|
On May 07 2015 09:37 The_Templar wrote:Looks like Mvp beat Flash 1-0, then Flash wouldn't take any of that and went undefeated for the rest of the tournament. Basically, Flash only won because of Mvp.
for the curious: this was MVP's best phase in Broodwar, he retired not so long afterwards and then came back for Wol.
|
On May 07 2015 09:43 Cele wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2015 09:37 The_Templar wrote:On May 07 2015 09:36 Cele wrote:I think MVP's highest accomplishment is taking a map of Flash in 2010 Hana Daetoo MSL. Looks like Mvp beat Flash 1-0, then Flash wouldn't take any of that and went undefeated for the rest of the tournament. Basically, Flash only won because of Mvp. for the curious: this was MVP's best phase in Broodwar, he retired not so long afterwards and then came back for Wol. yeah looking at it, seems that he beat Stork, Best, and TY to reach Flash. Not bad.
|
Showing up to the comment party very late, but what Life did, was over 2 expansions, Mvp won during WoL, forget about him wading through a weak foreign filled WCS 2013 S1 field. Life won stacked tournaments in WoL and HotS.
|
On May 02 2015 20:26 lichter wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2015 19:06 Rocket-Bear wrote: If the competition wasn't as strong back then is irrelevant.
The only kind of unfairness is that there was 9 GSL seasons in 2011. NINE. Now there are 3. If you had a dominanting period you had way more chances of getting some valueable championships.
But nothing we can do about it so it's whatever. Life will surpass Mvp in like a few months anyway More tournaments also means more chances to break your streak of dominance. There are pros and cons to both. What ifs are bad arguments. I could similarly say that Life's on and off form through his career suggests he would not have won more titles in a more frequent tournament circuit. Or he could have in equal measur. Again, a bad argument to make.
If you are the BEST player in the world for 3 months, and unbeatable during them, in toll you win 3 GSL's, in 2014-2015 you win 1. That's why more GSL's benefit you bud, not a bad argument.
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On May 07 2015 11:12 ClaudeSc2 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2015 20:26 lichter wrote:On May 02 2015 19:06 Rocket-Bear wrote: If the competition wasn't as strong back then is irrelevant.
The only kind of unfairness is that there was 9 GSL seasons in 2011. NINE. Now there are 3. If you had a dominanting period you had way more chances of getting some valueable championships.
But nothing we can do about it so it's whatever. Life will surpass Mvp in like a few months anyway More tournaments also means more chances to break your streak of dominance. There are pros and cons to both. What ifs are bad arguments. I could similarly say that Life's on and off form through his career suggests he would not have won more titles in a more frequent tournament circuit. Or he could have in equal measur. Again, a bad argument to make. If you are the BEST player in the world for 3 months, and unbeatable during them, in toll you win 3 GSL's, in 2014-2015 you win 1. That's why more GSL's benefit you bud, not a bad argument.
And you play 3x as many tournaments and opponents, giving people more opportunity to knock you down. Winning one tournament has a higher probability than winning three. Lose one tournament and your time at the top gets cut short. With fewer tournaments, the length of time at the top stretches longer between seasons. With more tournaments, your number of potential wins increases. Like I said, pros and cons.
|
Looked to see if Mvp was #1, all is right. I love Life and he is just out of control, but for me Mvp set the foundation for Sc2 and as others mentioned, whenever we were like "Well Mvp is done for, no way he will get past his first round" then he wins the whole thing. For me Mvp will always be number 1 and I wish he could have stayed healthy and was at a younger age for the Kespa age and future, we'll never know
|
Nice writeup! I loved about Life and Soulkey's comments, The mouse pad is epic.
|
On May 07 2015 09:36 Cele wrote:I think MVP's highest accomplishment is taking a map of Flash in 2010 Hana Daetoo MSL.
Yeah I think its safe to say that MVP was easily the best BW player in the SC2 scene for almost 2years (before kespa switched to SC2). Sure there were players who were much more successful in their time that already switched (nada, boxer, july) but they played when BW was not as developed so if MVP had a time machine he would have rekt all of them in their prime.
|
On May 07 2015 23:40 NasusAndDraven wrote:Yeah I think its safe to say that MVP was easily the best BW player in the SC2 scene for almost 2years (before kespa switched to SC2). Sure there were players who were much more successful in their time that already switched (nada, boxer, july) but they played when BW was not as developed so if MVP had a time machine he would have rekt all of them in their prime.
Boxer in his prime would have beaten MVP 99-0 in a best of 7 in Broodwar. Boxer took the current Broodwar meta and innovated with amazing control and harass that was unbelievable. Of course Boxer in his prime vs Boxer that played SC2 would have beaten the SC2 version just as bad at BW. Boxer still had some of the game sense, but wasn't near the player that he was in BW much like Nada...neither had near the ability left at their age once SC2 came around and neither focused like they did during BW.
|
On May 07 2015 11:12 ClaudeSc2 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2015 20:26 lichter wrote:On May 02 2015 19:06 Rocket-Bear wrote: If the competition wasn't as strong back then is irrelevant.
The only kind of unfairness is that there was 9 GSL seasons in 2011. NINE. Now there are 3. If you had a dominanting period you had way more chances of getting some valueable championships.
But nothing we can do about it so it's whatever. Life will surpass Mvp in like a few months anyway More tournaments also means more chances to break your streak of dominance. There are pros and cons to both. What ifs are bad arguments. I could similarly say that Life's on and off form through his career suggests he would not have won more titles in a more frequent tournament circuit. Or he could have in equal measur. Again, a bad argument to make. If you are the BEST player in the world for 3 months, and unbeatable during them, in toll you win 3 GSL's, in 2014-2015 you win 1. That's why more GSL's benefit you bud, not a bad argument. To be fair, this isn't about the best player of all time. It is about the greatest player of all time which has to do with more than just results. So regardless if they played 9 GSLs back then and 3 now, the criteria is based on a lot more than just wins.
|
You can talk about consistency and innovation as much as you want but i think in terms of pure achievements life has already surpassed mvp.
Also the major thing I disagree with in the criteria is that it only considers the opponents the player has beaten during their runs and not the overall difficulty of the tournament. For example in the WCS 2012 world finals there played many strong players like herO, HerO, Rain, Curious, Roro, stephano but they all got eliminated before they could face parting. Is it partings fault that the "good" players got eliminated by other players? It's like saying germany can't be considered to be the best football team in the world because they didn't face spain at the world cup and so they had an easy path.
|
Why the hell wasn't parting in top 15, the guy just manhandled rain today.
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/akHMLBp.jpg)
I made this I hope it's not that bad. All hail the king!
|
On May 21 2015 02:40 MCMarine wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/akHMLBp.jpg) I made this I hope it's not that bad. All hail the king!
Wow that marineKing flipping off MVP not cool
|
Most of MVP's wins are in 2011. Back then only Terran race was viable. Maybe this makes him the best T ever, but in my opinion no way he is the best player ever.
|
On May 21 2015 04:21 tokinho wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2015 02:40 MCMarine wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/akHMLBp.jpg) I made this I hope it's not that bad. All hail the king! Wow that marineKing flipping off MVP not cool
Mvp forgives his insolence
|
On May 21 2015 04:47 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2015 04:21 tokinho wrote:On May 21 2015 02:40 MCMarine wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/akHMLBp.jpg) I made this I hope it's not that bad. All hail the king! Wow that marineKing flipping off MVP not cool Mvp forgives his insolence ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/MGJHF.jpg)
M-M-Mvp senpai~...
|
United States485 Posts
These are some great writeups, and I was happy to see MVP rightly declared the best. The part about the 'MVP Paradox' pretty much captures it spot on. After all the down and dirty analysis and comparisons, the most important thing you can say about MVP is that he would just win because he was MVP.
|
|
On May 08 2015 06:01 Eliezar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2015 23:40 NasusAndDraven wrote:On May 07 2015 09:36 Cele wrote:I think MVP's highest accomplishment is taking a map of Flash in 2010 Hana Daetoo MSL. Yeah I think its safe to say that MVP was easily the best BW player in the SC2 scene for almost 2years (before kespa switched to SC2). Sure there were players who were much more successful in their time that already switched (nada, boxer, july) but they played when BW was not as developed so if MVP had a time machine he would have rekt all of them in their prime. Boxer in his prime would have beaten MVP 99-0 in a best of 7 in Broodwar. Boxer took the current Broodwar meta and innovated with amazing control and harass that was unbelievable. Of course Boxer in his prime vs Boxer that played SC2 would have beaten the SC2 version just as bad at BW. Boxer still had some of the game sense, but wasn't near the player that he was in BW much like Nada...neither had near the ability left at their age once SC2 came around and neither focused like they did during BW.
Without the power of replays perhaps those innovative players would have lasted a little bit longer.
|
|
|
|