EPTOn June 07 2012 05:00 Shiori wrote:
Has anyone been able to get (117.9, 73.1)?
Has anyone been able to get (117.9, 73.1)?
Desperation ensues. :D
[?] Spades hacking? - Page 250
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
07:06 KST - method linked here has been disproved here 10:54 KST - Find a full timeline of pro comments (including Spades) in the topic here. 08:47 KST - Summary: Accusations of maphacking have the potential to destroy a player's career if left unaddressed. Because of the potential consequences, we should be careful about accepting unproven accusations. The principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' should be applied here. That does not mean that there has been a conclusion about this case, however, which is why this thread remains tentatively open. Please discuss with caution and use evidence to back up your claims. (also a summary post by an unnamed pro on reddit here) | ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
Desperation ensues. :D | ||
|
dvorakftw
681 Posts
On June 07 2012 04:52 StarStrider wrote: So this is this the basic idea that is being put forward am I right? ![[image loading]](http://i45.tinypic.com/p3qkl.png) And so Spades' clicks should appear in the red scale since he is actually looking onscreen and not on black scale since he is supposedly not actually clicking minimap? lol, that is terrible. Correct as I understand it but your Paint skills are completely bronze league. | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
Hey I'll do it if someone tells me where that is. Just don't feel like clicking all over trying to find it ~~ | ||
|
itsjuspeter
United States668 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:06 dvorakftw wrote: lol, that is terrible. Correct as I understand it but your Paint skills are completely bronze league. what are you talking about thats awesome paint skills haha | ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:04 Roxor9999 wrote: Even though this nothing has been proved by this new method. I'm fucking impressed by this community and proud to be part of it. Keep up the good work! I'm confused by the community  No idea whats going on here lol. Are these people coming to the conclusion that some of the anti spades evidence is flawed? | ||
|
Geiko
France2052 Posts
![[image loading]](http://postimage.org/image/hwevht1az/) All minimap clicks | ||
|
recallsm
14 Posts
larger resolution = smaller variance Smallest: x - 0.4, y - 0.7 ![[image loading]](http://s15.postimage.org/tzlo852dl/daybreak1.png) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ![[image loading]](http://s15.postimage.org/5kdg733gp/daybreak2.png) | ||
|
artanis2
United States732 Posts
 http://s16.postimage.org/5bjjshq03/Untitled.pngIt's the bottom left of the north geyser on the expo right there. e: removed img tags since hotlinking isn't allowed. | ||
|
desuduesdeus
Germany18 Posts
| ||
|
Tewks44
United States2032 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:08 mrtomjones wrote: I'm confused by the community No idea whats going on here lol. Are these people coming to the conclusion that some of the anti spades evidence is flawed?It appears so. Maybe we're not actually a bunch of bloodthirsty Spades haters on a witch hunt like his supporters are claiming after all | ||
|
StarStrider
United States689 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:06 dvorakftw wrote: lol, that is terrible. Correct as I understand it but your Paint skills are completely bronze league. I know | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:00 Shiori wrote: Has anyone been able to get (117.9, 73.1)? Here you go, on the second click on my first try to find the general area of the point I hit it. http://drop.sc/192626 0:15 areaHaneul Right click; target: x=117.9,y=71.3 0:16 areaHaneul Right click; target: x=117.9,y=73.1 | ||
|
StarStrider
United States689 Posts
| ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:08 mrtomjones wrote: I'm confused by the community No idea whats going on here lol. Are these people coming to the conclusion that some of the anti spades evidence is flawed?Yes, so far every non-subjective piece of evidence has been flawed. I made a mistake on one myself regarding clicks that didn't exist, so now I'm having fun disproving them  | ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
| ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:10 EtherealDeath wrote: Here you go, on the second click on my first try to find the general area of the point I hit it. http://drop.sc/192626 0:15 areaHaneul Right click; target: x=117.9,y=71.3 0:16 areaHaneul Right click; target: x=117.9,y=73.1 Spades was already getting ready to spill the beans too, damn it you mith busters. | ||
|
Roxor9999
Netherlands771 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:11 StarStrider wrote: Please use TinyPic. It works! :D So then we can see what you're referring to. You can see the image if you right click it and press copy image url and then paste it. | ||
|
StarStrider
United States689 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:13 Roxor9999 wrote: You can see the image if you right click it and press copy image url and then paste it. thanks | ||
|
ZeroClick
Brazil63 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:10 EtherealDeath wrote: Here you go, on the second click on my first try to find the general area of the point I hit it. http://drop.sc/192626 0:15 areaHaneul Right click; target: x=117.9,y=71.3 0:16 areaHaneul Right click; target: x=117.9,y=73.1 Man, it's an "uncertainty" proof or it's an "innocence" proof? | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On June 07 2012 05:13 ZeroClick wrote: Man, it's an "uncertainty" proof or it's an "innocence" proof? It's a "this method is bogus" proof. | ||
| ||
