| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ProGear
Sweden35 Posts
On March 05 2012 07:48 Armada Vega wrote: Assets folder doesn't have a UI folder. I'm not able to go to step 3. Can anybody help me out? I only have NA version on my computer and I would like to install the Dropship There is none from the start, you make it when you move the backgroundfiles. | ||
|
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
There is none from the start, you make it when you move the backgroundfiles. Right, and as you can see, there are no file replacement. You don't replace anything, simply adding files. If you want delete it - then delete UI folder. | ||
|
Murlox
France1699 Posts
this looks totally bannable too, sadly. Please stop saying this does not give any ingame advantage as if it was a family argument or something, modifying the game files is against the ToS, period. Again, it looks kick ass. Edit : Battle.net terms of service 1. Grant of a Limited License to Use the Service. Subject to your agreement to and continuing compliance with the Terms of Use agreement, you may use the Service solely for your own non-commercial entertainment purposes by accessing it with a web browser or an authorized, unmodified Game client. You may not use the Service for any other purpose, or using any other method. 2. Additional License Limitations. (...) You agree that you will not, under any circumstances: use cheats, automation software (bots), hacks, mods or any other unauthorized third-party software designed to modify the Service, any Game or any Game experience; exploit the Service, a Game or any part thereof for any commercial purpose, including without limitation (a) use at a cyber cafe, computer gaming center or any other commercial establishment without the express written consent of Blizzard, unless otherwise stated in a Game EULA; (b) to communicate or facilitate any commercial advertisement or solicitation; (c) for gathering in-game currency, items or resources for sale outside the Game without Blizzard’s authorization; or (d) performing in-game services in exchange for payment outside the Game, e.g., power-leveling; use the Service for any “e-sports” or group competition sponsored, promoted or facilitated by any commercial or non-profit entity without Blizzard’s prior written consent; use any unauthorized third-party software that intercepts, "mines", or otherwise collects information from or through any Game or the Service, including without limitation any software that reads areas of RAM used by any Game or the Service to store information about a character or a Game environment; provided, however, that Blizzard may, at its sole and absolute discretion, allow the use of certain third party user interfaces; modify or cause to be modified any files that are a part of any Game or the Service in any way not expressly authorized by Blizzard; Edit 2 : Why wouldn't you go ahead and ask Blizzard if they authorize your [mod]ification, via mail for instance? | ||
|
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
On March 05 2012 09:10 Murlox wrote: the drophip looks totally good. this looks totally bannable too, sadly. Please stop saying this does not give any ingame advantage as if it was a family argument or something, modifying the game files is against the ToS, period. Again, it looks kick ass. Edit : Edit 2 : Why wouldn't you go ahead and ask Blizzard if they authorize your [mod]ification, via mail for instance? | ||
|
Teliko
Ireland1044 Posts
On March 05 2012 09:10 Murlox wrote: Why wouldn't you go ahead and ask Blizzard if they authorize your [mod]ification, via mail for instance? So many people have said this or asked Blizz themselves, and it really mindfucks me. If you ask Blizzard anything via a ticket system or mail, you're basically getting an automated response. Not to say they're not actually read by real people, but they're never going to tell you something that goes against the ToS. Modding is against the ToS, asking Blizzard anything about it will achieve nothing. If you ask them something like whether or not they'd consider making it allowable, they'll say something like "We'll look into it". If mods like this are ever to become an allowed feature, it'll be through publicity and demand from the community, i.e. threads like this, people constantly discussing (or in this case arguing) about it, and people like Existor, Pzea and me who create and spread the mods. The more people that use or want to use them, the more inclined Blizz will be to support and implement it. On March 05 2012 11:10 InfCereal wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J45iRrdGfqE&feature=player_detailpage#t=287s People need to stop relaying back to this response, too. Yeah, Browder said they like it, but he's a designer. He's interested in implementing similar features into the design of the game. This doesn't mean it no longer breaks the ToS if you start doing it. If you start modding and get banned, you can't say "Dustin Browder said it's ok, unban plx ty". He's not going to kick down the door at your local Blizz HQ when someone's about to be banned and say "Hold your shit, I support this jazz." At no point in the video did he say "If you use Pzea's colour mod, I guarantee your safety from ban." Now, don't get me wrong. I'm by no means suggesting people will be banned from this. It's pretty obvious Blizz have zero interest in hunting down modders, as it's generally innocent and merely an aesthetic adjustment. I'm just straightening things out as people have very different opinions as to why this is safe to use. Browder's response never made it more or less safe. I guess it's just become a delicate topic for me after getting so many people emailing me everyday about whether they'll be banned or not. *cough* [/rant] I've just drank a two litre bottle of Irn Bru, and it can make me... iffy... | ||
|
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
| ||
|
Lumi
United States1616 Posts
 TYVM for this, though!Edit: I'm wondering how easy it would be to take your own video and convert it to the format used for this? THAT would be sexy and I'd love to help with it. | ||
|
Teliko
Ireland1044 Posts
On March 14 2012 12:48 Lumi wrote: Gonna try this out soon. On one hand, I'm hoping that they won't change their interface / mpq structuring much with HotS because I'd probably like to always be able to go with the backgrounds I c hoose. On the other, I want it to change because when you edit for the 1v1 race pick backgrounds, while Protoss looks fine, zergs background image is screwed and you are forced to accept some of the original background image and it looks stupid TYVM for this, though!Edit: I'm wondering how easy it would be to take your own video and convert it to the format used for this? THAT would be sexy and I'd love to help with it. You would need to import the video to Autodesk 3Ds Max and then export it again as an m3 format model. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
RoKetha
United States211 Posts
Regarding this little point of contention that has popped up: As has been mentioned repeatedly, it's extremely unlikely that anyone will be banned for changing their assets MPQs. Blizzard has already separated MPQs containing graphical and aesthetic elements from actual data values used for online play and the "rules of the game". If you try to modify any of the MPQs that contain the things that might give an advantage, the battle.net launcher will refuse to start SC2 until the MPQ is "repaired". Whereas if you just screw around with still images, models, campaign assets (cinematics, closed captioning, embedded videos for the TV, etc.), and audio, the game will run normally and no one else will be able to even see anything different. Additionally, at this point, Blizzard would be doing themselves a lot of harm to suddenly ban a bunch of players who are only contributing to their sales and have made no negative impact whatsoever on their game's community, reputation, or value. Just as Blizzard may ban for any reason, they don't have to ban for violating the written letter of the ToS unless they deem it's in their best interest. | ||
|
Teliko
Ireland1044 Posts
On March 14 2012 15:34 RoKetha wrote: Blizzard has already separated MPQs containing graphical and aesthetic elements from actual data values used for online play and the "rules of the game". If you try to modify any of the MPQs that contain the things that might give an advantage, the battle.net launcher will refuse to start SC2 until the MPQ is "repaired". Whereas if you just screw around with still images, models, campaign assets (cinematics, closed captioning, embedded videos for the TV, etc.), and audio, the game will run normally and no one else will be able to even see anything different. While true, this isn't entirely accurate. It's been proven that it's possible to get an advantage with cloaked units. | ||
|
Gemini_19
United States1261 Posts
| ||
|
Teliko
Ireland1044 Posts
On April 23 2012 07:51 Gemini_19 wrote: How does one remove this effect if they no longer want it applied? Backing up your stuff before messing around with game files is usually a good idea. | ||
|
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
Just create new archive, called xxXX.sc2assets (xxXX - ur region letters, like enGB, koKR, etc) and put it inside LibertyMulti.sc2mod, Inside that MPQ-file put those new background files and your mod is ready! Any time you want to delete mod, you can simply delete that new xxXX.sc2assets file. | ||
|
Cynthedic
United States34 Posts
| ||
|
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
On May 11 2012 23:54 Cynthedic wrote: i must be the only one that doesnt understand the translated instructions =[ somebody please help with step by step? English instructions are in first post. And download links are in source | ||
|
L1ghty
Belgium51 Posts
On July 10 2012 02:23 Existor wrote: English instructions are in first post. And download links are in source The download link is not working though. I tried, but didn't find any working way to do it. | ||
|
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
Want to add screenshot of Heart of the swarm main menu ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/7PkRb.jpg) | ||
|
popillil
Canada4 Posts
| ||
|
SCguineapig
Netherlands289 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2  27028Mini 457Hyuk  253firebathero  183ggaemo 121Liquid`Ret 58Mong 52Hyun 41Killer 35PianO 25[ Show more ] Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
BSL: Ladder Tournament
Sparkling Tuna Cup
INu's Battles
herO vs Classic
Percival vs Rogue
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
MilkiCow vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
BSL Open Qualifier
BSL Open Qualifier
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Light
WardiTV Weekly
Monday Night Weeklies
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
