• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 11:22
CET 17:22
KST 01:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down21ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League99
StarCraft 2
General
How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book 5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 Evil Geniuses - shutting down
Tourneys
ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles Mutation # 548 Shining Bright
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Rollback Netcode in Brood War Sagi.gg Launcher Released Mathematicians needed to calc "Low Econ Epicness" Top Players of October 2026 (EBPD Rankings)
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2v2v2v2 Tournament Stage 1: Community Poll [IPSL] IPSL Winter 26-27 Ro24 is HERE! [$1250] International ShieldBattery League
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Deus Ex 3!? Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8986 users

Blizzard's thoughts on Swarm Hosts - Page 13

Forum Index > SC2 General
1050 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 15 53 Next
Musicus
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany23580 Posts
May 06 2014 19:36 GMT
#241
On May 07 2014 04:33 BisuDagger wrote:
The real solution is to put back in burrow charge from HoTS beta.



Put this in and now it's "Suprise Swarmhosts!"


If the knock back unburrows Swarmhosts, this would be so fucking cool!
Maru and Serral are probably top 5.
Squat
Profile Joined September 2013
Sweden7978 Posts
May 06 2014 19:38 GMT
#242
On May 07 2014 04:31 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 04:28 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:14 Plansix wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:12 Ganseng wrote:
as for the late game protoss deathball, i think it could be fixed by making tempests more expensive and buffing broodlords/corruptors a little bit... but that's just my opinion slightly off topic

When has this been a problem recently in any pro match? Not really an issue.

It's not necessarily a huge problem now, but making colossi and tempests immune to abduct completely breaks zerg late game vs toss. It's an absolutely essential tool.

Yeah, I would rather they go half way and just say that massive units are pulled a shorter distance. Not only does it make sense, it still makes the ability useful. It seems a better middle of the road change.

Even this is a massive hit tbh. The biggest problem for zerg in the late game vs air armies is the short range of corruptors, you have to get in the enemy wheelhouse to do any damage, and thus expose yourself to storm/PDDs/seekers/archon splash etc. Not to mention tempest volleys and yamotos dealing damage with no reciprocation.

The zerg counter to this is to move the enemy unit away from it's supporting cast so it can be focused without your on air army getting torn to shreds. The zerg air force is completely awful in a straight up fight assuming equal supply and good army comps. I think you and some others underestimate just how pivotal abduct is for zerg to be able to deal with mass tempests/BC/raven etc.
"Digital. They have digital. What is digital?" - Donald J Trump
Isualin
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany1903 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 19:39:01
May 06 2014 19:38 GMT
#243
On May 07 2014 04:36 Musicus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 04:33 BisuDagger wrote:
The real solution is to put back in burrow charge from HoTS beta.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOglpc_Bzbk

Put this in and now it's "Suprise Swarmhosts!"


If the knock back unburrows Swarmhosts, this would be so fucking cool!

I think we would see a lot of ultras dying to locusts while trying this, those damn little things hit like a truck.
| INnoVation | The literal god TY | ByuNjwa | LRSL when? |
Mun_Su
Profile Joined December 2012
France2063 Posts
May 06 2014 19:38 GMT
#244
Stephano has already affected the balance of starcraftII, it took him only a few days
INno <3 - TY - Maru - Taeja - Rain <3 - Classic <3 - Stephano <3 - soO <3 - Soulkey - Dark - SERRAL =O / END REGION LOCK
diverzee
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden992 Posts
May 06 2014 19:39 GMT
#245
Yes, please change the viper and make it unable to abduct bigger units. A viper abducting a Mothership is ridiculous and does not agree with Newton's third law of motion.
Parting
Squat
Profile Joined September 2013
Sweden7978 Posts
May 06 2014 19:40 GMT
#246
On May 07 2014 04:33 Sapphire.lux wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 04:25 sabas123 wrote:
I would like to see an option for zerg to counter mech other then swarm host so that they maby could remove it.

The Viper should be the key IMO. Some sort of ling roach hidra combo on the ground and blinding cloud. That spell could force tanks to spread out so helping Zerg and making the game look cool at the same time. So much potential there instead of the retarded SH Raven crap we see.

Vipers are already immensely strong vs mech. Zerg has little or no issue dealing with ground based mech, roach/hydra with vipers can deal fine already. It's the air armies that are the real killers. And that's where the viper goes from great to outright mandatory.
"Digital. They have digital. What is digital?" - Donald J Trump
Pursuit_
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States1330 Posts
May 06 2014 19:40 GMT
#247
On May 07 2014 04:32 Squat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 04:16 Ercster wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:10 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:08 Ercster wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:05 Falling wrote:
On May 07 2014 03:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On May 07 2014 03:52 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On May 07 2014 03:47 Ercster wrote:
Would capping the amount of swarm hosts you can have at once help? I'm not talking about increasing their supply cost, but just making it so you can only have something like 15-20 out at a time?


Changes like this are just poor design. You end up with a ton of unintuitive corner cases, which makes learning the game much harder. All changes need to make sense when compared to previously existing changes.

You could presumably design a balanced game where each unit deals a different amount of damage to each other unit, and with weird unit caps to each unit but it would be way too restrictive and confusing to play.


Not that I agree with him (its one of the dumber ideas I've heard) but the unit limit has already been done with the Mothership and the Mothership Core. Blizz is already okay with arbitrary non-supply limitations in the number of units.

It's still not a good solution. It basically acknowledges that they've made a unit that snowballs too well, but doesn't change the underlying cause on why it snowballs. Plus the swarmhost doesn't really even have special spells that would make it even feel like a hero unit like the Mothership. (And I never liked the idea of a mothership in the first place.)

I mean, realistically this could be the solution to any unit composition problem. Marauders are too good and Terran will only make pure marauders to snipe everything on the ground and shrug off air attacks. Solution? You can only make 20 marauders... or fix the reason why Terran only goes marauders every game.

It sounds like they want a short term fix, though. Long term would be to change what makes them good in a comp, and that doesn't seem likely in this expansion. It's kinda the reason why I presented the idea of the unit cap. It wasn't to be the end all solution to the unit, but for the time being it might fix the problems it has until they decide to rework the unit.

A short term fix that doesn't fuck up zerg late game is preferable, and available. Make BLs immune to abduct. Done.

"- Change the Viper’s Abduct ability to make massive units immune to it.
o By making Brood Lords immune to Abduct, we’d solve the stalemate. Late game ZvZ would be mostly about who wins in the air.
o There are downsides -- Abduct is a really cool ability, and it is something Zerg needs vs. Colossi in PvZ.
o To address that, we’d consider a potential buff to Blinding Cloud so that Vipers would still be a valuable utility unit in the ZvP matchup."

To me, it doesn't seem like they're capable of doing that otherwise it would have been suggested instead of all massive units. And I don't think applying it to all massive units would be helpful.

What prevents them from just making the broodlord immune exclusively? Ultras are immune to roots and snares.


I think elegance is part of the problem, if you have more exceptions than rules it becomes very hard to understand the game. Maybe make it so Abduct doesn't work vs Biological units? This would fix the problem with Abduct vs Brood Lord without affecting ZvMech or ZvP.

Another potential fix imo is to reduce the size of locusts, this would make banelings more effective vs them and baneling / ultra can actually wreck SH compositions in ZvZ (The banelings clear a wave of locusts and the ultralisks can't be stopped by fungal so they run in and decimate the SH's before the next wave spawns). It would also be a slight buff to other AoE counters to SH (Tanks and Hellions / Hellbats, Collosi and Storm). This also runs the risk of giving locusts more dps / surface area though.
In Somnis Veritas
sumsaR
Profile Joined January 2013
Sweden1812 Posts
May 06 2014 19:41 GMT
#248
"Abduct can't be used on flying massive units."

There, solved it.
Moonrisesc
Profile Joined July 2011
Netherlands38 Posts
May 06 2014 19:41 GMT
#249
The spore nerf and hydra buff would bring ZvZ back to muta v muta since hydras don't actualy matter. At the point where a roach player gets to hydras or infestors the muta player will have stopped going muta already anyway and the damage has been done. The abduct change would really hurt zergs other matchups. I'm not even sure that it would fix the SH versus SH issue either since broodlords don't kill the locusts quick enough. The locusts might just clean up all the spores at which point a bunch of corruptors clean up the broods. Or the game might become a BL SH versus BL SH fest, wow what an improvement right.
KristofferAG
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Norway25712 Posts
May 06 2014 19:41 GMT
#250
So...

free units are still a-okay?
@KristofferAG | http://vestkyststoy.bandcamp.com | last.fm/user/KristofferAG
Kylo55
Profile Joined April 2012
Poland64 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 19:44:03
May 06 2014 19:43 GMT
#251
On May 07 2014 04:32 Squat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 04:16 Ercster wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:10 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:08 Ercster wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:05 Falling wrote:
On May 07 2014 03:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On May 07 2014 03:52 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On May 07 2014 03:47 Ercster wrote:
Would capping the amount of swarm hosts you can have at once help? I'm not talking about increasing their supply cost, but just making it so you can only have something like 15-20 out at a time?


Changes like this are just poor design. You end up with a ton of unintuitive corner cases, which makes learning the game much harder. All changes need to make sense when compared to previously existing changes.

You could presumably design a balanced game where each unit deals a different amount of damage to each other unit, and with weird unit caps to each unit but it would be way too restrictive and confusing to play.


Not that I agree with him (its one of the dumber ideas I've heard) but the unit limit has already been done with the Mothership and the Mothership Core. Blizz is already okay with arbitrary non-supply limitations in the number of units.

It's still not a good solution. It basically acknowledges that they've made a unit that snowballs too well, but doesn't change the underlying cause on why it snowballs. Plus the swarmhost doesn't really even have special spells that would make it even feel like a hero unit like the Mothership. (And I never liked the idea of a mothership in the first place.)

I mean, realistically this could be the solution to any unit composition problem. Marauders are too good and Terran will only make pure marauders to snipe everything on the ground and shrug off air attacks. Solution? You can only make 20 marauders... or fix the reason why Terran only goes marauders every game.

It sounds like they want a short term fix, though. Long term would be to change what makes them good in a comp, and that doesn't seem likely in this expansion. It's kinda the reason why I presented the idea of the unit cap. It wasn't to be the end all solution to the unit, but for the time being it might fix the problems it has until they decide to rework the unit.

A short term fix that doesn't fuck up zerg late game is preferable, and available. Make BLs immune to abduct. Done.

"- Change the Viper’s Abduct ability to make massive units immune to it.
o By making Brood Lords immune to Abduct, we’d solve the stalemate. Late game ZvZ would be mostly about who wins in the air.
o There are downsides -- Abduct is a really cool ability, and it is something Zerg needs vs. Colossi in PvZ.
o To address that, we’d consider a potential buff to Blinding Cloud so that Vipers would still be a valuable utility unit in the ZvP matchup."

To me, it doesn't seem like they're capable of doing that otherwise it would have been suggested instead of all massive units. And I don't think applying it to all massive units would be helpful.

What prevents them from just making the broodlord immune exclusively? Ultras are immune to roots and snares.


Yeah i second that thought. The abduct problem is with BL only. It's absolutely necessary to have it vs collosi-tempest.
aZealot
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
New Zealand5447 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 20:06:22
May 06 2014 19:43 GMT
#252
On May 07 2014 04:18 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 04:08 LingBlingBling wrote:
Is Swarm host in zvz really a thing?? Come on now no one in NA or Korea uses it. Blizzard really considering making drastic changes because a few obnoxious EU pros are using it to stall out Tournaments??? ZvZ for rest of the world is roach vs roach muta into roach ect. Stephano is like the only person along with a few EU players that do that anyways, and they do it to make the other guy mad lol.

Well, that's why waiting a bit longer isn't too bad. Did Stephano break ZvZ and everyone else is behind the curve and we're about to get inundated with SH stalemates? Or is this a freak game?

In my heart of hearts, I'd like to think that it couldn't be possible to even have such a freak game, that design could preclude such a possibility. But who knows with how people will play. What does make it disturbing is it was such a bad stalemate in maxed army, macro situation. Rather than a weird base trade where someone has a cannon left and the other has a DT left and neither can attack the other. That's hard to account for, but it's also very rare. Maxed, macro games are a lot easier to get to. A lot easier to repeat the conditions that led to a stalemate. But for that reason, a wait and see is for the best, imo. (Even if I think SH's inherently lend themselves to passive gameplay.)


I agree. I can't help but feeling, yet again, that Blizzard would be better to ignore the hysteria. To be fair, they have conceded these are just preliminary thoughts. Still, I'd hate to see HOTS degenerate into patch-a-lot WOL. Wait and see, Blizzard.


KT best KT ~ 2014
ThePastor
Profile Joined February 2012
New Zealand380 Posts
May 06 2014 19:45 GMT
#253
On May 07 2014 04:41 sumsaR wrote:
"Abduct can't be used on flying massive units."

There, solved it.


How would you kill tempest balls?

The spore is definitely the issue. The problem with the swarm host style is that if you put up spores there is almost nothing that can kill your swarm hosts. Without the spore buff it would be different. People would have more opportunities to gogo muta switches.
Aiomon
Profile Joined December 2013
Canada39 Posts
May 06 2014 19:46 GMT
#254
Can't they just admit it is a terrible unit?
Shinespark
Profile Joined June 2011
Chile843 Posts
May 06 2014 19:46 GMT
#255
Good job Stephano. You come back for 1 day and screw everything up
lol
"I, for one, welcome our new Korean overlords."
TheFish7
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States2824 Posts
May 06 2014 19:48 GMT
#256
The Lurker and Lurker Den are in the game files

It can be placed in the editor

Just sayin
~ ~ <°)))><~ ~ ~
Krogan
Profile Joined January 2011
Sweden375 Posts
May 06 2014 19:48 GMT
#257
On May 07 2014 02:30 Noocta wrote:
Show nested quote +
Drastic changes to the way the Swarm Host currently works could affect the game negatively, as the unit plays a key role in various matchups.


But.. WHERE ?
Seriously, I haven't seen Swarm Host being used outside of the stalemate type of games. At all.

Why not changing the cause of the problem instead of always going around it....


I'd say that in a vast majority of games swarm host is used actively and in interesting way while the boring stalemate style is a minority.
Squat
Profile Joined September 2013
Sweden7978 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 19:56:15
May 06 2014 19:48 GMT
#258
On May 07 2014 04:40 Pursuit_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2014 04:32 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:16 Ercster wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:10 Squat wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:08 Ercster wrote:
On May 07 2014 04:05 Falling wrote:
On May 07 2014 03:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On May 07 2014 03:52 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On May 07 2014 03:47 Ercster wrote:
Would capping the amount of swarm hosts you can have at once help? I'm not talking about increasing their supply cost, but just making it so you can only have something like 15-20 out at a time?


Changes like this are just poor design. You end up with a ton of unintuitive corner cases, which makes learning the game much harder. All changes need to make sense when compared to previously existing changes.

You could presumably design a balanced game where each unit deals a different amount of damage to each other unit, and with weird unit caps to each unit but it would be way too restrictive and confusing to play.


Not that I agree with him (its one of the dumber ideas I've heard) but the unit limit has already been done with the Mothership and the Mothership Core. Blizz is already okay with arbitrary non-supply limitations in the number of units.

It's still not a good solution. It basically acknowledges that they've made a unit that snowballs too well, but doesn't change the underlying cause on why it snowballs. Plus the swarmhost doesn't really even have special spells that would make it even feel like a hero unit like the Mothership. (And I never liked the idea of a mothership in the first place.)

I mean, realistically this could be the solution to any unit composition problem. Marauders are too good and Terran will only make pure marauders to snipe everything on the ground and shrug off air attacks. Solution? You can only make 20 marauders... or fix the reason why Terran only goes marauders every game.

It sounds like they want a short term fix, though. Long term would be to change what makes them good in a comp, and that doesn't seem likely in this expansion. It's kinda the reason why I presented the idea of the unit cap. It wasn't to be the end all solution to the unit, but for the time being it might fix the problems it has until they decide to rework the unit.

A short term fix that doesn't fuck up zerg late game is preferable, and available. Make BLs immune to abduct. Done.

"- Change the Viper’s Abduct ability to make massive units immune to it.
o By making Brood Lords immune to Abduct, we’d solve the stalemate. Late game ZvZ would be mostly about who wins in the air.
o There are downsides -- Abduct is a really cool ability, and it is something Zerg needs vs. Colossi in PvZ.
o To address that, we’d consider a potential buff to Blinding Cloud so that Vipers would still be a valuable utility unit in the ZvP matchup."

To me, it doesn't seem like they're capable of doing that otherwise it would have been suggested instead of all massive units. And I don't think applying it to all massive units would be helpful.

What prevents them from just making the broodlord immune exclusively? Ultras are immune to roots and snares.


I think elegance is part of the problem, if you have more exceptions than rules it becomes very hard to understand the game. Maybe make it so Abduct doesn't work vs Biological units? This would fix the problem with Abduct vs Brood Lord without affecting ZvMech or ZvP.

Another potential fix imo is to reduce the size of locusts, this would make banelings more effective vs them and baneling / ultra can actually wreck SH compositions in ZvZ (The banelings clear a wave of locusts and the ultralisks can't be stopped by fungal so they run in and decimate the SH's before the next wave spawns). It would also be a slight buff to other AoE counters to SH (Tanks and Hellions / Hellbats, Collosi and Storm). This also runs the risk of giving locusts more dps / surface area though.

I'm unconvinced, Dota 2 is riddled with exceptions and special rules, yet pulls huge viewer numbers consistently. It's confusing one or two times.

Anyone who would find something like that hard to process is not very likely to be watching competitive Sc2. People who are interested enough in this game to watch other nerds play games for hours on a friday night probably have a decent understanding of what is going on already. And honestly, the market for new players getting into Sc2 at this point is likely negligible.
"Digital. They have digital. What is digital?" - Donald J Trump
-Kaiser-
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
Canada932 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-05-06 19:52:21
May 06 2014 19:50 GMT
#259
Get rid of abduct. Take neural parasite away from the infestor and give it to the viper. Make NP'd units immune to blinding cloud.

Vipers are harder to kill than infestors, so neural parasite will actually be useful again, but they're more vulnerable than vipers that use abduct. NP and Blinding Cloud will have better synergy than Abduct and Blinding Cloud. Solves the ZvZ problem because NPed Brood Lords won't shoot themselves or get abducted into spores while giving back Zerg's old method of dealing with Colossi and shit.

Tah-dah. Fix old, unused spell to replace new (and stupid) broken one.
3 Hatch Before Cool
MrMotionPicture
Profile Joined May 2010
United States4327 Posts
May 06 2014 19:52 GMT
#260
I don't like the spore buff reverted. You would have to keep a good number of hydras in your base instead of the spores. And I don't like the abduct potential change either. I think it is good that they can abduct broodlords to kill them off...
"Elvis Presley" | Ret was looking at my post in the GSL video by Artosis. | MMA told me I look like Juanfran while we shared an elevator with Scarlett
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 15 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 38m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko551
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4367
Shuttle 1878
Jaedong 1314
Bisu 1265
Mini 608
BeSt 372
Light 312
Larva 305
Snow 227
hero 171
[ Show more ]
firebathero 144
Stork 126
ggaemo 106
Mind 100
Hyuk 77
sorry 41
Terrorterran 32
Sea.KH 26
Killer 24
ToSsGirL 22
Hm[arnc] 20
HiyA 20
zelot 20
Aegong 19
scan(afreeca) 19
Yoon 17
Bishop 15
Sacsri 12
yabsab 11
Dota 2
qojqva2823
Cr1tdota1735
syndereN394
BananaSlamJamma269
420jenkins176
PGG 173
monkeys_forever133
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1705
ceh9361
x6flipin145
edward33
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King155
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu2128
crisheroes550
MindelVK6
Other Games
singsing2461
B2W.Neo1332
Liquid`RaSZi1109
hiko873
Beastyqt746
Livibee197
Liquid`VortiX162
ArmadaUGS122
QueenE85
TKL 78
Organizations
StarCraft 2
IntoTheiNu 1084
Other Games
WardiTV892
Counter-Strike
PGL486
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 8
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hui .233
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 24
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3561
• WagamamaTV663
League of Legends
• Nemesis3313
Other Games
• Shiphtur507
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
38m
Replay Cast
6h 38m
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
20h 38m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 8h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 18h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
Reynor vs Solar
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs MaxPax
herO vs Rogue
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
5 days
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
IPSL
6 days
Azhi_Dahaki vs ggnore13
Double vs WIZARD
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-01
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
CC Div. A S8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.