• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:36
CEST 17:36
KST 00:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy9[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple2BSL Season 238Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
SC4ALL II: Brood War Player Announcement 4/4 BSL Season 23 Bot on ladder screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague
Tourneys
[IPSL] IPSL is Back With Winter 26-27! [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague [ASL22] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Diablo IV Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Violent-Cooperative Play and…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7453 users

Do you macro like a pro? - Page 50

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 48 49 50 51 52 63 Next
Warble
Profile Joined May 2011
137 Posts
October 28 2011 10:40 GMT
#981
Very enjoyable read.

It's interesting to see how there is still such a large difference in macro skill even between diamond and masters, and between amateur players (in masters) and pros (top 100 GM).
Deleted User 61629
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
1664 Posts
October 28 2011 10:54 GMT
#982
--- Nuked ---
halpimcat
Profile Joined September 2011
215 Posts
October 28 2011 11:08 GMT
#983
Masters player, and I just found out my SQ fluctuates between the 50s and 70s...

I do have a question though: what exactly do the numbers represent in the "Average unspent resources" column? I'm guessing a higher score means you actually spent more? My mind automatically goes to the idea that a lower score is better because you kept your resources low
Robertxtrem
Profile Joined October 2011
United Kingdom3 Posts
October 28 2011 11:51 GMT
#984
Just did this for my last 20 games. It alternates between diamond and bronze. I guess that averages out as silver which I'm in.
average650
Profile Joined November 2010
24 Posts
October 28 2011 12:07 GMT
#985
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.
p1cKLes
Profile Joined November 2010
United States342 Posts
October 28 2011 17:01 GMT
#986
This is insane... Great write up! Great analysis! Great job!

Btw, did you see some of Idra's average unspent minerals? Holy crap.. I don't even come close.
Hulkoff
Profile Joined December 2010
Sweden51 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-28 17:12:16
October 28 2011 17:11 GMT
#987
On October 28 2011 21:07 average650 wrote:
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.



Macro is always your problem. Macro is more than just keeping your resources low. Anyone can keep it low by overproducing constructionbuildings and making 10 supply depots at the same time and queuing up 5 units in every building.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. SQ is a bullshit stat. Don't read too much into it. What you do with your resources is way more important.
average650
Profile Joined November 2010
24 Posts
October 28 2011 17:51 GMT
#988
On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 28 2011 21:07 average650 wrote:
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.



Macro is always your problem. Macro is more than just keeping your resources low. Anyone can keep it low by overproducing constructionbuildings and making 10 supply depots at the same time and queuing up 5 units in every building.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. SQ is a bullshit stat. Don't read too much into it. What you do with your resources is way more important.


You're right that those things could be the case, except I know they aren't. I never queue up units, except maybe and extra probe every once in a while. I don't build more than a couple pylons at a time, except when I lose a bunch of pylons to harrass or something. I will sometimes build an extra production facility, but so may my opponents. These things can be improved of course, but looking at all these things, my loses are not because I'm not spending my money on useful things.

On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:What you do with your resources is way more important.


This is too vauge. the statistic is a measure of spending the resources you have. It doesn't take into account some macro things, like producing probes or queuing, but these can be analyzed easily. I have, and I don't queue. I produce probes very well, though not perfectly. This can be improved, but looking at this statistic, (combined with other knowledge I have of my own play) this is not my main problem. I struggle with things like focusing on a specific strategy; I need better planning going into matchups. This happens because I don't play enough. I also need to focus on awareness, mostly just by being active with the units I have. I don't have the best apm so I find this difficult, but when I can work it in, I feel much more comfortable. There are probably other things i have yet to identify, but the basics of typical macro are not the problem in my matchups.

This does not cover all parts of macro, but it does give a good metric to measure one part of macro. Other parts can be identified in different ways. Worker production can be watched easily. Queuing is easily seen. Over producing buildings is more difficult to quantify, but can be done with work. Really, if you look at your income, and look at how quickly the buildings can spend resources, the spending should be within 1 production buildings worth of being equal. The same can be said for queen injects. Most other aspects are easily analyzed. This part is not usually, and this statistic helps a lot.
halpimcat
Profile Joined September 2011
215 Posts
October 28 2011 21:55 GMT
#989
On October 29 2011 02:51 average650 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:
On October 28 2011 21:07 average650 wrote:
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.



Macro is always your problem. Macro is more than just keeping your resources low. Anyone can keep it low by overproducing constructionbuildings and making 10 supply depots at the same time and queuing up 5 units in every building.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. SQ is a bullshit stat. Don't read too much into it. What you do with your resources is way more important.


You're right that those things could be the case, except I know they aren't. I never queue up units, except maybe and extra probe every once in a while. I don't build more than a couple pylons at a time, except when I lose a bunch of pylons to harrass or something. I will sometimes build an extra production facility, but so may my opponents. These things can be improved of course, but looking at all these things, my loses are not because I'm not spending my money on useful things.

Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:What you do with your resources is way more important.


This is too vauge. the statistic is a measure of spending the resources you have. It doesn't take into account some macro things, like producing probes or queuing, but these can be analyzed easily. I have, and I don't queue. I produce probes very well, though not perfectly. This can be improved, but looking at this statistic, (combined with other knowledge I have of my own play) this is not my main problem. I struggle with things like focusing on a specific strategy; I need better planning going into matchups. This happens because I don't play enough. I also need to focus on awareness, mostly just by being active with the units I have. I don't have the best apm so I find this difficult, but when I can work it in, I feel much more comfortable. There are probably other things i have yet to identify, but the basics of typical macro are not the problem in my matchups.

This does not cover all parts of macro, but it does give a good metric to measure one part of macro. Other parts can be identified in different ways. Worker production can be watched easily. Queuing is easily seen. Over producing buildings is more difficult to quantify, but can be done with work. Really, if you look at your income, and look at how quickly the buildings can spend resources, the spending should be within 1 production buildings worth of being equal. The same can be said for queen injects. Most other aspects are easily analyzed. This part is not usually, and this statistic helps a lot.

After playing around with the autoSQ toy i figured out how the measurement works in practice. Looking at my replays, my SQ was unusually high whenever i found my workers created count unusually low. This just means that I was able to spend my resources better because I never had any resources to begin with. If you're plat level (or anywhere below GM) and your SQ is high, it might mean that your worker production, is low to begin with. It becomes much more difficult managing your economy responsibly when you have 80 workers compared to 60. Or it could mean you don't really play macro games, and instead opt for a more timing-oriented play, in which case SQ is easier to manage. I really doubt macro is "not your problem" when you're in plat so just my 2 cents.
average650
Profile Joined November 2010
24 Posts
October 29 2011 01:42 GMT
#990
On October 29 2011 06:55 halpimcat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 02:51 average650 wrote:
On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:
On October 28 2011 21:07 average650 wrote:
Wow turns out macro is not my problem at all.... Usually just below 80, in low grandmaster/high masters territory...

And, none below 66 in diamond territory

I'm only in plat.

This will definitely help me focus more on different issues.



Macro is always your problem. Macro is more than just keeping your resources low. Anyone can keep it low by overproducing constructionbuildings and making 10 supply depots at the same time and queuing up 5 units in every building.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. SQ is a bullshit stat. Don't read too much into it. What you do with your resources is way more important.


You're right that those things could be the case, except I know they aren't. I never queue up units, except maybe and extra probe every once in a while. I don't build more than a couple pylons at a time, except when I lose a bunch of pylons to harrass or something. I will sometimes build an extra production facility, but so may my opponents. These things can be improved of course, but looking at all these things, my loses are not because I'm not spending my money on useful things.

On October 29 2011 02:11 Hulkoff wrote:What you do with your resources is way more important.


This is too vauge. the statistic is a measure of spending the resources you have. It doesn't take into account some macro things, like producing probes or queuing, but these can be analyzed easily. I have, and I don't queue. I produce probes very well, though not perfectly. This can be improved, but looking at this statistic, (combined with other knowledge I have of my own play) this is not my main problem. I struggle with things like focusing on a specific strategy; I need better planning going into matchups. This happens because I don't play enough. I also need to focus on awareness, mostly just by being active with the units I have. I don't have the best apm so I find this difficult, but when I can work it in, I feel much more comfortable. There are probably other things i have yet to identify, but the basics of typical macro are not the problem in my matchups.

This does not cover all parts of macro, but it does give a good metric to measure one part of macro. Other parts can be identified in different ways. Worker production can be watched easily. Queuing is easily seen. Over producing buildings is more difficult to quantify, but can be done with work. Really, if you look at your income, and look at how quickly the buildings can spend resources, the spending should be within 1 production buildings worth of being equal. The same can be said for queen injects. Most other aspects are easily analyzed. This part is not usually, and this statistic helps a lot.

After playing around with the autoSQ toy i figured out how the measurement works in practice. Looking at my replays, my SQ was unusually high whenever i found my workers created count unusually low. This just means that I was able to spend my resources better because I never had any resources to begin with. If you're plat level (or anywhere below GM) and your SQ is high, it might mean that your worker production, is low to begin with. It becomes much more difficult managing your economy responsibly when you have 80 workers compared to 60. Or it could mean you don't really play macro games, and instead opt for a more timing-oriented play, in which case SQ is easier to manage. I really doubt macro is "not your problem" when you're in plat so just my 2 cents.


This should account for that because it expects that when you have less income that you spend your money better. But even say you're right, I don't think I'm not making enough probes. I don't play super long macro games, because someone usually makes a fatal mistake before 5 bases are up. Most of my games I get 3 bases though. Sometimes shorter, sometimes I go longer, but usually 3. I feel confident that I tend to make enough probes. In fact, in a game against a diamond opponent the other day, he offered the advice that I had made too many probes, since in that particular game I didn't get a 3rd base up, I had too many probes for 2 bases. Now, he could be wrong, but this is a good indicator that I'm doing a decent job in that department.

You also underestimate how poor my army control can be, haha.
whatthefat
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States918 Posts
October 29 2011 01:49 GMT
#991
@average650

It's true that there are ways to 'game' SQ, e.g., by queuing units, or staying on a low income and building too many production facilities. Clearly though, these aren't going to help anyone win! In general, the measure does compensate for income, and it sounds like you are spending very well for your league, i.e., your macro is probably pretty good. Now, if you were to face a grandmaster player it would inevitably drop due to the increased harassment, but you are nonetheless macroing much better than the average platinum. Regarding worker production, you could check where you lie on the worker vs. game duration graph for different leagues.
SlayerS_BoxeR: "I always feel sorry towards Greg (Grack?) T_T"
average650
Profile Joined November 2010
24 Posts
October 29 2011 03:23 GMT
#992
On October 29 2011 10:49 whatthefat wrote:
@average650

It's true that there are ways to 'game' SQ, e.g., by queuing units, or staying on a low income and building too many production facilities. Clearly though, these aren't going to help anyone win! In general, the measure does compensate for income, and it sounds like you are spending very well for your league, i.e., your macro is probably pretty good. Now, if you were to face a grandmaster player it would inevitably drop due to the increased harassment, but you are nonetheless macroing much better than the average platinum. Regarding worker production, you could check where you lie on the worker vs. game duration graph for different leagues.


This I would agree with. My probe Production over the first 20 minutes (I chose this because it was easy to get a large sample over this timescale) Is about 67 with a standard error of ~3.5. The error is worse than it really should be because I simply took games that were about 20 minutes and treated them all as 20 minutes. Your plot of this data is rather course so it's hard to compare to my statistics to your data, but it seems as though diamond or masters fit this range, though there is little difference between the leagues at this time in the game.

Could you post your raw data so I could have a look at it?
Snickersnee
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States241 Posts
October 29 2011 05:57 GMT
#993
love the "EGIdrA" stat amazing job :D
Had an idea that combines the intimate moment of delivering babies with Crazy Taxi last night. Can emotional arcade style gaming work?
Isaac
Profile Joined August 2010
United States810 Posts
October 29 2011 07:14 GMT
#994
How can I make my SQ better on games that i am maxed? (strategically, dont tell me to build ravens and supply depots). I just got an 80 sq. (diamond league) and I was maxed killing his bases for a long time.
number one fan of marineking
halpimcat
Profile Joined September 2011
215 Posts
October 29 2011 08:46 GMT
#995
On October 29 2011 16:14 Isaac wrote:
How can I make my SQ better on games that i am maxed? (strategically, dont tell me to build ravens and supply depots). I just got an 80 sq. (diamond league) and I was maxed killing his bases for a long time.

I think people are putting too much emphasis on SQ. The number's not that important (or maybe that's just what I keep telling myself), what matters is that you are constantly making workers and constantly spending your money; SQ doesn't seem to measure your actual income rate, just the rate at which you spend it. Anywho, you should theoretically still be spending boatloads of money when you're maxed, and not on useless upgrades (medivac energy, HSM when not making ravens). You should constantly be losing units throughout your maxed period, and/or be making extra expansions and productions facilities so you can max instantly if you were ever to lose that army. Example: in a quiet macro tvp without any engagements, you should have a maxed out army by the 17-19 minute mark. After 3-5 more minutes, you should have some 10-12 barracks ready to pump out MMG after your major engagement.
Nemireck
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada1875 Posts
October 29 2011 08:51 GMT
#996
On October 29 2011 17:46 halpimcat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 16:14 Isaac wrote:
How can I make my SQ better on games that i am maxed? (strategically, dont tell me to build ravens and supply depots). I just got an 80 sq. (diamond league) and I was maxed killing his bases for a long time.

I think people are putting too much emphasis on SQ. The number's not that important (or maybe that's just what I keep telling myself), what matters is that you are constantly making workers and constantly spending your money; SQ doesn't seem to measure your actual income rate, just the rate at which you spend it. Anywho, you should theoretically still be spending boatloads of money when you're maxed, and not on useless upgrades (medivac energy, HSM when not making ravens). You should constantly be losing units throughout your maxed period, and/or be making extra expansions and productions facilities so you can max instantly if you were ever to lose that army. Example: in a quiet macro tvp without any engagements, you should have a maxed out army by the 17-19 minute mark. After 3-5 more minutes, you should have some 10-12 barracks ready to pump out MMG after your major engagement.


Correct.

SQ is merely a correlative statistic. People with higher skill TEND to also have a higher SQ. But it is possible to have a high SQ, and still lose a lot because all of the other skills required to play are found wanting. Things like spending on the proper units, controlling those units, making enough workers and saturating your bases properly, expanding to enough bases to make your workers worthwhile, defending your opponents aggression, scouting, responding properly to the scout, and etc. etc. etc. aren't factored into the SQ measurement at all.

SQ is ONLY a measurement of how low you keep your money based on your income.
Teamwork is awesome... As long as your team is doing all the work!
whatthefat
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States918 Posts
October 29 2011 17:14 GMT
#997
On October 29 2011 17:46 halpimcat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 29 2011 16:14 Isaac wrote:
How can I make my SQ better on games that i am maxed? (strategically, dont tell me to build ravens and supply depots). I just got an 80 sq. (diamond league) and I was maxed killing his bases for a long time.

I think people are putting too much emphasis on SQ. The number's not that important (or maybe that's just what I keep telling myself), what matters is that you are constantly making workers and constantly spending your money; SQ doesn't seem to measure your actual income rate, just the rate at which you spend it. Anywho, you should theoretically still be spending boatloads of money when you're maxed, and not on useless upgrades (medivac energy, HSM when not making ravens). You should constantly be losing units throughout your maxed period, and/or be making extra expansions and productions facilities so you can max instantly if you were ever to lose that army. Example: in a quiet macro tvp without any engagements, you should have a maxed out army by the 17-19 minute mark. After 3-5 more minutes, you should have some 10-12 barracks ready to pump out MMG after your major engagement.

It uses both - see the formula. It is measuring how well you are spending relative to all other players at the same level of income. It doesn't take any other factors into account, so it needs to be averaged across many games to be truly meaningful.
SlayerS_BoxeR: "I always feel sorry towards Greg (Grack?) T_T"
Primadog
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States4411 Posts
October 29 2011 20:50 GMT
#998
Congrats on the TL feature. Always nice to receive affirmation for all the hard work you put in.

Hope to see more statcraft from you in the future. Let's make e-sabermetrics happen.
Thank God and gunrun.
MaV_gGSC
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1345 Posts
October 29 2011 20:54 GMT
#999
O_O I don't macro like a pro
Life's good :D
romnomz
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States54 Posts
October 30 2011 03:34 GMT
#1000
while sq is a useful tool that can help you see how well you can spend your resources, it obviously doesnt account for most of what is required to win a game. I'm in bronze league and my average over my last 10 games is 65, which on his chart puts me at diamond, but im still at bronze. while my macro obviously needs works and will always need work, this is just proof that sq is merely a number that can vaguely place you on a scale of "averages" of leagues, races, and region. and by vague i mean that on his graphs, bronze players can, in some cases, score as well as grand masters. this is just a cool stat that can be used to just give yourself a vague placement or show good games from bad on spending, but is by no means the core of someones skill.
"Bravery is the capacity to perform properly even when scared half to death" -Omar Bradley
Prev 1 48 49 50 51 52 63 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 24m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
BRAT_OK 60
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 37378
Mini 931
actioN 781
Light 711
GuemChi 615
ggaemo 413
Stork 349
Barracks 162
firebathero 99
Dewaltoss 80
[ Show more ]
HiyA 50
sorry 43
soO 34
ToSsGirL 23
NaDa 21
Trap 14
NotJumperer 11
Dota 2
Gorgc6229
qojqva1922
Counter-Strike
x6flipin505
Other Games
summit1g2909
Liquid`RaSZi1306
B2W.Neo750
hiko728
mouzStarbuck285
XBOCT271
Liquid`VortiX217
Hui .194
byalli140
Rex93
Mew2King78
ArmadaUGS65
QueenE64
Trikslyr29
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream11262
StarCraft 2
WardiTV754
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 382
StarCraft 2
TaKeTV 0
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile143
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2625
League of Legends
• Nemesis2226
• Jankos1930
• TFBlade850
Other Games
• Shiphtur129
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
8h 24m
WardiTV Invitational
19h 24m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 11h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 18h
GSL
2 days
Yamato Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.