• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:26
CEST 01:26
KST 08:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall5HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL36Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster14Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? StarCraft Mass Recall: SC1 campaigns on SC2 thread How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
$5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29) WardiTV Mondays SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall Help: rep cant save Where did Hovz go?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] ProLeague LB Final - Saturday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Trading/Investing Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 596 users

5.0.11 Patch Released - Balance Changes - Page 7

Forum Index > SC2 General
223 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 12 Next All
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-25 21:03:03
January 25 2023 20:53 GMT
#121
On January 26 2023 02:04 InfCereal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 01:49 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 26 2023 01:46 InfCereal wrote:
On January 26 2023 01:42 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 25 2023 23:47 InfCereal wrote:
On January 25 2023 23:42 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 25 2023 23:18 RiSkysc2 wrote:
On January 25 2023 22:27 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 25 2023 09:16 RiSkysc2 wrote:
On January 24 2023 07:49 Charoisaur wrote:
Yeah letting pros handle patches is just a bad idea, they clearly have a conflict of interest regarding balancing the game which results in the race that has the most influential community members getting all the buffs. Shameful



Protoss has the most players in the balance discord by far and every change is voted on. Every player from the Dreamhack regionals and GSL is in the balance discord (or invited and declined) and thus protoss has the most representation.


So yeah there's no zerg cabal.

I mean, can you really with a straight face say Zerg isn't getting preferential treatment by the balance team and that for a long time now?
In 2019 there was one super tournament in which Protoss was doing really well and Protoss got immediately nerfed. Zerg has been dominating for 5 years and have never really been nerfed for it. All the nerfs they have received have either been counter-acted by buffs / nerfs to the other races or were extremely inconsequential.
And now they are pushing a very Zerg favored patch 2 weeks before IEM Katowice, can you imagine that happening for Terran or Protoss?
Honestly, I don't know what's the reason for this, if Zergs have conspired to get favorable balance, if certain decision-makers at Blizzard like Zerg, if they want Serral and Reynor to perform well or if Terrans and Protoss players are just too polite to vocally voice their opinion. However it's so clear that Zerg is getting preferential treatment by the balance team that I honestly think you are just arguing in bad faith if you try to deny this.



[image loading]


Answer my question:

I mean, can you really with a straight face say Zerg isn't getting preferential treatment by the balance team and that for a long time now?



I know it's a classic to attack the person instead of the argument when you have no arguments left


Zerg isn't getting preferential treatment

So you think if Protoss would win 50% of tournaments they wouldn't be getting nerfed?



Reynor mentioned this in his stream the other day - to him this patch is more about breathing life back into the game, not about making drastic game altering changes.

A Zerg player happy about the patch? I'm so surprised.


Won't answer to the mental gymnastics of you trying to argue one race winning 50% of tournaments is fine. We both know you'd be up in arms about it if your race was on the other side.


I don't know how you can argue about tournament winners when serral has won 89 of the 201 tournaments he's even participated in.

source: (Wiki)Serral/Results

1 person fucks up your entire arguement

To copy a popular post off the reddit

When you remove the top player of each race (Serral, herO, Maru):

Terran wins almost nothing.

Protoss wins absolutely nothing.

Zerg still wins the last 8 world championships (even the 2 that Serral won were off the back of ZvZ).

The idea that "It's just Serral" is completely stupid. How anyone can say that while terran and protoss success is much, much, more dependant on just one player. herO and Maru are bigger outliers than Serral has ever been.
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
moonsjde
Profile Joined October 2022
48 Posts
January 25 2023 20:54 GMT
#122
On January 26 2023 05:52 Sogetsu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 05:46 moonsjde wrote:
so, aside from all the boring balance whine from the same 3 people who have arguing on here for 15 years...

is there anything to try out or do differently with toss now in any matchup? new builds or strats? because it seems like mostly the plan is to play exactly the same except our tech is weaker

the only thing i can think of is maybe with ravager morph time being substantially longer there's a bigger window to do soul trains/force field based aggression again, which could be really cool, but haven't had a chance to test it out yet.


Better and earlier scout based on Sentries which can be used for some pushes later abusing ForceFields.
Since the Ravager takes longer to morph the Force Fields will be better offensive and deffensive wise.
Also the speedier Observer to keep as well scouting and denying creep.
Maybe better use on Archons to counter Mutas (which I used to play a Zealot Templar Archon build en PvZ super good time ago)
Now you need to micro better the Carriers and the Disruptors because of the nerfs.

There are changes that can't be analyzed on a vaccum, you need to wait to also see what other races go for and change.

not asking anyone to analyze in a vacuum, i'm interested in people's play experience as the patch is live and presumably streamers have been showing gameplay as well.
[Phantom]
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
Mexico2170 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-25 21:21:41
January 25 2023 21:13 GMT
#123
On January 26 2023 05:46 moonsjde wrote:
so, aside from all the boring balance whine from the same 3 people who have arguing on here for 15 years...

is there anything to try out or do differently with toss now in any matchup? new builds or strats? because it seems like mostly the plan is to play exactly the same except our tech is weaker

the only thing i can think of is maybe with ravager morph time being substantially longer there's a bigger window to do soul trains/force field based aggression again, which could be really cool, but haven't had a chance to test it out yet.


You do raise a good point. This change doesn't give Protoss any chance for new and cool strategies. Even the stasis guard was nerfed under the guise of Quality of life changes. (Now it has more priority, and you can tell your units to do something after the stasis ends. So if you got all your workers in stasis like a noob, you don't need to wait until the stasis finishes to send them to mine, which is ridiculous).

There's only 1 type of strategy this patch promotes for Protoss: all ins, thanks to the upgrade buffs.

What I've been doing is just all ining everyone with +1 mass zealot with sentries to FF ramps ala early WOL Or +2 mass zealot archon all in. At least in pvz.

After all that's what the balance team wants us to do.

The upgrade buffs literally have no effect unless you're all ining or your opponent is doing a timing push. If you don't attack when you get your upgrades or attack later than 10 seconds after they finish then the "buff" is meaningless as you'd have the upgrade anyway by then in the previous patch, and what remains are just nerfs to the mid/lategame like you say.

With this strategy and the sheer power of my hatred for Zerg i've been able to maintain my pvz winrate, but we'll see how it goes after a while.

Regrettably Protoss can't enjoy a macro game anymore,
So when you zergs are dying to shitty protoss all ins, don't you dare complain. You brought this on yourselves.
WriterTeamLiquid Staff writer since 2014 @Mortal_Phantom
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
January 25 2023 21:25 GMT
#124
On January 26 2023 06:13 [Phantom] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 05:46 moonsjde wrote:
so, aside from all the boring balance whine from the same 3 people who have arguing on here for 15 years...

is there anything to try out or do differently with toss now in any matchup? new builds or strats? because it seems like mostly the plan is to play exactly the same except our tech is weaker

the only thing i can think of is maybe with ravager morph time being substantially longer there's a bigger window to do soul trains/force field based aggression again, which could be really cool, but haven't had a chance to test it out yet.

There's only 1 type of strategy this patch promotes for Protoss: all ins, thanks to the upgrade buffs.


Regrettably Protoss can't enjoy a macro game anymore,
So when you zergs are dying to shitty protoss all ins, don't you dare complain. You brought this on yourselves.


This kind of meta is something a lot of people don't realise. If protoss is allin-ing every game that doesn't mean the allins are imba, it means that playing lategame is suicide.

Years ago when proxy every game was the meta in TvP it wasn't because they were imba either, it was because no one wanted to play macro.

Inevitably protoss will go 2 base or 3 base allin every game, and zerg will complain these allins are overpowered even if protoss wins one tournament every year.
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
moonsjde
Profile Joined October 2022
48 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-25 21:32:02
January 25 2023 21:31 GMT
#125
On January 26 2023 06:25 Fango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 06:13 [Phantom] wrote:
On January 26 2023 05:46 moonsjde wrote:
so, aside from all the boring balance whine from the same 3 people who have arguing on here for 15 years...

is there anything to try out or do differently with toss now in any matchup? new builds or strats? because it seems like mostly the plan is to play exactly the same except our tech is weaker

the only thing i can think of is maybe with ravager morph time being substantially longer there's a bigger window to do soul trains/force field based aggression again, which could be really cool, but haven't had a chance to test it out yet.

There's only 1 type of strategy this patch promotes for Protoss: all ins, thanks to the upgrade buffs.


Regrettably Protoss can't enjoy a macro game anymore,
So when you zergs are dying to shitty protoss all ins, don't you dare complain. You brought this on yourselves.


This kind of meta is something a lot of people don't realise. If protoss is allin-ing every game that doesn't mean the allins are imba, it means that playing lategame is suicide.

Years ago when proxy every game was the meta in TvP it wasn't because they were imba either, it was because no one wanted to play macro.

Inevitably protoss will go 2 base or 3 base allin every game, and zerg will complain these allins are overpowered even if protoss wins one tournament every year.

i simply don't understand why we can't have a protoss ground army that can do work at 4+ bases in pvz. every time they want to buff toss it's "void rays are faster now, carriers are better now" and when they want to nerf us they just nerf air back in the other direction. skytoss is notorious for being anti-fun at all levels, so why is it so often used as the crux of toss balance? this is for years now

this is why for SC3 i want separate air supply. i've been saying it for years and think it would improve every matchup and every race. air should be limited to like 30-50 supply and it should be separate from main supply. delete mass capital ships, mass muta, mass phoenix - all things that are silly, unfun, and either stomp or get stomped by nature, but keep the incentive to build a sensible amount of air by giving it separate supply. it seems obvious to me at this point!
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15918 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-25 22:18:09
January 25 2023 22:12 GMT
#126
On January 26 2023 04:38 Glorfindelio wrote:
Man, these forums have really turned into cancer, as they're dominated by like the same 4-5 bad faith posters making the same tired arguments. Pretty sad, considering browsing these forums used to be really enjoyable.

Also, balance has certainly tended to tilt toward Zerg at various points, but the largest factor in their dominance boils down to:

They have the largest pool of remaining S-tier talent and have for YEARS. At various points, Terran lost Innovation/TY and Protoss lost Stats, SoS, Classic (yes he's been back but not the same), Zest, and Trap. Zerg only had to say goodbye to Soo (and recently Rogue). Also, Rogue, Serral, Dark and Reynor are all-time SC2 talents, and have remained titans throughout the duration of their careers, with Rogue/Serral as GOAT contenders. These days, Terran and Protoss have only 1 realistic contender in Maru/Hero.

The era of Zerg dominance started in 2019 when almost all those players were still active. Barely any of the players you mentioned were winning tournaments in the months/ the year before they retired
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Athenau
Profile Joined March 2015
569 Posts
January 25 2023 22:23 GMT
#127
Cyclone change still isn't in btw.
CicadaSC
Profile Joined January 2018
United States1597 Posts
January 25 2023 22:33 GMT
#128
On January 26 2023 07:23 Athenau wrote:
Cyclone change still isn't in btw.

and it wont ever be in.
Remember that we all come from a place of passion!!
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-25 23:08:32
January 25 2023 23:08 GMT
#129
On January 26 2023 05:06 ZeroByte13 wrote:
And your argument for why top-4 zerg are so much better than Bunny and Cure is.... because they win more?
They win so much because they're so good, and the proof of them being super good is "because they win so much"?
Is this correct?

What if Bunny is better than Serral, and he's just being held back by balance all these 5 last years?

You'll say "don't be silly, Serral is obviously much better than Bunny".
But give marines +15 hp (breaking the balance) and top-5 terrans (including Bunny) will win most of the tournaments.
And then I'll say it's because they're just better than other players.
How would you prove it's not the case and there's a problem with game balance?


I like this comment, because it highlights how 'impossible' it is for anyone to really claim much regarding the importance of player skill vs balance when it comes to the success / lack of success regarding players and races.
It's fairly reasonable to say that it could be that the top zerg players are actually more talented than the players of other races in an environment where basically no new talent is entering the scene anymore (or that there are more of them at least). It's also reasonable to think that even if this was true, that zerg could still be the race which allows player skill to shine the most / make it the easiest to be competitive on the regular (so maybe the most forgiving race when it comes to errors which could lose a game on the spot, stuff like that).

There isn't any particular proof for any position, it's all just interpretations of the scenario we have and had for the past few years.

I personally think that zerg is the race which allows someone like serral to be as dominant as he is / was. I don't think we'd talk about serral in the same way if he played toss or terran. Does that mean zerg is op? Depends on what you think op signals.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
CicadaSC
Profile Joined January 2018
United States1597 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-25 23:18:17
January 25 2023 23:17 GMT
#130
On January 26 2023 08:08 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 05:06 ZeroByte13 wrote:
And your argument for why top-4 zerg are so much better than Bunny and Cure is.... because they win more?
They win so much because they're so good, and the proof of them being super good is "because they win so much"?
Is this correct?

What if Bunny is better than Serral, and he's just being held back by balance all these 5 last years?

You'll say "don't be silly, Serral is obviously much better than Bunny".
But give marines +15 hp (breaking the balance) and top-5 terrans (including Bunny) will win most of the tournaments.
And then I'll say it's because they're just better than other players.
How would you prove it's not the case and there's a problem with game balance?


I like this comment, because it highlights how 'impossible' it is for anyone to really claim much regarding the importance of player skill vs balance when it comes to the success / lack of success regarding players and races.
It's fairly reasonable to say that it could be that the top zerg players are actually more talented than the players of other races in an environment where basically no new talent is entering the scene anymore (or that there are more of them at least). It's also reasonable to think that even if this was true, that zerg could still be the race which allows player skill to shine the most / make it the easiest to be competitive on the regular (so maybe the most forgiving race when it comes to errors which could lose a game on the spot, stuff like that).

There isn't any particular proof for any position, it's all just interpretations of the scenario we have and had for the past few years.

I personally think that zerg is the race which allows someone like serral to be as dominant as he is / was. I don't think we'd talk about serral in the same way if he played toss or terran. Does that mean zerg is op? Depends on what you think op signals.


your argument should mean zerg is op to any sane person. If zerg has the tools to make you the best player in the world, and the other two races do not, then by default it is the strongest race. strongest ≠ easiest
Remember that we all come from a place of passion!!
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
January 25 2023 23:37 GMT
#131
On January 26 2023 08:17 CicadaSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 08:08 The_Red_Viper wrote:
On January 26 2023 05:06 ZeroByte13 wrote:
And your argument for why top-4 zerg are so much better than Bunny and Cure is.... because they win more?
They win so much because they're so good, and the proof of them being super good is "because they win so much"?
Is this correct?

What if Bunny is better than Serral, and he's just being held back by balance all these 5 last years?

You'll say "don't be silly, Serral is obviously much better than Bunny".
But give marines +15 hp (breaking the balance) and top-5 terrans (including Bunny) will win most of the tournaments.
And then I'll say it's because they're just better than other players.
How would you prove it's not the case and there's a problem with game balance?


I like this comment, because it highlights how 'impossible' it is for anyone to really claim much regarding the importance of player skill vs balance when it comes to the success / lack of success regarding players and races.
It's fairly reasonable to say that it could be that the top zerg players are actually more talented than the players of other races in an environment where basically no new talent is entering the scene anymore (or that there are more of them at least). It's also reasonable to think that even if this was true, that zerg could still be the race which allows player skill to shine the most / make it the easiest to be competitive on the regular (so maybe the most forgiving race when it comes to errors which could lose a game on the spot, stuff like that).

There isn't any particular proof for any position, it's all just interpretations of the scenario we have and had for the past few years.

I personally think that zerg is the race which allows someone like serral to be as dominant as he is / was. I don't think we'd talk about serral in the same way if he played toss or terran. Does that mean zerg is op? Depends on what you think op signals.


your argument should mean zerg is op to any sane person. If zerg has the tools to make you the best player in the world, and the other two races do not, then by default it is the strongest race. strongest ≠ easiest


Well my position mainly focuses on the idea that i think there would be no way for a terran or toss to be as consistent. I think the other races have an easier time losing even if played on a very high level. Though in that scenario it might still be true that terran or toss played on the highest achievable level by a person would be stronger.
People don't play at 100% at all times, the meta shifts too and potentially forces people into decision spaces which are more vulnerable than others / produce higher variances in outcomes, etc.
I don't think it is particularly clear what people even really mean when they talk about a race being OP.

But yeah, i'd generally agree with you that i'd call zerg op in the sense that it seems to allow strong players to be more consistent than similarly strong players of other races. But i also cannot prove that serral isn't just better than maru for example, whatever 'better' would even mean outside of their particular skills with their race. It seems like an easy conversation, but it really isn't.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Draddition
Profile Joined February 2014
United States59 Posts
January 25 2023 23:52 GMT
#132
On January 26 2023 06:13 [Phantom] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 05:46 moonsjde wrote:
so, aside from all the boring balance whine from the same 3 people who have arguing on here for 15 years...

is there anything to try out or do differently with toss now in any matchup? new builds or strats? because it seems like mostly the plan is to play exactly the same except our tech is weaker

the only thing i can think of is maybe with ravager morph time being substantially longer there's a bigger window to do soul trains/force field based aggression again, which could be really cool, but haven't had a chance to test it out yet.


You do raise a good point. This change doesn't give Protoss any chance for new and cool strategies. Even the stasis guard was nerfed under the guise of Quality of life changes. (Now it has more priority, and you can tell your units to do something after the stasis ends. So if you got all your workers in stasis like a noob, you don't need to wait until the stasis finishes to send them to mine, which is ridiculous).

There's only 1 type of strategy this patch promotes for Protoss: all ins, thanks to the upgrade buffs.

What I've been doing is just all ining everyone with +1 mass zealot with sentries to FF ramps ala early WOL Or +2 mass zealot archon all in. At least in pvz.

After all that's what the balance team wants us to do.

The upgrade buffs literally have no effect unless you're all ining or your opponent is doing a timing push. If you don't attack when you get your upgrades or attack later than 10 seconds after they finish then the "buff" is meaningless as you'd have the upgrade anyway by then in the previous patch, and what remains are just nerfs to the mid/lategame like you say.

With this strategy and the sheer power of my hatred for Zerg i've been able to maintain my pvz winrate, but we'll see how it goes after a while.

Regrettably Protoss can't enjoy a macro game anymore,
So when you zergs are dying to shitty protoss all ins, don't you dare complain. You brought this on yourselves.


That... isn't how this change works. The upgrade changes impact each subsequent upgrade as well. So +1 now comes out 7 seconds sooner, +2 comes out 16 seconds sooner (9 + 7), +3 comes out 26.7 seconds sooner (16 + 10.7). So +3 is hitting almost 30 seconds earlier than it did on the previous patch. Not that its a common build, but you could now get to 3/3 over 50 seconds sooner if you're working with a single forge.

I know most of this thread doesn't understand the concept, but also keep in mind that the late game doesn't happen in a vacuum, especially vs Zerg. Have efficient early fights vs Zerg means less drones early + more resources lost. All this is going to add up throughout a game, eventually limiting the resources zerg has to play with.
moonsjde
Profile Joined October 2022
48 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-26 01:50:03
January 26 2023 01:45 GMT
#133
On January 26 2023 08:52 Draddition wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 06:13 [Phantom] wrote:
On January 26 2023 05:46 moonsjde wrote:
so, aside from all the boring balance whine from the same 3 people who have arguing on here for 15 years...

is there anything to try out or do differently with toss now in any matchup? new builds or strats? because it seems like mostly the plan is to play exactly the same except our tech is weaker

the only thing i can think of is maybe with ravager morph time being substantially longer there's a bigger window to do soul trains/force field based aggression again, which could be really cool, but haven't had a chance to test it out yet.


You do raise a good point. This change doesn't give Protoss any chance for new and cool strategies. Even the stasis guard was nerfed under the guise of Quality of life changes. (Now it has more priority, and you can tell your units to do something after the stasis ends. So if you got all your workers in stasis like a noob, you don't need to wait until the stasis finishes to send them to mine, which is ridiculous).

There's only 1 type of strategy this patch promotes for Protoss: all ins, thanks to the upgrade buffs.

What I've been doing is just all ining everyone with +1 mass zealot with sentries to FF ramps ala early WOL Or +2 mass zealot archon all in. At least in pvz.

After all that's what the balance team wants us to do.

The upgrade buffs literally have no effect unless you're all ining or your opponent is doing a timing push. If you don't attack when you get your upgrades or attack later than 10 seconds after they finish then the "buff" is meaningless as you'd have the upgrade anyway by then in the previous patch, and what remains are just nerfs to the mid/lategame like you say.

With this strategy and the sheer power of my hatred for Zerg i've been able to maintain my pvz winrate, but we'll see how it goes after a while.

Regrettably Protoss can't enjoy a macro game anymore,
So when you zergs are dying to shitty protoss all ins, don't you dare complain. You brought this on yourselves.


That... isn't how this change works. The upgrade changes impact each subsequent upgrade as well. So +1 now comes out 7 seconds sooner, +2 comes out 16 seconds sooner (9 + 7), +3 comes out 26.7 seconds sooner (16 + 10.7). So +3 is hitting almost 30 seconds earlier than it did on the previous patch. Not that its a common build, but you could now get to 3/3 over 50 seconds sooner if you're working with a single forge.

I know most of this thread doesn't understand the concept, but also keep in mind that the late game doesn't happen in a vacuum, especially vs Zerg. Have efficient early fights vs Zerg means less drones early + more resources lost. All this is going to add up throughout a game, eventually limiting the resources zerg has to play with.

but what "efficient early fights" can protoss have while playing a macro game against a passive zerg? even low level zergs are mechanically proficient against pretty much every build these days. charge, glaives, archon drop, oracle - all of these builds require protoss to find a "gotcha" moment in the zergs defense which is just very uncommon these days when walking onto creep into 8 queens. gateway allins are often defended unscouted. blink can theoretically win games with efficient grinding but it's insanely taxing mechanically and if your tempo slips at any point/you don't know the timings perfectly you are probably dead

i think protoss players want to be active on the map, want to take fights with blink and forcefields, want to gain tempo with gateway skirmishes, etc. that's the more fun way to play! but the margin of error for doing damage is insanely narrow, and if you mess up an attack on creep you don't get a second chance, so people go straight to skytoss for stability. IMO ravagers always deleted the forcefield too easily from the very beginning, but because forcefields had an "abusive/feelsbad" reputation they were afraid to re-tune them into relevance

i get it, people hate splash damage, they hate skytoss, they hate forcefields. but when you take away these tools one by one and don't compensate by making low tech units stronger you end up with a neutered race that needs things like shield battery overcharge to survive while doing anything, and they're nerfing the battery too, so... i don't get it, how do you win if your compositins are never going to be efficient fast enough?
tigera6
Profile Joined March 2021
3341 Posts
January 26 2023 02:41 GMT
#134
On January 26 2023 02:43 InfCereal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 02:21 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 26 2023 02:04 InfCereal wrote:
On January 26 2023 01:49 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 26 2023 01:46 InfCereal wrote:
On January 26 2023 01:42 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 25 2023 23:47 InfCereal wrote:
On January 25 2023 23:42 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 25 2023 23:18 RiSkysc2 wrote:
On January 25 2023 22:27 Charoisaur wrote:
[quote]
I mean, can you really with a straight face say Zerg isn't getting preferential treatment by the balance team and that for a long time now?
In 2019 there was one super tournament in which Protoss was doing really well and Protoss got immediately nerfed. Zerg has been dominating for 5 years and have never really been nerfed for it. All the nerfs they have received have either been counter-acted by buffs / nerfs to the other races or were extremely inconsequential.
And now they are pushing a very Zerg favored patch 2 weeks before IEM Katowice, can you imagine that happening for Terran or Protoss?
Honestly, I don't know what's the reason for this, if Zergs have conspired to get favorable balance, if certain decision-makers at Blizzard like Zerg, if they want Serral and Reynor to perform well or if Terrans and Protoss players are just too polite to vocally voice their opinion. However it's so clear that Zerg is getting preferential treatment by the balance team that I honestly think you are just arguing in bad faith if you try to deny this.



[image loading]


Answer my question:

I mean, can you really with a straight face say Zerg isn't getting preferential treatment by the balance team and that for a long time now?



I know it's a classic to attack the person instead of the argument when you have no arguments left


Zerg isn't getting preferential treatment

So you think if Protoss would win 50% of tournaments they wouldn't be getting nerfed?



Reynor mentioned this in his stream the other day - to him this patch is more about breathing life back into the game, not about making drastic game altering changes.

A Zerg player happy about the patch? I'm so surprised.


Won't answer to the mental gymnastics of you trying to argue one race winning 50% of tournaments is fine. We both know you'd be up in arms about it if your race was on the other side.


I don't know how you can argue about tournament winners when serral has won 89 of the 201 tournaments he's even participated in.

source: (Wiki)Serral/Results

1 person fucks up your entire arguement


and Reynor and Dark and Rogue.
Weird how when Zerg is dominating Zerg players are just better but it's different when another race dominates


No, not like reynor, dark, and rogue.

Serral's combined Premier/Major medal count is 66 top 3 finishes.

For comparison:

Rogue: 30
Dark: 41
Reynor: 33

Maru: 48
Byun: 33
Innovation: 41

herO: 32
neeb: 51
Zest: 39

I don't understand how you people can't just like... go to liquipedia yourselves and see that the game's pretty fucking balanced, and serral's an enormous outlier.

How many of those tournaments are won by Serral when he had no real competition in the WCS/EU scene. I would do the same medal count but starting from late 2019/ early 2020 after Clem and Reynor has arrived.
CicadaSC
Profile Joined January 2018
United States1597 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-26 03:19:43
January 26 2023 03:19 GMT
#135
On January 26 2023 11:41 tigera6 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 02:43 InfCereal wrote:
On January 26 2023 02:21 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 26 2023 02:04 InfCereal wrote:
On January 26 2023 01:49 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 26 2023 01:46 InfCereal wrote:
On January 26 2023 01:42 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 25 2023 23:47 InfCereal wrote:
On January 25 2023 23:42 Charoisaur wrote:
On January 25 2023 23:18 RiSkysc2 wrote:
[quote]


[image loading]


Answer my question:

I mean, can you really with a straight face say Zerg isn't getting preferential treatment by the balance team and that for a long time now?



I know it's a classic to attack the person instead of the argument when you have no arguments left


Zerg isn't getting preferential treatment

So you think if Protoss would win 50% of tournaments they wouldn't be getting nerfed?



Reynor mentioned this in his stream the other day - to him this patch is more about breathing life back into the game, not about making drastic game altering changes.

A Zerg player happy about the patch? I'm so surprised.


Won't answer to the mental gymnastics of you trying to argue one race winning 50% of tournaments is fine. We both know you'd be up in arms about it if your race was on the other side.


I don't know how you can argue about tournament winners when serral has won 89 of the 201 tournaments he's even participated in.

source: (Wiki)Serral/Results

1 person fucks up your entire arguement


and Reynor and Dark and Rogue.
Weird how when Zerg is dominating Zerg players are just better but it's different when another race dominates


No, not like reynor, dark, and rogue.

Serral's combined Premier/Major medal count is 66 top 3 finishes.

For comparison:

Rogue: 30
Dark: 41
Reynor: 33

Maru: 48
Byun: 33
Innovation: 41

herO: 32
neeb: 51
Zest: 39

I don't understand how you people can't just like... go to liquipedia yourselves and see that the game's pretty fucking balanced, and serral's an enormous outlier.

How many of those tournaments are won by Serral when he had no real competition in the WCS/EU scene. I would do the same medal count but starting from late 2019/ early 2020 after Clem and Reynor has arrived.


this might be the funniest misrepresentation of stastics ive ever seen. and sorry i just realized i quoted the wrong message, i meant the guy you were replying to. This suggest Neeb is the best protoss when half his medals are probably from NA region locked tournaments.
Remember that we all come from a place of passion!!
Draddition
Profile Joined February 2014
United States59 Posts
January 26 2023 03:55 GMT
#136
On January 26 2023 10:45 moonsjde wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 08:52 Draddition wrote:
On January 26 2023 06:13 [Phantom] wrote:
On January 26 2023 05:46 moonsjde wrote:
so, aside from all the boring balance whine from the same 3 people who have arguing on here for 15 years...

is there anything to try out or do differently with toss now in any matchup? new builds or strats? because it seems like mostly the plan is to play exactly the same except our tech is weaker

the only thing i can think of is maybe with ravager morph time being substantially longer there's a bigger window to do soul trains/force field based aggression again, which could be really cool, but haven't had a chance to test it out yet.


You do raise a good point. This change doesn't give Protoss any chance for new and cool strategies. Even the stasis guard was nerfed under the guise of Quality of life changes. (Now it has more priority, and you can tell your units to do something after the stasis ends. So if you got all your workers in stasis like a noob, you don't need to wait until the stasis finishes to send them to mine, which is ridiculous).

There's only 1 type of strategy this patch promotes for Protoss: all ins, thanks to the upgrade buffs.

What I've been doing is just all ining everyone with +1 mass zealot with sentries to FF ramps ala early WOL Or +2 mass zealot archon all in. At least in pvz.

After all that's what the balance team wants us to do.

The upgrade buffs literally have no effect unless you're all ining or your opponent is doing a timing push. If you don't attack when you get your upgrades or attack later than 10 seconds after they finish then the "buff" is meaningless as you'd have the upgrade anyway by then in the previous patch, and what remains are just nerfs to the mid/lategame like you say.

With this strategy and the sheer power of my hatred for Zerg i've been able to maintain my pvz winrate, but we'll see how it goes after a while.

Regrettably Protoss can't enjoy a macro game anymore,
So when you zergs are dying to shitty protoss all ins, don't you dare complain. You brought this on yourselves.


That... isn't how this change works. The upgrade changes impact each subsequent upgrade as well. So +1 now comes out 7 seconds sooner, +2 comes out 16 seconds sooner (9 + 7), +3 comes out 26.7 seconds sooner (16 + 10.7). So +3 is hitting almost 30 seconds earlier than it did on the previous patch. Not that its a common build, but you could now get to 3/3 over 50 seconds sooner if you're working with a single forge.

I know most of this thread doesn't understand the concept, but also keep in mind that the late game doesn't happen in a vacuum, especially vs Zerg. Have efficient early fights vs Zerg means less drones early + more resources lost. All this is going to add up throughout a game, eventually limiting the resources zerg has to play with.

but what "efficient early fights" can protoss have while playing a macro game against a passive zerg? even low level zergs are mechanically proficient against pretty much every build these days. charge, glaives, archon drop, oracle - all of these builds require protoss to find a "gotcha" moment in the zergs defense which is just very uncommon these days when walking onto creep into 8 queens. gateway allins are often defended unscouted. blink can theoretically win games with efficient grinding but it's insanely taxing mechanically and if your tempo slips at any point/you don't know the timings perfectly you are probably dead

i think protoss players want to be active on the map, want to take fights with blink and forcefields, want to gain tempo with gateway skirmishes, etc. that's the more fun way to play! but the margin of error for doing damage is insanely narrow, and if you mess up an attack on creep you don't get a second chance, so people go straight to skytoss for stability. IMO ravagers always deleted the forcefield too easily from the very beginning, but because forcefields had an "abusive/feelsbad" reputation they were afraid to re-tune them into relevance

i get it, people hate splash damage, they hate skytoss, they hate forcefields. but when you take away these tools one by one and don't compensate by making low tech units stronger you end up with a neutered race that needs things like shield battery overcharge to survive while doing anything, and they're nerfing the battery too, so... i don't get it, how do you win if your compositins are never going to be efficient fast enough?


As a great example of taking efficient fights (early is a vague term, but I'm willing to say this isn't super early), the current ZvP meta of oracles into blink stalkers + zealot runbys. Alongside improved movespeed from sentries and HT to rotate around the map and force fights. It's not easy, but SC2 isn't an easy game. I'm honestly not interested in arguing balance regarding this, as there's just too many disingenuous and deceptive arguments going on here- I'm just saying this is the concept behind the patch; Encouraging fights around the map due to increased mobility and faster upgrades.

As an aside, I'm fully aboard the "remove the ravager" hate train that needs to get started. Sentries could be mildly interesting with the pacing of LotV, and honestly the negation of sentries are the far from the worst flaws of the ravager as far as I'm concerned.
MJG
Profile Joined May 2018
United Kingdom926 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-01-26 12:27:31
January 26 2023 10:07 GMT
#137
On January 26 2023 12:55 Draddition wrote:
As an aside, I'm fully aboard the "remove the ravager" hate train that needs to get started. Sentries could be mildly interesting with the pacing of LotV, and honestly the negation of sentries are the far from the worst flaws of the ravager as far as I'm concerned.

I don't necessarily think that the Ravager needs to be changed, but I've always thought that the Ravager should keep the Armoured tag that the Roach has, just because that makes more sense to me.

EDIT:

A "remove the Swarm Host" hate train would be something I'd willingly get behind though...
"You have to play for yourself, you have to play to get better; you can't play to make other people happy, that's not gonna ever sustain you." - NonY
Draddition
Profile Joined February 2014
United States59 Posts
January 26 2023 19:33 GMT
#138
On January 26 2023 19:07 MJG wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 26 2023 12:55 Draddition wrote:
As an aside, I'm fully aboard the "remove the ravager" hate train that needs to get started. Sentries could be mildly interesting with the pacing of LotV, and honestly the negation of sentries are the far from the worst flaws of the ravager as far as I'm concerned.

I don't necessarily think that the Ravager needs to be changed, but I've always thought that the Ravager should keep the Armoured tag that the Roach has, just because that makes more sense to me.

EDIT:

A "remove the Swarm Host" hate train would be something I'd willingly get behind though...



Don't want to completely derail patch discussion, but sign me up for the SH removal train. It's mostly irrelevant at this point anyways. Since HotS I've wanted the SH to be a proper T3 class unit for ranged play with zerg, then we got the lurker instead- so I don't even see a pathway to reworking the unit into something interesting.

Regarding the ravager, I mostly hate what its done to ZvZ where the matchup is largely locked into both players making a ball of stuff and staring at it for 10 minutes. Not much in the way of positional play, and hardly any room to tech into more interesting units. I also think without the ravager, shield batteries could be hit even more and certainly shield battery + cannon rushes into robo stuff would have to be removed.
Xamo
Profile Joined April 2012
Spain877 Posts
January 26 2023 20:43 GMT
#139

Fixed an issue where Reapers threw KD8 Charges with the wrong hand.
.

Wow
My life for Aiur. You got a piece of me, baby. IIIIIIiiiiiii.
TurtleFish
Profile Joined December 2022
11 Posts
January 27 2023 06:51 GMT
#140
Is it a surprise we are getting a zerg biased patch again? Harstem, who is clearly part of the zerg cabal, is representing protoss in the balance council lmao, what else do u expect?
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
20:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Gerald vs MojaLIVE!
ArT vs Jumy
SteadfastSC259
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 259
Livibee 150
ProTech75
CosmosSc2 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 698
Aegong 110
NaDa 12
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm89
League of Legends
JimRising 166
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K814
sgares249
Foxcn212
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken69
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor125
Other Games
summit1g9229
Grubby2378
Day[9].tv497
monkeys_forever100
Mew2King59
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick741
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta68
• Berry_CruncH65
• musti20045 36
• Hupsaiya 31
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 36
• Eskiya23 13
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4934
• Jankos1477
• masondota2785
Other Games
• Scarra1201
• imaqtpie985
• Day9tv497
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
35m
The PondCast
10h 35m
RSL Revival
10h 35m
ByuN vs Classic
Clem vs Cham
WardiTV European League
16h 35m
Replay Cast
1d
RSL Revival
1d 10h
herO vs SHIN
Reynor vs Cure
WardiTV European League
1d 16h
FEL
1d 16h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.