On July 22 2012 06:21 Pitrocelli wrote: When will they finally pull Day9 out of main stream ?
I am thinking about dedicating my life to training so i can reach tournament he casts and punch him in the face during interview.
So many great games ruined by his douche way of casting, ignoring his cocasters comments half the time.
User was temp banned for this post.
Damn...someone has some pent up aggression against Sean. Wouldn't it be weird though if he ACTUALLY followed through with it and years later there is a story about some guy punching Day during an interview?
maybe then when people talk about day9 we will finally have a new story to replace the masturbation story
Which one?
Also, why the hell did he think that he could say that any where. That was stupid and f taken seriously could be illegal (depending on location and judge) Besides day is ginormous, and works out, i don't think that would be the best idea.
On July 22 2012 06:21 Pitrocelli wrote: When will they finally pull Day9 out of main stream ?
I am thinking about dedicating my life to training so i can reach tournament he casts and punch him in the face during interview.
So many great games ruined by his douche way of casting, ignoring his cocasters comments half the time.
User was temp banned for this post.
Damn...someone has some pent up aggression against Sean. Wouldn't it be weird though if he ACTUALLY followed through with it and years later there is a story about some guy punching Day during an interview?
maybe then when people talk about day9 we will finally have a new story to replace the masturbation story
Which one?
Also, why the hell did he think that he could say that any where. That was stupid and f taken seriously could be illegal (depending on location and judge) Besides day is ginormous, and works out, i don't think that would be the best idea.
the one where he said he jacked off in/with a wicker basket i imagine
haha, he got unbanned. daphreak with those baller lawyer skills. I admit my huge bias for TL/mods, especially because their bans (deserved or not) can be pretty hilarious, and whatever concept of equality and/or justice I have flies out the window when faced with that combination winkwink. The first amendment lawyer protecting hate speech is a better comparison but one of the comparisons I thought of was the lawyer who defended Michael Jackson :S
I recognize Aeroplaneoverthesea too. Guess he got shot down :o
On July 22 2012 05:32 solidbebe wrote: I guess it's just that you don't want that kind of people on TL anyway, even if they haven't behaved badly on TL yet, you've seen their true colors and are banning them pre-emptively. 'Officially' it's wrong I guess, but logically it makes alot of sense to me.
drink that kool-aid. its not like tl.net has featured streamers abusing people even more seriously than what happened to ares, right? oh look, its idra with 4k viewers to my right, and im sure we can all name a lot more. its a double standard.
puppykiller was just temp banned for 2 days by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2009-08-05 05:02:09 and had 1107 posts.
Reason: dont play pvt like a jerk.
lol. this was even more petty.
I saw that happen live and about died. Within 3 seconds of losing the game he had found the guy on TL and banned him.
I still think the Ares[Effort] ban was fine. TL is a StarCraft community site, and if you want to crap up the StarCraft 2 community then I see no problem with you getting temp banned from a community site for it. We have no problem when they ban hackers (crapping on the community in game), or Deezer or Combat Ex or whatever.
On July 22 2012 11:07 jalstar wrote: andaylin is unbanned, aeroplaneoverthesea is banned.
Aeroplaneoverthesea was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2012-04-26 05:34:32 and had 1109 posts.
Reason: Whining about TvZ and generally negative attitude in a LR thread. Stop being so critical of everything and enjoy the games.
Oh Aeroplaneoverthesea,
There's probably not a single user on TL I hate more. I remember catching one of his first posts so I PMed him to tell him he had a cool username (it's after the song by Neutral Milk Hotel); I didn't get a response. Ever since then I have noticed his posts - though it would be hard not to because his negative comments draw so much attention.
I always hate it when assholes or bots or whatever steal good names or have bad ass references in their name as Aeroplaneoverthesea had. Oh well.
On July 22 2012 14:30 Little Rage Box wrote: Why don't you just climb back into that shit hole called Europe and leave us to take care of ourselves.
See you in a week.
I love it when people live up to their usernames.
EDIT: Holy shit ninja'd so badly.
On July 22 2012 21:48 Iyerbeth wrote:
I still think the Ares[Effort] ban was fine. TL is a StarCraft community site, and if you want to crap up the StarCraft 2 community then I see no problem with you getting temp banned from a community site for it. We have no problem when they ban hackers (crapping on the community in game), or Deezer or Combat Ex or whatever.
There's precedent for it anyway. Plexa banned someone in the exact same way, for the exact same reasons.... except the guy he banned was a total douchebag, far more than what Ares[Effort] had to deal with.
I can't find that Plexa ban at the moment, but I promise you it's there somewhere.
On July 22 2012 21:48 Iyerbeth wrote: I still think the Ares[Effort] ban was fine. TL is a StarCraft community site, and if you want to crap up the StarCraft 2 community then I see no problem with you getting temp banned from a community site for it. We have no problem when they ban hackers (crapping on the community in game), or Deezer or Combat Ex or whatever.
they arent cleaning up battle.net though. they are using their mod abilities on tl.net to settle petty squabbles they are involved in on battle.net. this ban wasn't a result of someone being a dick on battle.net--something tl.net mods don't care about and occurs on featured streams--this ban was a result of someone being a dick to a tl.net mod on battle.net, which was presumably completely unrelated to tl.net. its a double standard, and petty.
if someone goes on battle.net, recognizes a tl.net mod and then abuses the shit out of them, ban them. no problem with that because its related to tl.net. otherwise, address the problem through battle.net's moderation system, or act like an adult and click block communication.
this is my initial response to your post and others like it:
On July 22 2012 05:32 solidbebe wrote: I guess it's just that you don't want that kind of people on TL anyway, even if they haven't behaved badly on TL yet, you've seen their true colors and are banning them pre-emptively. 'Officially' it's wrong I guess, but logically it makes alot of sense to me.
drink that kool-aid. its not like tl.net has featured streamers abusing people even more seriously than what happened to ares, right? oh look, its idra with 4k viewers to my right, and im sure we can all name a lot more. its a double standard.
puppykiller was just temp banned for 2 days by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2009-08-05 05:02:09 and had 1107 posts.
I still think the Ares[Effort] ban was fine. TL is a StarCraft community site, and if you want to crap up the StarCraft 2 community then I see no problem with you getting temp banned from a community site for it. We have no problem when they ban hackers (crapping on the community in game), or Deezer or Combat Ex or whatever.
There's precedent for it anyway. Plexa banned someone in the exact same way, for the exact same reasons.... except the guy he banned was a total douchebag, far more than what Ares[Effort] had to deal with.
I can't find that Plexa ban at the moment, but I promise you it's there somewhere.
Yeah, this happened.
On April 06 2010 17:18 TL.net Bot wrote: Perimeter was just banned by Plexa.
That account was created on 2010-02-25 08:20:28 and had 6 posts.
On July 22 2012 21:48 Iyerbeth wrote: I still think the Ares[Effort] ban was fine. TL is a StarCraft community site, and if you want to crap up the StarCraft 2 community then I see no problem with you getting temp banned from a community site for it. We have no problem when they ban hackers (crapping on the community in game), or Deezer or Combat Ex or whatever.
they arent cleaning up battle.net though. they are using their mod abilities on tl.net to settle petty squabbles they are involved in on battle.net. this ban wasn't a result of someone being a dick on battle.net--something tl.net mods don't care about and occurs on featured streams--this ban was a result of someone being a dick to a tl.net mod on battle.net, which was presumably completely unrelated to tl.net. its a double standard, and petty.
if someone goes on battle.net, recognizes a tl.net mod and then abuses the shit out of them, ban them. no problem with that because its related to tl.net. otherwise, address the problem through battle.net's moderation system, or act like an adult and click block communication.
this is my initial response to your post and others like it:
Ignoring your rather stupid, and entirely unnecesary (slightly hypocritical) insult at the end, I simply disagree with your post. First, I actually wouldn''t care if it was a double standard but as I stated in the post you replied to it's not even a double standard. There are bans for all sorts of things, and for people who act like morons whenever a mod see's it. We've had at least one YouTube comment ban even. If I ran a community site and I knew for a fact that there were undesirable people on it I'd at least temporarily remove them too.
Further, being an adult has nothing to do with it. People are ignored because it's the only thing that definately works, not because it's the only thing that should. You can feel as smug as you like about ignoring them and leaving a festering, diseased membrane of pond scum (to be clear, refering more generally here to the more exteme childish trolls who should be permanantly removed as an example, not to any individual user I'm currently aware of) polluting both this site as well as the game we love, it doesn't make your position correct or the most mature, it just makes it the least controversial.
On July 22 2012 21:48 Iyerbeth wrote: I still think the Ares[Effort] ban was fine. TL is a StarCraft community site, and if you want to crap up the StarCraft 2 community then I see no problem with you getting temp banned from a community site for it. We have no problem when they ban hackers (crapping on the community in game), or Deezer or Combat Ex or whatever.
they arent cleaning up battle.net though. they are using their mod abilities on tl.net to settle petty squabbles they are involved in on battle.net. this ban wasn't a result of someone being a dick on battle.net--something tl.net mods don't care about and occurs on featured streams--this ban was a result of someone being a dick to a tl.net mod on battle.net, which was presumably completely unrelated to tl.net. its a double standard, and petty.
if someone goes on battle.net, recognizes a tl.net mod and then abuses the shit out of them, ban them. no problem with that because its related to tl.net. otherwise, address the problem through battle.net's moderation system, or act like an adult and click block communication.
this is my initial response to your post and others like it:
Ignoring your rather stupid, and entirely unnecesary (slightly hypocritical) insult at the end, I simply disagree with your post. First, I actually wouldn''t care if it was a double standard but as I stated in the post you replied to it's not even a double standard. There are bans for all sorts of things, and for people who act like morons whenever a mod see's it. We've had at least one YouTube comment ban even. If I ran a community site and I knew for a fact that there were undesirable people on it I'd at least temporarily remove them too.
Further, being an adult has nothing to do with it. People are ignored because it's the only thing that definately works, not because it's the only thing that should. You can feel as smug as you like about ignoring them and leaving a festering, diseased membrane of pond scum (to be clear, refering more generally here to the more exteme childish trolls who should be permanantly removed as an example, not to any individual user I'm currently aware of) polluting both this site as well as the game we love, it doesn't make your position correct or the most mature, it just makes it the least controversial.
america acting as the world police seems entirely relevant to the suggestion that tl.net mods should moderate battle.net.
On July 22 2012 21:48 Iyerbeth wrote: I still think the Ares[Effort] ban was fine. TL is a StarCraft community site, and if you want to crap up the StarCraft 2 community then I see no problem with you getting temp banned from a community site for it. We have no problem when they ban hackers (crapping on the community in game), or Deezer or Combat Ex or whatever.
they arent cleaning up battle.net though. they are using their mod abilities on tl.net to settle petty squabbles they are involved in on battle.net. this ban wasn't a result of someone being a dick on battle.net--something tl.net mods don't care about and occurs on featured streams--this ban was a result of someone being a dick to a tl.net mod on battle.net, which was presumably completely unrelated to tl.net. its a double standard, and petty.
if someone goes on battle.net, recognizes a tl.net mod and then abuses the shit out of them, ban them. no problem with that because its related to tl.net. otherwise, address the problem through battle.net's moderation system, or act like an adult and click block communication.
this is my initial response to your post and others like it:
Ignoring your rather stupid, and entirely unnecesary (slightly hypocritical) insult at the end, I simply disagree with your post. First, I actually wouldn''t care if it was a double standard but as I stated in the post you replied to it's not even a double standard. There are bans for all sorts of things, and for people who act like morons whenever a mod see's it. We've had at least one YouTube comment ban even. If I ran a community site and I knew for a fact that there were undesirable people on it I'd at least temporarily remove them too.
Further, being an adult has nothing to do with it. People are ignored because it's the only thing that definately works, not because it's the only thing that should. You can feel as smug as you like about ignoring them and leaving a festering, diseased membrane of pond scum (to be clear, refering more generally here to the more exteme childish trolls who should be permanantly removed as an example, not to any individual user I'm currently aware of) polluting both this site as well as the game we love, it doesn't make your position correct or the most mature, it just makes it the least controversial.
america acting as the world police seems entirely relevant to the suggestion that tl.net mods should moderate battle.net.
TL mods don't moderate battle.net, these guys can keep on playing and trolling there all they want, they were banned from TL, not battle.net. This is TL's house. This is not your house. This is not my house. If you or I get flamed, then we can ban them from OUR forums-- it's nothing awful or world policing, it's house keeping.
There's no double standard. There is only one standard: The first commandment.
i'm just glad that ares re-thought the ban, or someone more level headed decided that is not the direction they want to take tl.net moderation. the horse has been beaten. i am in abl irc chat if you want to discuss further.
EPT
I remember that. I remember Kiante laughing his ass off.
![[image loading]](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PghqjRgS4sA/TDaNZ5QPBaI/AAAAAAAAALU/E6oykSwhtSQ/s1600/20070425095734501.jpg)
![[image loading]](/staff/Plexa/sc2_reps/peri1.png)
![[image loading]](/staff/Plexa/sc2_reps/peri2.png)
![[image loading]](/staff/Plexa/sc2_reps/peri3.png)
![[image loading]](http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTM2Nzc4NjYxMV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTM1MTcyMQ@@._V1._SY317_CR6,0,214,317_.jpg)
