EPTidiots
User was warned for this post
Season 5 Map Pool Changes Announced - Page 44
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Eraserhead
159 Posts
idiots User was warned for this post | ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On December 22 2011 16:47 Rizell wrote: This is kinda sad.. the two maps they removed for the new ones were actually better.. TvZ is free win for the terran on both the new maps if he decides to go 2 rax and bunker rush, so they are both insta veto'es for a laddering zerg. Even if they were decent they are not playable in ladder with so many abuseable bunker spots. I dont see why it would be any more of a free win if you bunker rush than any other map? Arid Plateau is a joke and vetoed, the other map is OK. | ||
|
The KY
United Kingdom6252 Posts
Other one is probably gonna be fine, and I'm happy with the removal choices. | ||
|
KDot2
United States1213 Posts
On December 23 2011 23:22 Eraserhead wrote: "oh no, Blizzard made a map where i'll have to play a little bit differently than the other maps, fuck blizzard" booohooo idiots Blizzard gives us maps we dont want .... and refuses to give us maps that are already made that we DO want who's the idiots ? | ||
|
howLiN
Portugal1676 Posts
| ||
|
Nemireck
Canada1875 Posts
On December 24 2011 00:46 ToguRo wrote: Blizzard gives us maps we dont want .... and refuses to give us maps that are already made that we DO want who's the idiots ? The people who constantly whine, and keep playing anyways. | ||
|
Rk0
Netherlands224 Posts
| ||
|
Ballistixz
United States1269 Posts
imho you would have to playe atleast 6+ games with heavy replay analysis on new maps before you can call it balanced or imbalanced for a certain race. playing 1 game and instantly vetoing it just because you lost is stupid as hell. especially if you dont even try to adapt your playstyle on said new map. BTW, from my own experiences arid plateu is very zerg favored, especially late game. entombed however there are to many fucking rocks (at first i thought there werent so many but there fucking everywhere). im a person that likes to just plop down expos as zerg so any time there are rocks blocking an expo i rage my ass off. other then the rock problem expansions are fairly easy to take. i just really hate rocks.... | ||
|
Meega
Germany35 Posts
Blizz starts going on my nerves with their refusal to implement good maps like some of those from GSL or ICCup. Instead they fail with map creation from season to season again... as they fail with balancing marines and MULEs. GSL has even removed gold minerals from their maps as MULEs on gold are simply a joke towards every RTS player. btw: the best thing about all this is that the maps which have been removed have always been the new maps of the last season. obvious troll is obvious... | ||
|
AndAgain
United States2621 Posts
| ||
|
nick1689
Australia494 Posts
| ||
|
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
On December 25 2011 21:05 Nemireck wrote: The people who constantly whine, and keep playing anyways. We're not allowed to like the game but dislike the maps and certain other elements? I find that if anyone complains about anything it's considered "whining". | ||
|
PaPoolee
Netherlands660 Posts
| ||
|
TheSwamp
United States1497 Posts
On December 19 2011 05:09 TheSwamp wrote: The two player map looks like a balanced version of Xelnaga. Never mind that map is shit | ||
|
Kmatt
United States1019 Posts
However, the bunker rushes I just looked at are scary enough to warrant a veto, and the distance between the main and natural on Arid is way too big. Does a 9 overlord even get there in time to spot an 11/11 bunker rush? | ||
|
Tortious_Tortoise
United States944 Posts
| ||
|
Maetl
United States93 Posts
On December 27 2011 19:48 Corrosive wrote: We're not allowed to like the game but dislike the maps and certain other elements? I find that if anyone complains about anything it's considered "whining". Only things they aren't complaining about. | ||
| ||
