| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
For me personally, I'd revert the economic mechanism back to HotS, i.e. 6 workers to start and uniform amount of minerals at each patch. I just feel the economic tempo of HotS and WoL was more comfortable to me. The other option I'm thinking of is to reduce the degree of unit clunking-up, making them more spread out during them game. This would kind of make AOEs less effective and game-ending and make fights look more grand. (But the balance probably would have to be completely redone though.) | ||
|
phodacbiet
United States1740 Posts
| ||
|
pvsnp
7676 Posts
You said big. | ||
|
spookey1
4 Posts
So many games decided in about 8 ingame seconds when big armies clash (less happens less often these days) | ||
|
dbRic1203
Germany2655 Posts
Maybe Hybrid or Xelnaga or from outside the corprulu sector entirely | ||
|
rayl991
Afghanistan80 Posts
| ||
|
yht9657
1810 Posts
| ||
|
Solar424
United States4001 Posts
| ||
|
MockHamill
Sweden1798 Posts
All capital ships = 8 supply Liberator/Void Ray = 4 supply. All casters = 4 supply. The game is interesting as long as most units are ground units. Mass air should not be possible. No terrain= no strategy. | ||
|
vyzion
308 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20301 Posts
| ||
|
catplanetcatplanet
3830 Posts
| ||
|
oGoZenob
France1503 Posts
| ||
Nakajin
Canada8989 Posts
| ||
|
dbRic1203
Germany2655 Posts
On May 14 2020 14:57 Cyro wrote: Slow down economy so that there is a greater emphasis on strategy/tactics, especially below the top 1% level of play. It's kinda ridiculous that people just autopilot third bases in the early game because it's so strong - even if they're playing in Code S and they've never had a scout on the opponents tech or worker count. We allready has a shitton of Build Order Wins allready this GSL. Would become even worse I think. The reason it works years ago, was that the game wasn t as figured out as it was now and Players made more mistakes, so it was rasiert to come back | ||
|
Atlan___
Germany38 Posts
I want to be able to play straigt up versus any race. But as long medivacs are so strong its impossible to balance terran this way, or Terran harras would be unbeatable. I also despise doomtrops, they especially made TvT worse by a lot (ofc still the best mirror by a wide margin). | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
| ||
|
FataLe
New Zealand4505 Posts
| ||
|
Haukinger
Germany131 Posts
| ||
|
bela.mervado
Hungary395 Posts
- configurable colors for both enemy teams in 2v2 (.. and up to 4v4 maybe) there is only one enemy color now, there could be red+purp to differentiate the two same race opponent. - some more hotkeys: - all production buildings (rax+fact+port / gw+robo+stargate / hatches) - all raxes/gateways, - all factories/robos, - all starports/stargates, - all tech buildings (evos, spires, armories, forges, flee bacons, etc) - all queens, - remember location hotkeys across games for maps - configurable building and unit prio/ordering in selections - all upgrades / ongoing builds with one icon each on the left side, like the production tab icons on the observer interface, but placed vertically on the left side of the screen. upgrades would be easier to track, build orders would be easier to follow finished upgrades would stay, could be removed by clicking on icon. configurable to be unclickable otherwise or click to cycle through buildings providing that upgrade, hotkeyed buildings first (evos vs viper feed evos). | ||
|
Azzur
Australia6259 Posts
| ||
|
derkopf
Germany79 Posts
| ||
|
TelecoM
United States10675 Posts
| ||
|
HerrPfotig
Germany39 Posts
| ||
|
Creager
Germany1900 Posts
| ||
|
omop
42 Posts
| ||
|
gTank
Austria2577 Posts
| ||
|
Drfilip
Sweden590 Posts
On May 14 2020 21:04 gTank wrote: I would implement highground advantage again, like doing less damage shooting units on higher ground. I did not know that SC2 ever had high ground advantage. Was the advantage the same as in BW or was it something else? | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On May 14 2020 21:35 Drfilip wrote: I did not know that SC2 ever had high ground advantage. Was the advantage the same as in BW or was it something else? SC2 highground advantage is that you cannot see the unit on the highground and that's it. Never had it like in BW, IMO because people don't like RNG based mechanisms(IIRC it's 40 % chance of miss if you shoot a unit on higher ground in BW) | ||
|
RealityTheGreat
China564 Posts
and delete viper liberator disruptor (these unit are absolutely all or nothing design) | ||
|
heronn
34 Posts
Nerf WarpGates Remove +speed on creep Change Queens Add some BW units eg Scourges | ||
|
seopthi
391 Posts
It is just too quick and easy to get into the late game, which makes the games look all alike. I liked how maxing out in BW was bit of an achievement. ___ II) I'd remove bunch of units, e.g. Swarm Hosts, Thors, and Adepts. I still think Adept was a mistake - the degree in which it is good is overlapping with other Gateway units and anything special to it sucks. When they were introduced it was met with a huge criticism, and I still think it was valid back then. I fear that if people defend them today, it is just giving in. It seems to me quite clear that introducing them did not improve the game. Fewer units is ok, but if there's a good one introduced for replacement that's always gucci ___ III) Change the way walling is done. It is too easy to have a hole in a wall adding too much of volatility and randomness | ||
|
MachineHeadx
United Kingdom9 Posts
| ||
|
Vision_
861 Posts
I think instant damage spell as EMP is too "all or nothing" (punishement). | ||
|
ThunderJunk
United States694 Posts
| ||
|
NinjaNight
428 Posts
| ||
|
c4rn
4 Posts
| ||
|
purakushi
United States3300 Posts
| ||
|
Chaosvuistje
Netherlands2581 Posts
| ||
|
Mettis
84 Posts
| ||
|
virpi
Germany3598 Posts
| ||
|
DieuCure
France3713 Posts
 Or tankivac/PvP change. | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 13:56 pvsnp wrote: Remove creep and and rebalance Zerg around that. Or warpgate for Protoss. You said big. I like the idea of removing the warpgate. It makes space valuable again in the game, which potentially makes a better RTS. | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 14:16 spookey1 wrote: Re balance the damage so (some) fights lasted about 10-15% longer So many games decided in about 8 ingame seconds when big armies clash (less happens less often these days) Definitely agree. I would even want them to be twice as long if possible. My idea of removing unit clumping is along the same line | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 14:17 dbRic1203 wrote: Add a 4th race Maybe Hybrid or Xelnaga or from outside the corprulu sector entirely LOL, sounds exciting. Post your proposal (like the rough ideas) please | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 14:32 yht9657 wrote: Usually people in this type of posts just want the game to be more like broodwar, and it seems this post is no exception. But BW was indeed better than SC2 on those aspects, like a more valuable role of space and big, long-lasting fights. No one is saying they want 12-unit control groups or single building selection back. At this point, both games have thrived for long enough that changing a critical component of the gameplay becomes a suicide. But if we go back to the beginning, some kind of a combination of the two games indeed sound like a more ideal game, at least to me. Plus, I think we did see some interesting proposals here, like adding a 4th race/increasing the supply cap etc. | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 15:30 Atlan___ wrote: Remove the medivac speedboost ability and maybe even medivac heal. I really don't like how all terran matchups revolve around it. I want to be able to play straigt up versus any race. But as long medivacs are so strong its impossible to balance terran this way, or Terran harras would be unbeatable. I also despise doomtrops, they especially made TvT worse by a lot (ofc still the best mirror by a wide margin). Then we probably also need to remove/remake the warp mechanism/nydus. Massive, rapid movement of armies has become such a core aspect of SC2 now | ||
|
Pangpootata
1838 Posts
| ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 16:10 bela.mervado wrote: some ui changes - configurable colors for both enemy teams in 2v2 (.. and up to 4v4 maybe) there is only one enemy color now, there could be red+purp to differentiate the two same race opponent. - some more hotkeys: - all production buildings (rax+fact+port / gw+robo+stargate / hatches) - all raxes/gateways, - all factories/robos, - all starports/stargates, - all tech buildings (evos, spires, armories, forges, flee bacons, etc) - all queens, - remember location hotkeys across games for maps - configurable building and unit prio/ordering in selections - all upgrades / ongoing builds with one icon each on the left side, like the production tab icons on the observer interface, but placed vertically on the left side of the screen. upgrades would be easier to track, build orders would be easier to follow finished upgrades would stay, could be removed by clicking on icon. configurable to be unclickable otherwise or click to cycle through buildings providing that upgrade, hotkeyed buildings first (evos vs viper feed evos). The hotkey part is essentially what people do with control groups now. It'd be nice if it's automated, but I just wonder if we have enough keys for that (if we retain all control groups/screen locations) | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 16:25 derkopf wrote: Make the game font little bigger like .2. Remove the skins for units for laddering. Make the size of the chat symbols bigger. I'd rather love to see more skins. I don't love skins myself but removing them means SC2 is dead. Blizzard has to survive. | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 18:55 HerrPfotig wrote: I would change that starting locations stay the same (2 geysirs) and all other expansions have just ONE high yield gas geysir. Why this change? | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 22:40 deacon.frost wrote: SC2 highground advantage is that you cannot see the unit on the highground and that's it. Never had it like in BW, IMO because people don't like RNG based mechanisms(IIRC it's 40 % chance of miss if you shoot a unit on higher ground in BW) We could easily make it deterministic, like missing every other shot (within certain time frame) or just dealing reduced damage | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 14 2020 23:58 RealityTheGreat wrote: No mineral reduce patch in LotV and delete viper liberator disruptor (these unit are absolutely all or nothing design) I honestly don't like libs, despite I use it every terran game. Because to make other races do okay against libs, they've become so much stronger against everything else I have. | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 15 2020 01:10 MachineHeadx wrote: Move Warp Prism to stargate, It's an air unit. Imagine having a Medivac come out a factory. What about the Observer? | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 15 2020 01:45 ThunderJunk wrote: I'd bring back Scrap Station as a ladder map. LOL. Or just some more weird maps. I actually don't get it when people complain about weird maps. I always look forward to them cuz the core fun I have playing SC2 is to think through a completely unforeseen situation. But, to some extent, Purity and Industry is kinda Scrap Station Relived? | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 15 2020 02:53 NinjaNight wrote: Revert the economy changes. It was so much more fun and better in HoTS had way more fun in that game in 2015 than I've ever had in LOTV Yeah, I kind of spent years tuning myself to the new economic tempo of LotV. And even if I finally get used to it, I still prefer the HotS/WoL tempo. | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 15 2020 03:00 c4rn wrote: Something big? How about making the game balanced? I said big, not astronomical bro lol | ||
|
CMS_Flash
Hong Kong47 Posts
On May 15 2020 08:45 DieuCure wrote: Popularity. Or tankivac/PvP change. Well, that's something we probably can't fix lol, sadly. And Tankivac was my worst nightmare. Not looking at my army for 1 sec and it disappeared... | ||
|
Dracover
Australia177 Posts
eg let a warpprism carry 8 zealots but can't warp. increase the strength of core toss units so they can actually fight 1v1 since they don't have instant reinforcements. WTF is the point of a BC that can't beat anything because you have to balance the fact it can teleport ontop of you. | ||
|
Azzur
Australia6259 Posts
On May 15 2020 03:47 purakushi wrote: Increase maximum supply to 250 or perhaps 300. Unit supply inflation is real in SC2, so armies look pretty puny, especially with pathfinding tending toward a ball. Like this change! | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
More minerals per base Increase the supply cap Bigger maps like Alterzim back in the pool Give each side a new unit to play with Make mothership OP again or just bring back arbiters | ||
|
Ben...
Canada3485 Posts
Heck, even making it so queens can't transfuse other queens would make a huge difference. It's downright silly to see a group of queens with energy basically not die to sustained attacks. 5 queens should not be able to absorb twice the amount or more of queens worth damage. | ||
|
Mettis
84 Posts
| ||
|
RogerChillingworth
2984 Posts
decreasing the DPS of everything by 1/2. Longer fights, more micro, more time to defend, buildings don't die in 2 seconds, etc. As a PTR-like test, I think, or custom map, would like to see how it pans out. | ||
|
SC-Shield
Bulgaria831 Posts
There will be performance issues unless Blizzard optimises the game. | ||
|
AcrossFromTime
29 Posts
| ||
|
atuor
United States82 Posts
| ||
|
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
| ||
|
Aunvilgodess
954 Posts
| ||
|
Anc13nt
1557 Posts
| ||
|
GreasedUpDeafGuy
United States398 Posts
| ||
|
Vision_
861 Posts
That s not a surprised, it doesn t looks like a FPS PS : I always liked Protoss warp units, i think the problem is directly connected to the actual intensity of the game speed. | ||
|
xsnac
Barbados1365 Posts
make guerilla style small pack harass units more efficient (increase their speed) Adding more hp (maybe 20% more to everything). I know this sounds a bit like broodwar, but I never played it much tbh. I think a more relevant example would be how Dota 1 was played, and then Heroes of Newerth (HoN) came, and it had this much much faster pace of the game which was more or less bs, (everything was getting 1 shooted). and my best suggestion would be: Consider combining units and/or USE USE USE time gated abilities. e.g. (I play only protoss so this comes to mind first) remove adepts BUT give zealots the teleport ability from adepts for the first 6 minutes of the game, or in general, consider giving units abilities for a limited period of time, from minute 10 to minute 15 for example. Imagine all the timing possibilities would this open up. It would complelty revamp the game just by adding 2 abilities / race only available from minute 0 to 6 or from minute 6 to 10 or something like that. | ||
|
loppy2345
39 Posts
| ||
|
Vision_
861 Posts
On May 17 2020 19:39 loppy2345 wrote: Stop units from clumping. Smart cast avoids having to micro manage units, why isn't this true for anti-clumping, instead of needing 500apm to split units :/ Actually from what i know, it s difficult to improve the pathfinding in relation with latency. Blizzard already reached to create the best RTS engine. What actually is not clear is dependency between units (and their role) You could eventually add skirmisher as a new role, three visible units which represents only one with a reduction on every splash damage - each unit inside the main one lose the same amount of hit point and they die together (who cares if this isn t so real as long as the engine is working well) ![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/KqCVpdy/3marines.png) ![[image loading]](https://i.ibb.co/ysjVTpV/revert-splash-damage.png) | ||
|
WightyCity
Canada887 Posts
| ||
|
Decendos
Germany1338 Posts
On May 17 2020 06:34 atuor wrote: Add replay & spectator modes that are from the unit's POV. This would be so super cool! As for my suggestions: P: remove forcefields, give sentry a new support spell that buffs gateway units in area for x seconds. Either more damage or take less damage while under the new spell. Helps gateway armies vs bio or roach Ling bane ravager and removes forcefields that just anti micro spell for T and Z. T: not sure, Terran is in a really good place using basically all units on a regular basis. Maybe try something like medivacs are now dropships only, new unit medic but as fusion core upgrade get medivacs again. Z: buff aggressive harass options of Zerg. For example: - dropperlords also gain some extra base speed after morph - burrow move roaches get 2 extra armor while burrowed - let SHs be 4 supply so massing them sucks but buff in another way like being faster or give them burrow move - remove neural on infestor and give it a harass ability. Maybe even ITs back but make them be only 10hp or so and do more ground than air dmg so that they suck in army fights but are good vs workers | ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
buff gateway units | ||
|
Jenia6109
Russian Federation1612 Posts
| ||
|
washikie
United States752 Posts
On May 14 2020 15:03 catplanetcatplanet wrote: Record cooler voice lines. Hydralisk in particular says some reprehensible shit, and none of the brood lord's jokes really land for me. Lol | ||
|
washikie
United States752 Posts
Workers cost less supply (.5), rebalance all races accordingly. This would make zerg op and Terran underpowered probably so things would have to be adjusted. But it’s silly that past 4 bases you don’t really get an economic edge from having more until the first 4 dry up. Imagine if a worker was .5 supply. You could have 140 workers mining 8 base which would really help to spread things out earlier and provide less incentive to deathball. Obviously zerg benefits the most from this change while Terran no longer gets the very significant hidden supply advantage of the mule. But if things could be rebalanced to fix the problems it would be really fun to play. | ||
|
Solar424
United States4001 Posts
| ||
|
NicolasJohnson
30 Posts
For the gameplay, I would introduce an Easy mode on the ladder, with all units' HP multiplied by 2, to have longer lasting fights. For mental sanity, yes changing the way the replays work would be better  And to end balance whining, strongly minimize the frequencey of the interventions of the balance team. I firmly believe a strong reason why people whine so much is because they think they will be heard, while the game is not in an horrible place today. There should not be more than one balance change a year in my opinion. Today there is so much resentment inside of the community I sometimes feel like it is exactly the same kind of hatred than racism consists in (calling the 3 species "races", may have been a mistake in the first place ). | ||
|
SetStndbySmn
United States657 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10175 Posts
On May 14 2020 14:32 yht9657 wrote: Usually people in this type of posts just want the game to be more like broodwar, and it seems this post is no exception. Nothing wrong with that  | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
2- Training mode - you enter the BO and its benchmarks and then you fight the clock. | ||
|
ejozl
Denmark3408 Posts
The 0.5 supply worker could be a great change, though I'd change it so all other unit supplies are increased instead and now 400 max supply. It hasn't really been tested though, so there could be some side effects from this change. I think simply increasing the Supply by 100 could be the best thing for SC2 right now. It fixes the only issue about the economy that the LotV change didn't fix and we could even increase the value of the high value mineral patches further, so it's more forgiving when you lose expansions. AoE could get slightly better and that would increase the likelihood for strategic come backs. Turtle units could be buffed way stronger, we could even have the absolute killer Seeker Missile and it wouldn't be a problem, because the other player could take 8 bases, have 110+ workers on them and just send wave after wave of unit, depleting the energy on them and killing the turtling player. Sc2 would be a lot cooler if there was more turtle vs mass expand dynamics, LotV have streamlined the game so that everyone needs expanding, which is really cool, but the bad thing about it is that everyone have to keep up or they die, so every race plays essentially the same strategy. | ||
|
emperorofwild
87 Posts
| ||
|
AF0x
United States59 Posts
Remove the queen, move hydra den to hatch tech, and re-balance zerg units around that. Remove swarm hosts. Remove the MULE, supply call-down, medivac speed boost, and hellbat ability to be healed by medivacs and re-balance terran units around that. Remove cyclones cuz they're boring too. Also yeah, make unit pathfinding such that AoE is weaker and units clump less, and reduce damage or boost HP of everything in the game. | ||
|
RandomPlayer416
84 Posts
| ||
|
algue
France1436 Posts
For example : Terran gets Protoss macro mechanics => Supply depots generate a "landing zone" around them and terran units can be "warped" on said landing zones after researching the terran equivalent of the warp gate. Terran buildings can only be built on those landing zones ; Mules replaced by chronoboosts. Zerg gets Terran macro mechanics => Queen's injections replaced by an infested mule. Zerg buildings work like Terran buildings and can be upgraded to work the same way as either the reactor or the tech lab (Ex : Pools are either upgraded to produce lings 4 by 4 or or upgraded to become a banelings nest and produce banelings or zerglings) Protoss gets Zerg macro mechanics => The Nexus generates a warp field around it that works like the zerg creep, the chronoboost is replaced by protoss injections and protoss warp nodes (akin to creep turmors) ; All the units are produced from the nexus, protoss buildings only help unlock the protoss tech tree ; protoss units are faster when walking on the warp fields. Sounds like fun  | ||
|
washikie
United States752 Posts
On May 19 2020 05:33 algue wrote: Not something I'd change to the actual game but i'd love to see a mod where the core macro mechanics of each races are swapped. For example : Terran gets Protoss macro mechanics => Supply depots generate a "landing zone" around them and terran units can be "warped" on said landing zones after researching the terran equivalent of the warp gate. Terran buildings can only be built on those landing zones ; Mules replaced by chronoboosts. Zerg gets Terran macro mechanics => Queen's injections replaced by an infested mule. Zerg buildings work like Terran buildings and can be upgraded to work the same way as either the reactor or the tech lab (Ex : Pools are either upgraded to produce lings 4 by 4 or or upgraded to become a banelings nest and produce banelings or zerglings) Protoss gets Zerg macro mechanics => The Nexus generates a warp field around it that works like the zerg creep, the chronoboost is replaced by protoss injections and protoss warp nodes (akin to creep turmors) ; All the units are produced from the nexus, protoss buildings only help unlock the protoss tech tree ; protoss units are faster when walking on the warp fields. Sounds like fun I can envision the immortals made 15 at a time late game tech switch that would be scary as hell. | ||
|
geokilla
Canada8240 Posts
| ||
|
AssyrianKing
Australia2114 Posts
Regarding the mining efficiency. I remember back then there was many different ideas to solve this issue, some of which actually sounded quite good. Bring back highground advantage. I believe in WoL, because of how bad the maps were, a lot of units were nerfed. I think balancing should be done from scratch. -Remove Adept (There are already Zealots) -Remove Tempest (There are already carriers) -Warp Prism pickup range back to normal. -Medivac speed boost removed. | ||
|
Penev
28483 Posts
On May 14 2020 14:17 dbRic1203 wrote: Add a 4th race Maybe Hybrid or Xelnaga or from outside the corprulu sector entirely A completely mechanical one in contrast to the completely biological Zerg. | ||
|
neptunusfisk
2286 Posts
Less clumping, bigger armies, less concentrated DPS. Fights will be bigger, longer and more complicated. | ||
|
EmoBacon
41 Posts
| ||
|
Carminedust
487 Posts
| ||
|
TelecoM
United States10675 Posts
| ||
|
alpenrahm
Germany628 Posts
| ||
|
jeputera
30 Posts
| ||
|
TentativePanda
United States800 Posts
On July 06 2020 01:42 jeputera wrote: Really Simple, make all spellcasters less effective. I really disagree with this. Spellcasters aren’t particularly good until super late game attrition kicks in. They are pretty balanced before that. Except High Templars lol | ||
|
Lucasmus
35 Posts
As a trade off, Terran gets more upgrades, like up to 5/5. | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16765 Posts
Blizzard should've written a big cheque and just let one of the great Korean live event promoters run their entire SC2 esports operation. Whoever the "Don King"//"Dana White"//"Vince Mcmahon" of esports was... just pay him the huge money guys like Don King/Dana White expect and let him run it. Dana White, Vince Mcmahon, and Don King might seem like overpaid, loud-mouth, toital prick assholes. That's fine.. maybe they are. They also bring in the money. Every great salesman I've ever met has a huge ego and is a big loud talker. | ||
|
followZeRoX
Serbia1451 Posts
Nerf for lurkers base damage. Swarm host should fire 1 locust or reduce damafe. Infestor should have infested terrans back and removal of shroud. Banelings should cost 1 additional supply. Queen range 8again with previous transfuse way. Charge to get back to prevous state and reduced damage of zealots. Carrier removal or huge nerf. Buff voidrays. Reduced damage for storm. Collosi buff, immortal and archon less tanky. Cc build time faster, stronger base defence (adding something like canons). Tankivac back but in limited mode (like they can move just for an inch or 2). More easier control of units, maybe adding some spells which are aoe for fight against banelings. | ||
|
althaz
Australia1001 Posts
On May 14 2020 14:32 yht9657 wrote: Usually people in this type of posts just want the game to be more like broodwar, and it seems this post is no exception. That's because in some ways Broodwar is the superior game. Who wouldn't want the best of Broodwar (which is awesome) and the best of SC2 (which is awesome) together in one game? Hey Bliz, SC3 pls? For me, if I could only make one change, it would be to have Broodwar-esque scaling of the economy. IMO that total accident is one of the reasons BW is better to watch (I watch and play both games, but I prefer watching Broodwar). If I could have two changes, I'd globally reduce DPS and buff building HP. | ||
|
Jan1997
Norway671 Posts
| ||
|
Omnit
1 Post
OR LMAO REMOVE ALL THE SHIT UNITS AND GO BACK TO WINGS LEVEL. LMAO. MVP LMAO EZ | ||
|
CrymeaTerran
149 Posts
| ||
|
Itsxjoeyy
30 Posts
| ||
|
BlueStar
Bulgaria1167 Posts
reduce all dmg across all units - want fights that last at least 3+ seconds. | ||
|
BlueStar
Bulgaria1167 Posts
On July 06 2020 14:56 CrymeaTerran wrote: not letting david kim touch the game even once but rocks | ||
|
WaesumNinja
210 Posts
On July 06 2020 04:03 JimmyJRaynor wrote: In the story line I'd have Kerrigan turn down Raynor flat just like she did in SC1. Raynor remains bald. I know right?! Where's the romance thing even coming from. Kerrigan should've been the big bad in Sc2, replaying the old campaign feels pretty jarring knowing what's coming next.
| ||
|
Harris1st
Germany6945 Posts
Rocks are the invention of Dustin "Terrible Damage" Browder I think | ||
|
Rantech
Chile527 Posts
- remove disruptor - remove adepts - robo can only be built adjacent to a gate (in the same pylon radius) - make charge deal damage again, but this time scalable with upgrades. Make basic units great again, and f...proxy robos | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
OSC
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
PiGosaur Monday
LiuLi Cup
RSL Revival
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Zoun vs Classic
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
