
when you nuke someone does it nuke all of their posts, or do you have to go through each and nuke them separately?

On October 17 2012 07:47 Grobyc wrote:

It nukes all of their posts at once.

On October 17 2012 07:52 dAPhREAk wrote:

if that is true then why wont the admins nuke people's posts when they request a permban and that their entire history be removed from the site? someone asked that in the "ask anything" thread and i recall the response was that it would screw up the site if they deleted all the posts. cant recall whether an admin/mod answered or a user since everyone feels entitled to respond in that thread.

i guess if you want to remove your history spam advertising everywhere!!!!

On October 17 2012 07:56 monk. wrote:

Not sure if admins can do it, but regular banlings are limited to nuking low post count users.

On October 17 2012 05:58 dAPhREAk wrote:

there is a delay with search. it takes awhile (i think around 15 minutes) before you can search for someone's recent posts.

On October 17 2012 09:24 Grobyc wrote:

http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=375889#2

Note that post is the first reply to his own blog.

I was actually expecting it to be more than a week for that. I mean I'd expect a week for a first offense, but he edited his post after the mod edit at least once. I mean how can you be so idiotic...

On October 17 2012 09:58 turdburgler wrote:


i love that its now quite the mystery trying to work out exactly what happened.

whats real? whats fake? nobody knows anymore.

its not rape if she agreed to it.

On October 17 2012 13:59 MountainDewJunkie wrote:
StateofReverie, the pathological liar and active blogger, but still somehow bearable self-proclaimed college burner, was temp banned today


This was posted in the troll thread about Stephano being a rapist. Now, SoR was probably on a short leash, but even in the context, the post is technically correct. It is not rape if she agrees, that's just consensual sex, right? Maybe it's just a touchy subject because the completely baseless accusation is that said fictional girl is legally too young. I browsed around a little more, but was unable to put two and two together on why SoR fell in this manner. Such a waste! You'd thing he'd have slipped up in his own blogs.

its not rape if she agreed to it.

On October 17 2012 15:05 wongfeihung wrote:

Well, you see, there is this thing called statutory rape (sexual acts with a minor). So, yes, it is rape, even if she agreed to it. So, even in context, the post is technically incorrect. And I'm not sure if someone spreading misinformation along the lines of:
is allowed on this site, in the off chance that someone might take this statement seriously.

I suppose there are a couple of TL Commandments that he may have violated too (3rd and 5th? Maybe the last line of the 1st commandment, as well). I think posting doodoo-quality one-liners would fall under these commandments.

Also, as you said, he was likely on a short leash. Perhaps someone was just looking for an opportunity.