| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
di3alot
172 Posts
On May 08 2012 10:43 trinxified wrote: Why people still complain about no LAN? It's been said many times that it's not implemented to prevent piracy... yeah right and thats why pirates have lan and we don't....anyone who pirates sc or any other mp based game is doing it for the sp. and the no lan mode does not prevent them for doing that. its all about control. | ||
|
Nikoras
United States115 Posts
On May 08 2012 09:14 Taku wrote: So Blizzard upgrades Bnet from 0.2 to 0.5 and people love them for it, lol... Wow a lot of people in here feel extremely entitled. | ||
|
ampson
United States2355 Posts
On May 08 2012 10:25 Doraemon wrote: LAN is been saved for LotV. and everyone will react the same way as this. ridiculous how we must pay for functions that should have been free or patched up. Keeping LAN out is kinda necessary as the PC community is laden with pirates who would abuse the shit out of the function. This resume from replay thing will fix the issue at hand. | ||
|
carloselcoco
United States2302 Posts
On May 08 2012 05:03 Ojahh wrote: what like trademark Blizzard soon???  but I am happy about the features No, I mean for real before the end of 2012. The Beta is going to be released next month. | ||
|
Wrathsc2
United States2025 Posts
| ||
|
Taku
Canada2036 Posts
On May 08 2012 11:01 Nikoras wrote: Wow a lot of people in here feel extremely entitled. Well by praising Blizzard for this you're validating their business model which is: Take a way features while ignoring backlash and putting a few token 'additions', and then re-add them in the future when the backlash has died down and be praised. I dunno, I'm seeing people waiting to throw money at Blizzard and can't help but be amused. | ||
|
Gingerninja
United Kingdom1339 Posts
On May 08 2012 11:01 Nikoras wrote: Wow a lot of people in here feel extremely entitled. Its not entitled when we'er going to have to pay for the privilege of them providing standard features they removed. I'm happy their putting this stuff back in, but lets not get ahead of ourselves here.. they held off for 2 years with a substandard product so they could attach it to the expansion so we'd have to pay for something we should have had in the first place. | ||
|
Hoodlum
United States350 Posts
On May 08 2012 10:32 Cassel_Castle wrote: Everyone who plays sc2 at any more than a casual level was going to buy hots anyway, so they are essentially patching in those features, it's not a "battlenet feature dlc" or anything like that. They have openly said they will not be adding LAN to Starcraft... Thats why they are doing the fix through replay thing because they want people playing on BNET2.0... And I most people are switching to HotS anyway and WoL will cease to be relevant... And you're not paying for this you're paying for a new campaign and new units etc. | ||
|
Aceace
Turkey1305 Posts
Blizzard rocks? Blizz no:1 Guys seriously. WoL should had these "new" features. These aren't new. These features already used at BW, W3 and other games. They didn't put it into WoL and they forced us to buy HotS. So I agree with Zephyr. But I agree. This is a marketing strategy and they really did their job well. | ||
|
Masq
Canada1792 Posts
Multi language support? Viewing replays with friends? Clan support? These are features for an expansion..? are you fucking kidding me? All of these should have been in the original game, not an expansion. | ||
|
trinxified
Canada7774 Posts
On May 08 2012 11:01 di3alot wrote: yeah right and thats why pirates have lan and we don't....anyone who pirates sc or any other mp based game is doing it for the sp. and the no lan mode does not prevent them for doing that. its all about control. Huh? I didn't say that piracy didn't exist with SC2, I just said that it minimizes the number of people pirating it because it doesn't let them do any multiplayer at all. | ||
|
Dahaka
United States10 Posts
| ||
|
Mobius_1
United Kingdom2763 Posts
Also, don't ever give us LAN, gamers need something to complain about, always :D I'm curious what they will do with my multiple SC2 licences tied to one account once Global Play is implemented, basically actually having a choice at the Character Selection screen? | ||
|
Thrill
2599 Posts
Hope playerbase retention will be better with the expansion, guess their big hope for the casual segment is Blizz.DotA | ||
|
Dingobloo
Australia1903 Posts
On May 08 2012 11:03 radiantshadow92 wrote: Lan is a waste of time when they can work on resume from replays. Except for the latency, even in BW playing over Bnet had a minimum amount of latency to try ensure a more consistent experience, but when you played on Lan it was removed and your latency was only as bad as the connection between you so you got a snappier game in the best case. | ||
|
mtn
729 Posts
On May 08 2012 11:06 Aceace wrote: Well done? Blizzard rocks? Blizz no:1 Guys seriously. WoL should had these "new" features. These aren't new. These features already used at BW, W3 and other games. They didn't put it into WoL and they forced us to buy HotS. So I agree with Zephyr. But I agree. This is a marketing strategy and they really did their job well. Agree. But thats how business works... I guess. | ||
|
Hypemeup
Sweden2783 Posts
| ||
|
Pobearo
United States351 Posts
| ||
|
Jojo131
Brazil1631 Posts
| ||
|
Cylluus
United States153 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
LAN Event
Lambo vs Harstem
FuturE vs Maplez
Scarlett vs FoxeR
Gerald vs Mixu
Zoun vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
ByuN vs TBD
TriGGeR vs TBD
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
LAN Event
IPSL
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
BSL 21
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs Sterling
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
LAN Event
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
. Really excited for the multiple replay viewing again along with the global finally so I don't have to buy 2 HOTS :D
