|
On February 13 2011 10:28 Spazer wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2011 04:18 Hidden_MotiveS wrote:Why is it that, whenever I click the spoiler button or quote button to insert the quote or spoiler tags, the tags always go to the end of my post, rather than to my cursor? I'm looking at you Rich  IIRC, this question has been asked before, and the answer was something along the lines of "it's more complicated than you think". Just type a letter and highlight that before you push the spoiler/quote button. It's pretty simple, just hasn't been done yet. It's on the todo list!
You can highlight text and then hit spoiler/quote though.
|
It's a general standard of TeamLiquid moderators that repeat violations of the Ten Commandments will result in harsher penalties (in that a user previously warned for, say, posting a meme will have a more drastic punishment for a repeat offense than someone who posts a meme without prior incident). However, I'd like to know: do warnings always play a role in future moderation, or is there a "dropoff" point where a warning was given so long ago that another offense will not be amplified by it?
For example, let's say that a new TL poster, Joe, signs up, and gets warned for posting a fairly hostile comment around his 50th post. Now fast forward three years; Joe is now a 10,000 post veteran of the site, with no other warnings or bans – he has been a model poster since that first incident. For whatever reason, Joe gets mad enough at someone to post another hostile comment. A moderator or admin sees this post, and is faced with the task of dispensing some sort of punishment. Is that 50-post warning irrelevant due to the time passed without conflict, or is the fact that Joe was warned at all enough to prompt a more stringent form of discipline?
I suppose the TL;DR here is: Are warnings and bans put on a user's "permanent record" that cannot ever be erased or disregarded?
|
Braavos36372 Posts
On February 13 2011 10:32 Pokebunny wrote: What's the exchange rate of ESPORTS dollars and Ansadi dollars? What's the ratio of Stanley nickels to Schrute bucks?
|
On February 13 2011 11:38 SonuvBob wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2011 10:28 Spazer wrote:On February 13 2011 04:18 Hidden_MotiveS wrote:Why is it that, whenever I click the spoiler button or quote button to insert the quote or spoiler tags, the tags always go to the end of my post, rather than to my cursor? I'm looking at you Rich  IIRC, this question has been asked before, and the answer was something along the lines of "it's more complicated than you think". Just type a letter and highlight that before you push the spoiler/quote button. It's pretty simple, just hasn't been done yet. It's on the todo list! You can highlight text and then hit spoiler/quote though.
the cross browser compatible version of getCarat
function getCaret(el) { if (el.selectionStart) { return el.selectionStart; } else if (document.selection) { el.focus();
var r = document.selection.createRange(); if (r == null) { return 0; }
var re = el.createTextRange(), rc = re.duplicate(); re.moveToBookmark(r.getBookmark()); rc.setEndPoint('EndToStart', re);
return rc.text.length; } return 0; }
then in the addUBB_selected function that you're currently using, use:
function addUBB_selected(a,d){var c=document.getElementById(a),b=c.scrollTop,f=c.scrollLeft,e=getUserSelection(c);if(e.length==0)c.value=c.value.substring(0,getCaret(c))+"["+d+"][/"+d+"]"+c.value.substring(getCaret(c));else setUserSelection(c,"["+d+"]"+e+"[/"+d+"]");c.scrollTop=b;c.scrollLeft=f}
there!
|
Is there any tasks that the staff hate doing the most?
|
Are there any banned members that some of the staff miss? I miss MarklarMarklar and JensofSweden/Foucault.
|
United States12607 Posts
On February 13 2011 11:40 Aeres wrote: I suppose the TL;DR here is: Are warnings and bans put on a user's "permanent record" that cannot ever be erased or disregarded? the simple answer is yes, because all warnings and bans are recorded permanently and mods look at them before taking any other action against the warned/banned user. But — of course — the longer ago prior warnings/bans are (both in time and post count) the less important they are and the less weight mods put on them when considering a new ban. Safe to say, if you have one months-old, several-hundred-posts-old ban it's not going to make you at all susceptible to harsher mod action (maybe excepting if you've done the same exact thing that got you that old ban).
|
MarklarMarklar WAS pretty amusing.
|
On February 13 2011 12:26 JWD wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2011 11:40 Aeres wrote: I suppose the TL;DR here is: Are warnings and bans put on a user's "permanent record" that cannot ever be erased or disregarded? the simple answer is yes, because all warnings and bans are recorded permanently and mods look at them before taking any other action against the warned/banned user. But — of course — the longer ago prior warnings/bans are (both in time and post count) the less important they are and the less weight mods put on them when considering a new ban. Safe to say, if you have one months-old, several-hundred-posts-old ban it's not going to make you at all susceptible to harsher mod action (maybe excepting if you've done the same exact thing that got you that old ban).
So basically the last time you have had a punishment or warning can be a mitigating factor for when a mod/banling considers a suitable punishment to your offense (I think I'm using that term right).
|
United States12607 Posts
On February 13 2011 12:32 Torte de Lini wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2011 12:26 JWD wrote:On February 13 2011 11:40 Aeres wrote: I suppose the TL;DR here is: Are warnings and bans put on a user's "permanent record" that cannot ever be erased or disregarded? the simple answer is yes, because all warnings and bans are recorded permanently and mods look at them before taking any other action against the warned/banned user. But — of course — the longer ago prior warnings/bans are (both in time and post count) the less important they are and the less weight mods put on them when considering a new ban. Safe to say, if you have one months-old, several-hundred-posts-old ban it's not going to make you at all susceptible to harsher mod action (maybe excepting if you've done the same exact thing that got you that old ban). So basically the last time you have had a punishment or warning can be a mitigating factor for when a mod/banling considers a suitable punishment to your offense (I think I'm using that term right). The fact that the ban/warning is a long time ago is a mitigating factor. The ban/warning itself is obviously an aggravating factor (but less so if it's long ago).
|
On February 13 2011 12:39 JWD wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2011 12:32 Torte de Lini wrote:On February 13 2011 12:26 JWD wrote:On February 13 2011 11:40 Aeres wrote: I suppose the TL;DR here is: Are warnings and bans put on a user's "permanent record" that cannot ever be erased or disregarded? the simple answer is yes, because all warnings and bans are recorded permanently and mods look at them before taking any other action against the warned/banned user. But — of course — the longer ago prior warnings/bans are (both in time and post count) the less important they are and the less weight mods put on them when considering a new ban. Safe to say, if you have one months-old, several-hundred-posts-old ban it's not going to make you at all susceptible to harsher mod action (maybe excepting if you've done the same exact thing that got you that old ban). So basically the last time you have had a punishment or warning can be a mitigating factor for when a mod/banling considers a suitable punishment to your offense (I think I'm using that term right). The fact that the ban/warning is a long time ago is a mitigating factor. The ban/warning itself is obviously an aggravating factor (but less so if it's long ago).
I guess I misworded myself, but essentially, yeah that's what I meant (thanks).
|
On February 13 2011 12:32 Zona wrote: MarklarMarklar WAS pretty amusing.
Pic for reference in spoiler ^^
+ Show Spoiler +
|
Is there anyways that I can contact "THE MODS"? This is the closest I've found...
Anyways, I'd just like to apologize for my "meme/4chan crap", I'm working on stop it, it is really hard tho. I guess I'm just too used to poorly moderated forums. Good Job to you guys by the way.
|
how many beauty contests has JWD won?
|
Braavos36372 Posts
I was walking down the street with JWD and girls were literally throwing themselves at him, all "hey JWD!!! can I be in your next blog!??"
|
I knew it >.>
It's a miracle we've been able to tie him down to TL rather than letting him get it in 24/7
|
Are there any TL staff members that DON'T play SC2 but still played BW?
|
Will TL.net continue to host tlopens regularly after the TSL qualifiers have finished? (for funs sake;))
|
Baltimore, USA22250 Posts
On February 13 2011 21:44 KezseN wrote: Are there any TL staff members that DON'T play SC2 but still played BW?
Me! But it's not that I have anything in particular against SC2, it's just my current computer doesn't play it all that well. 
|
On February 13 2011 21:44 KezseN wrote: Are there any TL staff members that DON'T play SC2 but still played BW?
Mani..He probably has sc2, but from his posts it seems he mainly plays bw.
|
|
|
|