EPTEveryone else it is just the ID...
GSL 2012 Group Nominations - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Jotoco
Brazil1342 Posts
Everyone else it is just the ID... | ||
|
Skwid1g
United States953 Posts
On December 29 2011 00:39 Titorelli wrote: Afaik you have to earn your Code S spot by qualifying through the tough Code B and Code A qualifiers. The real reason I assume they invited them is because the want more foreign viewers. So its not about merit its all about popularity, I hate that  You can get them from MLG (which Idra did for Code A) and GOM has 2 foreign invites per season iirc. I'm pretty sure the only reason Sen got in is because Naniwa lost his Code S spot and Idra has the results, gsl points, and already had an up/down seed iirc. You also have to remember that GSL is much harder for foreigners than Koreans: you're usually thousands of miles from home, don't know anyone, probably don't speak the language or know the cultures, etc. So staying in Korea to continually try to just get into Code A is a lot to ask someone like Idra or Sen to be doing, if they don't deserve their slots in Code S they'll lose them quite quickly. | ||
|
zyzq
United States3123 Posts
On December 29 2011 01:23 aviator116 wrote: a bunch of the korean pros rode on MLG spots to get to Code S (MVP from Anaheim, MMA from Columbus), so idk about the "tough Code B and Code A qualifiers" part. GOM already said they were going to give spots to foreigners, might as well give them to the best foreigners. im sorry if you hate it. you can go talk to Mr. Chae if you want to. i doubt he'll care though. MMA, MC and DRG are the ones who got Code-S from MLG. | ||
|
FuzzyJAM
Scotland9300 Posts
Anyway, very pleased with this change. Good work from GOM. Now we just need them to have only two main tournaments a year and I'll be exceptionally happy. | ||
|
Thretau
Finland85 Posts
On December 29 2011 01:47 Jotoco wrote: Does anyone find it funny that Boxer is the only one ho has his Team stated? (As in SlayersBoxer) Everyone else it is just the ID... It used to be his nickname during his Broodwar years iirc. | ||
|
figq
12519 Posts
 Nice system, I approve. | ||
|
MrMotionPicture
United States4327 Posts
| ||
shannn
Netherlands2891 Posts
Hoping to see groups with some of these combinations: Zenio/IdrA Leenock/MKP MMA/DRG aLive/inCa Keen/NaDa sC/NesTea MVP/ForGG | ||
|
Azzur
Australia6260 Posts
On December 29 2011 00:43 Primadog wrote: Not a fan of tiers being determined by GSL rank points. This was the same trap that MLG fell in last year (and now abolished). The MAJOR difference between GSL and MLG (last year) is that you actually have to qualify for the GSL Code S ro32, and thus the seedings really only sorts the players out from positions 9-32 rather than giving them a spot. For MLG, being in the top16 (or was it top20?) meant that you were automatically put into the pool play and can only finish at the lowest in the 30-something position even if you go 0-5 in your group. This got you quite a bit of points and hence it's a self repeating cycle - players who are in the pool play got alot of points which made them keep their pool play position. In contrast, if you don't perform in the GSL Code S, you can fall into Code B in one season. The good thing this system does is to prevent suicidal picks (MC lol) and fan favourites eliminating each other in the ro32. | ||
|
Bazzyrick
United Kingdom361 Posts
I wish good luck to Sen, and I'm not a huge fan of Idra but I wish him luck anyway. I want to see a larger list of foreigners beating top level Koreans. I think once 2012 is over, we'll be calling that the year of eSports, and we'll of forgotten all about 2011. | ||
|
Xcobidoo
Sweden1871 Posts
I know it's mostly going to be random but still.... | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
Curisou is tier 4 haha, poor opponents. | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On December 29 2011 01:47 Jotoco wrote: Does anyone find it funny that Boxer is the only one ho has his Team stated? (As in SlayersBoxer) Everyone else it is just the ID... It's because his ID IS SlayersBoxer That's why his team is called slayers, and not the other way. | ||
|
VirgilSC2
United States6151 Posts
I miss sC's awesomeness. | ||
|
Packawana
United States1081 Posts
| ||
|
SeaSwift
Scotland4486 Posts
On December 29 2011 03:04 VirgilSC2 wrote: I'm just really curious about sC, will he be well in time to play in this season of GSL? I hope so I miss sC's awesomeness. sC vs Nestea was one of the most awesome series ever, but even then I underestimated him. His 2-0ing of MC in GSL, given that MC has the best PvT in the world, is pretty spectacular, however. I look forward to sC's return. | ||
|
Vindicate
United States169 Posts
| ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
On December 29 2011 03:04 VirgilSC2 wrote: I'm just really curious about sC, will he be well in time to play in this season of GSL? I hope so I miss sC's awesomeness. He got out of the hospital like yesterday or a day before if I recall correctly. There's still plenty of time to practice, if he doesn't have a relapse again. sC is an incredibly strong player when his health is okay and he has had enough practice. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On December 29 2011 02:13 Azzur wrote: The MAJOR difference between GSL and MLG (last year) is that you actually have to qualify for the GSL Code S ro32, and thus the seedings really only sorts the players out from positions 9-32 rather than giving them a spot. For MLG, being in the top16 (or was it top20?) meant that you were automatically put into the pool play and can only finish at the lowest in the 30-something position even if you go 0-5 in your group. This got you quite a bit of points and hence it's a self repeating cycle - players who are in the pool play got alot of points which made them keep their pool play position. In contrast, if you don't perform in the GSL Code S, you can fall into Code B in one season. The good thing this system does is to prevent suicidal picks (MC lol) and fan favourites eliminating each other in the ro32. also the number of GSLs to accumulate points from is larger than the MLG sample size. This makes it more fair than the MLG system imo | ||
|
Vorenius
Denmark1979 Posts
On December 29 2011 03:22 Shellshock1122 wrote: also the number of GSLs to accumulate points from is larger than the MLG sample size. This makes it more fair than the MLG system imo If anything more spread out tournaments (without decaying points) is more unfair. It shouldn't matter that who was good 11 months ago when you are determining seeds for a current tournament. It doesn't matter though because seeds in GSL is way less importnat that MLG. At least it means there won't be any more MVP vs Nestea in Ro32. | ||
| ||
