• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:40
CEST 17:40
KST 00:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202528RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me)
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Corsair Pursuit Micro? Pro gamer house photos
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 862 users

6 possible balance changes - David Kim - Page 47

Forum Index > SC2 General
1350 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 45 46 47 48 49 68 Next
saddaromma
Profile Joined April 2013
1129 Posts
September 24 2013 09:50 GMT
#921
On September 24 2013 18:43 vthree wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 18:36 saddaromma wrote:
On September 24 2013 18:26 vthree wrote:
On September 24 2013 18:16 LSN wrote:
On September 24 2013 18:04 boxerfred wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:58 NarutO wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:55 LSN wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:45 Sissors wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:41 LSN wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:27 saddaromma wrote:
[quote]

If anything I liked zergling vs mine micro, they shoud've preserved it for midgame. And give transition options for the lategame.

Now we're back to muta/bane a-move into siegetank/marine

[quote]
Haha, Iol'd.
Imagine DK balances things by player earnings :D



The problem is that people are not open minded to changes. Surely mine TvZ is highly beneficial for terran. Just believe me when I tell you that it is killing the fun for most zergs. It is just an unbalanced position that you are in when fighting against mines in its current state. Furthermore the issue about mines is that there is no alternative as they are so good. Therefore ZvT would end up being stale for the rest of SC2 life, without a mine nerf.

Example for you: Just consider PvZ if zergs went mass mutalisks any game and you had to defend it with stalkers/sentry/cannon only. Zerg is always offensive, attacking, deciding the pace of the game. If you make one mistake with stalkers then you die to mass muta. You gotta play this every single PvZ. This is how ZvT feels right now. Apart from the fact that it is imbalanced to be in an only defensive position in a matchup it also kills the fun of the game when you play against only a single always the same strategy in every single game of a matchup.

Blizzard is doing a step in the right direction there. But I am convinced that the thor needs to be redone completely to make mech a good choice in the end.

I agree with you 4M as only option as it currently is, is bad. However you are missing two problems:

1. This isn't just nerfing widow mines a bit, it is nerfing them into the ground. It is freaking enormous. Sure you can say it is just a number. If storm area was decreased by a factor 2.5 would you consider that just a number too?

2. Currently bio-mech and mech are not viable options whatsoever. A 10% decrease in cycle time of siege tanks won't change that, they still won't be viable options. They were in WoL, then they got minor boosts while zerg got huge boosts to directly counter them.



Widow mines are way op and too strong for what they cost. If terran appears to be too weak after such a change, further changes need to be done. Widow mines should be a nice addon a zerg does not expect. It should not be the ultimate offense/defense unit that it is now.

Just look at PvZ and how versatile the different styles are. I expect TvZ to become this versatile as well so that different strategies require certain adaptions from opponents on both sides and the matchup gets some creativity back. TvZ right now just sucks to play big time.


Widowmines and not overpowered and clearly its not too cost efficient. It always gets pointed out, yet whenever we saw the unit lost tab in current good-long TvZs we see its about even, strangely enough right? For reference, Curious vs INnoVation.


Widowmines enable terran to trade at least equal, imo with a small advantage for the terran. Once 3/3 tunes in, the terran can trade even better. That, plus given the fact that bio-mine is the most efficient way for terran to play ZvT, I don't think it's a balance issue, but it is a "restricting the game down to one style" issue, which sucks. So I guess I approve the change, but I think the range is nerfed too drastically.



@naruto
It isn't important if zergs can adapt to this state of the game and still might win games. Important is that this unit that btw is quite cheap for what it does makes the whole ZvT matchup a pure mine defusing game. Also this unit denies other playstyles from terran as it is way stronger than the other styles. Therefore it is safe to say that the mine is op in its current state.


It isn't important if terrans can adapt to this state of the game and still might win games. Important is that this unit that btw is quite cheap for what it does makes the whole TvP matchup a pure storm dodging game. Also this unit denies other playstyles from protoss as it is way stronger than the other styles. Therefore it is safe to say that the HT is op in its current state.

HTs are no comparison to widow mines. They're harder/risky to get and not cheap either.

If anything you should compare widow mines to banelings. Almost same cost and accessibility. That said, banelings are easy to use, widow mines require careful planning. Both are hard to play against. But widow mines have higher skill-cap with a potential of doing major damage to both ground and air. Banelings are less versatile.

All in all this has nothing to do with balance. But I get where the complaints are coming from, window mines seem to be "unfair" for spectator. Similar to lurkers in BW. Pro-gamers compensated it with good micro. Therefore I also think widow mines should remain untouched. For the sake of better micro and higher skillcap.


For the damage that they can do to a terran army? They are definitely cheap. I don't think any other unit at that cost has the same game turning potential.

And that is the problem with MSC, It used to be risky teching to storms quickly, but not anymore.

You are not complaining about HTs, are you?

And MSc is just a bad unit. Its sort of a bandage to PvT matchup. They didn't wanna mess with sentries so they just added nexus cannon. Very simple and cheap solution.
Creager
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany1893 Posts
September 24 2013 09:51 GMT
#922
On September 24 2013 18:43 vthree wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 18:36 saddaromma wrote:
On September 24 2013 18:26 vthree wrote:
On September 24 2013 18:16 LSN wrote:
On September 24 2013 18:04 boxerfred wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:58 NarutO wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:55 LSN wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:45 Sissors wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:41 LSN wrote:
On September 24 2013 17:27 saddaromma wrote:
[quote]

If anything I liked zergling vs mine micro, they shoud've preserved it for midgame. And give transition options for the lategame.

Now we're back to muta/bane a-move into siegetank/marine

[quote]
Haha, Iol'd.
Imagine DK balances things by player earnings :D



The problem is that people are not open minded to changes. Surely mine TvZ is highly beneficial for terran. Just believe me when I tell you that it is killing the fun for most zergs. It is just an unbalanced position that you are in when fighting against mines in its current state. Furthermore the issue about mines is that there is no alternative as they are so good. Therefore ZvT would end up being stale for the rest of SC2 life, without a mine nerf.

Example for you: Just consider PvZ if zergs went mass mutalisks any game and you had to defend it with stalkers/sentry/cannon only. Zerg is always offensive, attacking, deciding the pace of the game. If you make one mistake with stalkers then you die to mass muta. You gotta play this every single PvZ. This is how ZvT feels right now. Apart from the fact that it is imbalanced to be in an only defensive position in a matchup it also kills the fun of the game when you play against only a single always the same strategy in every single game of a matchup.

Blizzard is doing a step in the right direction there. But I am convinced that the thor needs to be redone completely to make mech a good choice in the end.

I agree with you 4M as only option as it currently is, is bad. However you are missing two problems:

1. This isn't just nerfing widow mines a bit, it is nerfing them into the ground. It is freaking enormous. Sure you can say it is just a number. If storm area was decreased by a factor 2.5 would you consider that just a number too?

2. Currently bio-mech and mech are not viable options whatsoever. A 10% decrease in cycle time of siege tanks won't change that, they still won't be viable options. They were in WoL, then they got minor boosts while zerg got huge boosts to directly counter them.



Widow mines are way op and too strong for what they cost. If terran appears to be too weak after such a change, further changes need to be done. Widow mines should be a nice addon a zerg does not expect. It should not be the ultimate offense/defense unit that it is now.

Just look at PvZ and how versatile the different styles are. I expect TvZ to become this versatile as well so that different strategies require certain adaptions from opponents on both sides and the matchup gets some creativity back. TvZ right now just sucks to play big time.


Widowmines and not overpowered and clearly its not too cost efficient. It always gets pointed out, yet whenever we saw the unit lost tab in current good-long TvZs we see its about even, strangely enough right? For reference, Curious vs INnoVation.


Widowmines enable terran to trade at least equal, imo with a small advantage for the terran. Once 3/3 tunes in, the terran can trade even better. That, plus given the fact that bio-mine is the most efficient way for terran to play ZvT, I don't think it's a balance issue, but it is a "restricting the game down to one style" issue, which sucks. So I guess I approve the change, but I think the range is nerfed too drastically.



@naruto
It isn't important if zergs can adapt to this state of the game and still might win games. Important is that this unit that btw is quite cheap for what it does makes the whole ZvT matchup a pure mine defusing game. Also this unit denies other playstyles from terran as it is way stronger than the other styles. Therefore it is safe to say that the mine is op in its current state.


It isn't important if terrans can adapt to this state of the game and still might win games. Important is that this unit that btw is quite cheap for what it does makes the whole TvP matchup a pure storm dodging game. Also this unit denies other playstyles from protoss as it is way stronger than the other styles. Therefore it is safe to say that the HT is op in its current state.

HTs are no comparison to widow mines. They're harder/risky to get and not cheap either.

If anything you should compare widow mines to banelings. Almost same cost and accessibility. That said, banelings are easy to use, widow mines require careful planning. Both are hard to play against. But widow mines have higher skill-cap with a potential of doing major damage to both ground and air. Banelings are less versatile.

All in all this has nothing to do with balance. But I get where the complaints are coming from, window mines seem to be "unfair" for spectator. Similar to lurkers in BW. Pro-gamers compensated it with good micro. Therefore I also think widow mines should remain untouched. For the sake of better micro and higher skillcap.


For the damage that they can do to a terran army? They are definitely cheap. I don't think any other unit at that cost has the same game turning potential.

And that is the problem with MSC, It used to be risky teching to storms quickly, but not anymore.


I completeley agree on this one, what's exactly the risk of getting fast HTs? Protoss is completely safe now during the early-game... If they stockpile a lot of gas they are more than easily capable of dumping it into HTs -> Archons... The unit seems too cheap and versatile at the same time, all when it's way too easy to transition into.
... einmal mit Profis spielen!
Liquid`Ret
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
Netherlands4511 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 09:53:17
September 24 2013 09:52 GMT
#923
I feel like david kim is finally listening to the community's opinion that the game is simply boring, but I feel like these changes have absolutely nothing to do with actual current balance.
Team Liquid
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
September 24 2013 09:53 GMT
#924
On September 24 2013 18:44 Grumbels wrote:
I do wonder how people can applaud Blizzard for buffing units instead of nerfing them, as this super awesome balance philosophy, while completely overlooking that this patch, which has a barely noticeable buff to siege tanks, also completely breaks the widow mine. It's just so dumb, it hurts my brain every time someone says "buff, not nerf".


there are hellbats, thors, tanks, bc, raven and many more units. Blizzard should rather put these units to the battlefields of TvZ than focussing the whole matchup on the widow mine unit only.

The mine will still be effective. Mass mines for the whole length of the game for sure wont do it anymore after the patch. This is intended and a step in the right direction. At this point we are gonna see in which direction the matchup is going to and what further changes will be required. I predict a thor change (thor ground & air attack design/mechanics) and an infestor buff (range, infested terrans, neural parasit) is incoming 2014.
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
September 24 2013 09:54 GMT
#925
On September 24 2013 18:52 Liquid`Ret wrote:
I feel like david kim is finally listening to the community's opinion that the game is simply boring, but I feel like these changes have absolutely nothing to do with actual current balance.


Thank you
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
Liquid`Ret
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
Netherlands4511 Posts
September 24 2013 09:57 GMT
#926
How hard is it really, with 10+ years of experience in Korea in progaming, to get Proper, educated opinions from coaches/players/team representives/team houses and make some REAL changes?

Focus on Korea where the skill is higest and fix the game.. or at least try to communicate, try to make things better.
Team Liquid
drkcid
Profile Joined October 2012
Spain196 Posts
September 24 2013 09:58 GMT
#927
On September 24 2013 18:53 LSN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 18:44 Grumbels wrote:
I do wonder how people can applaud Blizzard for buffing units instead of nerfing them, as this super awesome balance philosophy, while completely overlooking that this patch, which has a barely noticeable buff to siege tanks, also completely breaks the widow mine. It's just so dumb, it hurts my brain every time someone says "buff, not nerf".


there are hellbats, thors, tanks, bc, raven and many more units. Blizzard should rather put these units to the battlefields of TvZ than focussing the whole matchup on the widow mine unit only.

The mine will still be effective. Mass mines for the whole length of the game for sure wont do it anymore after the patch. This is intended and a step in the right direction. At this point we are gonna see in which direction the matchup is going to and what further changes will be required. I predict a thor change (thor ground & air attack design/mechanics) and an infestor buff (range, infested terrans, neural parasit) is incoming 2014.


THIS. Every race should have multiple viable strategies against the others or the game will keep being too predictable.

Back on topic: maybe the change on the T upgrades will boost Mech play.
Just for fun
FeyFey
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany10114 Posts
September 24 2013 10:00 GMT
#928
hmm If they remove the visibility of the mine not targeting I wouldn't mind it being useless at stopping Zerg a-moving masses.

The Radius reduce is aimed at noobs so they can swarm-in giant amounts of units without being instant dead. While they assume pros will continue to trickle in small units against the mines to hold up the advancement. But the nerfed Mine radius is actually a buff for Terran in that region, because by sending in small groups into the minefeld that has to be protected by Marines you hope to deliver splash to the Terran as well.
The more I think about it the more I hate it as Zerg and Toss, because I actually abused the friendly fire the most, which will now be a less of an issue. (Poor Dimaga his strat is so epic)
So it is quiet a game defining change, it might really happen that mines can only be effectively swarmed by mass units, because their splash is just not enough anymore. So the long drawn out battle that is so awesome will turn into a 20 second deciding fight based on lucky baneling and mine hits.

Just hope they don't ruin the matchup again like in WoL, because they allowed the Zerg to rush to t3.

Also where is my 75 mineral turret ! every air unit got stronger and faster damn it and now DTs will glide over the ground like the wind. I want to set down double turrets like in BW. Turrets Turrets everywhere.
MockHamill
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden1798 Posts
September 24 2013 10:00 GMT
#929
Mech ground and air attack upgrades combined
This change is good since it makes Hellbats without blue flame slightly useful in TvP if you go bio and upgrade viking attack anyway. If you go mech it is useful since it makes it a bit easier to fight Protoss if they transition into air.

Widow mine splash radius decreased from 1.75 to 1.1

Good idea but I suspect this in an over-nerf. Nerf the radious but nerf it less.

Siege tank attack period decreased from 3 to 2.7

Good idea but this is not enough. Tanks need a larger buff than this to be useful. Maybe have 2.5 attack period instead.

Oracle cost decreased from 150/150 to 150/100

It just makes Oracle cheese stronger but does not adress the limited usefulness of Oracles in the the lategame.

Dark Templar movement speed increased from 2.813 to 3.375

Good idea, but this is to fast.

Roach speed upgrade also increases the burrowed roach movement speed from 1.41 to 2.25
Good idea.
klup
Profile Joined May 2013
France612 Posts
September 24 2013 10:01 GMT
#930
I wonder if the WM nerf will be so much effective...

In my personal experience i don't like WM so much because they often backfire on marines, But if they have less radius you can build a ton of them and don't bother about backfiring anymore... I don't know yet i need to test it.
RaZorwire
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden718 Posts
September 24 2013 10:01 GMT
#931
I personally think bio+mine vs ling+bling+muta is one of the most exciting things in the game from a spectator point of view. It requires constant micro from both sides and allows for long, continous battles rather than a few short key engagements. Isn't that exactly what a lot of people wanted? More micro? More drawn out skirmishes instead of two large armies clashing a few times to decide the game?

I understand that the balance in the MU isn't perfect, but the current dynamic is really cool from a design persepctive, IMO. I'd prefer if Blizzard found something else to change than nerfing widow mines, or at least consider a less drastic nerf.
saddaromma
Profile Joined April 2013
1129 Posts
September 24 2013 10:02 GMT
#932
On September 24 2013 18:57 Liquid`Ret wrote:
How hard is it really, with 10+ years of experience in Korea in progaming, to get Proper, educated opinions from coaches/players/team representives/team houses and make some REAL changes?

Focus on Korea where the skill is higest and fix the game.. or at least try to communicate, try to make things better.

Has ever Blizzard contacted you or your friends regarding balance?
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
September 24 2013 10:06 GMT
#933
On September 24 2013 18:57 Liquid`Ret wrote:
How hard is it really, with 10+ years of experience in Korea in progaming, to get Proper, educated opinions from coaches/players/team representives/team houses and make some REAL changes?

Focus on Korea where the skill is higest and fix the game.. or at least try to communicate, try to make things better.


This can only be achieved in several steps of patching. The first step for blizzard is daring to take more risks when doing changes. The minimal change policy doesn't work out well as it takes too long to make real changes happen. With the recent announcement blizzard might have recognized this and show that they are willing to do bigger changes, so there is hope that in the beginning of 2014 things will get improved.
rtgICEMAN
Profile Joined November 2010
Romania66 Posts
September 24 2013 10:08 GMT
#934
Please ... make the siege tank buff happen.
woopr
Profile Joined December 2012
United States112 Posts
September 24 2013 10:10 GMT
#935
--- Nuked ---
JustPassingBy
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
10776 Posts
September 24 2013 10:11 GMT
#936
Nothing balance related, but am I the only one who misses tanks with a slow but absurdly powerful shot?
Cascade
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
Australia5405 Posts
September 24 2013 10:11 GMT
#937
On September 24 2013 18:57 Liquid`Ret wrote:
How hard is it really, with 10+ years of experience in Korea in progaming, to get Proper, educated opinions from coaches/players/team representives/team houses and make some REAL changes?

Focus on Korea where the skill is higest and fix the game.. or at least try to communicate, try to make things better.

I don't have a source, but I remember that someone said that the feedback from pros were close to useless, as it almost exclusively was "buff my race, nerf the other races". Blizzard want to make the game more spectator (and player...) friendly, the pros and teams want to win, and those two can be conflicting. Do you think that could be an issue?

Nonetheless, thanks for posting! <3
lessQQmorePEWPEW
Profile Joined November 2011
Jamaica921 Posts
September 24 2013 10:14 GMT
#938
Blizzard really need someone new for these balance changes. The game is dying slowly because of this radicals ideas. Boot david kim and bring someone else in with fresh ideas.

dt buff widow mine mega-nerf.. what has this guy been smoking?
Why drink and drive when you can smoke and fly - Bob Marley
Executerror
Profile Joined January 2011
New Zealand28 Posts
September 24 2013 10:14 GMT
#939
Widowmine splash should definitely go down.
RyLai
Profile Joined May 2011
United States477 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 10:19:47
September 24 2013 10:18 GMT
#940
1) Well it simplifies things a lot. Except in TvT, I feel there aren't many cases where this comes into play (makes Sky Terran more appealing, and will likely result in a lot more mech TvT because of this). It makes a Broodlord tech switch against mech much weaker, that's about it.

2) Widow Mine nerf is WAYYYYYYYYYYY too much unless you give a good buff somewhere else. Siege Tanks buff isn't enough, not by a longshot, to compensate for such a massive nerf. Not saying Widow Mines shouldn't be nerfed... Just not to this degree without a compensating buff of equal magnitude somewhere else. Upgrade and Siege Tank buffs don't count, since, like I said, upgrades will only have an impact in TvT, and the Tank will STILL be too slow and supply inefficient.

3) Siege Tank buff is good, but not enough to compensate for massive Widow Mine nerf. One thing that needs to be done to the Tank is dropping the supply cost to 2. They're too supply inefficient.

4) Oracle buff is beyond retarded. Please stop encouraging more Protoss cheese. Reducing the gas cost of the Oracle makes spotting proxy Oracle a little more difficult (since now they can afford the MSC immediately while doing it). The strength of the Oracle is about on par with a Cloaked Banshee. The Cloaked Banshee is a fairly large investment (lots of gas and delays economy and tech). The Oracle should be as well.

5) DTs not being able to dodge scans isn't because they're too slow... It's because Protoss players aren't bothering to split their DTs up as much as they can except at the very top. For them to be able to dodge scans makes constant DT warp ins nearly unstoppable unless you start off with a Turret ring around your base. Overseers and Ravens won't be able to catch up, and Observers at least have cloak to help them sneak up on the DTs so you can see them. All in all, a VERY bad decision.

6) I'm neutral on the Roach buff. As Zerg, it's REALLY nice and fun. As Protoss, it's more annoying. As Terran... Dear God... Does Terran have to always open early Ravens in TvZ and TvP? That's absurd! Reduce the cost of Ravens, and that's fair, but it makes late game Terran absurdly powerful. I think, buffing invisible units is rarely a good idea. I like how I came with the conclusion it's bad, but I'm still neutral cause I know if it was me using that, I'd have a hell of a lot of fun abusing it...
Prev 1 45 46 47 48 49 68 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 1
SHIN vs ReynorLIVE!
Maru vs TriGGeRLIVE!
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Classic vs Rogue
Serral vs HeRoMaRinE
EWC_Arena7285
ComeBackTV 2158
EWC_Arena_21162
TaKeTV 532
Hui .476
3DClanTV 310
Berry_CruncH243
Fuzer 238
Rex234
CranKy Ducklings205
mcanning177
Reynor168
EnkiAlexander 164
UpATreeSC155
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena6923
EWC_Arena_21162
Hui .484
Rex 247
Fuzer 230
mcanning 177
Reynor 168
UpATreeSC 161
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 25587
Barracks 1844
Bisu 1662
EffOrt 1599
Mini 1193
Jaedong 799
Stork 554
Larva 491
Soulkey 358
Soma 234
[ Show more ]
Snow 132
ToSsGirL 91
Sea.KH 69
Trikslyr62
Sharp 52
PianO 50
sas.Sziky 46
Movie 42
soO 40
Backho 33
Yoon 24
scan(afreeca) 21
zelot 19
Terrorterran 19
JulyZerg 14
ivOry 5
Counter-Strike
fl0m407
oskar254
edward110
byalli49
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor196
XaKoH 105
Other Games
singsing2577
B2W.Neo1384
ceh9460
ArmadaUGS341
crisheroes316
syndereN234
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis5207
• TFBlade1015
• Stunt769
Other Games
• Shiphtur148
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
18h 20m
Esports World Cup
1d 18h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.