• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:14
CEST 03:14
KST 10:14
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed6Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll2Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension2Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Starcraft in widescreen BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 487 users

Do you macro like a pro? - Page 50

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 48 49 50 51 52 63 Next
Warble
Profile Joined May 2011
137 Posts
October 28 2011 10:40 GMT
#981
Very enjoyable read.

It's interesting to see how there is still such a large difference in macro skill even between diamond and masters, and between amateur players (in masters) and pros (top 100 GM).
Deleted User 61629
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
1664 Posts
October 28 2011 10:54 GMT
#982
--- Nuked ---
halpimcat
Profile Joined September 2011
215 Posts
October 28 2011 11:08 GMT
#983
Masters player, and I just found out my SQ fluctuates between the 50s and 70s...

I do have a question though: what exactly do the numbers represent in the "Average unspent resources" column? I'm guessing a higher score means you actually spent more? My mind automatically goes to the idea that a lower score is better because you kept your resources low
Robertxtrem
Profile Joined October 2011
United Kingdom3 Posts
October 28 2011 11:51 GMT
#984
Just did this for my last 20 games. It alternates between diamond and bronze. I guess that averages out as silver which I'm in.
average650
Profile Joined November 2010
24 Posts
October 28 2011 12:07 GMT
#985
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.
p1cKLes
Profile Joined November 2010
United States342 Posts
October 28 2011 17:01 GMT
#986
This is insane... Great write up! Great analysis! Great job!

Btw, did you see some of Idra's average unspent minerals? Holy crap.. I don't even come close.
Hulkoff
Profile Joined December 2010
Sweden51 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-28 17:12:16
October 28 2011 17:11 GMT
#987
On October 28 2011 21:07 average650 wrote:
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.



Macro is always your problem. Macro is more than just keeping your resources low. Anyone can keep it low by overproducing constructionbuildings and making 10 supply depots at the same time and queuing up 5 units in every building.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. SQ is a bullshit stat. Don't read too much into it. What you do with your resources is way more important.
average650
Profile Joined November 2010
24 Posts
October 28 2011 17:51 GMT
#988
On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 28 2011 21:07 average650 wrote:
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.



Macro is always your problem. Macro is more than just keeping your resources low. Anyone can keep it low by overproducing constructionbuildings and making 10 supply depots at the same time and queuing up 5 units in every building.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. SQ is a bullshit stat. Don't read too much into it. What you do with your resources is way more important.


You're right that those things could be the case, except I know they aren't. I never queue up units, except maybe and extra probe every once in a while. I don't build more than a couple pylons at a time, except when I lose a bunch of pylons to harrass or something. I will sometimes build an extra production facility, but so may my opponents. These things can be improved of course, but looking at all these things, my loses are not because I'm not spending my money on useful things.

On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:What you do with your resources is way more important.


This is too vauge. the statistic is a measure of spending the resources you have. It doesn't take into account some macro things, like producing probes or queuing, but these can be analyzed easily. I have, and I don't queue. I produce probes very well, though not perfectly. This can be improved, but looking at this statistic, (combined with other knowledge I have of my own play) this is not my main problem. I struggle with things like focusing on a specific strategy; I need better planning going into matchups. This happens because I don't play enough. I also need to focus on awareness, mostly just by being active with the units I have. I don't have the best apm so I find this difficult, but when I can work it in, I feel much more comfortable. There are probably other things i have yet to identify, but the basics of typical macro are not the problem in my matchups.

This does not cover all parts of macro, but it does give a good metric to measure one part of macro. Other parts can be identified in different ways. Worker production can be watched easily. Queuing is easily seen. Over producing buildings is more difficult to quantify, but can be done with work. Really, if you look at your income, and look at how quickly the buildings can spend resources, the spending should be within 1 production buildings worth of being equal. The same can be said for queen injects. Most other aspects are easily analyzed. This part is not usually, and this statistic helps a lot.
halpimcat
Profile Joined September 2011
215 Posts
October 28 2011 21:55 GMT
#989
On October 29 2011 02:51 average650 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:
On October 28 2011 21:07 average650 wrote:
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.



Macro is always your problem. Macro is more than just keeping your resources low. Anyone can keep it low by overproducing constructionbuildings and making 10 supply depots at the same time and queuing up 5 units in every building.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. SQ is a bullshit stat. Don't read too much into it. What you do with your resources is way more important.


You're right that those things could be the case, except I know they aren't. I never queue up units, except maybe and extra probe every once in a while. I don't build more than a couple pylons at a time, except when I lose a bunch of pylons to harrass or something. I will sometimes build an extra production facility, but so may my opponents. These things can be improved of course, but looking at all these things, my loses are not because I'm not spending my money on useful things.

Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:What you do with your resources is way more important.


This is too vauge. the statistic is a measure of spending the resources you have. It doesn't take into account some macro things, like producing probes or queuing, but these can be analyzed easily. I have, and I don't queue. I produce probes very well, though not perfectly. This can be improved, but looking at this statistic, (combined with other knowledge I have of my own play) this is not my main problem. I struggle with things like focusing on a specific strategy; I need better planning going into matchups. This happens because I don't play enough. I also need to focus on awareness, mostly just by being active with the units I have. I don't have the best apm so I find this difficult, but when I can work it in, I feel much more comfortable. There are probably other things i have yet to identify, but the basics of typical macro are not the problem in my matchups.

This does not cover all parts of macro, but it does give a good metric to measure one part of macro. Other parts can be identified in different ways. Worker production can be watched easily. Queuing is easily seen. Over producing buildings is more difficult to quantify, but can be done with work. Really, if you look at your income, and look at how quickly the buildings can spend resources, the spending should be within 1 production buildings worth of being equal. The same can be said for queen injects. Most other aspects are easily analyzed. This part is not usually, and this statistic helps a lot.

After playing around with the autoSQ toy i figured out how the measurement works in practice. Looking at my replays, my SQ was unusually high whenever i found my workers created count unusually low. This just means that I was able to spend my resources better because I never had any resources to begin with. If you're plat level (or anywhere below GM) and your SQ is high, it might mean that your worker production, is low to begin with. It becomes much more difficult managing your economy responsibly when you have 80 workers compared to 60. Or it could mean you don't really play macro games, and instead opt for a more timing-oriented play, in which case SQ is easier to manage. I really doubt macro is "not your problem" when you're in plat so just my 2 cents.
average650
Profile Joined November 2010
24 Posts
October 29 2011 01:42 GMT
#990
On October 29 2011 06:55 halpimcat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 02:51 average650 wrote:
On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:
On October 28 2011 21:07 average650 wrote:
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.



Macro is always your problem. Macro is more than just keeping your resources low. Anyone can keep it low by overproducing constructionbuildings and making 10 supply depots at the same time and queuing up 5 units in every building.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. SQ is a bullshit stat. Don't read too much into it. What you do with your resources is way more important.


You're right that those things could be the case, except I know they aren't. I never queue up units, except maybe and extra probe every once in a while. I don't build more than a couple pylons at a time, except when I lose a bunch of pylons to harrass or something. I will sometimes build an extra production facility, but so may my opponents. These things can be improved of course, but looking at all these things, my loses are not because I'm not spending my money on useful things.

On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:What you do with your resources is way more important.


This is too vauge. the statistic is a measure of spending the resources you have. It doesn't take into account some macro things, like producing probes or queuing, but these can be analyzed easily. I have, and I don't queue. I produce probes very well, though not perfectly. This can be improved, but looking at this statistic, (combined with other knowledge I have of my own play) this is not my main problem. I struggle with things like focusing on a specific strategy; I need better planning going into matchups. This happens because I don't play enough. I also need to focus on awareness, mostly just by being active with the units I have. I don't have the best apm so I find this difficult, but when I can work it in, I feel much more comfortable. There are probably other things i have yet to identify, but the basics of typical macro are not the problem in my matchups.

This does not cover all parts of macro, but it does give a good metric to measure one part of macro. Other parts can be identified in different ways. Worker production can be watched easily. Queuing is easily seen. Over producing buildings is more difficult to quantify, but can be done with work. Really, if you look at your income, and look at how quickly the buildings can spend resources, the spending should be within 1 production buildings worth of being equal. The same can be said for queen injects. Most other aspects are easily analyzed. This part is not usually, and this statistic helps a lot.

After playing around with the autoSQ toy i figured out how the measurement works in practice. Looking at my replays, my SQ was unusually high whenever i found my workers created count unusually low. This just means that I was able to spend my resources better because I never had any resources to begin with. If you're plat level (or anywhere below GM) and your SQ is high, it might mean that your worker production, is low to begin with. It becomes much more difficult managing your economy responsibly when you have 80 workers compared to 60. Or it could mean you don't really play macro games, and instead opt for a more timing-oriented play, in which case SQ is easier to manage. I really doubt macro is "not your problem" when you're in plat so just my 2 cents.


This should account for that because it expects that when you have less income that you spend your money better. But even say you're right, I don't think I'm not making enough probes. I don't play super long macro games, because someone usually makes a fatal mistake before 5 bases are up. Most of my games I get 3 bases though. Sometimes shorter, sometimes I go longer, but usually 3. I feel confident that I tend to make enough probes. In fact, in a game against a diamond opponent the other day, he offered the advice that I had made too many probes, since in that particular game I didn't get a 3rd base up, I had too many probes for 2 bases. Now, he could be wrong, but this is a good indicator that I'm doing a decent job in that department.

You also underestimate how poor my army control can be, haha.
whatthefat
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States918 Posts
October 29 2011 01:49 GMT
#991
@average650

It's true that there are ways to 'game' SQ, e.g., by queuing units, or staying on a low income and building too many production facilities. Clearly though, these aren't going to help anyone win! In general, the measure does compensate for income, and it sounds like you are spending very well for your league, i.e., your macro is probably pretty good. Now, if you were to face a grandmaster player it would inevitably drop due to the increased harassment, but you are nonetheless macroing much better than the average platinum. Regarding worker production, you could check where you lie on the worker vs. game duration graph for different leagues.
SlayerS_BoxeR: "I always feel sorry towards Greg (Grack?) T_T"
average650
Profile Joined November 2010
24 Posts
October 29 2011 03:23 GMT
#992
On October 29 2011 10:49 whatthefat wrote:
@average650

It's true that there are ways to 'game' SQ, e.g., by queuing units, or staying on a low income and building too many production facilities. Clearly though, these aren't going to help anyone win! In general, the measure does compensate for income, and it sounds like you are spending very well for your league, i.e., your macro is probably pretty good. Now, if you were to face a grandmaster player it would inevitably drop due to the increased harassment, but you are nonetheless macroing much better than the average platinum. Regarding worker production, you could check where you lie on the worker vs. game duration graph for different leagues.


This I would agree with. My probe Production over the first 20 minutes (I chose this because it was easy to get a large sample over this timescale) Is about 67 with a standard error of ~3.5. The error is worse than it really should be because I simply took games that were about 20 minutes and treated them all as 20 minutes. Your plot of this data is rather course so it's hard to compare to my statistics to your data, but it seems as though diamond or masters fit this range, though there is little difference between the leagues at this time in the game.

Could you post your raw data so I could have a look at it?
Snickersnee
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States241 Posts
October 29 2011 05:57 GMT
#993
love the "EGIdrA" stat amazing job :D
Had an idea that combines the intimate moment of delivering babies with Crazy Taxi last night. Can emotional arcade style gaming work?
Isaac
Profile Joined August 2010
United States810 Posts
October 29 2011 07:14 GMT
#994
How can I make my SQ better on games that i am maxed? (strategically, dont tell me to build ravens and supply depots). I just got an 80 sq. (diamond league) and I was maxed killing his bases for a long time.
number one fan of marineking
halpimcat
Profile Joined September 2011
215 Posts
October 29 2011 08:46 GMT
#995
On October 29 2011 16:14 Isaac wrote:
How can I make my SQ better on games that i am maxed? (strategically, dont tell me to build ravens and supply depots). I just got an 80 sq. (diamond league) and I was maxed killing his bases for a long time.

I think people are putting too much emphasis on SQ. The number's not that important (or maybe that's just what I keep telling myself), what matters is that you are constantly making workers and constantly spending your money; SQ doesn't seem to measure your actual income rate, just the rate at which you spend it. Anywho, you should theoretically still be spending boatloads of money when you're maxed, and not on useless upgrades (medivac energy, HSM when not making ravens). You should constantly be losing units throughout your maxed period, and/or be making extra expansions and productions facilities so you can max instantly if you were ever to lose that army. Example: in a quiet macro tvp without any engagements, you should have a maxed out army by the 17-19 minute mark. After 3-5 more minutes, you should have some 10-12 barracks ready to pump out MMG after your major engagement.
Nemireck
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada1875 Posts
October 29 2011 08:51 GMT
#996
On October 29 2011 17:46 halpimcat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 16:14 Isaac wrote:
How can I make my SQ better on games that i am maxed? (strategically, dont tell me to build ravens and supply depots). I just got an 80 sq. (diamond league) and I was maxed killing his bases for a long time.

I think people are putting too much emphasis on SQ. The number's not that important (or maybe that's just what I keep telling myself), what matters is that you are constantly making workers and constantly spending your money; SQ doesn't seem to measure your actual income rate, just the rate at which you spend it. Anywho, you should theoretically still be spending boatloads of money when you're maxed, and not on useless upgrades (medivac energy, HSM when not making ravens). You should constantly be losing units throughout your maxed period, and/or be making extra expansions and productions facilities so you can max instantly if you were ever to lose that army. Example: in a quiet macro tvp without any engagements, you should have a maxed out army by the 17-19 minute mark. After 3-5 more minutes, you should have some 10-12 barracks ready to pump out MMG after your major engagement.


Correct.

SQ is merely a correlative statistic. People with higher skill TEND to also have a higher SQ. But it is possible to have a high SQ, and still lose a lot because all of the other skills required to play are found wanting. Things like spending on the proper units, controlling those units, making enough workers and saturating your bases properly, expanding to enough bases to make your workers worthwhile, defending your opponents aggression, scouting, responding properly to the scout, and etc. etc. etc. aren't factored into the SQ measurement at all.

SQ is ONLY a measurement of how low you keep your money based on your income.
Teamwork is awesome... As long as your team is doing all the work!
whatthefat
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States918 Posts
October 29 2011 17:14 GMT
#997
On October 29 2011 17:46 halpimcat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 16:14 Isaac wrote:
How can I make my SQ better on games that i am maxed? (strategically, dont tell me to build ravens and supply depots). I just got an 80 sq. (diamond league) and I was maxed killing his bases for a long time.

I think people are putting too much emphasis on SQ. The number's not that important (or maybe that's just what I keep telling myself), what matters is that you are constantly making workers and constantly spending your money; SQ doesn't seem to measure your actual income rate, just the rate at which you spend it. Anywho, you should theoretically still be spending boatloads of money when you're maxed, and not on useless upgrades (medivac energy, HSM when not making ravens). You should constantly be losing units throughout your maxed period, and/or be making extra expansions and productions facilities so you can max instantly if you were ever to lose that army. Example: in a quiet macro tvp without any engagements, you should have a maxed out army by the 17-19 minute mark. After 3-5 more minutes, you should have some 10-12 barracks ready to pump out MMG after your major engagement.

It uses both - see the formula. It is measuring how well you are spending relative to all other players at the same level of income. It doesn't take any other factors into account, so it needs to be averaged across many games to be truly meaningful.
SlayerS_BoxeR: "I always feel sorry towards Greg (Grack?) T_T"
Primadog
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States4411 Posts
October 29 2011 20:50 GMT
#998
Congrats on the TL feature. Always nice to receive affirmation for all the hard work you put in.

Hope to see more statcraft from you in the future. Let's make e-sabermetrics happen.
Thank God and gunrun.
MaV_gGSC
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1345 Posts
October 29 2011 20:54 GMT
#999
O_O I don't macro like a pro
Life's good :D
romnomz
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States54 Posts
October 30 2011 03:34 GMT
#1000
while sq is a useful tool that can help you see how well you can spend your resources, it obviously doesnt account for most of what is required to win a game. I'm in bronze league and my average over my last 10 games is 65, which on his chart puts me at diamond, but im still at bronze. while my macro obviously needs works and will always need work, this is just proof that sq is merely a number that can vaguely place you on a scale of "averages" of leagues, races, and region. and by vague i mean that on his graphs, bronze players can, in some cases, score as well as grand masters. this is just a cool stat that can be used to just give yourself a vague placement or show good games from bad on spending, but is by no means the core of someones skill.
"Bravery is the capacity to perform properly even when scared half to death" -Omar Bradley
Prev 1 48 49 50 51 52 63 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
SEL Masters #4 - Day 2
CranKy Ducklings95
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 208
Livibee 131
ProTech44
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 771
Icarus 5
Dota 2
monkeys_forever808
NeuroSwarm133
League of Legends
JimRising 1189
Trikslyr86
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1548
taco 358
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox746
Other Games
summit1g14127
shahzam1864
Day[9].tv259
C9.Mang0228
Maynarde140
Mew2King35
RuFF_SC223
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3441
BasetradeTV32
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH120
• Mapu4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift6400
• Scarra1362
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur602
Other Games
• Day9tv259
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
8h 46m
WardiTV European League
14h 46m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
22h 46m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 14h
Replay Cast
1d 22h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Epic.LAN
4 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.