| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
convention
United States622 Posts
On topic: -Can no longer build hatches over larvae (I have lost a game now because I couldn't rebuild a sniped hatch since one of my larvae glided to the center where I needed to rebuild it) -Low settings now dramatically reduce FPS (This has been commented on before) -One nice change, PF, OC, and CC in the same control group now all accept "s" to build scvs, instead of tabbing through. | ||
|
forsakeNXE
Germany539 Posts
| ||
|
Imzoo
132 Posts
On August 02 2012 00:44 Enemyy wrote: Is there any way to get the low textures actually to be low res textures? If you believe it or not the ultra textures are actually quite distracting ^^ I don't know but i'm hightly interrestig | ||
|
awaller
United States23 Posts
"Windows cannot access the specified device path or file. You may not have the appropriate permission to access the item" ( These are not replays saved in Starcraft 2 replay system ) | ||
|
wajd
240 Posts
On August 02 2012 00:39 pigmanbear wrote: I don't think you understand ... the game is in fact unplayable for a significant portion of the player base. This is robbery. The treatment of OSX 10.5 users (doesn't include me) is heinous: The updater forcibly makes they game they *purchased* unplayable. THANK YOU!!!! | ||
|
Strelok
Ukraine320 Posts
On August 02 2012 00:36 Nabes wrote: takes a few minutes for it to actually start downloading Starcraft starts immediately, how can it patch inside the game? | ||
|
HaZardous47
United States106 Posts
On August 02 2012 00:35 BretZ wrote: Yes because it's so bad we might as well refuse to play. No, that isn't the case. The game works fine, the UI and other variables are messed up. They aren't going to revert anything, definitely not from an internet petition Myself and many others are currently unable to ladder due to a huge negative bonus pool. I don't that is "working fine". | ||
|
Sea_Food
Finland1612 Posts
On August 02 2012 00:41 convention wrote: This thread really should just be listing new bugs. It is hard to wade through 14 pages to see if other people are having the same issues that I am having. Please refrain from comments about "that's why they shouldn't have patched this...". On topic: -Can no longer build hatches over larvae (I have lost a game now because I couldn't rebuild a sniped hatch since one of my larvae glided to the center where I needed to rebuild it) -Low settings now dramatically reduce FPS (This has been commented on before) -One nice change, PF, OC, and CC in the same control group now all accept "s" to build scvs, instead of tabbing through. or someone who is not a tl newbie could make a new op that is not complete shit and updates the bug list to op. | ||
|
Asturas
Finland587 Posts
On August 01 2012 22:36 chuDr3t4 wrote: For all people with language issues, try this out: http://eu.battle.net/support/en/article/starcraft-ii-language-issues This is not even close to the solution of the nasty bug. It works only if you have one client installed. I have installed NA, EU and KR/TW clients. Means that every time I want to switch, I have to change this language entries in variables.txt. | ||
|
NiKoJa
26 Posts
In 1.4.4 i used to play in all low settings at 60fps, since the patch i get less fps and the graphics look like, wierd? blurry? i don't know how to describe it by they look like shit and it's really annoying... any fix? | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
On August 02 2012 00:41 convention wrote: This thread really should just be listing new bugs. It is hard to wade through 14 pages to see if other people are having the same issues that I am having. Please refrain from comments about "that's why they shouldn't have patched this...". On topic: -Can no longer build hatches over larvae (I have lost a game now because I couldn't rebuild a sniped hatch since one of my larvae glided to the center where I needed to rebuild it) -Low settings now dramatically reduce FPS (This has been commented on before) -One nice change, PF, OC, and CC in the same control group now all accept "s" to build scvs, instead of tabbing through. ohhh that's awesome - gonna have to try that out tonight. | ||
|
FrogOfWar
Germany1406 Posts
On August 02 2012 00:39 pigmanbear wrote: I don't think you understand ... the game is in fact unplayable for a significant portion of the player base. This is robbery. The treatment of OSX 10.5 users (doesn't include me) is heinous: The updater forcibly makes they game they *purchased* unplayable. "5 signatures reached", hm. I personally would find it helpful if the petition explained what it is talking about. Is there no low graphics setting any more? How does it "aggressively break" Mac systems? | ||
|
aLmosTeu
Germany101 Posts
| ||
|
wajd
240 Posts
On August 02 2012 01:10 FrogOfWar wrote: "5 signatures reached", hm. I personally would find it helpful if the petition explained what it is talking about. Is there no low graphics setting any more? How does it "aggressively break" Mac systems? I think what is meant that some Mac's can't play the game anymore, ever, thanks to this patch. | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
Using 2500k- HD 7970-8GB-1600 RAM Not noticing any performance difference before and after patch. | ||
|
FrogOfWar
Germany1406 Posts
On August 02 2012 01:14 wajd wrote: I think what is meant that some Mac's can't play the game anymore, ever, thanks to this patch. If that is intentional, those people should definitely get a refund at least ... but can we assume any of this to be intentional at this point? I haven't patched, and I don't think I'm going to very soon, but this does sound messed up ... | ||
|
pigmanbear
Angola2010 Posts
On August 02 2012 01:14 wajd wrote: I think what is meant that some Mac's can't play the game anymore, ever, thanks to this patch. This patch is incompatible with OSX 10.5.x. Of course, you cannot play the game if you aren't on the latest patch, and the patching process begins as soon as you start your game. My understanding is that 10.5 users are simply left high-and-dry with a game that tells them they need to upgrade. Certainly they cannot play a game on battle.net. | ||
|
pigmanbear
Angola2010 Posts
On August 02 2012 01:18 FrogOfWar wrote: If that is intentional, those people should definitely get a refund at least ... but can we assume any of this to be intentional at this point? I haven't patched, and I don't think I'm going to very soon, but this does sound messed up ... Ye, Blizzard stated clearly in the 1.5 notes that 10.5 is EOL and that 10.5 users couldn't play the game anymore. | ||
|
wajd
240 Posts
On August 02 2012 01:18 FrogOfWar wrote: If that is intentional, those people should definitely get a refund at least ... but can we assume any of this to be intentional at this point? I haven't patched, and I don't think I'm going to very soon, but this does sound messed up ... It means I can't play the game I paid for. So give me a refund, or revert to the previous patch, or be sued by me for false advertising a game's system requirements... | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
