• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:35
CEST 07:35
KST 14:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed9Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll2Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension2Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Starcraft in widescreen BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 438 users

Team Liquid Map Contest 12 - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
114 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
billynasty
Profile Joined October 2014
United States260 Posts
January 11 2019 01:44 GMT
#21

You're right that "gimmicky" maps are more stale than standard maps but considering the vast majority of maps we have are standard maps I think it's a good thing to have some maps that have basically their own meta players have to adapt to.

Let's see it this way: if we have 5 standard and 2 weird maps in the mappool the overall variety is higher than when we have 7 standard maps even if the weird maps are more stale on their own.
The only problem is of course is that there's always the risk that a map turns out to be horribly imbalanced.


Isn't that pretty much what we have had the past few seasons? But what ends up happening is that the pro players end up vetoing the same weird maps over & over, so as a result we see the same few maps over & over again?
This "added variety" that you speak of ends up having the opposite effect where we in practice have less variety due to players vetoing those weird maps.
The key imo is not to have weird maps, but to have good maps with unique features.
I've been of the opinion that some of these more unique maps we've seen in the pool simply aren't that good.
I'm generalizing of course but I think map makers need to respect the plot. That these maps need to be balanced because this game & even our pro players livelihoods depend on them.

Given the past submissions I have no doubt our map making community will be up to the challenge. Its that selection process by Blizzard after the fact that i hold my breath for. Looking forward to seeing what everyone comes up with
i dont miss God but i sure miss Santa Claus
blunderfulguy
Profile Blog Joined April 2016
United States1415 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-11 02:35:04
January 11 2019 02:25 GMT
#22
I'm in favor of trying out new "weird"/"gimmicky" things for 1v1 maps as well as all kinds of custom maps, co-op, etc. etc. However, I dislike the new "toys" that have been presented specifially for these challenges so far, especially the Inhibitor Zone Generator. To me, inhibiting all unit movement outright in this way is a very unfun mechanic and something that, in my experience playing/running Dungeons & Dragons adventures, players will try to avoid at all costs or, if players are forced to go through it, become frustrated very quickly unless there is another mechanic/gimmick in the same area or close by, a puzzle to solve, treasure in the center of the aura, etc. that makes the encounter more interesting and fun.

Not only is it something I see as being unfun in practice, I also find it very unoriginal. New to SC2 =/= new to me and definitely doesn't automatically make it interesting, and so far (without seeing any maps that might implement it well, granted) that's all the inhibitor has going for it in my eyes.

Instead of the Inhibitor Zone Generator, I would much rather see new (fixed) air and line of sight/ranged attack blockers, new rocks/walls/interactive doors (structures that make new Tetris-block or custom-shaped rocks or indestructible walls, Jacky_'s Sky Gate as seen on Paradise Lost), new types of terrain (thick grass, deep snow, molten ground, rising or directionally flowing water, LAVA + Show Spoiler +
I'm not biased at all I promise
), etc. Or something that gives an aura or can be activated to buff nearby units for a certain amount of time that, instead of inhibiting movement, increases movement or perhaps allows them to enter "inhibited" areas and ignore that effect.

Even something simple like adding a button for each player that they can click to activate their controlled generators would turn the (imo) unfun gimmick into something that could be extremely interactive, strategic, and fun. Something that players won't want to avoid at all costs or (rightfully) blame for a loss or universally veto after one or two games.

On January 11 2019 10:23 Achamian wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2019 09:02 Nakajin wrote:
I'm ok with the change to mineral patches and gaz geyser, reaaaaaalllly not sure about the indestructible time warp, seems either super gimmicky/map breaking or totally useless. It's up to you guy's to change my mind!


I think if people use it to signify trudging through the snow / swamp / mud, it could be a great visual.

I like the idea of using the effect alongside weather changes on the map (affecting all units or only non-massive air units) much better, or, again, applying the effect to units moving across certain types of terrain (snow, mud, what-have-you). That's flavorful and cool and more interesting than not being to move somewhere just because the level designer placed an uninteractable inhibitor pylon nearby.

*Important edit: I always look forward to these map contests, even when I have no time to look at most of the maps or play on them, let alone make and submit any myself, this one's not an exception. I love seeing new maps. I just feel very strongly about these inhibitors and kind of (very much) oppose them being here for the challenge.
**And GLHF to the map makers!
Blunder Man doing everything thing a blunder can.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
January 11 2019 02:44 GMT
#23
The thing I find most interesting is that rich vespene geysers provide 8 gas per trip (unless I'm crazy, it was only 6 before the visual update).
Weavel
Profile Joined January 2010
Finland9221 Posts
January 11 2019 02:45 GMT
#24
I really want to see 4 spawn map make it into finals. Good luck to all contestants.
Life/Seed//Mvp/NaNiwa fighting! ZeNEX forever!
TheFish7
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States2824 Posts
January 11 2019 03:51 GMT
#25
On January 11 2019 10:19 Yonnua wrote:
What's the effect of the Inhibitor Zone on mining workers? Does it reduce their rate of mining (and consequently increase the potential saturation of a base)?

If so, could this create new configurations for bases: e.g. a rich mineral base with an inhibitor, where you can gain minerals at a faster rate, but only with an increased number of workers dedicated to a more precarious base?


My thoughts exactly.

I checked the data in the Editor, and the behavior only has one modification: Movement:Movement Speed Multiplier = 0.65 . So, the buff will only impact the amount of time it takes to return cargo, not the action of mining itself. It would have an impact but not sure the exact reduction. It also does not affect Frenzied units (Ultralisks).
~ ~ <°)))><~ ~ ~
Achamian
Profile Joined May 2017
82 Posts
January 11 2019 03:57 GMT
#26
On January 11 2019 12:51 TheFish7 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2019 10:19 Yonnua wrote:
What's the effect of the Inhibitor Zone on mining workers? Does it reduce their rate of mining (and consequently increase the potential saturation of a base)?

If so, could this create new configurations for bases: e.g. a rich mineral base with an inhibitor, where you can gain minerals at a faster rate, but only with an increased number of workers dedicated to a more precarious base?


My thoughts exactly.

I checked the data in the Editor, and the behavior only has one modification: Movement:Movement Speed Multiplier = 0.65 . So, the buff will only impact the amount of time it takes to return cargo, not the action of mining itself. It would have an impact but not sure the exact reduction. It also does not affect Frenzied units (Ultralisks).

But what ive you had a mineral base that could be mined from two sides, one easier to defend but in the Zone, and the opposite side harder to defend but zero Zone.
-NegativeZero-
Profile Joined August 2011
United States2141 Posts
January 11 2019 04:09 GMT
#27
i love the idea of the inhibitor fields, i'm 100% in favor of any feature that makes positioning more important and encourages players to think a little more about where they're moving their units.

good luck to all of my fellow mapmakers!
vibeo gane,
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
January 11 2019 04:17 GMT
#28
On January 11 2019 13:09 -NegativeZero- wrote:
i love the idea of the inhibitor fields, i'm 100% in favor of any feature that makes positioning more important and encourages players to think a little more about where they're moving their units.

good luck to all of my fellow mapmakers!

Yep. This game might not have a significant high-ground advantage like Brood War, but you can create basically the same dynamic by introducing slow-zones in certain low-ground or attacking areas. This can also make a "rush" map where defense is more reasonable, given the right construction.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Frudgey
Profile Joined September 2012
Canada3367 Posts
January 11 2019 04:49 GMT
#29
On January 11 2019 11:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
The thing I find most interesting is that rich vespene geysers provide 8 gas per trip (unless I'm crazy, it was only 6 before the visual update).

I'm super curious about the rich vespene geysers in general. I actually think they're neat and am curious to see if anything comes from them.

I do like them having some weird and unusual stuff, because we can always try it and if it doesn't work out then we don't need to use it again. See "Sparkle" in the ASL.
It is better to die for The Emperor than live for yourself.
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
January 11 2019 04:51 GMT
#30
I think workers spend around %40 of their time walking so it's like a %14 reduction in income per worker when they're slowed. You'd need more workers to saturate. It could have interesting effects on income per additional worker if, say, half the mineral line of a base is slowed.

8 Gas per trip is a bit difference compared to the 5 -> 7 difference in rich mineral fields. I guess the idea is that the overall gas income of a base can stay the same if you just use 1 rich geyser instead of 2 regular. It wouldn't do much other than free up 3 workers, though.
all's fair in love and melodies
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
January 11 2019 05:00 GMT
#31
On January 11 2019 13:49 Frudgey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2019 11:44 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
The thing I find most interesting is that rich vespene geysers provide 8 gas per trip (unless I'm crazy, it was only 6 before the visual update).

I'm super curious about the rich vespene geysers in general. I actually think they're neat and am curious to see if anything comes from them.

I do like them having some weird and unusual stuff, because we can always try it and if it doesn't work out then we don't need to use it again. See "Sparkle" in the ASL.


They have been used before (the six gas per trip variety), like on Atlantis Spaceship or GSL Daybreak. But that was quite a while ago, as Blizzard stopped allowing them due to the fact that they used to look just like regular geysers.
TheOneAboveU
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Germany3367 Posts
January 11 2019 08:10 GMT
#32
Good luck to all the creative minds out there, the features seem very interesting, so I can't wait to see what you all come up with!
Moderatoralias TripleM | @TL_TripleM | Big Dark Energy!
Kurao
Profile Joined April 2018
215 Posts
January 11 2019 10:10 GMT
#33
The rich vespene geyser concept is really interesting

Good luck to the contestants
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19230 Posts
January 11 2019 13:06 GMT
#34
On January 11 2019 13:17 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2019 13:09 -NegativeZero- wrote:
i love the idea of the inhibitor fields, i'm 100% in favor of any feature that makes positioning more important and encourages players to think a little more about where they're moving their units.

good luck to all of my fellow mapmakers!

Yep. This game might not have a significant high-ground advantage like Brood War, but you can create basically the same dynamic by introducing slow-zones in certain low-ground or attacking areas. This can also make a "rush" map where defense is more reasonable, given the right construction.

Inhibitor Zone Generator turns the maps into UMS imo. The high ground advantage was a way more organic way of creating map advantages. I think slowing units down should only come from casted abilities and not be a permanent ability. Are the generators at least destructible? If so, then I'm willing to give them a chance.

Lower mineral count: Is this exactly what it means or can we have higher mineral counts too? I think bases mine out very quickly. Not that it's a bad thing, but mining patches out any faster seems absurd. I'd like to see maps with heavier mineral counts at the third or fourth base locations so the mid-late game is propped up more. I don't know if it would lead to better games, but I'd like to see it in action and find out.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
opisska
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Poland8852 Posts
January 11 2019 14:15 GMT
#35
On January 11 2019 22:06 BisuDagger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2019 13:17 NewSunshine wrote:
On January 11 2019 13:09 -NegativeZero- wrote:
i love the idea of the inhibitor fields, i'm 100% in favor of any feature that makes positioning more important and encourages players to think a little more about where they're moving their units.

good luck to all of my fellow mapmakers!

Yep. This game might not have a significant high-ground advantage like Brood War, but you can create basically the same dynamic by introducing slow-zones in certain low-ground or attacking areas. This can also make a "rush" map where defense is more reasonable, given the right construction.

Inhibitor Zone Generator turns the maps into UMS imo. The high ground advantage was a way more organic way of creating map advantages. I think slowing units down should only come from casted abilities and not be a permanent ability. Are the generators at least destructible? If so, then I'm willing to give them a chance.

Lower mineral count: Is this exactly what it means or can we have higher mineral counts too? I think bases mine out very quickly. Not that it's a bad thing, but mining patches out any faster seems absurd. I'd like to see maps with heavier mineral counts at the third or fourth base locations so the mid-late game is propped up more. I don't know if it would lead to better games, but I'd like to see it in action and find out.


The lower mineral count obviously exists just to make mineral barriers that can be opened in a reasonable time, it doesn't seem targeted to actual bases.
"Jeez, that's far from ideal." - Serral, the king of mild trashtalk
TL+ Member
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19230 Posts
January 11 2019 14:53 GMT
#36
On January 11 2019 23:15 opisska wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2019 22:06 BisuDagger wrote:
On January 11 2019 13:17 NewSunshine wrote:
On January 11 2019 13:09 -NegativeZero- wrote:
i love the idea of the inhibitor fields, i'm 100% in favor of any feature that makes positioning more important and encourages players to think a little more about where they're moving their units.

good luck to all of my fellow mapmakers!

Yep. This game might not have a significant high-ground advantage like Brood War, but you can create basically the same dynamic by introducing slow-zones in certain low-ground or attacking areas. This can also make a "rush" map where defense is more reasonable, given the right construction.

Inhibitor Zone Generator turns the maps into UMS imo. The high ground advantage was a way more organic way of creating map advantages. I think slowing units down should only come from casted abilities and not be a permanent ability. Are the generators at least destructible? If so, then I'm willing to give them a chance.

Lower mineral count: Is this exactly what it means or can we have higher mineral counts too? I think bases mine out very quickly. Not that it's a bad thing, but mining patches out any faster seems absurd. I'd like to see maps with heavier mineral counts at the third or fourth base locations so the mid-late game is propped up more. I don't know if it would lead to better games, but I'd like to see it in action and find out.


The lower mineral count obviously exists just to make mineral barriers that can be opened in a reasonable time, it doesn't seem targeted to actual bases.

That's great then. I enjoy map opening strategies. They can make for creative play.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
Argonauta
Profile Joined July 2016
Spain4906 Posts
January 11 2019 15:27 GMT
#37
Really excited with new features!
Actually when I think ways to improve SC2 I always come up with: making terrain more determinant (Ex: mud and snow make units slow, roads and highways make units go fast) and ofc nerfing air to compensate.
Rogue | Maru | Scarlett | Trap
TL+ Member
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
January 11 2019 16:41 GMT
#38
On January 11 2019 22:06 BisuDagger wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2019 13:17 NewSunshine wrote:
On January 11 2019 13:09 -NegativeZero- wrote:
i love the idea of the inhibitor fields, i'm 100% in favor of any feature that makes positioning more important and encourages players to think a little more about where they're moving their units.

good luck to all of my fellow mapmakers!

Yep. This game might not have a significant high-ground advantage like Brood War, but you can create basically the same dynamic by introducing slow-zones in certain low-ground or attacking areas. This can also make a "rush" map where defense is more reasonable, given the right construction.

Inhibitor Zone Generator turns the maps into UMS imo. The high ground advantage was a way more organic way of creating map advantages. I think slowing units down should only come from casted abilities and not be a permanent ability.

yes but why
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19230 Posts
January 11 2019 17:20 GMT
#39
On January 12 2019 01:41 Ej_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2019 22:06 BisuDagger wrote:
On January 11 2019 13:17 NewSunshine wrote:
On January 11 2019 13:09 -NegativeZero- wrote:
i love the idea of the inhibitor fields, i'm 100% in favor of any feature that makes positioning more important and encourages players to think a little more about where they're moving their units.

good luck to all of my fellow mapmakers!

Yep. This game might not have a significant high-ground advantage like Brood War, but you can create basically the same dynamic by introducing slow-zones in certain low-ground or attacking areas. This can also make a "rush" map where defense is more reasonable, given the right construction.

Inhibitor Zone Generator turns the maps into UMS imo. The high ground advantage was a way more organic way of creating map advantages. I think slowing units down should only come from casted abilities and not be a permanent ability.

yes but why

Zones - Units are slowed in a way that you can't retreat without forces clumping. What it does is simply create areas of the map you want to avoid at all costs.

High Ground - Units aren't hindered but instead given an advantage. It allows you to defend key locations around the map including your offensive positions. So instead of creating places you never want to go to, it creates places on the map that provide opportunity for you to take these points instead and hold them.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
Doko
Profile Joined May 2010
Argentina1737 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-01-11 17:30:13
January 11 2019 17:27 GMT
#40
I'd like to see a map where the path between natural and 3rd has a slow zone but the 3rd has rich geysers, basically forcing you to commit a bit more to defending it to reap the rewards.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 25m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 243
StarCraft: Brood War
Noble 67
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm106
League of Legends
JimRising 859
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1330
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King184
Other Games
summit1g13474
WinterStarcraft376
ROOTCatZ45
Trikslyr36
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3234
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH370
• Hupsaiya 51
• practicex 33
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush2402
• Lourlo1434
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 25m
WardiTV European League
10h 25m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
18h 25m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 10h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
4 days
CSO Contender
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.