• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:57
CEST 23:57
KST 06:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed14Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Server Blocker Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
Starcraft Superstars Winner/Replays [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread We are Ready to Testify: Emergence Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 645 users

Pinnacle voids Dark vs. San bets due to match manipulation…

Forum Index > SC2 General
1079 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 54 Next
Matchfixing is a very serious offence and accusations of matchfixing should not be made lightly. Please avoid making accusations against specific individuals unless you have substantial proof, or until further information is released. (0620 KST)
Ben...
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3485 Posts
January 21 2015 04:06 GMT
#441
On January 21 2015 11:37 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 11:11 lichter wrote:
On January 21 2015 10:59 dsousa wrote:
Could the replay of the match provide conclusive evidence?


playing like crap isn't evidence

San didn't even play that bad



if it was then I can think of multiple games that Virus cheated xD.

Or San games before he became ManZenith when he dominated an entire group including Nestea. His games in the early GSLs were... painful to say the least.

Still waiting on that sword-swallowing.
"Cliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide" -Tastosis
Jaded.
Profile Joined June 2013
United States125 Posts
January 21 2015 04:10 GMT
#442
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. What I'm saying is that there are known knowns and there are known unknowns but there's also unknown unknowns, things that we don't know that we don't know
ZeromuS
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada13389 Posts
January 21 2015 04:14 GMT
#443
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


They didnt outright claim matchfixing. They claim odd betting patterns.

Two different things.
StrategyRTS forever | @ZeromuS_plays | www.twitch.tv/Zeromus_
Jaded.
Profile Joined June 2013
United States125 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-01-21 04:21:49
January 21 2015 04:20 GMT
#444
On January 21 2015 13:14 ZeromuS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


They didnt outright claim matchfixing. They claim odd betting patterns.

Two different things.


Doesn't change the fact this is only clickbait.

I expect to see click bait on Fox news MSNBC or CNN. I didn't expect it on TL.

Edit: If it's really not clickbait then change the language to "due to suspicious bets" not "match manipulation".
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. What I'm saying is that there are known knowns and there are known unknowns but there's also unknown unknowns, things that we don't know that we don't know
lichter
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
January 21 2015 04:20 GMT
#445
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


It isn't some random shady site. Pinnacle is a big betting website for traditional sports and also has betting on esports.
AdministratorYOU MUST HEED MY INSTRUCTIONS TAKE OFF YOUR THIIIINGS
magicmUnky
Profile Joined June 2011
Australia280 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-01-21 04:26:12
January 21 2015 04:24 GMT
#446
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


So we have the most reputable betting site in the world saying that the bets on their site were made in a manner that indicates unfair betting.

I fixed it for you.

Take note of the language that I used... I didn't say "they think the betting might have been unfair", I said "indicates". There's no guesswork or 'maybes' or anything like that.

You've regurgitated a bunch of misconceptions here so I'll just point them out for others to see, hopefully before they get parroted again in this thread.

- Unfair betting does not mean the match was fixed.
- Pinnacle's reputation cannot reasonably be doubted in this particular situation
- Pinncale loses money by voiding the bets
- You can decide with certainty that unfair betting is taking place by looking at betting behavior

This last one will no doubt trip some particularly stubborn minds up but I can't teach statistics and common sense on an sc2 board
Jarree
Profile Joined January 2012
Finland1004 Posts
January 21 2015 04:33 GMT
#447
Well obviously betting patterns indicate something out of the ordinary happened. It could have been match fixing, but it could have been inside knowledge that San is really bad / has been to hospital / doesn't even want to play / knows is going to lose / what ever, that made some people bet heavily in Dark.
Jaded.
Profile Joined June 2013
United States125 Posts
January 21 2015 04:34 GMT
#448
On January 21 2015 13:24 magicmUnky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


So we have the most reputable betting site in the world saying that the bets on their site were made in a manner that indicates unfair betting.


I'm not saying that they're not reputable or big in the betting community but betting is still considered a shady business thus I would not consider their word to mean much.

I'm more disappointed that because of this sites statement that people have jumped on an anti-san bandwagon and TL plays it as clickbait.

Few years back I'd have said Fulltilt was pretty reputable as well. They still owe me 5k (I know I'll never see it again).
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. What I'm saying is that there are known knowns and there are known unknowns but there's also unknown unknowns, things that we don't know that we don't know
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
January 21 2015 04:37 GMT
#449
On January 21 2015 13:24 magicmUnky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


So we have the most reputable betting site in the world saying that the bets on their site were made in a manner that indicates unfair betting.

I fixed it for you.

Take note of the language that I used... I didn't say "they think the betting might have been unfair", I said "indicates". There's no guesswork or 'maybes' or anything like that.

You've regurgitated a bunch of misconceptions here so I'll just point them out for others to see, hopefully before they get parroted again in this thread.

- Unfair betting does not mean the match was fixed.
- Pinnacle's reputation cannot reasonably be doubted in this particular situation
- Pinncale loses money by voiding the bets
- You can decide with certainty that unfair betting is taking place by looking at betting behavior

This last one will no doubt trip some particularly stubborn minds up but I can't teach statistics and common sense on an sc2 board


I'm not very familiar with betting practices, could you elaborate please on what constitutes unfair betting?
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
just_mo
Profile Joined March 2013
United States23 Posts
January 21 2015 04:39 GMT
#450
Betting is not "shady" when it's done through a reputable party like Pinny, it is something millions of people do worldwide every day 100% legally. And FYI you could have gotten your 5k back from FTP.
FG
Jaded.
Profile Joined June 2013
United States125 Posts
January 21 2015 04:40 GMT
#451
On January 21 2015 13:37 pure.Wasted wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 13:24 magicmUnky wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


So we have the most reputable betting site in the world saying that the bets on their site were made in a manner that indicates unfair betting.

I fixed it for you.

Take note of the language that I used... I didn't say "they think the betting might have been unfair", I said "indicates". There's no guesswork or 'maybes' or anything like that.

You've regurgitated a bunch of misconceptions here so I'll just point them out for others to see, hopefully before they get parroted again in this thread.

- Unfair betting does not mean the match was fixed.
- Pinnacle's reputation cannot reasonably be doubted in this particular situation
- Pinncale loses money by voiding the bets
- You can decide with certainty that unfair betting is taking place by looking at betting behavior

This last one will no doubt trip some particularly stubborn minds up but I can't teach statistics and common sense on an sc2 board


I'm not very familiar with betting practices, could you elaborate please on what constitutes unfair betting?


Put simply in this case someone or a group made a large amount of illogical bets that triggered the sites warning system.
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. What I'm saying is that there are known knowns and there are known unknowns but there's also unknown unknowns, things that we don't know that we don't know
Goibon
Profile Joined May 2010
New Zealand8185 Posts
January 21 2015 04:41 GMT
#452
What a nothing story lol
Leenock =^_^= Ryung =^_^= Parting =^_^= herO =^_^= Guilty
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
January 21 2015 04:42 GMT
#453
On January 21 2015 13:40 Jaded. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 13:37 pure.Wasted wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:24 magicmUnky wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


So we have the most reputable betting site in the world saying that the bets on their site were made in a manner that indicates unfair betting.

I fixed it for you.

Take note of the language that I used... I didn't say "they think the betting might have been unfair", I said "indicates". There's no guesswork or 'maybes' or anything like that.

You've regurgitated a bunch of misconceptions here so I'll just point them out for others to see, hopefully before they get parroted again in this thread.

- Unfair betting does not mean the match was fixed.
- Pinnacle's reputation cannot reasonably be doubted in this particular situation
- Pinncale loses money by voiding the bets
- You can decide with certainty that unfair betting is taking place by looking at betting behavior

This last one will no doubt trip some particularly stubborn minds up but I can't teach statistics and common sense on an sc2 board


I'm not very familiar with betting practices, could you elaborate please on what constitutes unfair betting?


Put simply in this case someone or a group made a large amount of illogical bets that triggered the sites warning system.


But just because they seem like illogical bets to the average person doesn't really mean they are. I mean, maybe San always loses horribly when there's a full moon out, and only one person in the universe has picked up on this fact.

How does the system handle something like that?
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
ROOTFayth
Profile Joined January 2004
Canada3351 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-01-21 04:48:59
January 21 2015 04:48 GMT
#454
On January 21 2015 13:34 Jaded. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 13:24 magicmUnky wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


So we have the most reputable betting site in the world saying that the bets on their site were made in a manner that indicates unfair betting.


I'm not saying that they're not reputable or big in the betting community but betting is still considered a shady business thus I would not consider their word to mean much.

I'm more disappointed that because of this sites statement that people have jumped on an anti-san bandwagon and TL plays it as clickbait.

Few years back I'd have said Fulltilt was pretty reputable as well. They still owe me 5k (I know I'll never see it again).

everybody got their money back from fulltilt, you should send an e-mail lol, Ultimate Bet on the other hand
Jarree
Profile Joined January 2012
Finland1004 Posts
January 21 2015 04:48 GMT
#455
On January 21 2015 13:42 pure.Wasted wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 13:40 Jaded. wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:37 pure.Wasted wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:24 magicmUnky wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


So we have the most reputable betting site in the world saying that the bets on their site were made in a manner that indicates unfair betting.

I fixed it for you.

Take note of the language that I used... I didn't say "they think the betting might have been unfair", I said "indicates". There's no guesswork or 'maybes' or anything like that.

You've regurgitated a bunch of misconceptions here so I'll just point them out for others to see, hopefully before they get parroted again in this thread.

- Unfair betting does not mean the match was fixed.
- Pinnacle's reputation cannot reasonably be doubted in this particular situation
- Pinncale loses money by voiding the bets
- You can decide with certainty that unfair betting is taking place by looking at betting behavior

This last one will no doubt trip some particularly stubborn minds up but I can't teach statistics and common sense on an sc2 board


I'm not very familiar with betting practices, could you elaborate please on what constitutes unfair betting?


Put simply in this case someone or a group made a large amount of illogical bets that triggered the sites warning system.


But just because they seem like illogical bets to the average person doesn't really mean they are. I mean, maybe San always loses horribly when there's a full moon out, and only one person in the universe has picked up on this fact.

How does the system handle something like that?

It's called math.
Cricketer12
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States13974 Posts
January 21 2015 04:50 GMT
#456
its this simple, this is a case of an almost certain statistical anomaly, the likelyhood that San/Dark are involved in match fixing is slim to none, and continuing to discuss the matter is only a waste of time.

Due to the immensity of the allegations of match-fixing, unless immense amounts of evidence are presented to the community, our best course of action is to assume that this was just a weird happening.

San's loss isnt even *that* unbelivable, blink fuckups happen all the time, i doubt he was throwing the game.
Kaina + Drones Linkcro Summon Cupsie Yummy Way
BuddhaMonk
Profile Joined August 2010
781 Posts
January 21 2015 04:52 GMT
#457
Large companies can be wrong and can make mistakes. If we're using Bill Gates as an example, you just need to look at the trail of government anti-trust cases against Microsoft to know that even the largest and most "reputable" companies are not always in the right.

Pinnacle doesn't run an anti-fraud / anti-corruption department out of the benevolence of their heart. They are 100% doing it to make/save them money. Whether from directly thwarting fraud, raising the barrier to entry for fraudsters, or to protect their brand.

The Pinnacle copy tries to straddle the line between certainty, and ass-covering weasel words. The "bet placement pattern clearly indicates that the match was not played on a fair basis" so they voided the bets to comply with their stance against "perceived match-fixing" for "suspected manipulation".

So wait, which was it? Suspected manipulation, or clearly not fair? In this contradiction, we have something for everyone to latch onto. What they probably should have written in their notice is that a suspicious betting pattern occurred, and in their experience this pattern is most often, but not always, indicative of match manipulation (whether fixing, or otherwise).
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
January 21 2015 04:52 GMT
#458
On January 21 2015 13:48 Jarree wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 13:42 pure.Wasted wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:40 Jaded. wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:37 pure.Wasted wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:24 magicmUnky wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


So we have the most reputable betting site in the world saying that the bets on their site were made in a manner that indicates unfair betting.

I fixed it for you.

Take note of the language that I used... I didn't say "they think the betting might have been unfair", I said "indicates". There's no guesswork or 'maybes' or anything like that.

You've regurgitated a bunch of misconceptions here so I'll just point them out for others to see, hopefully before they get parroted again in this thread.

- Unfair betting does not mean the match was fixed.
- Pinnacle's reputation cannot reasonably be doubted in this particular situation
- Pinncale loses money by voiding the bets
- You can decide with certainty that unfair betting is taking place by looking at betting behavior

This last one will no doubt trip some particularly stubborn minds up but I can't teach statistics and common sense on an sc2 board


I'm not very familiar with betting practices, could you elaborate please on what constitutes unfair betting?


Put simply in this case someone or a group made a large amount of illogical bets that triggered the sites warning system.


But just because they seem like illogical bets to the average person doesn't really mean they are. I mean, maybe San always loses horribly when there's a full moon out, and only one person in the universe has picked up on this fact.

How does the system handle something like that?

It's called math.


I stand before you an enlightened man.
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
BuddhaMonk
Profile Joined August 2010
781 Posts
January 21 2015 04:56 GMT
#459
On January 21 2015 13:37 pure.Wasted wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2015 13:24 magicmUnky wrote:
On January 21 2015 13:10 Jaded. wrote:
So we have a shady betting site saying the bets on their site were fishy and might have been matchfixing. No real evidence just conjecture.

And TL puts this on News?

You hurting for clicks that badly TL?


So we have the most reputable betting site in the world saying that the bets on their site were made in a manner that indicates unfair betting.

I fixed it for you.

Take note of the language that I used... I didn't say "they think the betting might have been unfair", I said "indicates". There's no guesswork or 'maybes' or anything like that.

You've regurgitated a bunch of misconceptions here so I'll just point them out for others to see, hopefully before they get parroted again in this thread.

- Unfair betting does not mean the match was fixed.
- Pinnacle's reputation cannot reasonably be doubted in this particular situation
- Pinncale loses money by voiding the bets
- You can decide with certainty that unfair betting is taking place by looking at betting behavior

This last one will no doubt trip some particularly stubborn minds up but I can't teach statistics and common sense on an sc2 board


I'm not very familiar with betting practices, could you elaborate please on what constitutes unfair betting?


It's PR copy designed to make you feel good about Pinnacle fighting back against all the evil match fixers! They're certain! Just don't ask them to define the exact meaning, because then the become less certain.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
January 21 2015 05:09 GMT
#460
math is generally right

maybe it's not. but it generally is.
Prev 1 21 22 23 24 25 54 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12h 3m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ZombieGrub300
Nathanias 161
UpATreeSC 141
JuggernautJason72
ForJumy 32
CosmosSc2 4
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 1046
scan(afreeca) 163
ZZZero.O 125
Aegong 113
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm106
League of Legends
Grubby4897
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K794
fl0m541
flusha510
byalli347
oskar251
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken57
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu597
Other Games
tarik_tv18468
summit1g7895
shahzam388
C9.Mang0188
Skadoodle135
ViBE83
Trikslyr51
PPMD44
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2749
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• sitaska40
• musti20045 26
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 10
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22752
• Ler81
League of Legends
• TFBlade1023
Other Games
• imaqtpie2184
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
12h 3m
Epic.LAN
14h 3m
CSO Contender
19h 3m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 12h
Online Event
1d 18h
Esports World Cup
3 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.