EPTAMA answers with MVP. Check them out now! - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
cmen15
United States1519 Posts
| ||
|
LuckyMacro
United States1482 Posts
[MVP]: To be completely honest, I’d say no. I rarely get recognized by people in public, let alone hot fan girls. T_T I lol'd a little.  Thanks for the interview | ||
|
Echeon
United States19 Posts
| ||
|
zyzq
United States3123 Posts
| ||
|
blae000
Norway1640 Posts
| ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
As for other teams, do more of these as well please. I really want to see what type of people these progamers are when they are not just in a booth or playing. Thanks | ||
|
Madera
Sweden2672 Posts
| ||
|
forsooth
United States3648 Posts
On November 18 2011 01:53 emc wrote: isn't that actually what artosis has told us though? He's always told us that bio is viable if you can play base trade scenarios and they will always work better on larger maps. I also thought he told us that MVP has always made fewer mistakes which is the reason why he wins, it just so happens that he uses mech and wins by huge margins when he does play perfectly. Mech has to be played perfectly in order to win because it's so hard to rebuild, but it truly IS the strongest army in TvT. I don't see how artosis is wrong here, MVP is only confirming that mech play can't be unique, it can only be played perfectly and he's only telling us something we already knew, bio is more mobile and does better on larger maps. The point I think MVP is making is that mech is going to become less and less the optimal choice as the current trend toward bigger maps continues. If you're playing to win, are you really going to choose the style that requires perfect play in order to succeed when you can become the best at a different style that allows more mistakes but still allows you to walk away with the win? Also, when he was talking about mistakes, he was talking about his mech play in relation to the mech play of others, not necessarily vs bio. In the end, mech is never going to be optimal as long as Terran still has marauders. Or unless one of the upcoming expansions introduces a factory unit that can handle them without the high risk of getting caught unsieged that tank play possesses. | ||
|
zerious
Canada3803 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
tuho12345
4482 Posts
What an awesome family lol | ||
|
Magnitoo
Serbia125 Posts
MVP is a quite cool person, plenty of respect he has from me. (cwhtididthr? :D) | ||
|
SolidMoose
United States1240 Posts
| ||
|
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
All the koreans seem to have huge respect for Thorzain (I can understand, he's amazing) relative to foriegners. | ||
|
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
| ||
|
Hider
Denmark9448 Posts
On November 18 2011 01:53 emc wrote: isn't that actually what artosis has told us though? He's always told us that bio is viable if you can play base trade scenarios and they will always work better on larger maps. I also thought he told us that MVP has always made fewer mistakes which is the reason why he wins, it just so happens that he uses mech and wins by huge margins when he does play perfectly. Mech has to be played perfectly in order to win because it's so hard to rebuild, but it truly IS the strongest army in TvT. I don't see how artosis is wrong here, MVP is only confirming that mech play can't be unique, it can only be played perfectly and he's only telling us something we already knew, bio is more mobile and does better on larger maps. The problem with artosis is that he states that if you play perfect mech vs perfect bio the mech guy will always win. But that isn't nessarcily true. It most likely is map dependant, and even then we dont really know. The logic of Artosis is that if you just defend perfectly with mech you will eventaully win. But thats not true if the bio player (if he plays perfectly) is able to get a better economy every time and hence tech to air and beat the mech guy. | ||
|
ampson
United States2355 Posts
| ||
|
Termit
Sweden3466 Posts
On November 18 2011 06:21 zerious wrote: Should have asked him about streaming. He would get 8k+ viewers ez. I doubt that tbh. There is/has been some really good Code S players streaming here (not GSL champions tho but still) but they get like 1k viewers from TL because they aint Zerg.  | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:10 Termit wrote: I doubt that tbh. There is/has been some really good Code S players streaming here (not GSL champions tho but still) but they get like 1k viewers from TL because they aint Zerg. If it was MVP, race bias and player favouritism wouldn't matter. He's the best goddam player in the world... | ||
| ||
