• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:46
CEST 20:46
KST 03:46
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 20259Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder2EWC 2025 - Replay Pack2Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced26BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Serral wins EWC 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Afreeca app available on Samsung smart TV Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
How many questions are in the Publix survey?
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 659 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 851

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 849 850 851 852 853 1266 Next
AxionSteel
Profile Joined January 2011
United States7754 Posts
December 20 2013 13:01 GMT
#17001
Carriers are the real tough one for mech imo.
Qwerty85
Profile Joined June 2012
Croatia5536 Posts
December 20 2013 13:04 GMT
#17002
On December 20 2013 21:47 AxionSteel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2013 21:33 TeeTS wrote:
On December 20 2013 21:12 Big J wrote:
On December 20 2013 20:39 seeme wrote:
On December 20 2013 16:49 Survivor61316 wrote:
On December 20 2013 11:37 GetHighAndWatchSC2 wrote:
On December 20 2013 10:02 TurboMaN wrote:
Terran is way too predictable in TvP. There is nothing else possible than MMM. Protoss on the other side can choose from like 4 Allin/early aggression builds and 2 Macro styles.

This can't be called balance when you force a race to play the same style over and over again.


Mech games are my favorite games to watch, but it seems like Terran players (at least in tourneys) go
Bio 90% of the time. I would definitely like to see balance changes that cause mech to be more commonly used.


It would have to be something that wouldnt affect TvZ, and hopefully not TvT (mech is already strong enough in that MU). I think something like a researchable upgrade on tanks that increased damage vs shields would be cool. Maybe like +30 or so, +/- 10.


While the idea of + shields would be cool, it would make it a staple in any PvT, especially if they field any Archons against your bio (assuming of course it is a good enough upgrade to make mech viable)

The introduction of some form of spell casting mech unit would raise the micro skill ceiling, while opening a very wide door for balance.

With spell casters you can do nearly anything that you feel would bring the matchup where you want.

IE
Static Interference - Units in the area take 10dmg every .5s
-This would help with the immortals that all but shut down mech as it would eat threw their shields in a timely manner

Sound Intereference - Units hit by the blast have activated abilities put on a 5s cd
-Think EMP but instead of dropping the energy of the units to 0, it puts there spells on cd. Vipers darting in to drop Blinding cloud? Hit them with the silence (if you can)


Other abilities could be added and the numbers could be played with. While I understand a unit will never get added, especially this late to the party, it would give the devs a tool to introduce whatever balance adjustments they feel they need while not worrying about skewing the game too hard.



Raven is a spellcaster and lategame it's quite viable to have ghosts with your Mech. Those two units are your actual late/endgame powerhouses already when you play Mech, so I really disagree that Mech needs another caster since it already uses two in the lategame. What it needs is combat units that are more well-rounded against Protoss units. The problem basically comes down to certain Protoss units being very well rounded against a lot of Mech units, while each of the Mech units is only good vs a few Protoss units.

E.g.
Immortal
Good: Hellbat, Hellion, Siege Tank, Thor
OK: Mines, Ravens
Bad: Banshee, Battlecruiser, Ghost
--> Good/OK against nearly all of Terrans Mech units.

Archon
Good: Hellbat, Hellion, Siege Tank, Raven, Banshee
OK: Mines, Battlecruisers
Bad: Thor, Ghost
--> Good/OK against nearly all of Terrans Mech units.

Siege Tank
Good: Stalker, Colossus, Sentry
OK: Phoenix, HT, Oracle
Bad: Zealot, Immortal, Archon, Voidray, Tempest, Carrier
--> Bad/OK against half of Protoss' options.

Thor
Good: HT, Archon, Oracle, Phoenix, Sentry
OK: Voidray, Tempest, Stalker, Colossus
Bad: Zealot, Immortal, Carrier
--> Bad/OK against half of Protoss' options.

Protoss can be much more "off" with their composition against Mech than Mech can be against Protoss. Protoss can cover most of Mechs options with supported Archons or Immortals (or Voidrays or Carriers) while a Mech-Terran has to adjust its composition perfectly to trade evenly for each option the Protoss has.
Mech needs stronger core units against Protoss, so that the Mech midgame armies cannot be completely wrecked when you built 2Thors instead of 4tanks, while the Protoss is not in trouble if he builds 4Archons instead of 4Immortals or vis-verca. It's not even that punishing to open Colossi or Stalkerheavy, for as long as you go into heavy Immortalproduction right afterwards.


Thors are OK vs Tempest? This sounds like a good joke haha! In fact there is no real counter to Tempest in the Terran arsenal, since vikings suck, if they have to attack into the enemy forces.


Raven/viking goes ok. (yes i am aware of feedback).


I must admit I never actually watched such game where terran goes mech and toss has tempests and templar. I would really love to see that. Any VODs available?

On paper, in theory it seems to me that toss should have an advantage because (as you said) of feedback + huge tempest range but as I said, I never actually saw it in actual game.
AxionSteel
Profile Joined January 2011
United States7754 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-20 13:10:15
December 20 2013 13:09 GMT
#17003
On December 20 2013 22:04 Qwerty85 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2013 21:47 AxionSteel wrote:
On December 20 2013 21:33 TeeTS wrote:
On December 20 2013 21:12 Big J wrote:
On December 20 2013 20:39 seeme wrote:
On December 20 2013 16:49 Survivor61316 wrote:
On December 20 2013 11:37 GetHighAndWatchSC2 wrote:
On December 20 2013 10:02 TurboMaN wrote:
Terran is way too predictable in TvP. There is nothing else possible than MMM. Protoss on the other side can choose from like 4 Allin/early aggression builds and 2 Macro styles.

This can't be called balance when you force a race to play the same style over and over again.


Mech games are my favorite games to watch, but it seems like Terran players (at least in tourneys) go
Bio 90% of the time. I would definitely like to see balance changes that cause mech to be more commonly used.


It would have to be something that wouldnt affect TvZ, and hopefully not TvT (mech is already strong enough in that MU). I think something like a researchable upgrade on tanks that increased damage vs shields would be cool. Maybe like +30 or so, +/- 10.


While the idea of + shields would be cool, it would make it a staple in any PvT, especially if they field any Archons against your bio (assuming of course it is a good enough upgrade to make mech viable)

The introduction of some form of spell casting mech unit would raise the micro skill ceiling, while opening a very wide door for balance.

With spell casters you can do nearly anything that you feel would bring the matchup where you want.

IE
Static Interference - Units in the area take 10dmg every .5s
-This would help with the immortals that all but shut down mech as it would eat threw their shields in a timely manner

Sound Intereference - Units hit by the blast have activated abilities put on a 5s cd
-Think EMP but instead of dropping the energy of the units to 0, it puts there spells on cd. Vipers darting in to drop Blinding cloud? Hit them with the silence (if you can)


Other abilities could be added and the numbers could be played with. While I understand a unit will never get added, especially this late to the party, it would give the devs a tool to introduce whatever balance adjustments they feel they need while not worrying about skewing the game too hard.



Raven is a spellcaster and lategame it's quite viable to have ghosts with your Mech. Those two units are your actual late/endgame powerhouses already when you play Mech, so I really disagree that Mech needs another caster since it already uses two in the lategame. What it needs is combat units that are more well-rounded against Protoss units. The problem basically comes down to certain Protoss units being very well rounded against a lot of Mech units, while each of the Mech units is only good vs a few Protoss units.

E.g.
Immortal
Good: Hellbat, Hellion, Siege Tank, Thor
OK: Mines, Ravens
Bad: Banshee, Battlecruiser, Ghost
--> Good/OK against nearly all of Terrans Mech units.

Archon
Good: Hellbat, Hellion, Siege Tank, Raven, Banshee
OK: Mines, Battlecruisers
Bad: Thor, Ghost
--> Good/OK against nearly all of Terrans Mech units.

Siege Tank
Good: Stalker, Colossus, Sentry
OK: Phoenix, HT, Oracle
Bad: Zealot, Immortal, Archon, Voidray, Tempest, Carrier
--> Bad/OK against half of Protoss' options.

Thor
Good: HT, Archon, Oracle, Phoenix, Sentry
OK: Voidray, Tempest, Stalker, Colossus
Bad: Zealot, Immortal, Carrier
--> Bad/OK against half of Protoss' options.

Protoss can be much more "off" with their composition against Mech than Mech can be against Protoss. Protoss can cover most of Mechs options with supported Archons or Immortals (or Voidrays or Carriers) while a Mech-Terran has to adjust its composition perfectly to trade evenly for each option the Protoss has.
Mech needs stronger core units against Protoss, so that the Mech midgame armies cannot be completely wrecked when you built 2Thors instead of 4tanks, while the Protoss is not in trouble if he builds 4Archons instead of 4Immortals or vis-verca. It's not even that punishing to open Colossi or Stalkerheavy, for as long as you go into heavy Immortalproduction right afterwards.


Thors are OK vs Tempest? This sounds like a good joke haha! In fact there is no real counter to Tempest in the Terran arsenal, since vikings suck, if they have to attack into the enemy forces.


Raven/viking goes ok. (yes i am aware of feedback).


I must admit I never actually watched such game where terran goes mech and toss has tempests and templar. I would really love to see that. Any VODs available?

On paper, in theory it seems to me that toss should have an advantage because (as you said) of feedback + huge tempest range but as I said, I never actually saw it in actual game.

You'd have to look up stream vods of people like avilo, Strelok etc. HeroMarine was messing around with mech last night as well. avilo makes BF Hellions to dart in and try and pick off some templars. It's not as bad as it seems, I don't think tempests are TOO unstoppable vs mech, although i've yet to see a protoss who gets tempests lose vs a bio player in a long game. From my personal experience and from what i've watched, carriers seem far stronger. I could be wrong though.
Qwerty85
Profile Joined June 2012
Croatia5536 Posts
December 20 2013 13:10 GMT
#17004
On December 20 2013 22:09 AxionSteel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2013 22:04 Qwerty85 wrote:
On December 20 2013 21:47 AxionSteel wrote:
On December 20 2013 21:33 TeeTS wrote:
On December 20 2013 21:12 Big J wrote:
On December 20 2013 20:39 seeme wrote:
On December 20 2013 16:49 Survivor61316 wrote:
On December 20 2013 11:37 GetHighAndWatchSC2 wrote:
On December 20 2013 10:02 TurboMaN wrote:
Terran is way too predictable in TvP. There is nothing else possible than MMM. Protoss on the other side can choose from like 4 Allin/early aggression builds and 2 Macro styles.

This can't be called balance when you force a race to play the same style over and over again.


Mech games are my favorite games to watch, but it seems like Terran players (at least in tourneys) go
Bio 90% of the time. I would definitely like to see balance changes that cause mech to be more commonly used.


It would have to be something that wouldnt affect TvZ, and hopefully not TvT (mech is already strong enough in that MU). I think something like a researchable upgrade on tanks that increased damage vs shields would be cool. Maybe like +30 or so, +/- 10.


While the idea of + shields would be cool, it would make it a staple in any PvT, especially if they field any Archons against your bio (assuming of course it is a good enough upgrade to make mech viable)

The introduction of some form of spell casting mech unit would raise the micro skill ceiling, while opening a very wide door for balance.

With spell casters you can do nearly anything that you feel would bring the matchup where you want.

IE
Static Interference - Units in the area take 10dmg every .5s
-This would help with the immortals that all but shut down mech as it would eat threw their shields in a timely manner

Sound Intereference - Units hit by the blast have activated abilities put on a 5s cd
-Think EMP but instead of dropping the energy of the units to 0, it puts there spells on cd. Vipers darting in to drop Blinding cloud? Hit them with the silence (if you can)


Other abilities could be added and the numbers could be played with. While I understand a unit will never get added, especially this late to the party, it would give the devs a tool to introduce whatever balance adjustments they feel they need while not worrying about skewing the game too hard.



Raven is a spellcaster and lategame it's quite viable to have ghosts with your Mech. Those two units are your actual late/endgame powerhouses already when you play Mech, so I really disagree that Mech needs another caster since it already uses two in the lategame. What it needs is combat units that are more well-rounded against Protoss units. The problem basically comes down to certain Protoss units being very well rounded against a lot of Mech units, while each of the Mech units is only good vs a few Protoss units.

E.g.
Immortal
Good: Hellbat, Hellion, Siege Tank, Thor
OK: Mines, Ravens
Bad: Banshee, Battlecruiser, Ghost
--> Good/OK against nearly all of Terrans Mech units.

Archon
Good: Hellbat, Hellion, Siege Tank, Raven, Banshee
OK: Mines, Battlecruisers
Bad: Thor, Ghost
--> Good/OK against nearly all of Terrans Mech units.

Siege Tank
Good: Stalker, Colossus, Sentry
OK: Phoenix, HT, Oracle
Bad: Zealot, Immortal, Archon, Voidray, Tempest, Carrier
--> Bad/OK against half of Protoss' options.

Thor
Good: HT, Archon, Oracle, Phoenix, Sentry
OK: Voidray, Tempest, Stalker, Colossus
Bad: Zealot, Immortal, Carrier
--> Bad/OK against half of Protoss' options.

Protoss can be much more "off" with their composition against Mech than Mech can be against Protoss. Protoss can cover most of Mechs options with supported Archons or Immortals (or Voidrays or Carriers) while a Mech-Terran has to adjust its composition perfectly to trade evenly for each option the Protoss has.
Mech needs stronger core units against Protoss, so that the Mech midgame armies cannot be completely wrecked when you built 2Thors instead of 4tanks, while the Protoss is not in trouble if he builds 4Archons instead of 4Immortals or vis-verca. It's not even that punishing to open Colossi or Stalkerheavy, for as long as you go into heavy Immortalproduction right afterwards.


Thors are OK vs Tempest? This sounds like a good joke haha! In fact there is no real counter to Tempest in the Terran arsenal, since vikings suck, if they have to attack into the enemy forces.


Raven/viking goes ok. (yes i am aware of feedback).


I must admit I never actually watched such game where terran goes mech and toss has tempests and templar. I would really love to see that. Any VODs available?

On paper, in theory it seems to me that toss should have an advantage because (as you said) of feedback + huge tempest range but as I said, I never actually saw it in actual game.

You'd have to look up stream vods of people like avilo, Strelok etc. HeroMarine was messing around with mech last night as well. avilo makes BF Hellions to dart in and try and pick off some templars. It's not as bad as it seems, I don't think tempests are TOO bad vs mech, from my personal experience and from what i've watched, carriers seem far stronger. I could be wrong though.


Avilo kind of annoys me but I will check it out, thanks
shockaslim
Profile Joined December 2010
United States1104 Posts
December 20 2013 13:10 GMT
#17005
On December 20 2013 10:41 Wingblade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2013 10:02 TurboMaN wrote:
Terran is way too predictable in TvP. There is nothing else possible than MMM. Protoss on the other side can choose from like 4 Allin/early aggression builds and 2 Macro styles.

This can't be called balance when you force a race to play the same style over and over again.


It seemed ok in Wings when Protoss was essentially forced into the same thing.


There are some differences though. Back in WoL Terran could at least control the flow of the early-midgame, they no longer can afford that luxury and it has been totally reversed. On top of that, Protoss STILL controls the flow of the game going into the late game.

Protoss also has a plethora of openers while Terran really just has one.
Dirty Deeds...DONE DIRT CHEAP!!!
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
December 20 2013 13:56 GMT
#17006
On December 20 2013 22:09 AxionSteel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2013 22:04 Qwerty85 wrote:
On December 20 2013 21:47 AxionSteel wrote:
On December 20 2013 21:33 TeeTS wrote:
On December 20 2013 21:12 Big J wrote:
On December 20 2013 20:39 seeme wrote:
On December 20 2013 16:49 Survivor61316 wrote:
On December 20 2013 11:37 GetHighAndWatchSC2 wrote:
On December 20 2013 10:02 TurboMaN wrote:
Terran is way too predictable in TvP. There is nothing else possible than MMM. Protoss on the other side can choose from like 4 Allin/early aggression builds and 2 Macro styles.

This can't be called balance when you force a race to play the same style over and over again.


Mech games are my favorite games to watch, but it seems like Terran players (at least in tourneys) go
Bio 90% of the time. I would definitely like to see balance changes that cause mech to be more commonly used.


It would have to be something that wouldnt affect TvZ, and hopefully not TvT (mech is already strong enough in that MU). I think something like a researchable upgrade on tanks that increased damage vs shields would be cool. Maybe like +30 or so, +/- 10.


While the idea of + shields would be cool, it would make it a staple in any PvT, especially if they field any Archons against your bio (assuming of course it is a good enough upgrade to make mech viable)

The introduction of some form of spell casting mech unit would raise the micro skill ceiling, while opening a very wide door for balance.

With spell casters you can do nearly anything that you feel would bring the matchup where you want.

IE
Static Interference - Units in the area take 10dmg every .5s
-This would help with the immortals that all but shut down mech as it would eat threw their shields in a timely manner

Sound Intereference - Units hit by the blast have activated abilities put on a 5s cd
-Think EMP but instead of dropping the energy of the units to 0, it puts there spells on cd. Vipers darting in to drop Blinding cloud? Hit them with the silence (if you can)


Other abilities could be added and the numbers could be played with. While I understand a unit will never get added, especially this late to the party, it would give the devs a tool to introduce whatever balance adjustments they feel they need while not worrying about skewing the game too hard.



Raven is a spellcaster and lategame it's quite viable to have ghosts with your Mech. Those two units are your actual late/endgame powerhouses already when you play Mech, so I really disagree that Mech needs another caster since it already uses two in the lategame. What it needs is combat units that are more well-rounded against Protoss units. The problem basically comes down to certain Protoss units being very well rounded against a lot of Mech units, while each of the Mech units is only good vs a few Protoss units.

E.g.
Immortal
Good: Hellbat, Hellion, Siege Tank, Thor
OK: Mines, Ravens
Bad: Banshee, Battlecruiser, Ghost
--> Good/OK against nearly all of Terrans Mech units.

Archon
Good: Hellbat, Hellion, Siege Tank, Raven, Banshee
OK: Mines, Battlecruisers
Bad: Thor, Ghost
--> Good/OK against nearly all of Terrans Mech units.

Siege Tank
Good: Stalker, Colossus, Sentry
OK: Phoenix, HT, Oracle
Bad: Zealot, Immortal, Archon, Voidray, Tempest, Carrier
--> Bad/OK against half of Protoss' options.

Thor
Good: HT, Archon, Oracle, Phoenix, Sentry
OK: Voidray, Tempest, Stalker, Colossus
Bad: Zealot, Immortal, Carrier
--> Bad/OK against half of Protoss' options.

Protoss can be much more "off" with their composition against Mech than Mech can be against Protoss. Protoss can cover most of Mechs options with supported Archons or Immortals (or Voidrays or Carriers) while a Mech-Terran has to adjust its composition perfectly to trade evenly for each option the Protoss has.
Mech needs stronger core units against Protoss, so that the Mech midgame armies cannot be completely wrecked when you built 2Thors instead of 4tanks, while the Protoss is not in trouble if he builds 4Archons instead of 4Immortals or vis-verca. It's not even that punishing to open Colossi or Stalkerheavy, for as long as you go into heavy Immortalproduction right afterwards.


Thors are OK vs Tempest? This sounds like a good joke haha! In fact there is no real counter to Tempest in the Terran arsenal, since vikings suck, if they have to attack into the enemy forces.


Raven/viking goes ok. (yes i am aware of feedback).


I must admit I never actually watched such game where terran goes mech and toss has tempests and templar. I would really love to see that. Any VODs available?

On paper, in theory it seems to me that toss should have an advantage because (as you said) of feedback + huge tempest range but as I said, I never actually saw it in actual game.

You'd have to look up stream vods of people like avilo, Strelok etc. HeroMarine was messing around with mech last night as well. avilo makes BF Hellions to dart in and try and pick off some templars. It's not as bad as it seems, I don't think tempests are TOO unstoppable vs mech, although i've yet to see a protoss who gets tempests lose vs a bio player in a long game. From my personal experience and from what i've watched, carriers seem far stronger. I could be wrong though.

Carriers are way harder to deal with, I agree. Vikings are very effective against tempests if you can force an engagement and PDD is obviously very good too. Carriers on the other hand kill vikings really quickly and ravens don't do much against them.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
December 20 2013 15:20 GMT
#17007
On December 20 2013 10:41 Wingblade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2013 10:02 TurboMaN wrote:
Terran is way too predictable in TvP. There is nothing else possible than MMM. Protoss on the other side can choose from like 4 Allin/early aggression builds and 2 Macro styles.

This can't be called balance when you force a race to play the same style over and over again.


It seemed ok in Wings when Protoss was essentially forced into the same thing.

What a grotesque rewriting of WoL TvP...

1. Protoss had options, even after expand, but perhaps you conveniently forgot quick thirds, Immortal busts, DTs, 4g, 5g, 6-7g, 8g after quick third, Storm all-ins, Colossi all-ins?... I spare you the full list of 1-base all-ins so you don't feel too ashamed from writing something so blatantly wrong.
2. Protoss had a universal safe opening, 1 gate expand into 3gR, that could reactively deal with anything, from 1-base all-ins to 1 rax CC CC. Compare with HotS Terran universal builds which require tons of adjustments based on unobtainable knowledge (e. g. scouted 2-bases Blink? still zero way to know if Protoss is going to warp 6 Stalkers or build 2 Forges + chrono Charge and laugh at your forced overreaction) since Protoss goes from full agression to full macro at will because of the outrageous flexibility provided by Warpgate/chrono/MSC. The problem is not only that Terran is pidgeonholed into a few predictable builds, it is that those builds still fall short in some situations because Protoss can play in ways they should never have access to (attacks that have the strength of an all-in without being all-in at all, smooth and low risk / high reward agression → macro transitions because of a dumb Swiss Army knife unit).
TurboMaN
Profile Joined October 2005
Germany925 Posts
December 20 2013 16:13 GMT
#17008
Korean GM Top 50, just 8 Terrans lol
And Korea is supposed to be the country where the best Terran players come from.

[image loading]
riceant
Profile Joined October 2012
Canada54 Posts
December 20 2013 16:14 GMT
#17009
Hi Protoss players,

We terrans are obviously bad, we just need to learn to handle everything better and improve, SINCE BALANCE DOES NOT MATTER BELOW MID MASTER LEVEL ANYWAY!!! We just need to improve! Balance problems don't exist below that level, because, well, everyone can improve sooo much...

So here's a proposition: Since balance doesn't matter, let's test out 50/25 marauders and 50/50 medivacs, and 4 supply thors!
Also, stim and warp gate cost the same, and chrono costs 50 minerals to use. Lets give photon overcharge a buff! (costs ONLY 50 energy, and does 5 damage per shot, what a wonderful buff!) Also, ghosts should have a new ability called "prevent ability" with radius 10 that reduces the duration of spells that are casted in that radius by 80% just like time warp prevents movement.

I mean, balance doesn't matter, because you can obviously get better, right? Cuz below mid-masters, JUST GET BETTER!!!
I mean, obviously YOU wouldn't complain because you are such good citizens of starcraft giving awesome advice to other players, so you would obviously take your own advice.

Let's try out those changes for a few months ok? I mean, I even buffed photon overcharge for you! Relax, you just have to adapt, eventually the winrates will even out.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -Albert Einstein
fdsdfg
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States1251 Posts
December 20 2013 16:19 GMT
#17010
On December 21 2013 01:14 riceant wrote:
Hi Protoss players,

We terrans are obviously bad, we just need to learn to handle everything better and improve, SINCE BALANCE DOES NOT MATTER BELOW MID MASTER LEVEL ANYWAY!!! We just need to improve! Balance problems don't exist below that level, because, well, everyone can improve sooo much...

So here's a proposition: Since balance doesn't matter, let's test out 50/25 marauders and 50/50 medivacs, and 4 supply thors!
Also, stim and warp gate cost the same, and chrono costs 50 minerals to use. Lets give photon overcharge a buff! (costs ONLY 50 energy, and does 5 damage per shot, what a wonderful buff!) Also, ghosts should have a new ability called "prevent ability" with radius 10 that reduces the duration of spells that are casted in that radius by 80% just like time warp prevents movement.

I mean, balance doesn't matter, because you can obviously get better, right? Cuz below mid-masters, JUST GET BETTER!!!
I mean, obviously YOU wouldn't complain because you are such good citizens of starcraft giving awesome advice to other players, so you would obviously take your own advice.

Let's try out those changes for a few months ok? I mean, I even buffed photon overcharge for you! Relax, you just have to adapt, eventually the winrates will even out.


Nice, you completely dismantled the opinion that nobody has.
aka Siyko
Wingblade
Profile Joined April 2012
United States1806 Posts
December 20 2013 16:33 GMT
#17011
On December 21 2013 00:20 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 20 2013 10:41 Wingblade wrote:
On December 20 2013 10:02 TurboMaN wrote:
Terran is way too predictable in TvP. There is nothing else possible than MMM. Protoss on the other side can choose from like 4 Allin/early aggression builds and 2 Macro styles.

This can't be called balance when you force a race to play the same style over and over again.


It seemed ok in Wings when Protoss was essentially forced into the same thing.

What a grotesque rewriting of WoL TvP...

1. Protoss had options, even after expand, but perhaps you conveniently forgot quick thirds, Immortal busts, DTs, 4g, 5g, 6-7g, 8g after quick third, Storm all-ins, Colossi all-ins?... I spare you the full list of 1-base all-ins so you don't feel too ashamed from writing something so blatantly wrong.
2. Protoss had a universal safe opening, 1 gate expand into 3gR, that could reactively deal with anything, from 1-base all-ins to 1 rax CC CC. Compare with HotS Terran universal builds which require tons of adjustments based on unobtainable knowledge (e. g. scouted 2-bases Blink? still zero way to know if Protoss is going to warp 6 Stalkers or build 2 Forges + chrono Charge and laugh at your forced overreaction) since Protoss goes from full agression to full macro at will because of the outrageous flexibility provided by Warpgate/chrono/MSC. The problem is not only that Terran is pidgeonholed into a few predictable builds, it is that those builds still fall short in some situations because Protoss can play in ways they should never have access to (attacks that have the strength of an all-in without being all-in at all, smooth and low risk / high reward agression → macro transitions because of a dumb Swiss Army knife unit).


I love it when Terrans list every build that beat them on ladder or builds that one pro used one or twice, or a build that had been dead for months(seriously, 4gate?). 1 base all-ins? Sure maybe there were some in 2011 but come on at least pretend to give an effort. You listed 4 different builds that are essentially the same but with more gateways which changes the level of aggression, but it's still an early gateway bust. Colossi all-ins were popular for about 2 weeks when HerO beat Taeja in DH Winter finals 2012 and Squirtle did it a little bit longer. The 8gate 3 nexus build was something I saw PartinG do like twice, it wasn't exactly viable for any long period of time. By this logic every build mixed into a long series or usable on ladder in Diamond league is viable. 1-1-1, proxy 2rax, banshees, hellion openings. Apparently anything done in any pro game ever is considered viable in your book.

1 gate expand into 2-3 gates could react to anything if you could actually scout it, which in Wings if a Terran put any effort into denying scouting meant that you essentially couldn't. An observer getting to the Terran base around 6:30 or 7 with standard robo timing was really helpful when the medivac was already unloading the 4 hellions in your base, or the tank-raven 1-1-1 push was already moving out, or the banshee was just outside your natural.

Does Terran need more flexibility? Yes it's pretty obvious. But pretending like there is some mega super imbalance that is killing the game is just whiny hyperbole
PartinG fanboy to the max, Rain/Squirtle/Dear/Scarlett/Bbyong are cool too. I don't always watch Dota2 but when I do I have no clue what's going on. GOGO POWER RANGERS
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3188 Posts
December 20 2013 19:40 GMT
#17012
On December 21 2013 01:33 Wingblade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 21 2013 00:20 TheDwf wrote:
On December 20 2013 10:41 Wingblade wrote:
On December 20 2013 10:02 TurboMaN wrote:
Terran is way too predictable in TvP. There is nothing else possible than MMM. Protoss on the other side can choose from like 4 Allin/early aggression builds and 2 Macro styles.

This can't be called balance when you force a race to play the same style over and over again.


It seemed ok in Wings when Protoss was essentially forced into the same thing.

What a grotesque rewriting of WoL TvP...

1. Protoss had options, even after expand, but perhaps you conveniently forgot quick thirds, Immortal busts, DTs, 4g, 5g, 6-7g, 8g after quick third, Storm all-ins, Colossi all-ins?... I spare you the full list of 1-base all-ins so you don't feel too ashamed from writing something so blatantly wrong.
2. Protoss had a universal safe opening, 1 gate expand into 3gR, that could reactively deal with anything, from 1-base all-ins to 1 rax CC CC. Compare with HotS Terran universal builds which require tons of adjustments based on unobtainable knowledge (e. g. scouted 2-bases Blink? still zero way to know if Protoss is going to warp 6 Stalkers or build 2 Forges + chrono Charge and laugh at your forced overreaction) since Protoss goes from full agression to full macro at will because of the outrageous flexibility provided by Warpgate/chrono/MSC. The problem is not only that Terran is pidgeonholed into a few predictable builds, it is that those builds still fall short in some situations because Protoss can play in ways they should never have access to (attacks that have the strength of an all-in without being all-in at all, smooth and low risk / high reward agression → macro transitions because of a dumb Swiss Army knife unit).


I love it when Terrans list every build that beat them on ladder or builds that one pro used one or twice, or a build that had been dead for months(seriously, 4gate?). 1 base all-ins? Sure maybe there were some in 2011 but come on at least pretend to give an effort. You listed 4 different builds that are essentially the same but with more gateways which changes the level of aggression, but it's still an early gateway bust. Colossi all-ins were popular for about 2 weeks when HerO beat Taeja in DH Winter finals 2012 and Squirtle did it a little bit longer. The 8gate 3 nexus build was something I saw PartinG do like twice, it wasn't exactly viable for any long period of time. By this logic every build mixed into a long series or usable on ladder in Diamond league is viable. 1-1-1, proxy 2rax, banshees, hellion openings. Apparently anything done in any pro game ever is considered viable in your book.

1 gate expand into 2-3 gates could react to anything if you could actually scout it, which in Wings if a Terran put any effort into denying scouting meant that you essentially couldn't. An observer getting to the Terran base around 6:30 or 7 with standard robo timing was really helpful when the medivac was already unloading the 4 hellions in your base, or the tank-raven 1-1-1 push was already moving out, or the banshee was just outside your natural.

Does Terran need more flexibility? Yes it's pretty obvious. But pretending like there is some mega super imbalance that is killing the game is just whiny hyperbole

He didn't say there was a mega super imbalance, he said Protoss had more builds in WoL than Terran has now. And you're confusing "this build was popular" with "this build was possible." Sure, people didn't 4gate a lot in PvT (although it was never actually dead, there were always people hiding a pylon somewhere in the Terran base and 4gating from it, not to mention warp prisming in a 4gate), but you COULD and you'd win games with it. That means Terrans had to account for the possibility, even if it didn't happen very often. Same goes for colossus all-ins, gateway busts, dark templar, and everything else scary the Protoss could hide.

By contrast, Protoss does not need to account for 2rax or banshees because they already have everything they need to defend it in most cases. If Terran goes 2rax in HotS, Protoss will go "huh, that's weird," defend with overcharge, and collect the win. By comparison if a WoL Protoss went immortal bust and you didn't account for it, you died.

And I didn't play Protoss in WoL, but my understanding is you just needed to verify the Terran was on 1-base to defend with 1gate expo. Whether it's hellion drop or 2rax or 1-1-1, you just needed to know you he hadn't expanded and you knew everything you needed to defend. That is not true of current TvP.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
TurboMaN
Profile Joined October 2005
Germany925 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-20 19:59:58
December 20 2013 19:58 GMT
#17013
I have the perfect idea for SC2:

Raise the skill level again (like in Broodwar):
- No Auto-Mine
- Only 12 Units per control group
- Only 1 Building can be selected at a time
- No command queues for buildings
- Remove auto surround, so unmicroed units in the back can't fire

THIS would make the game harder and allins would be more difficult.

For me Broodwar is still the better game, because it's more fair to the better player. How often do you see Pros lose vs amateurs in BW? Yes 1 out of 100.
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
December 20 2013 20:06 GMT
#17014
On December 21 2013 01:33 Wingblade wrote:
I love it when Terrans list every build that beat them on ladder or builds that one pro used one or twice, or a build that had been dead for months(seriously, 4gate?). 1 base all-ins? Sure maybe there were some in 2011 but come on at least pretend to give an effort. You listed 4 different builds that are essentially the same but with more gateways which changes the level of aggression, but it's still an early gateway bust.

I love it when low level Protoss who don't even know their own race still come and adamant that all is fine, calling upon 2011 WoL and dubious revising of the match-up to refute/minimize the current issues.

1-base all-ins were dead in 2012 in PvT? Really? Never saw a Blink Stalker all-in in WoL? Never saw a proxy Immortal bust? Never saw a Void Ray + 3-4g all-in warping Zealots in the high ground? Never saw a 4g Prism? Did you even play the game at that time?

I listed "4 different builds that are essentially the same but with more gateways which changes the level of aggression, but it's still an early gateway bust". Oh, OK. So the builds are different, the level of agression, from mild pressure to severe all-in, is different, the timings are different, but since they operate with the same 3 units, "they're essentially the same". Yeah, right. Also, since you failed to understand it, I was talking about 4g pressure after expand, not the 1-base variant (which still existed, yes).

Colossi all-ins were popular for about 2 weeks when HerO beat Taeja in DH Winter finals 2012 and Squirtle did it a little bit longer. The 8gate 3 nexus build was something I saw PartinG do like twice, it wasn't exactly viable for any long period of time.

I don't care about the popularity or even the "full viability" of all those openings. Things like gasless 3 rax expand, various forms of 2 rax, Cloak Banshee after expands, etc., were rare too from the Terran side but they still existed; the possibility was there, so the other side had to account for it. Just because 1 rax FE was the most played build doesn't mean those "peripheral builds" had no existence or role in the grand scheme of things.

By this logic every build mixed into a long series or usable on ladder in Diamond league is viable. 1-1-1, proxy 2rax, banshees, hellion openings. Apparently anything done in any pro game ever is considered viable in your book.

No. I wouldn't list stuff like proxy gate in WoL, for instance, because walls were standard and would automatically thwart it; but I would in HotS, since walls are much rarer as you auto-lose them to stalks/MSC pokes + there are stronger transitions + CC first is more common. The viability of something has to do with the threats it carries vs builds/things commonly used, but I spare you this as you need to understand at least the very basics of the match-up to get that.

1 gate expand into 2-3 gates could react to anything if you could actually scout it, which in Wings if a Terran put any effort into denying scouting meant that you essentially couldn't. An observer getting to the Terran base around 6:30 or 7 with standard robo timing was really helpful when the medivac was already unloading the 4 hellions in your base, or the tank-raven 1-1-1 push was already moving out, or the banshee was just outside your natural.

Hilarious. The Observer isn't even out at 6'30 with the earlier HotS robo timing and you think the WoL robo timing could have it in Terran's base at this time? Can't you at least know your stuff so you can try to defend your race properly? An Observer could not hit Terran's base before 7:30 – 7:45 in the best case when going 1 gate expand into gate gate robo. Guess why Protoss used the following timings at first?

7:40 Double assimilator at your natural
7:50 Double forge

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=292549

So that you could cancel them if you suddenly found Terran was going 1-1-1 all-in when your Observer reached his base. How come I have to teach you this?

The Banshee was "just outside your natural" when your first Observer arrived in Terran's base? Such a tragic situation indeed; if only you could build a second Observer after the first one so that it would be there in time for the said Banshee…

FAQs
Why such a fast robo?
This is the fastest robo in any 1 gate expand into 3 gate robo build I’ve ever seen. The reason for the fast robo is safety. Timing-wise, your 2nd observer will be popping out at around the same time as the first cloaked banshee comes to your base. However, more importantly, the faster your first observer gets to your opponent’s base, the faster you can know if he’s 1 basing you or has expanded. This scouting information is invaluable, as it tells you whether you should cut probes to optimally defend an allin or chorno probes to gain economy versus a expansion build.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=294136#1
(And please notice this was written before the Observer build time buff.)

May I use some of my notes from the end of WoL to further bury your statement ("Protoss was essentially forced into the same thing")? Here is a list of some PvTs with a brief description of some of the non-standard Protoss openings used:

+ Show Spoiler +

IEM Katowice
LucifroN vs PartinG, Daybreak : Hellions/Banshees triple OC → bio vs quick third.
LucifroN vs PartinG, Metropolis : gas first Hellion drop vs 3g.
Dream vs PartinG, Metropolis : 6g.
YoDa vs Socke, Daybreak : 6g.
YoDa vs Socke, Entombed Valley : 2 rax (lab + naked) vs 2gR expand.

Code S Season 1 2013
YoDa vs Squirtle, Icarus: proxy Immo bust.
ByuN vs PartinG, Icarus: proxy Immortal bust. [Wingblade: "1 base all-ins? Sure maybe there were some in 2011 (...)"]
ByuN vs PartinG, Neo Planet S: gas first Reactor Hellion vs 3g exe.
GuMiho vs MC, Akilon Flats: 1 rax FE → 4 rax vs 1g exe → 3g pressure.
GuMiho vs MC, Daybreak: Hellions/Banshees 10/2 Cloak → bio vs 1g exe → 3g → 3gR → 2-bases 6gR all-in (one Immortal).

IPTL
KrasS vs Seed, Daybreak: quick third → 5g forge Twilight (Blink → Charge) → 8g double forge + Archives → 10g.
LucifroN vs Seed, Whirlwind: FFE → 7g +1 armor → reactive wall + Robo upon scouting Hellions vs 1 rax CC → Hellions/Banshees → bio.
MMA vs Tassadar, Atlantis Spaceship: proxy marau → 2 rax expand vs Zealot/Stalker/Stalker/Stalker → in base Stargate → 3gS Voids all-in.
GuMiho vs Sage, Atlantis Spaceship: DT expand.
jjakji vs HerO, Entombed Valley: gasless 3 rax vs gate nex.
YoDa vs JYP, Daybreak: Cloak Banshee vs proxy Immortal bust.
Keen vs Panic, Ohana: 1 rax FE with EB block, Panic has only one Stalker and reactively decides to 4g.

Proleague
Bogus vs Argo, Caldeum: CC first vs 1g exe → proxy Immortal bust.
Baby/TY vs sOs, Akilon: 1-1-1 Marines/Hellions/Medivac with proxy Factory + Starport, sOs holds and kills him with Stalker counter-pressure.
PuMa vs Argo, Entombed Valley: Cloak Banshee → 3-1-1 all-in vs Nexus first → 4gR. [PuMa won. Vade retro Satanas! The last working instance of 1-1-1 I remember in WoL (and from memory, a complete throw from the Protoss.)]
Cure vs JYP, NeoBifrost: 3g pressure into expand vs rax fact exe.
Reality vs Zest, Antiga: gas first Reactor 4 Hellions drop expand vs 1g exe → 3g → 3gR; Reality kills only 6 Probes. [Standard opening from Protoss, but notice how little damage he took from the apparently dreaded 4 Hellions drop...]


Shall I go on? I still have 33 pages of pro games reports to peruse. Or can you swallow your pride, concede that you were wrong and stop wasting our time with your ridiculous claim that Protoss at the end of WoL was in the same situation as Terran in HotS as of now? Protoss had agressive options, Protoss had risky options, Protoss had a working universal build that did fine even in the worst case scenario (i. e. near total blindness until the first Observer reaches Terran's main) because it could defend everything even if you only saw a wall at first and it could catch up without any problem even against stuff like triple OC + dual EB openings.

Does Terran need more flexibility? Yes it's pretty obvious.

Terran does not need more flexibility. Protoss needs less of it, with adjusted risk/rewards ratios for what they do.
Ana_
Profile Joined May 2012
Finland453 Posts
December 20 2013 20:06 GMT
#17015
On December 21 2013 04:58 TurboMaN wrote:
I have the perfect idea for SC2:

Raise the skill level again (like in Broodwar):
- No Auto-Mine
- Only 12 Units per control group
- Only 1 Building can be selected at a time
- No command queues for buildings
- Remove auto surround, so unmicroed units in the back can't fire

THIS would make the game harder and allins would be more difficult.

For me Broodwar is still the better game, because it's more fair to the better player. How often do you see Pros lose vs amateurs in BW? Yes 1 out of 100.


No...just no...How you are going to attract more players, if you make game mechanically THAT much harder? Is the game fun anymore after making those restrictions?!
Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.
Faust852
Profile Joined February 2012
Luxembourg4004 Posts
December 20 2013 20:06 GMT
#17016
On December 21 2013 04:58 TurboMaN wrote:
I have the perfect idea for SC2:

Raise the skill level again (like in Broodwar):
- No Auto-Mine
- Only 12 Units per control group
- Only 1 Building can be selected at a time
- No command queues for buildings
- Remove auto surround, so unmicroed units in the back can't fire

THIS would make the game harder and allins would be more difficult.

For me Broodwar is still the better game, because it's more fair to the better player. How often do you see Pros lose vs amateurs in BW? Yes 1 out of 100.


Go play to your archaic game then.
iliketurtles
Profile Joined October 2013
Germany6 Posts
December 20 2013 20:27 GMT
#17017
Ladder needs a "Challenge for BO3: winner takes it all" button !
Pursuit_
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States1330 Posts
December 20 2013 21:53 GMT
#17018
On December 21 2013 04:58 TurboMaN wrote:
I have the perfect idea for SC2:

Raise the skill level again (like in Broodwar):
- No Auto-Mine
- Only 12 Units per control group
- Only 1 Building can be selected at a time
- No command queues for buildings
- Remove auto surround, so unmicroed units in the back can't fire

THIS would make the game harder and allins would be more difficult.

For me Broodwar is still the better game, because it's more fair to the better player. How often do you see Pros lose vs amateurs in BW? Yes 1 out of 100.


Pretty sure all of this would actually make All-Ins stronger and macro play harder.
In Somnis Veritas
Chaggi
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)1936 Posts
December 20 2013 23:11 GMT
#17019
TheDwf, ouch.
vNmMasterT
Profile Joined September 2012
68 Posts
December 20 2013 23:36 GMT
#17020
All I can say is TheDwf needs to post more. There's far too much nonsense getting posted around these forums and its so nice to see them getting called out once in a while.
Prev 1 849 850 851 852 853 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
17:00
Rotti Stream Rumble All-Random
RotterdaM653
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 653
mcanning 199
UpATreeSC 118
SteadfastSC 63
EmSc Tv 59
MindelVK 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 1038
EffOrt 686
Larva 333
Mind 147
yabsab 128
Dewaltoss 117
TY 78
Free 48
eros_byul 0
Dota 2
qojqva5468
League of Legends
Grubby2291
Counter-Strike
fl0m3945
sgares432
Super Smash Bros
Westballz31
Other Games
B2W.Neo935
Fuzer 114
Trikslyr83
mouzStarbuck27
trigger1
Organizations
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 59
EmSc2Tv 59
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 181
• Berry_CruncH128
• davetesta55
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 29
• 80smullet 18
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 5398
• masondota21709
• WagamamaTV369
League of Legends
• TFBlade1329
Other Games
• imaqtpie1322
• Shiphtur569
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
15h 14m
WardiTV European League
21h 14m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 5h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 21h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Online Event
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.