EPTI feel like of everybody involved here the Korean pro gamers are the ones who have the highest potential to get screwed by the system...
WCS, Conceivably you alright? - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
TheFish7
United States2824 Posts
I feel like of everybody involved here the Korean pro gamers are the ones who have the highest potential to get screwed by the system... | ||
|
DeathProfessor
United States1052 Posts
"Players were worried they did not understand the English translation (did he just say I could switch to NA/EU?) so they chose what they thought would get them free money, they were confused as to properly take advantage of this system" sounds about right | ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10152 Posts
But i have doubts about the challengers season 3 being useless. It would make sense that they will be important for next year season 1. I could be wrong tho, so if there is any information regarding this would be nice to know. | ||
|
sitromit
7051 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:25 TheFish7 wrote: The alternative suggested here actually makes a lot of sense. I feel like of everybody involved here the Korean pro gamers are the ones who have the highest potential to get screwed by the system... No, the alternative doesn't make sense. I would hate for the GSL to be like that. That's basically the IEM system. There are a few tournaments a year, all of which have regional open qualifiers, and at the end of the year one world championship with invites based on points gathered from all those tournaments. This is good for a weekend tournament like IEM, but it doesn't create a consistent storyline from season to season and year to year like the GSL. The way the GSL works, it's impossible to have Code A before Code S, because half the players in Code A come from Code S. It's a great system and has proven to us all that it allows the best players to consistently stay at the top while also allowing newcomers to rise to replace those who are slacking off. | ||
Waxangel
United States33638 Posts
sugoyo | ||
|
Derez
Netherlands6068 Posts
I also think it is blizzard intention to make a qualifier -> challenger -> premier royal road impossible, and that the format in US/EU will follow the entire GSL format after the various divisions have been filled with qualifiers? | ||
|
TheFish7
United States2824 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:41 sitromit wrote: No, the alternative doesn't make sense. I would hate for the GSL to be like that. That's basically the IEM system. There are a few tournaments a year, all of which have regional open qualifiers, and at the end of the year one world championship with invites based on points gathered from all those tournaments. This is good for a weekend tournament like IEM, but it doesn't create a consistent storyline from season to season and year to year like the GSL. The way the GSL works, it's impossible to have Code A before Code S, because half the players in Code A come from Code S. It's a great system and has proven to us all that it allows the best players to consistently stay at the top while also allowing newcomers to rise to replace those who are slacking off. Oh I see what you are saying, and perhaps you are right, but the question I would then pose is: "Does the GSL system make sense when you have a points system?" Maybe I misinterpreted the OP.... but isn't that what he/she is getting at? | ||
|
larse
1611 Posts
They should have just used a single elimination format. So that every season is self-contained and has no effects on the next season. | ||
|
rename
Estonia329 Posts
On April 12 2013 05:04 larse wrote: They should not use the Code S/A format. They should have just used a single elimination format. So that every season is self-contained and has no effects on the next season. Code S/A is by far superior since it allows for constant high level play, simultaneously with second tier. Any kind of single elimination would mean month of one-sided stomps, and another month of higher level play. Not to mention ro64 or whatever would have too many chances of possible top8 players eliminating each other too early, i mean even in OSL single-elim starts at ro8, and they have had 12 years to tune their system. | ||
|
virpi
Germany3599 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17651 Posts
| ||
|
PrAeToR.FeNiX
Canada361 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17651 Posts
On April 12 2013 06:26 PrAeToR.FeNiX wrote: i think its simple look the person s passport : bang there you go you are locked to that region problem is... people screw around with nationality even at the Olympic level. and the IOC has a team of guys who do nothing but verify the nationality of its participants. Is Lennox Lewis Canadian, Jamacian, or British? | ||
|
xuanzue
Colombia1747 Posts
now is it only 100k? | ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
On April 11 2013 17:51 belatube wrote: Hope Blizzard can have the Games rebroadcasted at better hours next day. even though its great its now free and 720p doesnt change fact that most of us cant watch taht because of school or work. gsl did this couple times and it was great jaeh its unwatchable times ^^ i mean i have to work xD | ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
On April 12 2013 06:26 PrAeToR.FeNiX wrote: i think its simple look the person s passport : bang there you go you are locked to that region come on thats bullshit, polt living in USA for study etc ? why should he play on Korea ? Europeans in US can only play in EU ? all that is so stupid you have to see it | ||
|
McCane
France23 Posts
| ||
|
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
|
PrAeToR.FeNiX
Canada361 Posts
On April 12 2013 06:40 CoR wrote: come on thats bullshit, polt living in USA for study etc ? why should he play on Korea ? Europeans in US can only play in EU ? all that is so stupid you have to see it Simle anwser: yes why not ? they are a minority. | ||
|
TeslasPigeon
464 Posts
On April 12 2013 07:19 PrAeToR.FeNiX wrote: Simle anwser: yes why not ? they are a minority. Or you know, you can do the more logical thing and restrict people to the region in which they reside. Players shouldn't be punished for trying to establish residency in other countries. Players should be punished for "region" hopping. | ||
| ||
