• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:35
CET 12:35
KST 20:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3
Community News
[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage0Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win62025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!10BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION3
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Monday Nights Weeklies SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia $3,500 WardiTV Korean Royale S4 Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion SnOw on 'Experimental' Nonstandard Maps in ASL [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions Ladder Map Matchup Stats
Tourneys
BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION [ASL20] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Dating: How's your luck? Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Big Reveal
Peanutsc
Challenge: Maths isn't all…
Hildegard
Career Paths and Skills for …
TrAiDoS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1516 users

Blizzard's Potential Balance Test Map Changes - Page 33

Forum Index > SC2 General
1113 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 31 32 33 34 35 56 Next
bongling
Profile Joined March 2013
41 Posts
April 24 2013 06:40 GMT
#641
Think the corruptor needs some love, zerg struggling so much for anti air and the one thing the corruptor is meant to do, does it poorly. It's too slow, gets penalised for being armoured and the thing it's really good at, taking down carriers and bc's, is so rare, it just doesn't add much value. The only thing it was truly good at was toppling colossi but now vipers do a much better job of that. It needs changed in some way to make it relevant, could even help alleviate the muta wars depending upon it's buff and corruption is a bland ability that doesn't see much use.
FLUFFYPenguin
Profile Joined March 2013
Finland25 Posts
April 24 2013 06:41 GMT
#642
On April 24 2013 15:34 Belha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 10:06 ETisME wrote:
Oracle speed is insane already. Why is everything so fast nowadays with speedmedivac and new muta

Nothing on terran drop only style which is disappointing

I agree on this, why in the world there must be stupidly fast stuff??

The muta problem is because of the silly hots muta buff.



Because insanely fast stuff is insanely more entertaining to watch. As a Protoss player, dealing with the Speedivac is definetely difficult but not impossible. It's rewarding when I completely shut down a Terran harass. Same goes for the Zerg Mutalisks. As Protoss you need to actively scout for the Spire and prepare for a Mutalisk switch accordingly.

A lot of people say you need Phoenix to deal with the Mutalisk. Sure, you do. Another way of getting a win Straight off the bat is adding gates and going all-in with what you have (considering a tech switch situation). Works quite beautifully most of the time.
samurai80
Profile Joined November 2011
Japan4225 Posts
April 24 2013 07:06 GMT
#643
On April 24 2013 15:13 y0su wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 15:00 ETisME wrote:
honestly they should just do something to make the oracle less gimmicky, a buff in movement speed is not the way to go at all, it's already damn fast.
give it a hp/sield boost, increase production time and lower the cost for the other spells so that the protoss actually can choose to save energy to use them, not just "oh i have spare energy, well let's just use these spells since I can't harass with oracle anymore now in mid game"

I think the point of the speed buff is to allow protoss more options with the oracle in the later game. It'll be safer to track an army and get off an revelation without losing the oracle.
Further, using the oracle for emergency detection (envision) will also be easier as the oracle could make it to a base/army slightly quicker.

Alternatively some upgrade (from cybernetics core) that follows your suggestion could work well too.

This is exactly my thoughts. Depending on how the balance is changed with this, this could be an upgrade at the cyber core or even at the fleet beacon if the early oracle pressure is made too strong. But having this option for the late game would give protoss more occasions to use envision or revelation and variety is always good.

Now of course I think it may be a bit early to do this change, especially because protoss are not yet that well used to the new units and abilities/spells, especially because we changed from 2 main spell units (sentry and HT, not taking into account more minor spellcasters as mothership) to 4 with the mothership core and the oracle (or even 5 if we take the void ray prism alignment into account).

I think many low level toss are not able to use all of these at the same time efficiently (not enough control groups...), which is why they may not use the oracle in the late game anyway.
Jerom
Profile Joined April 2011
Netherlands588 Posts
April 24 2013 07:12 GMT
#644
I don't like how they want to give Zerg more all ins. Honestly it feels like there is no race in the game that can all in better than zerg..
samurai80
Profile Joined November 2011
Japan4225 Posts
April 24 2013 07:14 GMT
#645
On April 24 2013 13:49 omnic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 13:40 Patate wrote:
On April 24 2013 07:56 ishmoks wrote:
On April 24 2013 03:25 Rabiator wrote:
On April 24 2013 03:20 Shikyo wrote:
SC2 harder for casuals than BW? I mean... that's just completely off. The players who were attacking with 5 Zealots and 3 Dragoons at 10min in BW with their 40 APM are now platinum in SC2. SC2 is far more casual-centric.

Thats just stupid, because you have to do FAR MORE multitasking .... just argue with the things I mentioned which make any kind of casual strategy harder. Did you ever get killed in a few minutes because your opponent made one or two Reapers and jumped into your walled off base and you werent ready for it? That is a stupid and not really satisfying way for a game to be played.

BW simply did not have these gimmicks and was much simpler and thus easier to play for a casual ... If you dont want to accept that it is just Blizzard propaganda about the awesome unlimited unit selection ... which is stupid and the cause for many balance issues.


Your suggestions for changes in the game make the game really BORING.

That's like asking the NBA to take out slam dunks and fade aways from basketball just because the "casuals" can't do it like the pros do.

BORING.


Yeah small engagements (with 1a deathballs being removed out of the game) sure are more BORING than a big deathball huh?

BORING small engagements...

You should read the entire conversation to get the context on what was being discussed. Nobody is saying small engagements are boring. People just don't think gimmicky coin flippy style strategies are a "good" thing.

Agreed. I think the hardest is to find a good balance between variety and gimmicky/coin flip strategies. Coin flip strats can be dealt with by improving scouting ability though.
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
April 24 2013 07:23 GMT
#646
On April 24 2013 16:12 Jerom wrote:
I don't like how they want to give Zerg more all ins. Honestly it feels like there is no race in the game that can all in better than zerg..


lol. this made me laugh. ZvP vs FFE you cant all in, ZvP vs gate expand you could do all ins and pressure...now with planetary nexus you cant. ZvT you could do roach ling (bling) pressure/all in, now with reaper into factory builds you cant. reaper scouts everything and mines + bunker and if you really want to push it a tank with free siege mode deals with everything.

so yeah they finally need to give Z something to be able to do GOOD pressure on hatchtech so P and T cant play insanely greedy and cant be punished like it is right now. making burrow 50 50 and lower research time would definetly help so really hope they do that! all Z does right now on hatchtech is defend while P and T can play as greedy as they want.
convention
Profile Joined October 2011
United States622 Posts
April 24 2013 07:28 GMT
#647
On April 24 2013 16:06 samurai80 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 15:13 y0su wrote:
On April 24 2013 15:00 ETisME wrote:
honestly they should just do something to make the oracle less gimmicky, a buff in movement speed is not the way to go at all, it's already damn fast.
give it a hp/sield boost, increase production time and lower the cost for the other spells so that the protoss actually can choose to save energy to use them, not just "oh i have spare energy, well let's just use these spells since I can't harass with oracle anymore now in mid game"

I think the point of the speed buff is to allow protoss more options with the oracle in the later game. It'll be safer to track an army and get off an revelation without losing the oracle.
Further, using the oracle for emergency detection (envision) will also be easier as the oracle could make it to a base/army slightly quicker.

Alternatively some upgrade (from cybernetics core) that follows your suggestion could work well too.

This is exactly my thoughts. Depending on how the balance is changed with this, this could be an upgrade at the cyber core or even at the fleet beacon if the early oracle pressure is made too strong. But having this option for the late game would give protoss more occasions to use envision or revelation and variety is always good.

Now of course I think it may be a bit early to do this change, especially because protoss are not yet that well used to the new units and abilities/spells, especially because we changed from 2 main spell units (sentry and HT, not taking into account more minor spellcasters as mothership) to 4 with the mothership core and the oracle (or even 5 if we take the void ray prism alignment into account).

I think many low level toss are not able to use all of these at the same time efficiently (not enough control groups...), which is why they may not use the oracle in the late game anyway.

I would argue that having more speed on an oracle helps the pros (who are definitely struggling right now at the very high levels), because they will be able to use the oracle that they were able to keep alive longer. Lower level players will most likely have lost the oracle at some point.
Terrasmith
Profile Joined February 2013
47 Posts
April 24 2013 07:33 GMT
#648
So, in light of all of the complaining about Terran, I figured I'd point out that there are more zergs than terrans in the code S Ro16. At the pro level, zvt is pretty balanced right now.

About the balance updates. Oracle speed is a bad idea, which seems to be the collective opinion. I'd like to see them used for more than a one-time early game harass, and think that the damage should be slightly decreased while health or shields is buffed, if any changes are made at all. I don't have real opinions on zvz, but it seems like buffing static defense against mutas is the wrong way to go. Mutas are designed to work around static defense, not attack into it, so a buff would either be irrelevant or make mutas useless. All of which has been said before. Burrow as a quicker upgrade would be useful, but it isn't necessary and it might result in a lot of cheese, which I would not like to see, so I'm slightly against it.

I've seen a few people asking for longer infestor root times...NO. The infestor root is one of the most imbalanced abilities in the game, because it makes micro and decision making and overall player skill absolutely irrelevant as soon as it hits. (while the projectile aspect makes it harder to land, the ability itself is still unfair to the opposing player). I'd absolutely prefer to see fungal growth completely reworked (or removed) than for it to be rebuffed. I'd prefer to see a hydra AA range buff and/or a corruptor buff. Several people have pointed out how ineffective the corruptor is, and after reading their arguments I'm inclined to agree.

I'm still in favor of no patches at the moment, mainly because the game is still changing quickly. What looks like an imbalance could be countered next week by some new strat, which makes patching unnecessary.
samurai80
Profile Joined November 2011
Japan4225 Posts
April 24 2013 07:33 GMT
#649
On April 24 2013 16:28 convention wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 16:06 samurai80 wrote:
On April 24 2013 15:13 y0su wrote:
On April 24 2013 15:00 ETisME wrote:
honestly they should just do something to make the oracle less gimmicky, a buff in movement speed is not the way to go at all, it's already damn fast.
give it a hp/sield boost, increase production time and lower the cost for the other spells so that the protoss actually can choose to save energy to use them, not just "oh i have spare energy, well let's just use these spells since I can't harass with oracle anymore now in mid game"

I think the point of the speed buff is to allow protoss more options with the oracle in the later game. It'll be safer to track an army and get off an revelation without losing the oracle.
Further, using the oracle for emergency detection (envision) will also be easier as the oracle could make it to a base/army slightly quicker.

Alternatively some upgrade (from cybernetics core) that follows your suggestion could work well too.

This is exactly my thoughts. Depending on how the balance is changed with this, this could be an upgrade at the cyber core or even at the fleet beacon if the early oracle pressure is made too strong. But having this option for the late game would give protoss more occasions to use envision or revelation and variety is always good.

Now of course I think it may be a bit early to do this change, especially because protoss are not yet that well used to the new units and abilities/spells, especially because we changed from 2 main spell units (sentry and HT, not taking into account more minor spellcasters as mothership) to 4 with the mothership core and the oracle (or even 5 if we take the void ray prism alignment into account).

I think many low level toss are not able to use all of these at the same time efficiently (not enough control groups...), which is why they may not use the oracle in the late game anyway.

I would argue that having more speed on an oracle helps the pros (who are definitely struggling right now at the very high levels), because they will be able to use the oracle that they were able to keep alive longer. Lower level players will most likely have lost the oracle at some point.

It depends, if u really need them in the late game then you can make new ones. Obviously this would be for better positioning with revelation, so buying new ones would be worth it.
Terrasmith
Profile Joined February 2013
47 Posts
April 24 2013 07:41 GMT
#650
On April 24 2013 16:23 Decendos wrote:

so yeah they finally need to give Z something to be able to do GOOD pressure on hatchtech so P and T cant play insanely greedy and cant be punished like it is right now. making burrow 50 50 and lower research time would definetly help so really hope they do that! all Z does right now on hatchtech is defend while P and T can play as greedy as they want.


If by insanely greedy you mean take a really fast natural, then I feel obligated to point out that most zergs respond with an insanely fast third. And except in zvz, this third is very hard to pressure without a major attack from t or p. In other words, this "insanely greedy play" you speak of is an opponent getting a second just before zerg gets a third.

Also, baneling busts can still work. Jaedong vs Flash if you need a recent example.
mihajovics
Profile Joined April 2011
179 Posts
April 24 2013 07:46 GMT
#651
they should rather rework the corruptor in my oppinion
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
April 24 2013 07:46 GMT
#652
On April 24 2013 16:41 Terrasmith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 16:23 Decendos wrote:

so yeah they finally need to give Z something to be able to do GOOD pressure on hatchtech so P and T cant play insanely greedy and cant be punished like it is right now. making burrow 50 50 and lower research time would definetly help so really hope they do that! all Z does right now on hatchtech is defend while P and T can play as greedy as they want.


If by insanely greedy you mean take a really fast natural, then I feel obligated to point out that most zergs respond with an insanely fast third. And except in zvz, this third is very hard to pressure without a major attack from t or p. In other words, this "insanely greedy play" you speak of is an opponent getting a second just before zerg gets a third.

Also, baneling busts can still work. Jaedong vs Flash if you need a recent example.


talking about fast teching with 1 or no sentries ZvP and fast 3 CC ZvT. and obv. blingbusts work vs flash because he doesnt open reaper into factory like most other T.

anybody saying burrow on hatchtech is useful right now or saying Z has viable options to pressure/all in on hatchtech...share your builds that no pro seems to know...
Krymming
Profile Joined May 2011
Sweden38 Posts
April 24 2013 07:50 GMT
#653
I don't understand why people want hellbat nerfs?

It's a 100 minerals and 2 food for a tanky repair/healable AoE zealot without charge upgrade with 8s less build time. I don't see how it could be good with X unit composition, sometimes I hesitate to use it due to it's efficiency compared to the cost
... said no one ever
No excuses, play like a champion
E.L.V.I.S
Profile Joined April 2011
Belgium458 Posts
April 24 2013 07:52 GMT
#654
On April 24 2013 16:46 mihajovics wrote:
they should rather rework the corruptor in my oppinion


agreed, and the benshee aswell
http://twitch.tv/maggrig | @SC2ELVIS | http://www.facebook.com/sc2ELVIS
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-24 08:00:00
April 24 2013 07:54 GMT
#655
On April 24 2013 16:50 Krymming wrote:
I don't understand why people want hellbat nerfs?

It's a 100 minerals and 2 food for a tanky repair/healable AoE zealot without charge upgrade with 8s less build time. I don't see how it could be good with X unit composition, sometimes I hesitate to use it due to it's efficiency compared to the cost
... said no one ever


:D

whats really funny about hellbat drops: it costs 300/100, which means even IF T fucks up and manages to not kill a single drone and just makes the opponent pull drones AND lose medivac + hellbat...the drop was worth it because of the lost mining time. now in a real game you always kill some drones since drones are much slower than speedvac and you also have to build units/static so damage done is always: lost mining time + units/static + some drones...which is just retarded. even with perfect defense more damage is done than the drop costs and T loses everything. LOL. seems like thats what players like DeMuslim mean then they say hellbats are way too cost efficient.
FLUFFYPenguin
Profile Joined March 2013
Finland25 Posts
April 24 2013 08:01 GMT
#656
On April 24 2013 16:23 Decendos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 16:12 Jerom wrote:
I don't like how they want to give Zerg more all ins. Honestly it feels like there is no race in the game that can all in better than zerg..


lol. this made me laugh. ZvP vs FFE you cant all in, ZvP vs gate expand you could do all ins and pressure...now with planetary nexus you cant. ZvT you could do roach ling (bling) pressure/all in, now with reaper into factory builds you cant. reaper scouts everything and mines + bunker and if you really want to push it a tank with free siege mode deals with everything.


So, I guess you have never heard of Speedling/Roach allins off of 2 bases.
Terrasmith
Profile Joined February 2013
47 Posts
April 24 2013 08:03 GMT
#657
Blizzard might not be nerfing the hellbat because they don't mesh well with bio armies. The 4 medivac slots and the no stim means they make the whole army less mobile, and the strongest feature of bio is its mobility. Seeing as mech is never used, the hellbat is kinda stuck, and you don't see it all that often in pro games, except for against mass zealot and in tvt with a meching player. While hellbat drops are still strong, they aren't all that hard to counter with good static defense and a few roaches/mutas/stalkers/marines and marauders. Also, hellbats are easy to kite.
Drake
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany6146 Posts
April 24 2013 08:04 GMT
#658
i feel every t and z have p and whenever something seems to help a p its instatnly thumbs down even if protoss thinks twice voting for t and z things ... sad world how can you guys be sad oracle gets better ? so fragile
Nb.Drake / CoL_Drake / Original Joined TL.net Tuesday, 15th of March 2005
Drake
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany6146 Posts
April 24 2013 08:04 GMT
#659
On April 24 2013 17:03 Terrasmith wrote:
Blizzard might not be nerfing the hellbat because they don't mesh well with bio armies. The 4 medivac slots and the no stim means they make the whole army less mobile, and the strongest feature of bio is its mobility. Seeing as mech is never used, the hellbat is kinda stuck, and you don't see it all that often in pro games, except for against mass zealot and in tvt with a meching player. While hellbat drops are still strong, they aren't all that hard to counter with good static defense and a few roaches/mutas/stalkers/marines and marauders. Also, hellbats are easy to kite.


still every TERRAN flames about hellbats because tvt is hellbat vs hellbat
Nb.Drake / CoL_Drake / Original Joined TL.net Tuesday, 15th of March 2005
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
April 24 2013 08:05 GMT
#660
On April 24 2013 17:01 FLUFFYPenguin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 16:23 Decendos wrote:
On April 24 2013 16:12 Jerom wrote:
I don't like how they want to give Zerg more all ins. Honestly it feels like there is no race in the game that can all in better than zerg..


lol. this made me laugh. ZvP vs FFE you cant all in, ZvP vs gate expand you could do all ins and pressure...now with planetary nexus you cant. ZvT you could do roach ling (bling) pressure/all in, now with reaper into factory builds you cant. reaper scouts everything and mines + bunker and if you really want to push it a tank with free siege mode deals with everything.


So, I guess you have never heard of Speedling/Roach allins off of 2 bases.


do you even read what i write?! i said they work in WoL but DONT WORK vs reaper into factory into fast 3CC openings which is the absolute standard opening ZvT right now! wow...srsly you need to read before answering.

it obv still works vs 1 rax FE or CC first since nothing has changed to WoL there but NOT vs reaper into fast 3 CC!
Prev 1 31 32 33 34 35 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #111
NightMare vs ShamelessLIVE!
ByuN vs uThermal
CranKy Ducklings130
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 153
StarCraft: Brood War
Horang2 9598
Jaedong 3740
Pusan 623
Stork 392
Mong 179
ToSsGirL 139
hero 79
Aegong 65
Liquid`Ret 60
Sharp 37
[ Show more ]
Killer 37
Icarus 28
sas.Sziky 8
Dota 2
XaKoH 821
XcaliburYe185
League of Legends
JimRising 345
Counter-Strike
zeus697
x6flipin342
Other Games
singsing1553
B2W.Neo791
crisheroes252
Pyrionflax234
Sick147
Fuzer 121
NeuroSwarm27
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick604
Counter-Strike
PGL153
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 10
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 43
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1243
• Stunt655
Other Games
• WagamamaTV159
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Korean Royale
25m
LAN Event
3h 25m
LAN Event
6h 25m
Replay Cast
21h 25m
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d
LAN Event
1d 3h
OSC
1d 11h
The PondCast
1d 22h
LAN Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
LAN Event
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
LAN Event
4 days
IPSL
4 days
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
LAN Event
5 days
IPSL
5 days
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.