EPT[Poll] What do you want changed in SC2 the MOST? - Page 25
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
ngooo
Germany102 Posts
 | ||
|
1st_Panzer_Div.
United States621 Posts
| ||
|
KingPaddy
1053 Posts
Either the ability to create more then one account per game or the possibility to have different MMRs per race on one account. In WC3 I liked to be able to play all the races with different accounts and to fool around and stuff, which definitely kept my interest in playing high over a long time. Nowadays I haven't played SC2 for 2-3 months, because I'm kinda bored, but I'd probably play more, if I could play a different race without having to lose the next 20 games and later on winning the next 20 against easy opponents, if I switch back. | ||
|
xuanzue
Colombia1747 Posts
On October 27 2012 01:37 Barrin wrote: I didnt see fewer resources per base / high ground mechanic / etc so i just went with "Simplified Custom games area with individually named games" which is a close second. I was expecting more map mechanics in hots, and blizzard bring collpasable rocks :s my suggestion to new map mechanics: + Show Spoiler + Here are a few alternatives to make more interesting the maps IMO, the maps currently only offer xel'naga towers and infamous rocks. Bridges: those could be neutral structures allowing be destroyed or be repaired throughout the game. With this idea the islands maps could have interesting mechanics. Yeah, you can call it rocks -1 Chrono Rift fields. would be an area with the spell of Jim Raynor (the pyramid) Anything trapped inside of the area will suffer penalties to its movement speed and attack speed. To remove this rift-zone I propose to destroy an obelisk, or control two Xel'Naga towers. Near of the pyramid. This can be ethereal rocks. Platforms (levers) are areas large enough to contain a base that can change the ground level. Two alternatives, the platform can raise the ground level to make easy its defense, and the platform can lower the level, to make easy the siege. Platforms could also move horizontally, to isolate the area or approaching the "continental area". No rocks analogy this time Please note that all those mechanics are triggered by the players, and no by one auto-script, like was the rising lava working. | ||
|
Swift118
United Kingdom335 Posts
Warp tech removal would be #1 on my hit list. | ||
|
Wertheron
France439 Posts
| ||
|
birdkicker
United States752 Posts
| ||
|
archonOOid
1983 Posts
| ||
|
Aveng3r
United States2411 Posts
also, being able to watch replays with people would be nice, i think there was some talk about that feature a while ago but i guess it never went through | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
A way to spectate games in client and watch pros with others. Simplified Custom games area with individually named games. Allowing you to watch replays with friends. Allowing Global play Other -- Please write a comment. (Community interface: clan support, in game tournament/boX setup etc). I personally think that the biggest of those is what made BW great for a lot of people: Better custom game / Arcade options. | ||
|
JoFeSboyAT
Austria128 Posts
why not. | ||
|
Darksoldierr
Hungary2012 Posts
| ||
|
robopork
United States511 Posts
On October 27 2012 02:33 archonOOid wrote: Please add automated tournaments to the list. It would add a different aspect to the game instead of endless hours of laddering. Also it would be great to have tournaments in the custom games section where i suppose the dedicated players in nexus wars or what ever could get a big reward for playing custom games, now known as the arcade. I already voted for in game viewership, but if I could take that back and vote for client hosted tournaments I would. I would LOVE to have that, especially with clan support incoming. | ||
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
Add LAN, support e-sports tournaments  Shared replay viewing. Fix Blords/Infestors. | ||
|
IndyStarCraft
Poland2579 Posts
| ||
|
tztztz
Germany314 Posts
| ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
Edit: But bnet tournaments as in wc3 would be the best! | ||
|
NoobSkills
United States1600 Posts
This game reworked with FTP and micro transactions would actually make them more money. This game actually done right would have made them more money based off word of mouth and reviews. I also find the pro scene kind of boring at the moment, but I really don't attribute that being 100% Acti Blizz's fault, except maybe the PvZ and how the end game works out, that is their fault. I really just think players aren't really developed fully enough to make games consistently entertaining like in Broodward because the players knew what they could get away with at any time. But with the release of an expansion every couple-few years it will always reset this clock on the pro player's skill levels. So, now you will get 6+ years of mediocre SC2, except sometimes where the metagame happens meets up or two good players skill levels and play styles match up. | ||
|
vgijamven
Sweden95 Posts
On October 26 2012 09:27 Ethoex wrote: I think most of this is coming Blizz has said that since 2010 though. And at this point I've lost all hope and patience for Starcraft 2 and Blizzard in general. | ||
| ||
