EPT[Poll] What do you want changed in SC2 the MOST? - Page 11
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Tailss
Sweden233 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
lower apm players stand less of a chance in terms of hotkey use | ||
|
Martijn
Netherlands1219 Posts
On October 24 2012 17:55 Tailss wrote: If you were able to spectate other people in client, wouldnt that hurt streaming a lot? Short answer, you could have audio from casters ingame. They could potentially add ads and banners to make sure this functionality is revenue neutral (unlike some 20% tax cuts *snorts*). The only thing that straight up wouldn't work anymore is camera views and lets face it, much of the joy of watching DH comes from the amazing production.. | ||
|
Imbu
United States903 Posts
On October 24 2012 17:55 Tailss wrote: If you were able to spectate other people in client, wouldnt that hurt streaming a lot? That is a potential problem, but if they implemented something similar to League of Legend's system I don't imagine it hurting the streams that much. In LoL, you can spectate people that are (in SC2) mutual friends with you. Additionally, Riot generates a series of "high level" games that people can spectate. Thus, unless you are friends with TLO for example, you wouldn't be able to consistently watch his games, and so instead would go to his stream to both see his play first hand and listen to the music that he enjoys (sick playlist). | ||
|
mortales
174 Posts
On October 24 2012 17:54 Justone wrote: 4: why not have a tournament tab? - I mean its a competitive game where we want to embrace e-sport but we have no online tournaments intergrated? its soon 2013 guys. Here's how it could work: Blizzard could monthly (one day before the ladder reset) host 1 tournament for each and every league where players just hit the "play tournament" button and get quened up as a qualifier, during qualifiing rounds there could be single elimination before after winning x-ammount of games u get thrown into an bracket, Your then enrolled in the tournament the game will automaticly start when both players hit "ready", you have 5 minutes between each new match to hit ready before W/O and 2 minutes to hit ready between the games once you already play an oponent (say in a best of 3). the tournament should be fast phased and designed to be played in one evening. with a 30 minute break at some point. Games could automaticly be decided if the game would continue for over x-ammount of time(1 hour or so), looking at army value, income and units / buildings killed or w.ever and summing them up. to keep the phase of the tournament up It could then be posted on your page as "tournament statistics" with individual rewards and perhaps some hardware for the winner, i mean something like a mouse or signed mousepad. maybe a collectors edition figurine or w.ever. No punishments for w/o or leaving players but instead embrace those who stay and fight and reward them. The same system could be used for Partners/sponsors that want to host tournaments, each and every tournament could get an page with information and a place for a banner or so. Basically intergrating tournaments into the bnet engine. yeah, this would be great! | ||
|
spoonmaster
United States347 Posts
I've been a large advocate for in-game tournaments where you earn points to spend on avatars/character rewards/titles etc. | ||
|
Basique
Korea (South)40 Posts
This is such a basic feature it's just incredible that it's not already in the game. But what boggles my mind even more is that people ask to PAY for that. It mak es me mad because if people are asking themselves to get ripped of think of what companies can get with, paying for gamemode, even for a race, whatever. Don't accept a priced name change ! Damn ! | ||
|
algue
France1436 Posts
| ||
|
{ToT}ColmA
Japan3260 Posts
like real chat channels, clan support, bnet tournaments like wc3, support to ladder vs a certain race when u dont find people to custom against (like u want to play vs race x but only find y on ladder and have not one to custom against) and make it that when i log in i am not feeling like...oh boy i am alone T_T ladder maps should be looked at and maps who are not in tournaments should not be in the map pool, if gsl has like xyz in the pool, ladder should adapt for example | ||
|
Lylat
France8575 Posts
On October 24 2012 17:59 Imbu wrote: That is a potential problem, but if they implemented something similar to League of Legend's system I don't imagine it hurting the streams that much. In LoL, you can spectate people that are (in SC2) mutual friends with you. Additionally, Riot generates a series of "high level" games that people can spectate. Thus, unless you are friends with TLO for example, you wouldn't be able to consistently watch his games, and so instead would go to his stream to both see his play first hand and listen to the music that he enjoys (sick playlist). Well in that case it becomes useless imo, because most people don't have pro friends, and I don't see the point of watching your non pro friends playing (except for the fun maybe).. | ||
|
Nightwishone
Italy391 Posts
| ||
|
Imbu
United States903 Posts
On October 24 2012 18:07 Lylat wrote: Well in that case it becomes useless imo, because most people don't have pro friends, and I don't see the point of watching your non pro friends playing (except for the fun maybe).. Yeah, I personally don't really see the advantage of having a method viewing your friends in game. We all have a friend or two that are really good and its fun to watch them, but why not just watch the best? Even tournament games, being able to spectate the game yourself takes so much more energy than just enjoying the game being played out and casted. | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17749 Posts
| ||
|
Imbu
United States903 Posts
On October 24 2012 18:13 Die4Ever wrote: I still don't see the appeal of in client streaming...like at all, I would put it last out of this list It's like that feature that you can immediately say should be included but then once its introduced, you realize that it probably didn't live up to what you were expecting. The only in client streaming that in my mind makes any scene were the DotA2 ones during their Invitational that awarded prizes to fans that were spectating the game on their team's side. But even that can be implemented without having to use a similar feature. | ||
|
Csong
Canada396 Posts
| ||
|
MacNaughty
Canada41 Posts
| ||
|
iLithiuM
Australia31 Posts
I don't mind that i've dished out $90 for this game but it seems that a free game would be the best way to attract new players and viewers. | ||
|
MateShade
Australia736 Posts
Personally I'm torn between better customs and sc2 F2P multiplayer. More than anything I just want all my friends to be playing sc2. And those 2 are the things that have the best chance of achieving that. | ||
|
Order
Lithuania231 Posts
| ||
|
j3cht
United States86 Posts
Give us a seperate ladder for each of the four race options (yes random included) so that we can have Zerg by diamond Terran be gold and so on... Also give us the option to restrict what race to play against so if we want we can play Protoss. Yes this will increase queue time, but if we want this will allow us to practice using the ladder. I would LOVE to see in game tournaments hosted through Battle.net in client Finally it would be kinda cool to be able to sign up for a best of 3 match in ladder as well. Woot Woot ladder changes! <3 PS LOVE YOU SHETH | ||
| ||
