• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 18:48
CET 00:48
KST 08:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)1Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win2RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14
StarCraft 2
General
When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest
Strategy
Ride the Waves in Surf City: Why Surfing Lessons H
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft Data analysis on 70 million replays 2v2 maps which are SC2 style with teams together? [BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)
Tourneys
[BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Clair Obscur - Expedition 33
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2241 users

Code S: Armani and Maru advance to semifinals

Forum Index > SC2 General
32 CommentsPost a Reply
1 2 Next All
TL.net ESPORTS
Profile Joined July 2011
4 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-18 19:40:01
October 18 2020 13:09 GMT
#1
[image loading]2020 Global StarCraft II League: Code S Season 3

Armani extended his career-best Code S run by another week and another round, defeating Zest 3-2 to advance to the Code S semifinals. Zest's decision to bring back the 3-Stargate Void Ray build he unveiled in the RO16 cost him the first two maps, with Armani able to play around the unusual strategy without much trouble. While Zest was able to recover two maps to tie up the score, he was unable to complete the reverse sweep as he fell to a Drone-drill assisted Speedling all-in on the final map.

After six first round eliminations in Code S, Armani has made up for a lot of lost time this season. However, his miracle run is in danger of coming to cruel end in the semifinals, as he's set to face the four-time Code S champion Maru. The clash between Maru and Trap in the last quarterfinal ended up being surprisingly one-sided, with Maru taking a 3-1 victory. While Maru's late-game play was notable in the RO16, his ability to inflict early game damage was key to his victory against his teammate.

Coming up: Code S will continue on Wednesday, Oct 21 8:00am GMT (GMT+00:00) with the first semifinal match: TY vs Stats.

[image loading]




Quarterfinal #3: Armani 3 - 2 Zest

Game 1 - Deathaura: Zest brought back his fast 3-Stargate Void Ray strategy from the RO16, which had helped him get past Armani's fellow KR-Zerg clique members Solar and DRG. Not surprisingly, Armani had an answer prepared, opening with an odd 2-base defensive Hydralisk build aimed at safely getting him to late game tech. Zest didn't seem to mind having his mid-game aggressive options taken away, and accepted Armani's invitation to a late-game showdown.

Faced with a daunting defensive line of of Spore Crawlers and Lurkers, Zest looked to re-use another strategy from the RO16: Mass Recall with Carriers and Templars. He did a good job of posturing with his Carriers to goad Armani's Corruptors to one side of the map, opening up a path for his Mothership to sneak past enemy lines on the opposite side. However, Zest had sent his Mothership in blind to what he could only assume was a less defended Zerg base, which caused him to pull the trigger on a Recall a bit too early. He actually Recalled onto a position where Armani had a decent amount of static defense set up, missing the undefended Zerg main base just a screen or so away. This resulted in the humorous scene of Zest having to Nexus Recall his armada OUT just a few moments after it had Mass Recalled IN.

Having staved off the first major attack, Armani started taking the advantage in map control, able to divide up his forces to secure new bases while also delaying/cancelling Zest's attempts to take more expansions of his own. Zest's Carrier deathball ambled around the map looking for something to do, but couldn't find any openings until he had another Mothership Recall ready. This time, Zest actually did manage to get his Mothership into a mostly undefended Zerg base. However, things still went poorly, with Armani reacting quickly and inflicting heavy damage on the Protoss force with Corruptors and Neural Parasite before forcing another Nexus Recall retreat.

Winning this battle gave Armani a brief window to attack as Zest slowly replenished his Carrier count, with Ultralisks and Corruptors taking down Nexuses on opposite ends of the map. With his income severely damaged, Zest had to use up all of his bank to remake a Carrier-Tempest force for one last-ditch attack. Armani crushed this force in style with his Corruptors and Infestors, even Neural Parasiting a Templar to Storm the stacked Protoss force.

(Interestingly enough, Armani later said that practicing with Stats helped his late game ZvP, pointing out the difference in late-game ability between Stats and Zest.)

Game 2 - Ice and Chrome: Zest gave his 3-Stargate opener another shot, while Armani opened with a more normal 3-Hatch build. This time, Zest looked to go for a dangerous mid-game attack, combining his initial Void Rays with Chargelots, Archons, and Templars. Unperturbed, Armani made over ninety Drones, seemingly confident in his ability to hold off the imminent attack. We'll never know how Armani would have fared in normal circumstances, because Zest made the abnormal mistake of forgetting to get Psi Storm upgrade. Armani realized this during a Baneling drop, seeing a Templar Archives being hastily Chrono-Boosted. Armani took advantage of the situation by loading up for a giant Hydralisk-Baneling attack, smashing Zest's Storm-less army to collect the GG.

Game 3 - Submarine: Zest changed things up and went for a Glaive Adept opener, letting Armani see up to four Gateways, but getting two more Gateways behind it for a dedicated early-game attack. While Armani fended off the initial few waves of Adepts with ease, he erred by sending his Speedlings out to counter attack just as Zest was about to send in what would end up being the final wave of attackers. Zest's Adepts took up a superior position and overpowered Armani's troops, saving Zest from being swept.

Game 4 - Ever Dream: Armani was the one going for early game aggression this time, opening with a pool-first build. However, a Probe sent to scout/Hatch-block scouted out Armani's build in time, and Zest was able to prepare back at home by going for two Gateways. Zest held off the early Zergling attack with little trouble, and was put in a good position due to his superior tech. Without Zergling speed, Armani was basically contained to two bases by just a handful of Adepts, letting Zest get further ahead in economy and tech.

Zest had a chance to deal a crippling blow with a DT drop, but Armani lucked out as Zest assumed his Dark Shrine had been Overlord scouted (or that Armani would make the right read) and went for an Archon drop when there was no detection. Still, missing that opportunity didn't matter for Zest, because he was so far ahead in macro that he just ran over Armani with Immortal-Archon-Gateway units soon after.

Game 5 - Pillars of Gold: Zest wasn't the only one to recycle strategies from his RO16 group, as Armani brought out the Speedling + Drone-drill all-in that Solar had used to take a map off Zest (Armani later said it was a build he himself had learned from PartinG, and then passed on to Solar). It seemed like Zest semi-expected the strategy, as he had a secondary wall half-done at the time of the attack. However, Zest didn't react in time and allowed the Drones clip through the wall. With Drones blocking all the re-wall spots, Armani's Zerglings were able to stream into Zest's base and collect the final GG.


Quarterfinals: Maru 3 - 1 Trap

Game 1 - Deathaura: Maru started off with a 1-base tech build and an Engineering Bay block at Trap's natural (Maru's winner interview suggested this could be ByuN's influence), prompting Trap to pull some Probes to clear out intrusive construction. Trap looked to go defensive Stargate after the delay, while Maru's follow-up was to proxy a Starport while making Hellions back at his main. The proxy went undetected, allowing Maru to catch Trap off guard with his extra-fast Hellion drop. Combined with more Hellions coming in by land, Maru ended up killing fourteen Probes to take a massive early-game advantage.

The two players macroed up, with Trap needing to make some brilliant plays to make up for his poor start. There was an inkling of hope for Trap when he managed to fight off Maru's first Infantry-Tank push, but that hope quickly vanished when Maru's follow-up Mine drops killed yet more Probes. Maru gathered an even bigger force of Infantry for a second major offensive, and this time around, Trap had no choice but to GG out.

Game 2 - Ice and Chrome: Maru opened up with 1-Barracks proxy Reaper, nabbing two Probe kills after dancing his way around Trap's main. Maru then followed with a Bunker in Trap's natural, with a Mine drop coming after that. While none of those moves inflicted a huge amount of damage, it let Maru go up to three Orbital Commands safely and set him up for some powerful mid-game attacks.

Trap opted for Robotics Bay units to try and hold onto his three bases, with his first test coming at Maru's 1/1 Infantry upgrade timing. Trap did a good job of pre-emptively engaging the Terran force before Tanks could set up in a good position, and was barely able to thwart the attack. However, it only meant Trap had bought himself a tiny bit of breathing room, as another Terran attack was incoming. Yet again, Trap found a great angle to fight at, which let him barely survive yet again—even finding the space to do a Zealot warp-in at Maru's third base. However, Trap was still merely surviving and not truly stabilizing. Trap couldn't keep taking perfect fights forever, and the next attack from Maru cracked the Protoss defenses and forced Trap to GG.

Game 3 - Pillars of Gold: Maru went for the Engineering Bay-block + 1 base tech start again, but this time played out a regular Hellion drop without proxying any buildings. Trap's defensive Phoenix build did a good job of minimizing the damage from the Hellion drop, but Trap sent his Phoenixes out to counter-attack too soon as Maru was going for several waves of Mine drops as his next move. Though none of the drops got any jackpot hits, the aggregate damage put Maru in a good position as he macroed up behind the drops.

Maru moved out for another Marine-Tank push with 1/1 infantry upgrades, but this time, Trap did more than just survive, winning a decisive defensive battle with his Colossi, Phoenixes, and assorted Gateway units. With enough army left over to go for a counter attack, Trap caught Maru with a somewhat broken army composition that was too heavy on Marauders and Tanks. With Zealots and Archons at the front and Colossi at the back, Trap forced Maru to enlist his SCVs on defense, and killed almost 30 Terran workers as a result. Trap capitalized on his economic advantage, building up a superior army and finishing Maru off a few minutes later.

Game 4 - Deathaura: Maru brought out the 1-Barracks proxy Reaper once more, this time netting himself four early Probe kills due to some poor micro from Trap on defense. Again, Maru followed up by macroing up on three Orbitals, while Trap opted for a more drastic follow-up by going for a handful of Void Rays and mass Glaive-Adepts.

While Maru turtled up initially, looking to defend against any faster all-in or harassment, he wasn't able to detect Trap's plan to attack a few beats later. Trap masked his strategy well, and an unaware Maru moved out onto the map once he had 1/1 infantry upgrades. However, even though Trap managed to get the jump on Maru with his Adepts, everything went wrong as he shaded his units directly into lethal Widow Mine hits. Combined with anti-armor from Maru's Raven, this resulted in Trap's Adepts evaporating almost instantaneously, forcing Trap to concede the series loss.
Facebook Twitter Reddit
TL+ Member
GuybrushThreepwood
Profile Joined May 2020
16 Posts
October 18 2020 14:34 GMT
#2
Zest played so arrogantly imo.He had it coming.
Agodak
Profile Joined March 2012
England9 Posts
October 18 2020 15:02 GMT
#3
Correction: next day of GSL will start one and a half hours earlier than usual.
RKC
Profile Joined June 2012
2848 Posts
October 18 2020 15:36 GMT
#4
Armani practised with Stats to prep against Zest? Where's the KT love, yo!

Stats and TY still seem pretty tight (based on Snow's interview). Guess Zest is more of an aloof gym dude?
gg no re thx
sneakyfox
Profile Joined January 2017
8216 Posts
October 18 2020 15:55 GMT
#5
On October 19 2020 00:36 RKC wrote:
Armani practised with Stats to prep against Zest? Where's the KT love, yo!


It's that freecy love yo
"I saw what sneakyfox wrote on TL.net and it made me furious" - PartinG
tskarzyn
Profile Joined July 2010
United States516 Posts
October 18 2020 16:36 GMT
#6
Armani's late game in G1 was very impressive. IK zest is a champion and all, but he always looks sloppy and lost if the game goes long.
[Phantom]
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
Mexico2170 Posts
October 18 2020 18:33 GMT
#7
Should Protoss have a "door"?
WriterTeamLiquid Staff writer since 2014 @Mortal_Phantom
mikedupp
Profile Joined May 2020
233 Posts
October 18 2020 19:24 GMT
#8

Armani later said it was a build he himself had learned from PartinG, and then passed on to Solar.


so parting is shaping toss and zerg meta now
Sprog
Profile Joined April 2010
New Zealand83 Posts
October 18 2020 20:27 GMT
#9
On October 19 2020 03:33 [Phantom] wrote:
Should Protoss have a "door"?


Drone drill free win!
RandomPlayer416
Profile Joined January 2019
84 Posts
October 18 2020 20:44 GMT
#10
I am very suspicious of the way Zest played this matchup.

Before I explain why I will just say that the betting line was 5.00x for Armani to win. So if you were to bet $1000 on Armani you would of won $5000 (for those not familiar with betting lines)

Zests strategy in the first game wasn't the greatest but it wasn't really out of line either. The fact he tried to do the exact same build that failed in game 2 is where it becomes suspicious.

I am not sure what the payout structure is for the GSL but it isn't what it once was. I honestly feel that Zest bet against himself and threw the set because he didn't believe he could beat Maru or Trap. The way he played games 3 and 4 were more legit as he moved away from mass stargate play, then lost to an all in on game 5 making it all seem very legit.

I'm curious what other people think about this.

User was warned for this post.

User was banned for this post.
Argonauta
Profile Joined July 2016
Spain4958 Posts
October 18 2020 20:49 GMT
#11
On October 19 2020 05:44 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
I am very suspicious of the way Zest played this matchup.

Before I explain why I will just say that the betting line was 5.00x for Armani to win. So if you were to bet $1000 on Armani you would of won $5000 (for those not familiar with betting lines)

Zests strategy in the first game wasn't the greatest but it wasn't really out of line either. The fact he tried to do the exact same build that failed in game 2 is where it becomes suspicious.

I am not sure what the payout structure is for the GSL but it isn't what it once was. I honestly feel that Zest bet against himself and threw the set because he didn't believe he could beat Maru or Trap. The way he played games 3 and 4 were more legit as he moved away from mass stargate play, then lost to an all in on game 5 making it all seem very legit.

I'm curious what other people think about this.



I think is a bunch of bullshit
Rogue | Maru | Scarlett | Trap
TL+ Member
[Phantom]
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
Mexico2170 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-18 21:15:43
October 18 2020 21:13 GMT
#12
On October 19 2020 05:44 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
I am very suspicious of the way Zest played this matchup.

Before I explain why I will just say that the betting line was 5.00x for Armani to win. So if you were to bet $1000 on Armani you would of won $5000 (for those not familiar with betting lines)

Zests strategy in the first game wasn't the greatest but it wasn't really out of line either. The fact he tried to do the exact same build that failed in game 2 is where it becomes suspicious.

I am not sure what the payout structure is for the GSL but it isn't what it once was. I honestly feel that Zest bet against himself and threw the set because he didn't believe he could beat Maru or Trap. The way he played games 3 and 4 were more legit as he moved away from mass stargate play, then lost to an all in on game 5 making it all seem very legit.

I'm curious what other people think about this.



While he would have a motivation like you said I doubt this happened.

The Stargate strats on game one and two where used by him effectively in two of his games in the previous round and he won both games. The only "suspicious" decision was recalling on top of the lurkers at the third instead of doing it in the main, but since the mothership isn't a detector he couldn't have known there were lurkers there. He would have needed to have Armani in on it and I don't think that's the case.

I believe it's simply a case of Armani being in really good shape, and players underestimating him because of previous results.


As a side note, I wish the mothership was a detector (and couldn't be pulled by the viper). Those two changes might just be what protoss needs in the lategame.
WriterTeamLiquid Staff writer since 2014 @Mortal_Phantom
RandomPlayer416
Profile Joined January 2019
84 Posts
October 18 2020 21:46 GMT
#13
Phantom I'd love to respond more in depth but I got warned for expressing a thought that was in the back of my mind.

All I'll say is I never flat out accused him of match fixing, I just think that there was an opportunity for him to make a +EV decision in which he would of had the ability to control. When there is money to be made on the outside the possibility is always there.

neptunusfisk
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
2286 Posts
October 18 2020 21:53 GMT
#14
On October 19 2020 06:46 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
Phantom I'd love to respond more in depth but I got warned for expressing a thought that was in the back of my mind.

All I'll say is I never flat out accused him of match fixing, I just think that there was an opportunity for him to make a +EV decision in which he would of had the ability to control. When there is money to be made on the outside the possibility is always there.



Or maybe he just is playing bad because he is bad
maru G5L pls
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33493 Posts
October 18 2020 22:18 GMT
#15
On October 19 2020 06:46 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
Phantom I'd love to respond more in depth but I got warned for expressing a thought that was in the back of my mind.

All I'll say is I never flat out accused him of match fixing, I just think that there was an opportunity for him to make a +EV decision in which he would of had the ability to control. When there is money to be made on the outside the possibility is always there.



LOL you literally directly accused him of match fixing
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
October 18 2020 22:39 GMT
#16
On October 19 2020 05:44 RandomPlayer416 wrote:
I am very suspicious of the way Zest played this matchup.

Before I explain why I will just say that the betting line was 5.00x for Armani to win. So if you were to bet $1000 on Armani you would of won $5000 (for those not familiar with betting lines)

Zests strategy in the first game wasn't the greatest but it wasn't really out of line either. The fact he tried to do the exact same build that failed in game 2 is where it becomes suspicious.

I am not sure what the payout structure is for the GSL but it isn't what it once was. I honestly feel that Zest bet against himself and threw the set because he didn't believe he could beat Maru or Trap. The way he played games 3 and 4 were more legit as he moved away from mass stargate play, then lost to an all in on game 5 making it all seem very legit.

I'm curious what other people think about this.

User was warned for this post.

User was banned for this post.

The fuck is wrong with you? Dude, ending in the top4 gives you 8,5k USD. Had he not been greedy and recalled into the main he would have won the 1st game.
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
Argonauta
Profile Joined July 2016
Spain4958 Posts
October 18 2020 23:07 GMT
#17
really nice recap btw, Maru Trap was a good series but it just wasnt close at all. Game 1 and 5 of Armani vs Zest was just amazing dor wikd different reasons
Rogue | Maru | Scarlett | Trap
TL+ Member
tskarzyn
Profile Joined July 2010
United States516 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-19 00:06:08
October 19 2020 00:05 GMT
#18
Now that you mention matchfixing, the recall on top of 20 spores in g1 did seem suspicious. And hasn't Zest been connected with strange betting lines in the past? I believe some lines raised so many alarms that bets were cancelled. Obv have to tread very carefully on this subject because this is his livelihood, but I don't think it's crazy to ask the question when tournament winnings aren't enough to pay the bills for most.

User was warned for this post
[Phantom]
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
Mexico2170 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-10-19 00:23:26
October 19 2020 00:22 GMT
#19
On October 19 2020 09:05 tskarzyn wrote:
Now that you mention matchfixing, the recall on top of 20 spores in g1 did seem suspicious. And hasn't Zest been connected with strange betting lines in the past? I believe some lines raised so many alarms that bets were cancelled. Obv have to tread very carefully on this subject because this is his livelihood, but I don't think it's crazy to ask the question when tournament winnings aren't enough to pay the bills for most.


The problem with that is that the mothership isnt a detector, and 3 spores is not enough to stop zest army. But the lurkers that were there+spores+the rest of Amarni's army is. Zest couldn't have possibly known there were lurkers there, so if he did that to throw on purpose he would have had to agree with armany to leave lurkers there so he could do that before the games started.

But then again, the game didn't even end there. He inmediately recalled his army away with a Nexus. Why go through all that trouble then?

I think people are reading too much into it. I don't think Zest lost on purpose.

That being said... Zest is a suspicious player. Just read this: https://tl.net/forum/starcraft-2/561363-betting-suspicious-activity-detected?page=8

Pinnacle has voided bets in like 8 series Zest has played for "suspicious activity".

I just don't think this particular case was that suspicious, I think he just played sloppy and underestimated Armani. And Armani played really well.

I know Armani hasn't been amazing in his career, but just this GSL he has beaten:
-sOs
-Cure
-Dream
-Zoun
-And now Zest.

Appart from Zoun, I don't think anyone thinks Armani was favored in those matches. The guy is simply playing well and his opponents keep underestimating him. Let's not undermine his achivement. He deserves to be in the semi-finals.

User was warned for this post
WriterTeamLiquid Staff writer since 2014 @Mortal_Phantom
mikedupp
Profile Joined May 2020
233 Posts
October 19 2020 00:40 GMT
#20
Zest is extremely hot or miss and if you've been paying attention you can see Armani has clearly been trending up even outside of season 3 GSL.
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
elazer 201
CosmosSc2 47
Nathanias 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 1735
Artosis 537
BeSt 194
Hyun 131
ZZZero.O 128
Killer 44
ggaemo 29
SilentControl 22
NaDa 14
Dota 2
syndereN294
Counter-Strike
Foxcn119
Fnx 82
Super Smash Bros
PPMD18
Other Games
Grubby3753
Liquid`Hasu151
ViBE140
Maynarde106
Trikslyr48
minikerr35
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream220
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 90
• davetesta38
• musti20045 33
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 27
• mYiSmile14
• Pr0nogo 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4342
Other Games
• Scarra1373
• imaqtpie1304
• Shiphtur509
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
1h 12m
Replay Cast
9h 12m
Wardi Open
12h 12m
OSC
13h 12m
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d
The PondCast
1d 10h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
OSC
2 days
LAN Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.