| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
followZeRoX
Serbia1449 Posts
On November 27 2019 22:26 AttackZerg wrote: I play mostly unranked games. Sometimes I am just not interested in getting crushed. Started playing in April for the first time ever. =) He was saying that ranked works fine for most of us, for some reason, and ranked do not. | ||
|
AttackZerg
United States7454 Posts
On November 27 2019 22:48 JanDe wrote: He was saying that ranked works fine for most of us, for some reason, and ranked do not. I don't know how to read his words to mean that, but sure. I thought he was calling me out for being chicken. | ||
|
Mverdo
24 Posts
On November 27 2019 07:07 Obamarauder wrote: new meta is to leave league every match. its what maru does We have reached new levels of 'just play like maru'! | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/Ya8pVj9.png) | ||
|
Harris1st
Germany6906 Posts
On November 27 2019 22:26 AttackZerg wrote: I play mostly unranked games. Sometimes I am just not interested in getting crushed. Started playing in April for the first time ever. =) Bit offtopic but here it goes anyway: Isn't in unranked all kinds of MMR's play versus each other? I think the chance of getting crushed is higher in unranked than in ranked where you actually play vs people with your skill level. Or maybe I'm just wrong | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
| ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On November 28 2019 00:25 Cyro wrote: Unranked is the same as the 1v1 queue but it doesn't show you your MMR. You still have one. Also unranked uses wider range to find the opponent, although it tries to be as close as possible. So waiting times are usually shorter. AT least that's how it works for me and based on who I have faced in the past  | ||
|
Majick
416 Posts
On November 28 2019 00:20 Harris1st wrote: Bit offtopic but here it goes anyway: Isn't in unranked all kinds of MMR's play versus each other? I think the chance of getting crushed is higher in unranked than in ranked where you actually play vs people with your skill level. Or maybe I'm just wrong I played unranked a lot for the past few weeks and have a feeling that mmr either increases very slowly or stays in place. I am winning like 80% of my unranked games because most of the time it matches me with people 200-300 mmr points below my ranked mmr. | ||
|
Majick
416 Posts
| ||
|
norlock
Netherlands918 Posts
| ||
|
Majick
416 Posts
On November 28 2019 02:40 norlock wrote: Why don't they nerf the range of the queen? I don't know why such a unit should have such a huge range, when libs, warp prism, etc all get nerfed in range. I think it should be a t1 unit to just survive air at the opening phase of the game. It's role is too generic like the infestor was/is in my opinion, what do you think? I think the queen should be even stronger but there should be a limit of 1 queen per hatch so that massiing is not an option. I hate it that I have to build so many queens to survive early game without falling behind. | ||
|
Big-t
Austria1350 Posts
On November 28 2019 02:44 Majick wrote: I think the queen should be even stronger but there should be a limit of 1 queen per hatch so that massiing is not an option. I hate it that I have to build so many queens to survive early game without falling behind. This. I hate watching mass queens and I think it is the real reason zerg was / is so strong. One queen per hatch could solve this. Maybe buff the queen a bit, but I think it is not Ok that Zergs just mass queens the whole time. But yeah, anti air range feals to be too much. | ||
|
alanmartinpmp
United Kingdom1 Post
| ||
|
heronn
34 Posts
| ||
|
Majick
416 Posts
On November 28 2019 03:03 Big-t wrote: This. I hate watching mass queens and I think it is the real reason zerg was / is so strong. One queen per hatch could solve this. Maybe buff the queen a bit, but I think it is not Ok that Zergs just mass queens the whole time. But yeah, anti air range feals to be too much. Yeah and on top of that it just looks and feels plain stupid. Why would a small Zerg brood need 6-8 queens to manage 2-3 hatcheries and a pack of zerglings? It is nothing else than duct taping balance issues with terrible, terrible design choices. I always get so triggered when I think about it too much. It is so dumb... For instance, if you look at an ant colony (which somehow always reminds me of a Zerg brood), there is usually one queen per colony, sometimes more, but usually just one, as the name, __queen__, implies. | ||
|
BaneRiders
Sweden3630 Posts
| ||
|
91matt
United Kingdom147 Posts
On November 28 2019 03:23 BaneRiders wrote: What are the odds of Blizzard rolling back to the previous patch? 0% chance | ||
|
BaneRiders
Sweden3630 Posts
So we are stuck with these ramps then, until they find a solution? Like patch 4.11.1?  | ||
|
91matt
United Kingdom147 Posts
On November 28 2019 03:37 BaneRiders wrote: So we are stuck with these ramps then, until they find a solution? Like patch 4.11.1? gotta wait it out, i imagine they will fix ladder pretty soon though. | ||
|
MockHamill
Sweden1798 Posts
That way if you have more than 5 queens it will decrease your potential army supply. Zergs being able to defeat all early attacks by going mas Queens seems a bit absurd in my opinion. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
PiGosaur Monday
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
The PondCast
WardiTV European League
Replay Cast
Epic.LAN
CranKy Ducklings
Epic.LAN
CSO Contender
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
