EPTOn September 21 2013 00:37 Wabbit wrote:
Underline mine. I think that part is very debatable, because objectively the measured response times of C-PVA are.....really slow. But, this is a good thing. If you're happy with that, you'd be in no way bothered by the much-better motion of AMVA as WomWomWom said. Yeah it sucks that you had to figure out that viewing angles of IPS aren't as important to you as black depth since you're used to *VA, but at least you now know.
Underline mine. I think that part is very debatable, because objectively the measured response times of C-PVA are.....really slow. But, this is a good thing. If you're happy with that, you'd be in no way bothered by the much-better motion of AMVA as WomWomWom said. Yeah it sucks that you had to figure out that viewing angles of IPS aren't as important to you as black depth since you're used to *VA, but at least you now know.
Even still - the OP needs to be aware of the compromises you have to accept going with a *VA panel:
EtherealDeath - see two examples of gamma shifting below:
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1034392199&postcount=2490
http://www.toastyx.net/va-test.png (Open this full-view - my 2405 fails this test hard, while my IPS has no problems)
+ Show Spoiler +
For more info, go to this thread:
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1036408218#post1036408218
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1036408218#post1036408218
This is the kind of compromise you will have to accept if you want to stick to a *VA panel for your black crush desires haha. IMO, gamma shift is like a classier form of reduced viewing angles
I've owned a 2405 for 8 years (PVA panel) and I simply tolerated it because it was such a great deal back in 2005. In 2013 though, you can and should be far more discerning because of the choices available today.
