[Resolved] Kespa, GOM, ESF dispute - Page 100
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Lucumo
6850 Posts
| ||
StarStruck
25339 Posts
Now behave. | ||
MrMercuG
Netherlands2389 Posts
Yeah, based on foreigner experiences they should, but the KeSPA players (preferably the legends) bring in much more viewers. | ||
TheDougler
Canada8304 Posts
On August 27 2012 21:54 Leetley wrote: Are they going to seed 2 Kespa players there? Edit: Oh yes, two to Code S and four to Code A. Neat. For epicness and for WCS Result: Jaedong and Roro For Racial Balance and WCS Result: Flash and Roro For another form of epicness could be Jangbi and Fantasy Hard to say really though. I'd say there's a pretty good chance that Roro will make the cut though. | ||
Incomplet
United Kingdom1419 Posts
| ||
ChewbroCColi
Denmark108 Posts
| ||
Sandermatt
Switzerland1365 Posts
| ||
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
On August 27 2012 23:17 TheDougler wrote: For epicness and for WCS Result: Jaedong and Roro For Racial Balance and WCS Result: Flash and Roro For another form of epicness could be Jangbi and Fantasy Hard to say really though. I'd say there's a pretty good chance that Roro will make the cut though. I think there's a strong argument to be made that it should be Jangbi and Fantasy, but my guess will be Flash / Jangbi. Based on results it should definitely be Roro + 1 (probably hero, by.sun or reality) but GOM is trying t oget viewers here. | ||
Tsubbi
Germany7979 Posts
have doubts that gom would use bw results for seeding (so no jangbi or fantasy) and also the fact that seeds were used to put kespa players in wcs korea leads me to believe proleague stats will be considered dont know where to find the individual results of proleague players though, are they on liquipedia? | ||
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
On August 27 2012 23:32 Tsubbi wrote: there are basically 2 measures for seeds imo, either proleague individual results or wcs korea have doubts that gom would use bw results for seeding (so no jangbi or fantasy) and also the fact that seeds were used to put kespa players in wcs korea leads me to believe proleague stats will be considered dont know where to find the individual results of proleague players though, are they on liquipedia? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=356574 | ||
![]()
opterown
![]()
Australia54784 Posts
On August 27 2012 23:32 Tsubbi wrote: there are basically 2 measures for seeds imo, either proleague individual results or wcs korea have doubts that gom would use bw results for seeding (so no jangbi or fantasy) and also the fact that seeds were used to put kespa players in wcs korea leads me to believe proleague stats will be considered dont know where to find the individual results of proleague players though, are they on liquipedia? http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-korean/leagues/2838_SKP12_Proleague_S2/player_stats | ||
SarcasmMonster
3136 Posts
On August 27 2012 23:37 opterown wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-korean/leagues/2838_SKP12_Proleague_S2/player_stats When did Kespa ![]() | ||
Frankon
3054 Posts
On August 27 2012 23:39 SarcasmMonster wrote: When did Kespa ![]() WCS Korea. After getting almost all killed in round one Kespa players went full elephant mode and trampled the loser bracket. | ||
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
Crazy how Soulkey was one of the most hyped going into proleague (for SC2) and has now seemed to kind of fizzle out ![]() | ||
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
On August 27 2012 23:39 SarcasmMonster wrote: When did Kespa ![]() Its different for each players, but all top10-15 players sorted by ranking cought to at least code a level. The big resurgance happened around 1-2 month ago. When Roro won his match in WCS suddenly everyone started, but its still unclear when that happened in proleague. | ||
BraveProbe
36 Posts
| ||
mrRoflpwn
United States2618 Posts
| ||
garbanzo
United States4046 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
Wounded31
124 Posts
| ||
vesicular
United States1310 Posts
The bigger question is who gets the Code A seeds. Again, based on WCS results it would have to be herO, Jaedong, Effort and Reality. I think those make the most sense to start. | ||
| ||