Multiple 1v1 ranks and the future of the ladder - Page 9
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Tsuki.eu
Portugal1049 Posts
| ||
Msr
Korea (South)495 Posts
(every good wc3 feature from bnet got removed and most still not added lan,smurfing, bnet tournys for casual players, etc.) look at diablo 3 they even are removing the open drop system or however it is termed and removed stat points (every point went into vit anyway for most builds but still...) | ||
Roxy
Canada753 Posts
Honestly, I would kill from some ranked 1v1 (2v2 team melee) | ||
PHILtheTANK
United States1834 Posts
| ||
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
| ||
KingLori
Germany187 Posts
In the last time, I tried some Teamgames, because you can mess around there alot - but random is so horrible. Diamond 4v4 is like Silver 1on1, the people are sooooo bad there :/ | ||
Ferr3t
21 Posts
I simply feel like I'm locked into my main race because I don't want to tank my current 1v1. After all, I did ladder that 1v1 with a goal in mind, and I'm far from achieving that, but its hard to chose whether to learn something new or keep improving at how I play right now. | ||
sjschmidt93
United States2518 Posts
| ||
ambrosiaa
Singapore333 Posts
| ||
Snackysnacks
United States411 Posts
On October 13 2011 12:01 ambrosiaa wrote: You do know that if a master player offraces, he'll still probly roflstomp everyone in gold right? Do you seriously want gm/master smurfers owning you everyday? Either man up or buy a new account to ladder. Though, the idea is that his offrace may only be a mid/high master skill in that race, therefor he wont have to play vs grandmasters offracing but still play within a skill bracket. Then again, what stops a korean from smashing gold leagues when they get a NA account? Nothing | ||
reneg
United States859 Posts
On October 13 2011 11:18 Tsuki.eu wrote: practice 1v1 ladder plx (using 1v1 ranked mmr) i think an unranked ladder would be worthless. That's what custom games are for. Or practice partners. If you want to play against someone near your skill level, find someone your level and play against them. Or talk to someone you meet in 1v1 ladder (i've met a number of people that way) and play with them. It's getting a little old to keep on reading about people who supposedly love sc2 / competition, but are too terrified to compete. IMO, if everyone keeps getting stressed out about ladder, then sc2 might not be the game for you. Either find a way to play and make it fun (either enjoy 1v1, or goof off in team games w/ friends, or play custom games like the mage game, or dota clones or something). Unranked ladder completely defeats the purpose of ladder. The purpose of ladder is to rank you vs other people. Unranked ladder doesn't rank you, doesn't do anything except give you an opponent near your MMR (which you could theoretically find anyway) at the expense of stealing people from normal ladder | ||
stokes17
United States1411 Posts
i do think multiple ranks is kinda possible- but that would def increase the amount of lopsided games as higher level players level up their other races for fun. I really think everyone just needs to realize ladder rank anit no thing and then it'll be better. | ||
OmyVi
United States137 Posts
| ||
ambrosiaa
Singapore333 Posts
On October 13 2011 12:08 Snackysnacks wrote: Though, the idea is that his offrace may only be a mid/high master skill in that race, therefor he wont have to play vs grandmasters offracing but still play within a skill bracket. Then again, what stops a korean from smashing gold leagues when they get a NA account? Nothing The idea is that is gives the player too many options to SMURF. Imagine the number of people who will just use that extra ladder ID to purposely stay in gold league (by throwing games away as well) and own scrubs when they're bored in their gm league. | ||
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
On October 13 2011 12:15 reneg wrote: i think an unranked ladder would be worthless. That's what custom games are for. Or practice partners. If you want to play against someone near your skill level, find someone your level and play against them. Or talk to someone you meet in 1v1 ladder (i've met a number of people that way) and play with them. Unranked ladder completely defeats the purpose of ladder. The purpose of ladder is to rank you vs other people. Unranked ladder doesn't rank you, doesn't do anything except give you an opponent near your MMR (which you could theoretically find anyway) at the expense of stealing people from normal ladder Please read the disclaimer... this isn't about unranked ladder. | ||
annYeong(o11)
Canada784 Posts
to be sure, no separate ladders, just different rankings on the same ladder for each race. | ||
kazie
258 Posts
| ||
Snackysnacks
United States411 Posts
On October 13 2011 12:34 ambrosiaa wrote: The idea is that is gives the player too many options to SMURF. Imagine the number of people who will just use that extra ladder ID to purposely stay in gold league (by throwing games away as well) and own scrubs when they're bored in their gm league. It would show, wouldnt it? Then again, nothing stops a player from owning a second or side account to smurf on (see friends who only bought the game to play customs/not care about ladder) On October 13 2011 12:37 kazie wrote: yeah this game needs a seperate unranked 1v1 with a seperate mmr. learn from lol's success Lol Ladder system, look at it like this Ranked 5 Teams Ranked Solo Memebers (unranked) Pool play (its still ranked) The only difference is that Unranked in lol factors in wins no matter what premade group you go in. This makes an insane elo with players with little to no losses, high end players playing against random arranged players. I kinda of see it like how we have ranked 4's Random and ranked 4's Teams In starcraft. | ||
ambrosiaa
Singapore333 Posts
[QUOTE]On October 13 2011 12:34 ambrosiaa wrote: [QUOTE]On October 13 2011 12:08 Snackysnacks wrote: [QUOTE]On October 13 2011 12:01 ambrosiaa wrote: You do know that if a master player offraces, he'll still probly roflstomp everyone in gold right? Do you seriously want gm/master smurfers owning you everyday? Either man up or buy a new account to ladder.[/QUOTE] Though, the idea is that his offrace may only be a mid/high master skill in that race, therefor he wont have to play vs grandmasters offracing but still play within a skill bracket. Then again, what stops a korean from smashing gold leagues when they get a NA account? Nothing [/QUOTE] The idea is that is gives the player too many options to SMURF. Imagine the number of people who will just use that extra ladder ID to purposely stay in gold league (by throwing games away as well) and own scrubs when they're bored in their gm league.[/QUOTE] It would show, wouldnt it? Then again, nothing stops a player from owning a second or side account to smurf on (see friends who only bought the game to play customs/not care about ladder) [QUOTE]On October 13 2011 12:37 kazie wrote: Meanin the gold players? The lowest league is bronze, and then what? All this does is make impossible for new, genuine players to practice on the ladder with the amount of smurfers around. | ||
FlamingTurd
United States1059 Posts
| ||
| ||