| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2368 Posts
On July 31 2013 01:49 Juliette wrote: Coupd we have this, but more of it? Like, extra smix voice packs or something. You can even charge for them... Do you find the Korean pack important? Or the thing what matters is Smix's voice after all? | ||
|
Juliette
United States6003 Posts
On July 31 2013 04:56 Dakota_Fanning wrote: Do you find the Korean pack important? Or the thing what matters is Smix's voice after all? A bit of both. A male korean voice (could you imagine progamer packs?!) would be really cool as well, but so would extra smix packs. It makes the experience a little cooler and more personal I think. And it's an easy way to add in customization (and possibly monetizing :p). Thanks for listening to suggestions, it's really cool of you, even if it's a small one like this. ^^ | ||
|
Ahelvin
France1866 Posts
I've been so sucked up into Kerbal Space Program recently, but if there's one thing that can get me back into SC2, this is SC2Gears ! | ||
|
AgamemnonSC2
Canada254 Posts
| ||
|
phodacbiet
United States1740 Posts
On July 31 2013 04:56 Dakota_Fanning wrote: Do you find the Korean pack important? Or the thing what matters is Smix's voice after all? Smix voice helps a lot because it is soothing and makes me feel safe because I know Smix would never lie to me. | ||
|
faderedguy
Indonesia58 Posts
I hope this will be a worthy successor :D | ||
|
Gofarman
Canada648 Posts
Never could get sc2gears to work properly. | ||
|
GiveMeCake
148 Posts
| ||
|
ulan-bat
China403 Posts
If you're more in a "i want to build my second son" mood then maybe not because you'll get feedback going in every direction possible, suggestions often backed by one or two persons and overall will doubt instead of just following your own idea. I'd say put the new one out, publish a feature comparison and a poll for each missing feature (want/dontwant + priority 1 to 4) and see how it goes. Build a nice webpage for that instead of TL polls. | ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On August 03 2013 09:40 ulan-bat wrote: Release early and get feedback if you want something that pleads most people. If you're more in a "i want to build my second son" mood then maybe not because you'll get feedback going in every direction possible, suggestions often backed by one or two persons and overall will doubt instead of just following your own idea. I'd say put the new one out, publish a feature comparison and a poll for each missing feature (want/dontwant + priority 1 to 4) and see how it goes. Build a nice webpage for that instead of TL polls. So basically incremental development. Yep, it would be nice to see a prototype so you can get feedback and then work on it if you want. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
It'd be great to have some way to make that easier, if possible both for the sender and receiver. Thanks for your work, love the current sc2gears.  | ||
|
ulan-bat
China403 Posts
On August 03 2013 09:46 darkness wrote: So basically incremental development. Yep, it would be nice to see a prototype so you can get feedback and then work on it if you want. Yes but not in the context of a team of professional and with the old/current software to keep in mind. Taking it a step further would be to build a plugin system and get the new software out on github ASAP and let the magic be done. People will build plugins and most popular plugins/features can then get packaged with the main release and other plugins can be downloaded from everywhere/the main website/something. I feel like it's not what the author wants to do, which i understand perfectly and respect, but don't agree that much with. There's good and bad points to either way (closed/one-man dev VS doors and windows open). | ||
|
MaxField
United States2386 Posts
| ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On August 03 2013 09:51 ulan-bat wrote: Yes but not in the context of a team of professional and with the old/current software to keep in mind. Taking it a step further would be to build a plugin system and get the new software out on github ASAP and let the magic be done. People will build plugins and most popular plugins/features can then get packaged with the main release and other plugins can be downloaded from everywhere/the main website/something. I feel like it's not what the author wants to do, which i understand perfectly and respect, but don't agree that much with. There's good and bad points to either way (closed/one-man dev VS doors and windows open). Agreed. An example is Chaos Launcher from BW, different people were making plugins. Besides, open source for non-commercial product also sounds nice assuming the author doesn't want to make profit. | ||
|
Aberu
United States968 Posts
On July 30 2013 22:18 Dakota_Fanning wrote: To mention a few reasons that immediately pops into my mind: -A web based application can't analyze thousands of replays located on your computer instantly. -A web page can't even access them. -Many users don't want to upload their replays to a server. -Even those who would agree to upload their replays would not want to pay for the resources it requires to store and/or process them. -A web based application can't provide you services like replay auto-save, APM alert, On-top info dialogs etc. -A web based application is slower than a desktop app. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against web programming (doing that for a living for 10 years), but there are things which are better off the web. This and... GG Tracker already exists, so you can gauge how successful a more "extreme" version of GG tracker would be based on their success, not very. | ||
|
pyrodias
United States27 Posts
| ||
|
MrMedic
Canada452 Posts
| ||
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2368 Posts
On August 03 2013 09:34 GiveMeCake wrote: Great news, you're very talented, or hardworking, or a mixture of the two. With that said, I can't see anything 'secret' about this project, or any reason to keep it a secret. Can't help feel that the 'secret' in the thread title was to entice more people to read it (it worked). The secret referred to the previous state/stage of the application. There were hints to a secret project in the Sc2gears thread. | ||
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2368 Posts
On August 03 2013 09:51 ulan-bat wrote: Yes but not in the context of a team of professional and with the old/current software to keep in mind. Taking it a step further would be to build a plugin system and get the new software out on github ASAP and let the magic be done. People will build plugins and most popular plugins/features can then get packaged with the main release and other plugins can be downloaded from everywhere/the main website/something. I feel like it's not what the author wants to do, which i understand perfectly and respect, but don't agree that much with. There's good and bad points to either way (closed/one-man dev VS doors and windows open). Sc2gears has a quite advanced plugin system (advanced plugin API, plugin manager etc.) yet the 3rd party plugin development was quite inactive/precipitated/stagnated. The only exception is the MMR plugin. But fear not, I also plan / working on something similar in the successor which will support official built-in extensions with built-in installing and auto-updating (taking the required hassle out of the plugin's hands and out of the users' hands). Users of the successor will be able to install/enable official external plugins from within the application with the easiness of one click. | ||
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2368 Posts
On August 03 2013 10:29 darkness wrote: Agreed. An example is Chaos Launcher from BW, different people were making plugins. Besides, open source for non-commercial product also sounds nice assuming the author doesn't want to make profit. Read my previous post regarding extensions. Also I don't want to hide the fact that if possible, I'd like to make some profit. Even Sc2gears is much more than a hobby project, and with the successor I'd like to top Sc2gears in every way possible. | ||
| ||
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Weekly #137
SHIN vs ShamelessLIVE!
RSL Revival
Season 6 - Group B
Solar vs NightMareLIVE!
Maru vs TBD
[ Submit Event ] |
|
|
|
IPSL
Bonyth vs Hawk
GSL
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
