EPTWe Must Fight For The Carrier - Page 8
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
| ||
|
Tchado
Jordan1831 Posts
| ||
|
Fruitalchemist
Greenland51 Posts
They suppose to be a T3 kick ass unit. Buff them already  This should be posted on the Blizzard forms also!! | ||
|
Gingerninja
United Kingdom1339 Posts
Keep the carrier.. adjust or dump the Colossus. | ||
|
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
| ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
| ||
|
Shiladie
Canada1631 Posts
On January 26 2012 09:52 Acayex wrote: Really hoping for the Carrier to stay and maybe Blizzard would look at the Colossus and the general Deathball style of Protoss instead so the Carrier can maintain its role, instead of having it overlap. It's extremely dull and uninteresting to both players and viewers IMO. Here's hoping for the Colossus to get replaced with a non-Deathball AoE unit. (/prays for Reaver-style unit) That's my thought as well, instead of removing the carrier, remove the colossus. Put the reaver, or another better designed than the colossus (not hard) siege unit into the game for protoss. | ||
|
SwordM13X24
United States191 Posts
| ||
|
Keyboard Warrior
United States1178 Posts
But please Blizzard listen to the community. I have not seen a single person who says Carrier should go. Not a sinlge one. Save the Carrier please | ||
|
IrT4nkz
229 Posts
For example, in brood war, units such as the Devourer, Queen, Scout etc. are rarely used, but should they be removed from the game? No. They are not imbalanced, but they are unique in their own way and should not be touched. | ||
|
flanksteak
Canada246 Posts
 | ||
HackBenjamin
Canada1094 Posts
*Brood War comparison in spoiler, but not looking to start the BW v SC2 fight.* + Show Spoiler + BW was different because units didn't move like they do in SC2. The clumping and pathing in SC2 allows for situations that could have never taken place in BW. Everything seems like it's designed to just huddle in a ball and move. When a group of carriers approaches a clump of hydras, the player typically focus fires the carriers, and it goes down hard. Or if it approaches stalkers, not only do you have a clump, but you have a clump that can BLINK forward or backward. Thors also scare the shit out of me if I have carriers. And of course, these units are seldom the only unit in the composition, so there's tons of other shit to have to worry about. The Carrier just doesn't seem like it was designed to work with SC2 as fluidly as it was in BW. | ||
|
ChEDo
Canada310 Posts
On January 26 2012 09:24 Tppz! wrote: You cant save something that isnt used AT ALL. Although Carriers aren't used much, they do make an appearance once in a while. MC vs Select @ MLG 0:55 #4 Hongun vs gix(?) and Hongun uses them quite often on his stream. If they tweaked the carrier a bit, it will be used much more. Even now they can be viable and do tremendous amounts of damage. I'm a mid-high master player and I used carriers in some of my games and had great success with them. Only problem is they are very fragile (corruptors, hydra, viking , marines) and extremely situational, but with some minor buffs I believe they can play a huge role in the PvX late game. Also they are super fun! Nothing is more rewarding then when you fly into your opponents base with 10 carriers 3-3-3 :D | ||
|
h0oTiS
United States101 Posts
| ||
|
ampson
United States2355 Posts
On January 27 2012 01:28 Keyboard Warrior wrote: I get that they want SC2 to be completely different from BW. But please Blizzard listen to the community. I have not seen a single person who says Carrier should go. Not a sinlge one. Save the Carrier please You clearly haven't read the whole thread. Also, I don't know why so many people jump on the kill-colossus bandwagon. They want to get rid of the unit that is working as intended to keep the unit that is essentially useless. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15725 Posts
On January 27 2012 02:00 ampson wrote: You clearly haven't read the whole thread. Also, I don't know why so many people jump on the kill-colossus bandwagon. They want to get rid of the unit that is working as intended to keep the unit that is essentially useless. They don't need to overlap though. In BW, Reavers didn't overlap with Carriers. I really have no idea where this silly argument that they intrinsically overlap with Colossus came from. They attack air, they have a larger range, they fly. There is so much different about them. All that they need are a few tweaks so that they are less vulnerable and are actually capable of leaving fights. | ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4782 Posts
On January 27 2012 02:00 ampson wrote: You clearly haven't read the whole thread. Also, I don't know why so many people jump on the kill-colossus bandwagon. They want to get rid of the unit that is working as intended to keep the unit that is essentially useless. It's because we (or at least I) want the reaver back - reeeebu reeeebu reeebu!!!!!!!! | ||
|
Chunhyang
Bangladesh1389 Posts
| ||
|
Hoodlum
United States350 Posts
| ||
|
KevinIX
United States2472 Posts
On January 27 2012 02:26 Hoodlum wrote: Personally I think they should buff the Carrier and remove the collosi PLEASE! For the love of all things protoss, get rid of the damned Colossi. It is ruining all the matchups. Give us back the Reaver! | ||
| ||
