• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:51
CEST 05:51
KST 12:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 637 users

4.11.0 Patch - Major balance changes, Mengsk Commander - P…

Forum Index > SC2 General
240 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 12 13 Next All
SirPinky
Profile Joined February 2011
United States525 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-28 10:13:34
November 28 2019 09:55 GMT
#81
On November 28 2019 07:12 Snakestyle11 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2019 05:14 Elentos wrote:
On November 28 2019 04:54 Snakestyle11 wrote:
Queen were giving extra range so libs cant deny mining til spire unit.

Queens were given extra range primarily for this, but also the strength of tankivacs and possibly 2-1-1 back in 2016. 2-1-1 is a dead build, tankivacs were removed a few months after the queen buff and liberators no longer have the range they used to. On top of that, mapmakers in this day and age are very aware that liberators exist and have that in their mind when they set up their maps.

Functionally, the 8 range anti-air queen is a relic from a time where Zerg had it a lot worse. It has outlived every reason it was implemented for. So I think the question of whether it's still necessary to have that +1 extra range that snipes air units in the middle of the map from the natural is at the very least justified.


True,It could maybe be reverted to 7 range, especially with WP pick up nerf, lib range nerf, and tankivacs removal.

Too bad they had to break the game even more by adding free teleport battlecruisers that can shoot while moving and be in your main base at the 5minute mark.

Now if you remove 1 range from queens, BCs can just kite them away and kill everything on their path while moving away. Lmao.

Its kind of ridiculous that its viable way to open is with a BC as your first gas unit, and harass workers with it.
Why does every damn terran unit has to be a worker harass unit.

Dont mean to offend anyone, but this is what happen when our game is balanced by the ppl in charge of coop commander. I really think they are the same ppl, and probably dont have the resources they need to properly balance this game or change the design...


Your last sentence is kind of funny. You realize that Terran economy is terrible early game. All things equal: Protoss will have 25% more workers in the first 5 minutes without disruption; Zerg will have even more. This is why Terran's are not winning. There are maps that take almost a minute to cross and Zerg units that trade evenly AND have a better economy...similar with Protoss.

I would enjoy games where Terran does not have to kill 10+ workers to be even.
How much better to get wisdom than gold; to get insight rather than silver!
Penev
Profile Joined October 2012
28474 Posts
November 28 2019 10:42 GMT
#82
Now show me some S H R O U D zergbois, you'll only have to evolve through the entire tech tree to get it!
I Protoss winner, could it be?
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19229 Posts
November 28 2019 11:17 GMT
#83
On November 28 2019 13:42 AttackZerg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2019 10:59 BisuDagger wrote:
On November 28 2019 07:12 Snakestyle11 wrote:
On November 28 2019 05:14 Elentos wrote:
On November 28 2019 04:54 Snakestyle11 wrote:
Queen were giving extra range so libs cant deny mining til spire unit.

Queens were given extra range primarily for this, but also the strength of tankivacs and possibly 2-1-1 back in 2016. 2-1-1 is a dead build, tankivacs were removed a few months after the queen buff and liberators no longer have the range they used to. On top of that, mapmakers in this day and age are very aware that liberators exist and have that in their mind when they set up their maps.

Functionally, the 8 range anti-air queen is a relic from a time where Zerg had it a lot worse. It has outlived every reason it was implemented for. So I think the question of whether it's still necessary to have that +1 extra range that snipes air units in the middle of the map from the natural is at the very least justified.


True,It could maybe be reverted to 7 range, especially with WP pick up nerf, lib range nerf, and tankivacs removal.

Too bad they had to break the game even more by adding free teleport battlecruisers that can shoot while moving and be in your main base at the 5minute mark.

Now if you remove 1 range from queens, BCs can just kite them away and kill everything on their path while moving away. Lmao.

Its kind of ridiculous that its viable way to open is with a BC as your first gas unit, and harass workers with it.
Why does every damn terran unit has to be a worker harass unit.

Dont mean to offend anyone, but this is what happen when our game is balanced by the ppl in charge of coop commander. I really think they are the same ppl, and probably dont have the resources they need to properly balance this game or change the design...

This is just theory crafting:
I'm not opposed to going a step further to make hydras attainable. Zergs get the least units unlocked per structure built. Pool, hydra den, lurker den, ultra etc... All are buildings that unlock one unit. I would be okay if the roach warren (renamed?) also unlocked hydras that way they can be built without the extra building investment and provide the extra has for more just as earlier.


Not to nitpick but a roach warren unlocks 2 units right - roach and ravagers?

I didn't list Roach Warren as I agree with you, even though you need lair to get to the second unit. I only mention roach warren as an option for where the hydra could come out.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
Harris1st
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany6891 Posts
November 28 2019 12:02 GMT
#84
On November 28 2019 19:42 Penev wrote:
Now show me some S H R O U D zergbois, you'll only have to evolve through the entire tech tree to get it!


Hmmm ... since we have that ability now anyway and nobody uses it. How about some early game harass defense vs Protoss / Terran air?

Like Queens can cast shroud (upgradable in Hatcheries?) now and we move Transfuse to Infestors and buff it slightly.
Would help vs all sorts of air harass, be it Lib, Banshee, BC, Oracle, VR. Situation with Phoenix is different since they lift above the shroud. Or they can't lift things under shroud period.
Go Serral! GG EZ for Ence. Flashbang dance FTW
Majick
Profile Joined August 2016
416 Posts
November 28 2019 12:03 GMT
#85
On November 28 2019 20:17 BisuDagger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2019 13:42 AttackZerg wrote:
On November 28 2019 10:59 BisuDagger wrote:
On November 28 2019 07:12 Snakestyle11 wrote:
On November 28 2019 05:14 Elentos wrote:
On November 28 2019 04:54 Snakestyle11 wrote:
Queen were giving extra range so libs cant deny mining til spire unit.

Queens were given extra range primarily for this, but also the strength of tankivacs and possibly 2-1-1 back in 2016. 2-1-1 is a dead build, tankivacs were removed a few months after the queen buff and liberators no longer have the range they used to. On top of that, mapmakers in this day and age are very aware that liberators exist and have that in their mind when they set up their maps.

Functionally, the 8 range anti-air queen is a relic from a time where Zerg had it a lot worse. It has outlived every reason it was implemented for. So I think the question of whether it's still necessary to have that +1 extra range that snipes air units in the middle of the map from the natural is at the very least justified.


True,It could maybe be reverted to 7 range, especially with WP pick up nerf, lib range nerf, and tankivacs removal.

Too bad they had to break the game even more by adding free teleport battlecruisers that can shoot while moving and be in your main base at the 5minute mark.

Now if you remove 1 range from queens, BCs can just kite them away and kill everything on their path while moving away. Lmao.

Its kind of ridiculous that its viable way to open is with a BC as your first gas unit, and harass workers with it.
Why does every damn terran unit has to be a worker harass unit.

Dont mean to offend anyone, but this is what happen when our game is balanced by the ppl in charge of coop commander. I really think they are the same ppl, and probably dont have the resources they need to properly balance this game or change the design...

This is just theory crafting:
I'm not opposed to going a step further to make hydras attainable. Zergs get the least units unlocked per structure built. Pool, hydra den, lurker den, ultra etc... All are buildings that unlock one unit. I would be okay if the roach warren (renamed?) also unlocked hydras that way they can be built without the extra building investment and provide the extra has for more just as earlier.


Not to nitpick but a roach warren unlocks 2 units right - roach and ravagers?

I didn't list Roach Warren as I agree with you, even though you need lair to get to the second unit. I only mention roach warren as an option for where the hydra could come out.


You don’t need Lair to unlock Ravagers...
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19229 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-28 13:16:40
November 28 2019 13:12 GMT
#86
On November 28 2019 21:03 Majick wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2019 20:17 BisuDagger wrote:
On November 28 2019 13:42 AttackZerg wrote:
On November 28 2019 10:59 BisuDagger wrote:
On November 28 2019 07:12 Snakestyle11 wrote:
On November 28 2019 05:14 Elentos wrote:
On November 28 2019 04:54 Snakestyle11 wrote:
Queen were giving extra range so libs cant deny mining til spire unit.

Queens were given extra range primarily for this, but also the strength of tankivacs and possibly 2-1-1 back in 2016. 2-1-1 is a dead build, tankivacs were removed a few months after the queen buff and liberators no longer have the range they used to. On top of that, mapmakers in this day and age are very aware that liberators exist and have that in their mind when they set up their maps.

Functionally, the 8 range anti-air queen is a relic from a time where Zerg had it a lot worse. It has outlived every reason it was implemented for. So I think the question of whether it's still necessary to have that +1 extra range that snipes air units in the middle of the map from the natural is at the very least justified.


True,It could maybe be reverted to 7 range, especially with WP pick up nerf, lib range nerf, and tankivacs removal.

Too bad they had to break the game even more by adding free teleport battlecruisers that can shoot while moving and be in your main base at the 5minute mark.

Now if you remove 1 range from queens, BCs can just kite them away and kill everything on their path while moving away. Lmao.

Its kind of ridiculous that its viable way to open is with a BC as your first gas unit, and harass workers with it.
Why does every damn terran unit has to be a worker harass unit.

Dont mean to offend anyone, but this is what happen when our game is balanced by the ppl in charge of coop commander. I really think they are the same ppl, and probably dont have the resources they need to properly balance this game or change the design...

This is just theory crafting:
I'm not opposed to going a step further to make hydras attainable. Zergs get the least units unlocked per structure built. Pool, hydra den, lurker den, ultra etc... All are buildings that unlock one unit. I would be okay if the roach warren (renamed?) also unlocked hydras that way they can be built without the extra building investment and provide the extra has for more just as earlier.


Not to nitpick but a roach warren unlocks 2 units right - roach and ravagers?

I didn't list Roach Warren as I agree with you, even though you need lair to get to the second unit. I only mention roach warren as an option for where the hydra could come out.


You don’t need Lair to unlock Ravagers...

*facepalm* Can I blame my two year old for my brain deadness? To explain where my head was, I've always thought ravagers would be a better lair unit and hydras a tier 1. It's part of the SC1 in me that wants hydras available sooner.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
bela.mervado
Profile Joined December 2008
Hungary387 Posts
November 28 2019 14:26 GMT
#87
i wish hydra to be a 1 supply unit on hatch level, probably ~50 hp until the lair level research is done
(speed+hp like banes, or hp distributed to the 2 upgrades, like each gives +20 hp so hopefully there would not be too sharp spikes in hydra power level, and no unstoppable early allins with hydra).
hmm this looks like a zerg marine
AttackZerg
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States7454 Posts
November 28 2019 14:34 GMT
#88
On November 28 2019 22:12 BisuDagger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2019 21:03 Majick wrote:
On November 28 2019 20:17 BisuDagger wrote:
On November 28 2019 13:42 AttackZerg wrote:
On November 28 2019 10:59 BisuDagger wrote:
On November 28 2019 07:12 Snakestyle11 wrote:
On November 28 2019 05:14 Elentos wrote:
On November 28 2019 04:54 Snakestyle11 wrote:
Queen were giving extra range so libs cant deny mining til spire unit.

Queens were given extra range primarily for this, but also the strength of tankivacs and possibly 2-1-1 back in 2016. 2-1-1 is a dead build, tankivacs were removed a few months after the queen buff and liberators no longer have the range they used to. On top of that, mapmakers in this day and age are very aware that liberators exist and have that in their mind when they set up their maps.

Functionally, the 8 range anti-air queen is a relic from a time where Zerg had it a lot worse. It has outlived every reason it was implemented for. So I think the question of whether it's still necessary to have that +1 extra range that snipes air units in the middle of the map from the natural is at the very least justified.


True,It could maybe be reverted to 7 range, especially with WP pick up nerf, lib range nerf, and tankivacs removal.

Too bad they had to break the game even more by adding free teleport battlecruisers that can shoot while moving and be in your main base at the 5minute mark.

Now if you remove 1 range from queens, BCs can just kite them away and kill everything on their path while moving away. Lmao.

Its kind of ridiculous that its viable way to open is with a BC as your first gas unit, and harass workers with it.
Why does every damn terran unit has to be a worker harass unit.

Dont mean to offend anyone, but this is what happen when our game is balanced by the ppl in charge of coop commander. I really think they are the same ppl, and probably dont have the resources they need to properly balance this game or change the design...

This is just theory crafting:
I'm not opposed to going a step further to make hydras attainable. Zergs get the least units unlocked per structure built. Pool, hydra den, lurker den, ultra etc... All are buildings that unlock one unit. I would be okay if the roach warren (renamed?) also unlocked hydras that way they can be built without the extra building investment and provide the extra has for more just as earlier.


Not to nitpick but a roach warren unlocks 2 units right - roach and ravagers?

I didn't list Roach Warren as I agree with you, even though you need lair to get to the second unit. I only mention roach warren as an option for where the hydra could come out.


You don’t need Lair to unlock Ravagers...

*facepalm* Can I blame my two year old for my brain deadness? To explain where my head was, I've always thought ravagers would be a better lair unit and hydras a tier 1. It's part of the SC1 in me that wants hydras available sooner.


This.

Queens+creep and no early hydras have been the strangest adjustments for me. That and muta control being way, way less dangerous.
Harris1st
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany6891 Posts
November 28 2019 14:34 GMT
#89
On November 28 2019 23:26 bela.mervado wrote:
i wish hydra to be a 1 supply unit on hatch level, probably ~50 hp until the lair level research is done
(speed+hp like banes, or hp distributed to the 2 upgrades, like each gives +20 hp so hopefully there would not be too sharp spikes in hydra power level, and no unstoppable early allins with hydra).
hmm this looks like a zerg marine


Exactly. Makes it boring and generic. I'm against it
Go Serral! GG EZ for Ence. Flashbang dance FTW
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-28 15:17:31
November 28 2019 15:14 GMT
#90
On November 28 2019 19:42 Penev wrote:
Now show me some S H R O U D zergbois, you'll only have to evolve through the entire tech tree to get it!

Have. To. Resist. The. Urge. To. Link. The. SWTOR. Videos. Where. I. Used. The. Shroud.

Nghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh,

Fine, I made it.
(I simply love the fact I used shroud so many times, although in a different Star* game )

I just don't get the usage, like at all. What was the intention? That you group your hydras and f2 them under carriers? While they don't melt to storms, big boom balls, archons or colossi? With a radius 3? (IIRC) Even on lair it's useless as the issue of airtoss strength always was the splash damage melting your units not the airtoss itself.

Fine, it will help lower league players against "airtoss" players, but this is usually decided with +2/+2 hydra push on lair before they can mass the critical mass(or get splash to it). So, uh. Yeah, then we return to the hive reminder :D
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
MockHamill
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden1798 Posts
November 28 2019 15:26 GMT
#91
On November 29 2019 00:14 deacon.frost wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2019 19:42 Penev wrote:
Now show me some S H R O U D zergbois, you'll only have to evolve through the entire tech tree to get it!

Have. To. Resist. The. Urge. To. Link. The. SWTOR. Videos. Where. I. Used. The. Shroud.

Nghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh,

Fine, I made it.
(I simply love the fact I used shroud so many times, although in a different Star* game )

I just don't get the usage, like at all. What was the intention? That you group your hydras and f2 them under carriers? While they don't melt to storms, big boom balls, archons or colossi? With a radius 3? (IIRC) Even on lair it's useless as the issue of airtoss strength always was the splash damage melting your units not the airtoss itself.

Fine, it will help lower league players against "airtoss" players, but this is usually decided with +2/+2 hydra push on lair before they can mass the critical mass(or get splash to it). So, uh. Yeah, then we return to the hive reminder :D


Well so far it seems like Zerg is still the strongest race. So until Zerg starts to stuggle in the late game I see no reason to improve the shroud ability.

Maybe a switch could be made where Vipers can not abduct massive units, then I could see an improved shroud ability. It would also be a design improvement.
bela.mervado
Profile Joined December 2008
Hungary387 Posts
November 28 2019 15:30 GMT
#92
On November 28 2019 23:34 Harris1st wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2019 23:26 bela.mervado wrote:
i wish hydra to be a 1 supply unit on hatch level, probably ~50 hp until the lair level research is done
(speed+hp like banes, or hp distributed to the 2 upgrades, like each gives +20 hp so hopefully there would not be too sharp spikes in hydra power level, and no unstoppable early allins with hydra).
hmm this looks like a zerg marine


Exactly. Makes it boring and generic. I'm against it


hehe good point there
Obamarauder
Profile Joined June 2015
697 Posts
November 28 2019 17:19 GMT
#93
liberators dont hit burrowed lurkers. is that intended?
batatm
Profile Joined June 2014
Israel116 Posts
November 28 2019 17:21 GMT
#94
On November 29 2019 00:26 MockHamill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 29 2019 00:14 deacon.frost wrote:
On November 28 2019 19:42 Penev wrote:
Now show me some S H R O U D zergbois, you'll only have to evolve through the entire tech tree to get it!

Have. To. Resist. The. Urge. To. Link. The. SWTOR. Videos. Where. I. Used. The. Shroud.

Nghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh,

Fine, I made it.
(I simply love the fact I used shroud so many times, although in a different Star* game )

I just don't get the usage, like at all. What was the intention? That you group your hydras and f2 them under carriers? While they don't melt to storms, big boom balls, archons or colossi? With a radius 3? (IIRC) Even on lair it's useless as the issue of airtoss strength always was the splash damage melting your units not the airtoss itself.

Fine, it will help lower league players against "airtoss" players, but this is usually decided with +2/+2 hydra push on lair before they can mass the critical mass(or get splash to it). So, uh. Yeah, then we return to the hive reminder :D


Well so far it seems like Zerg is still the strongest race. So until Zerg starts to stuggle in the late game I see no reason to improve the shroud ability.

Maybe a switch could be made where Vipers can not abduct massive units, then I could see an improved shroud ability. It would also be a design improvement.

having a uselss ability is a design flaw,not a balance problem.
if you're claiming that design flaws should not be dealt with until balance is resolved i can't agree with you.
also, declaring zerg is still the strongest race only 2 days after the patch was released is rather doubtful,
even when considering the tournament played on it prior to it's release (olimo weekly, HSC).
BabelFish1
Profile Joined September 2015
186 Posts
November 28 2019 19:26 GMT
#95
Not a fan of what they did to Protoss. Chargelots are awful now, Adepts may as well not be a unit and Flux Void Rays are kinda silly. You can juggle your opponent using 2 squads of them the same way Terran juggles their opponents with alternating drops...

Blizzard. If I want fast, disposable units, I'll play Zerg. If I want to harass the entire game and piss my opponent off with juggling drops, I'll play Terran. Why the heck are you screwing with racial identity and making weird changes nobody asked for? Charge wasn't overpowered and if your intent was for the Zealot to be a front line meat shield instead of a front line damage dealer, you failed because you didn't understand that the reason the +8 damage Chargelot tanked well wasn't because it actually tanked. It was because it killed stuff fast enough to reduce the damage it had to tank. And that was a variable you didn't think through. I am a little disappointed in you. Do better please.
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
November 28 2019 21:21 GMT
#96
On November 29 2019 04:26 BabelFish1 wrote:
Adepts may as well not be a unit.

They're shockingly bad now. You used to at least be able to get glaives and do a bit of harass against zerg while also being able to use them defensively afterward if the zerg countered with a bunch of lings or even a few roaches, but now that upgrade is basically useful for that one first surprise shot of harass then the adepts are useless afterward. It's turned the adept into this crappy all-or-nothing unit where either the zerg is unprepared for the harass and they lose all their drones and the game since 4-6 adepts can basically wipe out a mineral line in that 6 seconds, or the zerg defends the adepts and then the protoss is at a big disadvantage because the upgrade isn't really useful defensively. I can only really see adepts being used offensively in all-ins now and that's about it. If the time with boosted attack speed was longer they might be more useful in other scenarios, but as is they're not.

As is, when attacking, the opponent can bait out a shade from the adepts, retreat until either the shade is cancelled and put on cooldown or until the adepts shade, then attack a second or two later and at most deal with a couple seconds of adepts at boosted attack speed before they're on cooldown and back to attacking super slowly until the next shade completes. At best, an adept can be in their boosted attack speed around 6 of every 18 seconds, but that requires perfectly timed shades and for the adepts to be able to be utilized for the entire 6 seconds. I just don't see how it's a worthwhile upgrade to consider anymore outside of all-in timings.

I can't really judge charge zealots yet. They definitely seem better against zerg off-creep and for running into mineral lines. Terran is a different story. From what I've seen so far, charge zealots seem much worse when used how we used old zealots against Terran, but there are likely to be other ways of using them that we haven't fully figured out yet. Trapping armies with flanks and things like that will likely become much more common I expect.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
BabelFish1
Profile Joined September 2015
186 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-28 21:43:01
November 28 2019 21:41 GMT
#97
On November 29 2019 06:21 Ben... wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 29 2019 04:26 BabelFish1 wrote:
Adepts may as well not be a unit.

They're shockingly bad now. You used to at least be able to get glaives and do a bit of harass against zerg while also being able to use them defensively afterward if the zerg countered with a bunch of lings or even a few roaches, but now that upgrade is basically useful for that one first surprise shot of harass then the adepts are useless afterward. It's turned the adept into this crappy all-or-nothing unit where either the zerg is unprepared for the harass and they lose all their drones and the game since 4-6 adepts can basically wipe out a mineral line in that 6 seconds, or the zerg defends the adepts and then the protoss is at a big disadvantage because the upgrade isn't really useful defensively. I can only really see adepts being used offensively in all-ins now and that's about it. If the time with boosted attack speed was longer they might be more useful in other scenarios, but as is they're not.

As is, when attacking, the opponent can bait out a shade from the adepts, retreat until either the shade is cancelled and put on cooldown or until the adepts shade, then attack a second or two later and at most deal with a couple seconds of adepts at boosted attack speed before they're on cooldown and back to attacking super slowly until the next shade completes. At best, an adept can be in their boosted attack speed around 6 of every 18 seconds, but that requires perfectly timed shades and for the adepts to be able to be utilized for the entire 6 seconds. I just don't see how it's a worthwhile upgrade to consider anymore outside of all-in timings.

I can't really judge charge zealots yet. They definitely seem better against zerg off-creep and for running into mineral lines. Terran is a different story. From what I've seen so far, charge zealots seem much worse when used how we used old zealots against Terran, but there are likely to be other ways of using them that we haven't fully figured out yet. Trapping armies with flanks and things like that will likely become much more common I expect.


My issue with the chargelot in TvP is sure, we can flank with them but they just evaporate to everything now. The front loaded damage on charge reduced the amount of units the chargelot had to tank.

And with Tanks, Mines, Liberators and PFs...where's the runby potential? Terran is uniquely designed to be nigh immune to runbys.

As for Zerg, sure they're good at chasing down zerg units off creep but the old chargelots already did that and actually killed what they chased. You kited or you lost all your Roaches during the retreat. Now you can just stand still and force the chargelots to run away.

It was a very poorly thought through change...which is kinda par for all the Protoss changes. Poorly thought through.
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19229 Posts
November 28 2019 21:48 GMT
#98
Adepts and zealots need synergy in the late game. What if you could shade onto a unit and the shade would absorb damage as if it were a d-matrix for the duration of the shade attached to the unit/zealot. Adepts would then be useful in equal numbers with zealots, but frail damage dealers left alone.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
BabelFish1
Profile Joined September 2015
186 Posts
November 28 2019 22:50 GMT
#99
On November 29 2019 06:48 BisuDagger wrote:
Adepts and zealots need synergy in the late game. What if you could shade onto a unit and the shade would absorb damage as if it were a d-matrix for the duration of the shade attached to the unit/zealot. Adepts would then be useful in equal numbers with zealots, but frail damage dealers left alone.


Sounds complicated. Why doesn't the balance team just follow through and make the Adept actually deal damage and the Zealot actually tank damage?

Charge giving +30 or 40 shields and take away some of that meme worthy Zealot speed currently on charge and Adepts dealing bonus damage to targets they consecutively attack with Shade active would be enough, along with reverting that Glavies change they did.
BronzeKnee
Profile Joined March 2011
United States5217 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-11-29 00:55:10
November 29 2019 00:54 GMT
#100
On November 28 2019 06:25 Allred wrote:
well from a balance point of view. zealots are now officially awful units...


"These were the kind of bold balance changes Protoss needed to have chance in PvZ." - Random Terran Player

I called it when I saw the notes, these changes hurt Protoss more than they help.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 12 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Korean StarCraft League #77
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 203
ProTech60
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 858
Leta 215
Sharp 103
MaD[AoV]47
Bale 18
Icarus 11
LuMiX 1
Dota 2
monkeys_forever802
League of Legends
JimRising 772
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 201
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King162
Other Games
summit1g9463
shahzam824
WinterStarcraft355
Maynarde151
NeuroSwarm77
SortOf54
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick41862
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH300
• practicex 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra2181
• Shiphtur298
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6h 9m
WardiTV European League
12h 9m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
20h 9m
The PondCast
1d 6h
WardiTV European League
1d 8h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 12h
Replay Cast
1d 20h
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
[ Show More ]
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.