• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:58
CEST 20:58
KST 03:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists4Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up2PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition245.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)102$2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 151Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada11
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version) Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition ZvT - Army Composition - Slow Lings + Fast Banes Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle Stellar Fest $2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 15 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LANified! 37: Groundswell, BYOC LAN, Nov 28-30 2025
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive
Brood War
General
RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site BW General Discussion Question regarding recent ASL Bisu vs Larva game BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro8 Day 4 [ASL20] Ro8 Day 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Proposed Glossary of Strategic Uncertainty Current Meta TvZ Theorycraft - Improving on State of the Art 9 hatch vs 10 hatch vs 12 hatch
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts The Automated Ban List BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final
Blogs
[AI] From Comfort Women to …
Peanutsc
Mental Health In Esports: Wo…
TrAiDoS
Try to reverse getting fired …
Garnet
[ASL20] Players bad at pi…
pullarius1
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1430 users

David Kim / Tim Morten Interview @ BlizzCon: Changes for S…

Forum Index > SC2 General
52 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
-IAEVAI-KolosS
Profile Joined October 2016
Canada60 Posts
November 15 2016 12:22 GMT
#21
Well, that watch feature is going to almost never be used unless you're new to the game and don't know anything about Twitch.Tv, other gamer stream sites and TL.Net. As far as mech goes, I must agree with KeksX, I have been playing mech in all matchups at masters level since HOTS and never was the style less fun to play in my opinion. I like the fact that they're trying to make it more potent in a way, but I'd rather have fun playing a bit more dynamic mech every game and be ranked lower on ladder then playing boring mech that ranks high because of new buffs.

Just to point out, to me boring mech is pretty much the swarm host era and more dynamic mech is what Nathanias does on stream where he is the aggressor and moves out quite a lot to poke and trade with cyclones hellbats and tanks. Seems to work for him in GM.
Masters Terran Mech Player
saalih416
Profile Joined April 2016
19 Posts
November 15 2016 12:36 GMT
#22
The interviewer clearly doesn't value his time. If I was told that there would be no BWHD, I'd just get up and leave. There's really no reason to continue after that. He should've cut to the chase and made that BWHD question his first!
ihatevideogames
Profile Joined August 2015
570 Posts
November 15 2016 12:56 GMT
#23
So, let me get this right. A free to play game can have thousands of people watching in-client, both for tournaments and for high-ranked ladder matches, and a 40 euro huge AAA game from one of the most famous developers ever, that markets itself as the 'l33test' of esports, can only do what is basically a glorified in-client Twitch implementation?
KeksX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Germany3634 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-15 13:19:15
November 15 2016 13:18 GMT
#24
On November 15 2016 21:56 ihatevideogames wrote:
So, let me get this right. A free to play game can have thousands of people watching in-client, both for tournaments and for high-ranked ladder matches, and a 40 euro huge AAA game from one of the most famous developers ever, that markets itself as the 'l33test' of esports, can only do what is basically a glorified in-client Twitch implementation?


Technology is a bitch sometimes.
You could also argue this about LoL with replays.

Here's the problem with the watch feature:
Other games can simply send gamestates to your client and your client does not care what happened in the past, just what is happening right now.
StarCraft II, because of its architecture, needs to re-do EVERY step in order to get a valid state out of it (this is why you can't jump in replays, just fast-forward really fast), and providing a watch-system that offers a nice user experience will be a bitch to implement.

And I'd say that right now there are bigger issues than this.
Tuczniak
Profile Joined September 2010
1561 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-15 13:21:10
November 15 2016 13:20 GMT
#25
David Kim: And as for skins, I think we’ve said before that we wanted to do it, but performance issues made it so that we can’t do it, but our engineering team has solved those issues.
The technology is here!

Watch tab in-game
Video is fine. But ingame observing buffered through server with delay is possible on SC2 engine. Although I don't consider it main priority for SC2. Twitch experience is pretty good already.

So say we’re 95% there after these changes go in, then obviously there won’t be a major patch next year, but if we’re halfway there, then maybe we do. It really depends.
It's scary that they would even consider not doing big patch next year. These changes are nice, don't get me wrong. But even if all of them make it through the game would 100% greatly benefit from big unit changes next year. Ideal would be at least one patch like this half way through 2017.
eviltomahawk
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States11135 Posts
November 15 2016 13:42 GMT
#26
On November 15 2016 22:18 KeksX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2016 21:56 ihatevideogames wrote:
So, let me get this right. A free to play game can have thousands of people watching in-client, both for tournaments and for high-ranked ladder matches, and a 40 euro huge AAA game from one of the most famous developers ever, that markets itself as the 'l33test' of esports, can only do what is basically a glorified in-client Twitch implementation?


Technology is a bitch sometimes.
You could also argue this about LoL with replays.

Here's the problem with the watch feature:
Other games can simply send gamestates to your client and your client does not care what happened in the past, just what is happening right now.
StarCraft II, because of its architecture, needs to re-do EVERY step in order to get a valid state out of it (this is why you can't jump in replays, just fast-forward really fast), and providing a watch-system that offers a nice user experience will be a bitch to implement.

And I'd say that right now there are bigger issues than this.

This is also why Heroes of the Storm has such a mediocre reconnect feature. It essentially tries to resume from replay then catches up to the live game state at the very end of that. It ends up being a slow, cumbersome process. Fortunately, games don't go for too long in HotS so the reconnect times aren't even longer, but unfortunately those lost minutes are even more important in those short game times.

I think that the issues in both SC2 and HotS with these features show how hard-coded these problems are. The engine may not have been built from the ground-up to accommodate for those features when they started working on it nearly ten years ago, and considering how convoluted Blizzard's legacy code can become in their other games, I wouldn't be surprised to see similar coding difficulties in the SC2/HotS engine.
ㅇㅅㅌㅅ
mantequilla
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
Turkey779 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-15 13:52:38
November 15 2016 13:48 GMT
#27
well good little features they are adding

I kinda swore I won't buy lotv for that price (40 eur) unless they make the gameplay noticeably fun, and not frustrating.

Better to subscribe to a streamer with that money for 9 months since watching is still some fun. If they suck it up and make a huge discount maybe another wave of players will buy it, but blizz never discount do they?
Age of Mythology forever!
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9405 Posts
November 15 2016 14:09 GMT
#28
So say we’re 95% there after these changes go in, then obviously there won’t be a major patch next year, but if we’re halfway there, then maybe we do. It really depends.


Lul 95% there?

This patch at best increases strategic diversity potential from 10% to 20%. Game could be a million times better.
xAdra
Profile Joined July 2012
Singapore1858 Posts
November 15 2016 14:18 GMT
#29
On November 15 2016 21:56 ihatevideogames wrote:
So, let me get this right. A free to play game can have thousands of people watching in-client, both for tournaments and for high-ranked ladder matches, and a 40 euro huge AAA game from one of the most famous developers ever, that markets itself as the 'l33test' of esports, can only do what is basically a glorified in-client Twitch implementation?

This is incredibly puzzling to me as well. DotA has great spectating tools already and it's free to play. This game costs so much money and is so big budget yet is only beginning to think about implementing this.
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
November 15 2016 14:43 GMT
#30
On November 15 2016 05:49 TeamLiquid ESPORTS wrote:One thing teased in the announcements was the idea of a new Watch tab in-game. Can you talk a bit more about how that will function?

Tim Morten: We’re working towards a future where video content can be consumed directly within the Starcraft 2 client. We’re not at a point yet where we can predict when that’s going to land next year, but we are working towards being able to host esports video content within the client.


So is that going to be a direct video feed, or would you possibly be able to observe within the game itself?

Tim Morten: What we’re envisioning for now is a video feed. I think that observing on a broad scale, where we are connecting potentially hundreds of thousands of players to a game has a lot of implications in terms of performance, bandwidth, the potential for those observers to disrupt the game, which we absolutely do not want to happen. So video is what we’re focussed on for now.

Hype went up.

Then went down.

Video is a tiny first step, it should really be in-game streaming, like Dota 2, not video.
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
November 15 2016 14:59 GMT
#31
On November 15 2016 22:48 mantequilla wrote:
well good little features they are adding

I kinda swore I won't buy lotv for that price (40 eur) unless they make the gameplay noticeably fun, and not frustrating.

Better to subscribe to a streamer with that money for 9 months since watching is still some fun. If they suck it up and make a huge discount maybe another wave of players will buy it, but blizz never discount do they?

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/20372288/starcraft-ii-battlechest-and-legacy-of-the-void-price-drop-11-10-2016
gab12
Profile Joined June 2016
Poland147 Posts
November 15 2016 15:04 GMT
#32
well i rly lked this interview thx for doing this )
lestye
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States4178 Posts
November 15 2016 15:17 GMT
#33
On November 15 2016 23:43 paralleluniverse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2016 05:49 TeamLiquid ESPORTS wrote:One thing teased in the announcements was the idea of a new Watch tab in-game. Can you talk a bit more about how that will function?

Tim Morten: We’re working towards a future where video content can be consumed directly within the Starcraft 2 client. We’re not at a point yet where we can predict when that’s going to land next year, but we are working towards being able to host esports video content within the client.


So is that going to be a direct video feed, or would you possibly be able to observe within the game itself?

Tim Morten: What we’re envisioning for now is a video feed. I think that observing on a broad scale, where we are connecting potentially hundreds of thousands of players to a game has a lot of implications in terms of performance, bandwidth, the potential for those observers to disrupt the game, which we absolutely do not want to happen. So video is what we’re focussed on for now.

Hype went up.

Then went down.

Video is a tiny first step, it should really be in-game streaming, like Dota 2, not video.

That'd be nice, but I don't think that's possible with the SC2 client, since its so old and its not really designed around it.
"You guys are just edgelords. Embrace your inner weeb desu" -Zergneedsfood
KeksX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Germany3634 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-15 15:42:55
November 15 2016 15:39 GMT
#34
On November 15 2016 23:18 xAdra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2016 21:56 ihatevideogames wrote:
So, let me get this right. A free to play game can have thousands of people watching in-client, both for tournaments and for high-ranked ladder matches, and a 40 euro huge AAA game from one of the most famous developers ever, that markets itself as the 'l33test' of esports, can only do what is basically a glorified in-client Twitch implementation?

This is incredibly puzzling to me as well. DotA has great spectating tools already and it's free to play. This game costs so much money and is so big budget yet is only beginning to think about implementing this.


You're approaching this from the wrong angle. Just because one game is free to play doesn't mean it didn't cost any money to develop.

Also, even though the game have similar controls, from a networking perspective they're completely different. DotA2 uses dedicated servers, StarCraft II uses p2p servers. Meaning for DotA2, there is a server that handles all the server related stuff(updating time/physics, giving commands to NPC units), and players then only push input to those servers and get updates from the server on what the other players did. 10~15 units or so, not a lot of data.
Compared to StarCraft II where this is done by a player and also with a lot more data and with a verification method to ensure that every player at all times has the same state (and that the host can't cheat the state).

I'm missing a lot of technical details to make the explanation easier. The point is, networked RTS are really hard to do and take a lot of engineering power. SC2 was designed without all of these fancy features in mind, DotA2 has fewer problems from the beginning and also was designed with all these problems in mind.

This doesn't mean that DotA2 had it easy, it had it's own share of problems since the Source Engine wasn't built with RTS in mind. But talking about all those fancy customization and network features - those are definitely harder to implement in StarCraft II.

This is no excuse of course to not try anyway for Blizzard, since I think if there's a company that can push the technical boundaries for this, it's them.
But as I said earlier, it was probably not a high priority feature so far.

On November 15 2016 22:42 eviltomahawk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 15 2016 22:18 KeksX wrote:
On November 15 2016 21:56 ihatevideogames wrote:
So, let me get this right. A free to play game can have thousands of people watching in-client, both for tournaments and for high-ranked ladder matches, and a 40 euro huge AAA game from one of the most famous developers ever, that markets itself as the 'l33test' of esports, can only do what is basically a glorified in-client Twitch implementation?


Technology is a bitch sometimes.
You could also argue this about LoL with replays.

Here's the problem with the watch feature:
Other games can simply send gamestates to your client and your client does not care what happened in the past, just what is happening right now.
StarCraft II, because of its architecture, needs to re-do EVERY step in order to get a valid state out of it (this is why you can't jump in replays, just fast-forward really fast), and providing a watch-system that offers a nice user experience will be a bitch to implement.

And I'd say that right now there are bigger issues than this.

This is also why Heroes of the Storm has such a mediocre reconnect feature. It essentially tries to resume from replay then catches up to the live game state at the very end of that. It ends up being a slow, cumbersome process. Fortunately, games don't go for too long in HotS so the reconnect times aren't even longer, but unfortunately those lost minutes are even more important in those short game times.

I think that the issues in both SC2 and HotS with these features show how hard-coded these problems are. The engine may not have been built from the ground-up to accommodate for those features when they started working on it nearly ten years ago, and considering how convoluted Blizzard's legacy code can become in their other games, I wouldn't be surprised to see similar coding difficulties in the SC2/HotS engine.


Good point! This is why I was hoping for Heroes to be a financial success, since every feature they'd implement there could be ported to StarCraft II with relative ease.
Topin
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Peru10084 Posts
November 15 2016 15:45 GMT
#35
cant wait to see mech TvT again w/o tankivacs and in other matchups too. on the other hand i would like they stop making speed buffs so often... the banshee upgrade shouldnt even exist.
i would define my style between a mix of ByuN, Maru and MKP
Incognoto
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
France10239 Posts
November 15 2016 16:29 GMT
#36
why is the watch feature bad?
maru lover forever
Cele
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Germany4016 Posts
November 15 2016 16:31 GMT
#37
ctrl+f no comment about BW HD )=
Broodwar for life!
Edowyth
Profile Joined October 2010
United States183 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-15 17:10:34
November 15 2016 16:49 GMT
#38
We almost never see mech play in LotV—that’s something we obviously wanted to address—and SkyToss is another thing that’s going to be changing—we’re changing three stargate units. That’s our ultimate goal, and hopefully this major patch pushes us towards that.


... I have no idea what he's talking about here. Does anybody see a viable composition for SkyToss coming about due to these changes? It seems like, to me, even with mass storm + cannons, SkyToss only became less likely in this patch.

Here's what I think:

- Carriers losing release interceptors decreases the slim chances they'll ever be used

- Carriers having 5-mineral interceptors doesn't affect the rapidity with which interceptors die (so, you can afford more of them, but they still do nothing if the opponent plays well)

- Tempests costing 50% more supply makes them even less likely to be used

- The ability doesn't nearly compensate for the loss of range for anti-ground (again making the unit less useful than previously. Anti-ground range could kill marines, this ability won't hit marines.)

- Void speed is a token change. The unit still plays exactly the same, they're just very slightly faster now.

Maybe it's just PR speak? Even counting extreme-late-game mass-cannon + storm and vs-mech, it seems like air units will be generally less useful than previously.
"Q. How do I check a valid [e-]mail address? A. You can't, at least, not in real time. Bummer, eh?" /r/programming
Of course, you could just send them a validation email.
Clbull
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United Kingdom1439 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-15 17:02:51
November 15 2016 17:00 GMT
#39
I'd like to congratulate Blizzard on making the most infuriating version of StarCraft II yet. I've actually uninstalled the game on at least three occasions during this expansion because of how rage inducing ladder has become to play. Games are meant to be fun, and when former Brood War KeSPA pros complain that Legacy of the Void is 'too difficult', that's the point where Blizzard should step back and admit that they screwed up hard.

Ever since Heart of the Swarm, I've personally disliked the direction Blizzard took with the game by buffing harassment options for all three races. At one point, certain harassment options were so overpowered that if you didn't build specifically to counter that option, you'd lose the game outright.

In this expansion however, not only did they cut minerals per base to make players mine out quicker and force aggressive expansions, but they also buffed harassment options even more. Adepts, Overlords, Ravagers Siegeivacs and Warp Prisms are some of these buffs that have just made the game so bad.

The Siege Tank buff is a welcome change, but that's about it, really. The rest of the changes have been dubious at best. Besides, if the complete lack of playerbase on the test ladder is any indication, 2017 will be the final nail in the coffin for SC2.
Clbull
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United Kingdom1439 Posts
November 15 2016 17:12 GMT
#40
On November 16 2016 01:49 Edowyth wrote:
> We almost never see mech play in LotV—that’s something we obviously wanted to address—and SkyToss is another thing that’s going to be changing—we’re changing three stargate units. That’s our ultimate goal, and hopefully this major patch pushes us towards that.

... I have no idea what he's talking about here. Does anybody see a viable composition for SkyToss coming about due to these changes? It seems like, to me, even with mass storm + cannons, SkyToss only became less likely in this patch.

Here's what I think:

- Carriers losing release interceptors decreases the slim chances they'll ever be used

- Carriers having 5-mineral interceptors doesn't affect the rapidity with which interceptors die (so, you can afford more of them, but they still do nothing if the opponent plays well)

- Tempests costing 50% more supply makes them even less likely to be used

- The ability doesn't nearly compensate for the loss of range for anti-ground (again making the unit less useful than previously. Anti-ground range could kill marines, this ability won't hit marines.)

- Void speed is a token change. The unit still plays exactly the same, they're just very slightly faster now.

Maybe it's just PR speak? Even counting extreme-late-game mass-cannon + storm and vs-mech, it seems like air units will be generally less useful than previously.


Blizzard have taken entirely the wrong approach with the Tempest. Yes, Tempests were too supply efficient, but their range wasn't the issue, and were actually a core design principle of the unit when they were first introduced in HotS as an Infestor/Brood Lord counter. If Tempests didn't exist, Protoss couldn't have survived those 3 hour stalemates you always saw from Swarm Host PvZ games.

The fact that Tempests hard-counter Mech says more about how crap Mech anti-air is. For anti-air, Mech only has two options, Thors which are terrible against capital ships and don't even perform that well against swarms of air units thanks to a trick known as magic boxing, or Cyclones, which were a bad idea in both iterations. There is a reason why Terran relied on mass Vikings as Mech anti-air, and that is because the other options outright sucked. A 20% splash radius increase won't be anywhere near enough to fix the Thor's flaws.

Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
#25
Clem vs herOLIVE!
RotterdaM1508
TKL 440
SteadfastSC373
IndyStarCraft 332
BRAT_OK 159
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1508
TKL 440
SteadfastSC 373
IndyStarCraft 332
BRAT_OK 159
Hui .156
Livibee 141
MindelVK 25
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 23938
Larva 156
firebathero 118
sas.Sziky 63
Backho 57
scan(afreeca) 36
NaDa 6
Counter-Strike
fl0m3225
ScreaM749
pashabiceps348
Stewie2K79
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu461
Khaldor221
Other Games
qojqva3201
Grubby3176
FrodaN2232
ceh9923
Beastyqt756
B2W.Neo386
ToD184
mouzStarbuck73
Trikslyr61
UpATreeSC47
Chillindude20
JuggernautJason5
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Psz 17
• Hupsaiya 7
• Reevou 4
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV777
• masondota2658
League of Legends
• Nemesis3742
• Jankos1844
• TFBlade717
Other Games
• imaqtpie921
• Shiphtur270
Upcoming Events
Map Test Tournament
16h 2m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 5h
Map Test Tournament
1d 16h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Map Test Tournament
2 days
Map Test Tournament
3 days
OSC
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Map Test Tournament
4 days
OSC
4 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
4 days
Safe House 2
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Map Test Tournament
5 days
OSC
5 days
IPSL
6 days
dxtr13 vs Napoleon
Doodle vs OldBoy
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Team Wars
Maestros of the Game
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Acropolis #4 - TS2
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
ESL Pro League S22
Frag Blocktober 2025
Urban Riga Open #1
FERJEE Rush 2025
Birch Cup 2025
DraculaN #2
LanDaLan #3
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
WardiTV TLMC #15
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.