EPTBlizzard announces HoTS Feature List - Page 61
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Adventurekid
Sweden505 Posts
| ||
|
paralleluniverse
4065 Posts
Now, I want a global ladder. And statistics. | ||
|
Sergio1992
Italy522 Posts
On May 08 2012 20:21 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote: Really? You consider this a beta state? Tell me, what other "complete" games are you playing and what beast of a software engineer you are to consider this a beta? Some people act like every scrub developer could put out a game of this magnitude. BNet doesn't have some features you want? Okay, what does this have to do with "beta" status? read once again the post , it has the answers you are asking for. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
Protoss expansion LotV going to have LAN? I am happy with this news, especially with global play. But, come on. 3 years after beta we get this? | ||
|
Miragee
8636 Posts
On May 08 2012 01:07 KingRajesh wrote: Awesome. Maybe this will stop people from complaining about Blizzard and lack of LAN. No, because LAN is not in the Feature List............... But beside that: Excellent adds! | ||
|
beetlelisk
Poland2276 Posts
Good changes. | ||
|
laoji
United Kingdom382 Posts
| ||
|
NukeD
Croatia1612 Posts
On May 08 2012 20:56 beetlelisk wrote: Let's see if by saying "at or around release of the HOTS" means this patch will require buying HOTS or not. Good changes. That is indeed a good question. Im expecting it will be, if not, that will at least finally seal the deal on whether Blizz had indeed become this money whore that is ripping off its costumers which a lot of people are accusing them to be, or they had good intentions with SC2 and Bnet but just screwed up. | ||
|
Hubble
Germany248 Posts
On May 08 2012 20:56 beetlelisk wrote: Let's see if by saying "at or around release of the HOTS" means this patch will require buying HOTS or not. Good changes. Would be the first time a patch would require a addon, or? Take Warcraft III - Reign of Chaos for example. There is a Patch 1.26a for RoC and for the Addon TFT (and, the patch is dated 2011, so Blizz is pretty much the same as today). Not a patch for only TFT. And there are also balance changes and new features in that patch and not only bug fixes. Yeah, Blizz may decide to only add these features to HotS, but it would be the first time. | ||
|
rotegirte
Germany2859 Posts
On May 08 2012 20:21 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote: Really? You consider this a beta state? Tell me, what other "complete" games are you playing and what beast of a software engineer you are to consider this a beta? Some people act like every scrub developer could put out a game of this magnitude. BNet doesn't have some features you want? Okay, what does this have to do with "beta" status? Every other scrub developer managed to deliver those things a long time ago.. aka Blizzard themselves. The complain is that features were consciously scrapped. The technology was already there, but was omitted in favor of other things. If you take away what people liked of your products, then yes, the customer has every right to complain. To call it beta is perfectly valid, since the majority of concerns were already raised in beta and were dismissed up until the expansion. Then yes, they are finishing a product just now. | ||
|
Goetzinho23
Germany15 Posts
| ||
|
Greenei
Germany1754 Posts
| ||
|
Fus
Sweden1112 Posts
 | ||
|
AmericanUmlaut
Germany2591 Posts
On May 08 2012 21:37 rotegirte wrote: Every other scrub developer managed to deliver those things a long time ago.. aka Blizzard themselves. The complain is that features were consciously scrapped. The technology was already there, but was omitted in favor of other things. If you take away what people liked of your products, then yes, the customer has every right to complain. To call it beta is perfectly valid, since the majority of concerns were already raised in beta and were dismissed up until the expansion. Then yes, they are finishing a product just now. Most software is improved by its developer for years after its release, including by adding features that were on the wish list but not implemented for initial release (and every feature that is not present in a piece of software was "omitted in favor of other things", that's how the world works in the absense of a programming team of infinite size). I've never programmed on a piece of software that shipped feature complete in the sense that no new features would ever be added to it. If SC2 were crashing or was unplayable due to missing features we could complain about it being unfinished. You're saying they released a beta version of their software, but what you're describing is your dissatisfaction with the priorities they gave various features, which is an entirely different issue. | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
Does this mean that players will be matched with players of similar MMR but that wins/losses won't count towards a rank? | ||
|
AmericanUmlaut
Germany2591 Posts
On May 08 2012 22:11 Deleuze wrote: Unranked matchmaking... Does this mean that players will be matched with players of similar MMR but that wins/losses won't count towards a rank? We also intend to have our first version of unranked play so you will have the ability to match-make against like-skilled players without having to affect your ladder ranking... | ||
|
Nokshalees
United States120 Posts
Activision in a nutshell. | ||
|
Maggost
Venezuela296 Posts
On May 08 2012 01:08 Kennigit wrote:We continue to read your passionate requests for clan support. We can confirm that we are building a clan/group system that will be released with Heart of the Swarm. We also intend to have our first version of unranked play so you will have the ability to match-make against like-skilled players without having to affect your ladder ranking while you practice off-race or experiment with a new build order. YES!!!! no more fear for me in 1v1! Now there is no point to get into ladder matches with that amazing un-ranked matchmaking! | ||
|
Darksoldierr
Hungary2012 Posts
On May 08 2012 22:29 Nokshalees wrote: Release unfinished game for $60, put the remaining necessary features on expansions and charge $40 ea. Activision in a nutshell. You get a new campign. You get new cgi videos. You get new multiplayer units. You get new battle.net features. For a price of an expansion pack. Yes, totally like a rip off DLC which gives you 5 more multiplayer map, of which 2 was already used in a game 1 year before. Madness. | ||
Whitewing
United States7483 Posts
On May 08 2012 22:37 Maggost wrote: YES!!!! no more fear for me in 1v1! Now there is no point to get into ladder matches with that amazing un-ranked matchmaking! Um.... what? The only reason I can think of to play unranked matches is to play an off-race. Ranked matches are pretty good at matching people up against people at around the same skill level, and for measuring progress. If you want to get better and not stay completely static in skill, ranked matches are pretty much the only way to go until you're pro... Think of it this way: you play people unranked constantly at the skill level your ladder rank indicates you are at. When you're getting better, that skill increase is not reflected in changing opponents any longer, because your ladder rank isn't updating. Suddenly your growth is limited because you can't play against better opponents. | ||
| ||
