EPTJokes aside,this is amazing work man,took some real dedication.
Do you macro like a pro? - Page 16
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
Jokes aside,this is amazing work man,took some real dedication. | ||
|
JeffJohnson
Germany62 Posts
| ||
|
Acurus
Norway32 Posts
Edit: Calculated my SQ for the last 20 1v1s. : 59.75 Since I'm in gold league I'l take that as a compliment  | ||
|
Goggalor
United States310 Posts
On September 17 2011 02:41 TheLight wrote: Thank you for this!!Here's a Excel 2000 template: http://www.mediafire.com/?h1cd1f2kdj16p6f Just put in your numbers and it'll do the rest for you. | ||
|
Nyast
Belgium554 Posts
| ||
|
itkovian
United States1763 Posts
| ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On September 17 2011 03:42 sVnteen wrote: whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat? bronze players have 10k overmids with 500 income? i cant believe that tbh but GREAT WORK due i would be dead after working so much for 1 thread You haven't been in bronze then lol. Started out there and watching replays that definitely happened alot cause I would turtle, max out, then push. We'd both have over 10k minerals by the 25 minute mark unspent, although I would usually triple or even quadruple number of workers built (once I build 110 workers as zerg, and the other dude just built 20). | ||
|
Treble557
United States221 Posts
| ||
|
Ownos
United States2147 Posts
 On September 17 2011 03:49 mucker wrote: Fantastic work. Down with APM, long live SQ! APM will be obsolete by the end of the year. APM and SQ aren't quite the same though and measure different things and imply different things (with some overlap). | ||
|
Vague
170 Posts
| ||
|
Demonhunter04
1530 Posts
On September 17 2011 02:55 Proof. wrote: Yup, I don't think your first point was accounted for, but the second point was (probably a bit subtle). "Note that while this is a measure of the number of workers constructed by the end of a game (rather than an actual measure of workers at any stage of a game) it shows the expected profile for worker production across a game." Those players that made 160 workers are probably those who had to remake from losing a crapton of workers. I read that part, but he did not have a way of knowing the highest workers at any point, so I don't get where he got the "expected profile" from. | ||
|
GabrielB
Brazil594 Posts
On September 17 2011 03:49 perestain wrote: It would be nice if sc2gears was picking up on the SQ-quotient so everybody can conveniently track his development. Overall the most beautiful thing about it is that you dont even need to parse a replay to get the most practical information. Ingenuity beats data overkill. As some people have said, it seems hard to automate this from the replay file (the replay file doesn't seem to save that information). However, sc2ranks probably can get this done pretty easily, as it gathers its info from the match history. | ||
|
Deadlyfish
Denmark1980 Posts
On September 17 2011 03:50 AA.spoon wrote: I took a sample of 12 games, the last games I played in tournaments (in advanced rounds). I have 86.5 average. So idra's result is absolutely not impressing. Weirdly enough, the game with the lowest score 79.1, was a very short game in which I did a 4 gate + prism against a 1-1-1. I macroed very well in that game. It seems your formula isn't well adapted for short games. Yea i took my latest 7 games and i got a score of 89.522. And even got a game with 97.997 SQ score O.o (this was a 15min game). My macro isnt THAT good, i often have quite a few minerals stacked up after battles and such, but these numbers seem really high compared to the different leagues. I'm certainly nowhere near the macro of IdrA so i dont really understand... | ||
|
zergules
United States55 Posts
| ||
|
GabrielB
Brazil594 Posts
On September 17 2011 04:00 Deadlyfish wrote: Yea i took my latest 7 games and i got a score of 89.522. And even got a game with 97.997 SQ score O.o (this was a 15min game). My macro isnt THAT good, i often have quite a few minerals stacked up after battles and such, but these numbers seem really high compared to the different leagues. I'm certainly nowhere near the macro of IdrA so i dont really understand... It's statistics... You need a large sample to get anything of actual value out of it. | ||
|
MapleLeafSirup
Germany950 Posts
Just looked up a 12 minutes game from ret and his SQ was 122 ;o | ||
|
Thaniri
1264 Posts
| ||
|
Ownos
United States2147 Posts
On September 17 2011 04:00 Deadlyfish wrote: Yea i took my latest 7 games and i got a score of 89.522. And even got a game with 97.997 SQ score O.o (this was a 15min game). My macro isnt THAT good, i often have quite a few minerals stacked up after battles and such, but these numbers seem really high compared to the different leagues. I'm certainly nowhere near the macro of IdrA so i dont really understand... It means your spending is good for short games and that the beginning of the game is relatively easy. Could factor game length into it? You could dump each SQ figure into certain time frames to compare. I doubt you could pull 89 in a 25-30 minute game. I think anyone could pull high spending efficiency in a cheese game. (I guess that explains why a lot of low skill players do it hahahaha) Of course there could be anomalies like noob bronze players 1 basing the entire 30 minute length. | ||
|
xai_death
Netherlands65 Posts
On September 17 2011 04:04 Thaniri wrote: Hmm, since I do not have excell, what does "ln" represent for me? You can use this: http://beijers.eu/share/sq.html Or, if you really want to know: ln is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_logarithm | ||
|
ForayeR
Brazil34 Posts
| ||
| ||
