• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:03
CEST 19:03
KST 02:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202541RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
EXPERT CRYPTO RECOVERY SERVICES →→ CONNECT WITH FU ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 795 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 122

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 120 121 122 123 124 1266 Next
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
September 26 2011 08:15 GMT
#2421
On September 26 2011 17:11 love4every1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:09 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:05 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.


You also don't die from emp. You die from the follow up. Which is the same with storm.

Any good storm will either punish the terran from entering close enough to attack, or delay the engagement.

The difference is EMP isn't designed to kill. Storm is.


Seeing as it does shield damage, which is basically health, I'd say it is very much is designed to kill. Also, I'm trying to gauge why you posted that? O_o

You said it yourself "You also don't die from EMP."

Storm is a spell designed to kill enemy units. EMP is a spell designed to neutralize enemy casters, and lessen the effectiveness of the Protoss army.

If we're comparing similar spells here, short of the AoE, Feedback is a closer spell to EMP than Storm is. However, that was not the intended design. EMP is not designed to be a killing blow, while Storm is, however EMP does its job easily, while any competent player can negate ~35%+ of the designed effectiveness of Storm.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
Pillage
Profile Joined July 2011
United States804 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-26 08:16:44
September 26 2011 08:15 GMT
#2422
Is it just me or do immortals kick the holy hell out of any roach play at all now? I've lost several games to P where they haven't gotten any splash units, but have utilized a fuckton of immortals ( 6 or more).
And no, none of my armies in these games were more than 50% roach...
"Power has no limits." -Tiberius
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
September 26 2011 08:17 GMT
#2423
On September 26 2011 17:15 usethis2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2011 04:43 MeLo wrote:
My balance suggestions for Protoss:

Make an Observer buildable from the Nexus available after Warpgate is finished.
- Increase Observer build time from 40 to 70 seconds.
- Nerf it's pre upgrade speed.
- Remove permanent cloaking.
- Add an upgrade to the Robotics Bay to permanently cloak Observers (cost 50/50).

Case for:
- Allows Protoss to avoid Robo tech altogether without the risk of losing to Cloak.
- Gives Protoss the 5gate, Charge/Blink build, fast High Templars, Stargate builds to fight against 111s without being fucked over by Cloak Banshees.
- Protoss can now do early game Pylon at edge on bottom of cliff warp up Dark Templars to main which would effectively be their Worker harass/raid unit which is what they need and what Terran (Hellions) and Zergs (Mutalisks) have fairly early.
- Makes Blink Stalkers much better in PvP, especially vs "I will have more Collosus than you" builds.

Case against:
- 6-7gate allin vs Zerg becomes 10x stronger.
- Effectively ends Dark Templar rushes in PvP.
- 4gate in all 3 matchups will become stronger (though I think is incredibly weak right now).

Case again

That sounds like a nerf. No cloak, slower than it is now, 70 seconds? I don't know if it'll see anything before it dies. And Toss has what you suggested already: Hallucination. Hallucinated Pheonix does much better job scouting than your 'buffed' observer.

You're asking us to cut workers for 70 seconds for our only form of detection? No.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
usethis2
Profile Joined December 2010
2164 Posts
September 26 2011 08:20 GMT
#2424
On September 26 2011 17:17 VirgilSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:15 usethis2 wrote:
On September 24 2011 04:43 MeLo wrote:
My balance suggestions for Protoss:

Make an Observer buildable from the Nexus available after Warpgate is finished.
- Increase Observer build time from 40 to 70 seconds.
- Nerf it's pre upgrade speed.
- Remove permanent cloaking.
- Add an upgrade to the Robotics Bay to permanently cloak Observers (cost 50/50).

Case for:
- Allows Protoss to avoid Robo tech altogether without the risk of losing to Cloak.
- Gives Protoss the 5gate, Charge/Blink build, fast High Templars, Stargate builds to fight against 111s without being fucked over by Cloak Banshees.
- Protoss can now do early game Pylon at edge on bottom of cliff warp up Dark Templars to main which would effectively be their Worker harass/raid unit which is what they need and what Terran (Hellions) and Zergs (Mutalisks) have fairly early.
- Makes Blink Stalkers much better in PvP, especially vs "I will have more Collosus than you" builds.

Case against:
- 6-7gate allin vs Zerg becomes 10x stronger.
- Effectively ends Dark Templar rushes in PvP.
- 4gate in all 3 matchups will become stronger (though I think is incredibly weak right now).

Case again

That sounds like a nerf. No cloak, slower than it is now, 70 seconds? I don't know if it'll see anything before it dies. And Toss has what you suggested already: Hallucination. Hallucinated Pheonix does much better job scouting than your 'buffed' observer.

You're asking us to cut workers for 70 seconds for our only form of detection? No.

Jesus. Do people read before quoting?
love4every1
Profile Joined September 2011
United States37 Posts
September 26 2011 08:23 GMT
#2425
But just because it isn't instantaneous doesn't mean you can kite it completely. One emp won't bring your whole army to half health, and neither will one storm for terran if you micro. But you are going to take damage, and seeing as it only takes 3 seconds in a storm to kill a marine, I think "chip away" isn't exactly a fair statement either. Also the damage is only "100% guaranteed" if it hits, same as storm. So storm has the potential to do massive damage, killing units outright, but at the worst protoss loses 30-50% hp.
Help!
Destructicon
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
4713 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-26 08:27:48
September 26 2011 08:25 GMT
#2426
I'm not working of multiple assumptions you are.

So, you plan to make multiple Warp Prisms with or without HT in them, or with a varying number of them, just to get 1 storm of?
Again, 7 vikings 1 shot a WP, and they do it from a range of 9 with a reload time of 2. That means you'll lose a WP every 2 seconds, starting from when the first is spotted and immediately shot down. Even if you send 4 WP they will all die in 6 seconds.

What are you really going to do? Trow away multiple WP empty or with just 1 HT just to trow him of? Those 7 vikings he build now start to become cost effective if you do that. Negating WP droping HT is in itself cost effective.

You are also assuming the terran is somehow an idiot and will just sit his army in place while you waltz in with the WP. If the terran is smart enough he will split his army into smaller clusters the same he would to to a baneling bomb, and at the same time he will have his vikings target fire your WP.

So do you plan to just trow away WP at him and risk storming nearly nothing while he eats away at your WP, while his ghosts work away on your HT on the ground, your sentries and your army?

The terran can also just sit back for a while and just avoid an engagement with your main Protoss ball if you happen to have colossus, however if you do happen to have colossus it takes just 13 vikings to 1 shot a colossus. How about if the terran just rounds up the number to 14 vikings, which incidentally is the exact number needed to 1 shot 2 WPs if he micro's well.

The thing is, you can't force the terran to engage if he doesn't want to, he will scan your army looking for a favorable window and he won't bite if he doesn't want to. Meanwhile the terran can force an engagement since he has the more mobile army, he can also poke much more effectively since his EMP destroys your effective HP and neutralizes your specialists while his vikings nibble away at your colossus and WP. You can only force an engagement if you force him into a corner, which no smart terran will let himself be put into, or if you forcefield his army, which won't happen since your sentries will be EMPed.
WriterNever give up, never surrender! https://www.youtube.com/user/DestructiconSC
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
September 26 2011 08:28 GMT
#2427
On September 26 2011 17:20 usethis2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:17 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:15 usethis2 wrote:
On September 24 2011 04:43 MeLo wrote:
My balance suggestions for Protoss:

Make an Observer buildable from the Nexus available after Warpgate is finished.
- Increase Observer build time from 40 to 70 seconds.
- Nerf it's pre upgrade speed.
- Remove permanent cloaking.
- Add an upgrade to the Robotics Bay to permanently cloak Observers (cost 50/50).

Case for:
- Allows Protoss to avoid Robo tech altogether without the risk of losing to Cloak.
- Gives Protoss the 5gate, Charge/Blink build, fast High Templars, Stargate builds to fight against 111s without being fucked over by Cloak Banshees.
- Protoss can now do early game Pylon at edge on bottom of cliff warp up Dark Templars to main which would effectively be their Worker harass/raid unit which is what they need and what Terran (Hellions) and Zergs (Mutalisks) have fairly early.
- Makes Blink Stalkers much better in PvP, especially vs "I will have more Collosus than you" builds.

Case against:
- 6-7gate allin vs Zerg becomes 10x stronger.
- Effectively ends Dark Templar rushes in PvP.
- 4gate in all 3 matchups will become stronger (though I think is incredibly weak right now).

Case again

That sounds like a nerf. No cloak, slower than it is now, 70 seconds? I don't know if it'll see anything before it dies. And Toss has what you suggested already: Hallucination. Hallucinated Pheonix does much better job scouting than your 'buffed' observer.

You're asking us to cut workers for 70 seconds for our only form of detection? No.

Jesus. Do people read before quoting?

My reply was to the original post, I apologize for the confusion.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
love4every1
Profile Joined September 2011
United States37 Posts
September 26 2011 08:28 GMT
#2428
On September 26 2011 17:15 VirgilSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:11 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:09 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:05 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.


You also don't die from emp. You die from the follow up. Which is the same with storm.

Any good storm will either punish the terran from entering close enough to attack, or delay the engagement.

The difference is EMP isn't designed to kill. Storm is.


Seeing as it does shield damage, which is basically health, I'd say it is very much is designed to kill. Also, I'm trying to gauge why you posted that? O_o

You said it yourself "You also don't die from EMP."

Storm is a spell designed to kill enemy units. EMP is a spell designed to neutralize enemy casters, and lessen the effectiveness of the Protoss army.

If we're comparing similar spells here, short of the AoE, Feedback is a closer spell to EMP than Storm is. However, that was not the intended design. EMP is not designed to be a killing blow, while Storm is, however EMP does its job easily, while any competent player can negate ~35%+ of the designed effectiveness of Storm.


What??

Just because it doesn't do the finishing blow doesn't mean it wasn't designed to kill. Seeing as it takes 100 shields, I would say that blizzard proooobably meant for it to be a damage dealer.

Also, you know 65% of storm is still 52 damage right? As in, the terran is basically dead. And just because protoss can't use storms competently doesn't mean that it's terrans fault. Two storms will stop every bio advance outright, if not killing it immediately. Emp stops advancing protoss.
Help!
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
September 26 2011 08:31 GMT
#2429
On September 26 2011 17:23 love4every1 wrote:
But just because it isn't instantaneous doesn't mean you can kite it completely. One emp won't bring your whole army to half health, and neither will one storm for terran if you micro. But you are going to take damage, and seeing as it only takes 3 seconds in a storm to kill a marine, I think "chip away" isn't exactly a fair statement either. Also the damage is only "100% guaranteed" if it hits, same as storm. So storm has the potential to do massive damage, killing units outright, but at the worst protoss loses 30-50% hp.

Did you even read what I posted?

You're comparing two spells that are fundamentally different:

1) Area of Effect, Instantaneous, Not fatal

2) Area of Effect, Damage over Time, Fatal

If you want to compare the two, the first step is to either make EMP DoT, or make Storm instant, neither of which is going to happen.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
September 26 2011 08:37 GMT
#2430
On September 26 2011 17:28 love4every1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:15 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:11 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:09 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:05 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.


You also don't die from emp. You die from the follow up. Which is the same with storm.

Any good storm will either punish the terran from entering close enough to attack, or delay the engagement.

The difference is EMP isn't designed to kill. Storm is.


Seeing as it does shield damage, which is basically health, I'd say it is very much is designed to kill. Also, I'm trying to gauge why you posted that? O_o

You said it yourself "You also don't die from EMP."

Storm is a spell designed to kill enemy units. EMP is a spell designed to neutralize enemy casters, and lessen the effectiveness of the Protoss army.

If we're comparing similar spells here, short of the AoE, Feedback is a closer spell to EMP than Storm is. However, that was not the intended design. EMP is not designed to be a killing blow, while Storm is, however EMP does its job easily, while any competent player can negate ~35%+ of the designed effectiveness of Storm.


What??

Just because it doesn't do the finishing blow doesn't mean it wasn't designed to kill. Seeing as it takes 100 shields, I would say that blizzard proooobably meant for it to be a damage dealer.

Also, you know 65% of storm is still 52 damage right? As in, the terran is basically dead. And just because protoss can't use storms competently doesn't mean that it's terrans fault. Two storms will stop every bio advance outright, if not killing it immediately. Emp stops advancing protoss.

If I shoot you in the heart, it's fatal, and will kill.

If I shoot you in the leg, unless I hit the artery, while it does damage to you, it's not going to kill you.

"Doing the finishing blow" is the act of killing, which EMP can NEVER do, in ANY engagement or scenario. That 52 hypothetical damage? You have units floating overhead that heal during, and after the Storm, Protoss does not have that luxury.

You're blaming Protoss players for ineffectively using Storm? Are you really that blind that you can say EVERY Terran player is smart enough to use EMP effectively, and the reason Protoss players can't use Storm as effectively is because of user error? Sorry, I can speak for the entire Protoss player-base when I apologize for our slow, defenseless, uncloaked, damage over time spellcaster isn't as effective as your cloaked, longer ranged, attacking, spammable, instantaneous spellcaster.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
Thrombozyt
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1269 Posts
September 26 2011 08:38 GMT
#2431
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.

Storm has a guaranteed effect:
It does initial damage - usually around 20, because even if you storm while they are already running, you will hit them.

After that storm always has one of two effects:
1) It deals more damage.
2) It prevents damage as the opponent is running

So yes, the opponent can choose between eating damage and not dealing damage... but storms have a guaranteed effect.
love4every1
Profile Joined September 2011
United States37 Posts
September 26 2011 08:41 GMT
#2432
On September 26 2011 17:25 Destructicon wrote:
I'm not working of multiple assumptions you are.

So, you plan to make multiple Warp Prisms with or without HT in them, or with a varying number of them, just to get 1 storm of?
Again, 7 vikings 1 shot a WP, and they do it from a range of 9 with a reload time of 2. That means you'll lose a WP every 2 seconds, starting from when the first is spotted and immediately shot down. Even if you send 4 WP they will all die in 6 seconds.

What are you really going to do? Trow away multiple WP empty or with just 1 HT just to trow him of? Those 7 vikings he build now start to become cost effective if you do that. Negating WP droping HT is in itself cost effective.

You are also assuming the terran is somehow an idiot and will just sit his army in place while you waltz in with the WP. If the terran is smart enough he will split his army into smaller clusters the same he would to to a baneling bomb, and at the same time he will have his vikings target fire your WP.

So do you plan to just trow away WP at him and risk storming nearly nothing while he eats away at your WP, while his ghosts work away on your HT on the ground, your sentries and your army?

The terran can also just sit back for a while and just avoid an engagement with your main Protoss ball if you happen to have colossus, however if you do happen to have colossus it takes just 13 vikings to 1 shot a colossus. How about if the terran just rounds up the number to 14 vikings, which incidentally is the exact number needed to 1 shot 2 WPs if he micro's well.

The thing is, you can't force the terran to engage if he doesn't want to, he will scan your army looking for a favorable window and he won't bite if he doesn't want to. Meanwhile the terran can force an engagement since he has the more mobile army, he can also poke much more effectively since his EMP destroys your effective HP and neutralizes your specialists while his vikings nibble away at your colossus and WP. You can only force an engagement if you force him into a corner, which no smart terran will let himself be put into, or if you forcefield his army, which won't happen since your sentries will be EMPed.


I'm saying one storm changes the entire outcome of a battle.

Imagine this: You are going colossus. 3 warp prisms, each with HT = 750/450. 7 vikings 1050/525.

He can't emp your HT, they're in separate warp prisms.

If he gets too close trying to pick them off, he risks getting his vikings stormed from drop micro, or blink stalker'd to death.

And while I can't force him to engage, I can force him to disengage by landing storms that actually do what they are supposed to do: provide positional advantage. And even then, there are still ways to make him engage (ie, your army is tearing up his expansions faster than his marine/marauder is killing your buildings).

You don't have sentries, because they are a stupid unit cause they WILL get empd late game.

And I don't get how protoss says "risk storming nothing" when you'd only engage with warp prisms with the right opportunity, just like he'd only attack with the right opportunity? You're assuming the best circumstances with emp and the worst with storm. I assume they best of both.

In the six seconds you killed my warp prisms, I just finished doing 60 damage to your army with storm. If you microed out of the way to save your army, your viking are up for grabs and I kill them. I roflstomp you with colossus in my followup, and enjoy the extra ladder points.

?
Help!
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
September 26 2011 08:44 GMT
#2433
On September 26 2011 17:38 Thrombozyt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.

Storm has a guaranteed effect:
It does initial damage - usually around 20, because even if you storm while they are already running, you will hit them.

After that storm always has one of two effects:
1) It deals more damage.
2) It prevents damage as the opponent is running

So yes, the opponent can choose between eating damage and not dealing damage... but storms have a guaranteed effect.

The other two "similar" spells don't allow a choice, you either:

a) Disengage after taking the full effect of the spell
b) Continue to engage after taking the full effect of the spell.

Storm results in:

a) Disengaging after taking partial effects of the spell
b) Eating the full effect of the spell
c) Engaging after taking partial effects of the spell

See the difference?
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
love4every1
Profile Joined September 2011
United States37 Posts
September 26 2011 08:46 GMT
#2434
On September 26 2011 17:37 VirgilSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:28 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:15 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:11 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:09 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:05 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.


You also don't die from emp. You die from the follow up. Which is the same with storm.

Any good storm will either punish the terran from entering close enough to attack, or delay the engagement.

The difference is EMP isn't designed to kill. Storm is.


Seeing as it does shield damage, which is basically health, I'd say it is very much is designed to kill. Also, I'm trying to gauge why you posted that? O_o

You said it yourself "You also don't die from EMP."

Storm is a spell designed to kill enemy units. EMP is a spell designed to neutralize enemy casters, and lessen the effectiveness of the Protoss army.

If we're comparing similar spells here, short of the AoE, Feedback is a closer spell to EMP than Storm is. However, that was not the intended design. EMP is not designed to be a killing blow, while Storm is, however EMP does its job easily, while any competent player can negate ~35%+ of the designed effectiveness of Storm.


What??

Just because it doesn't do the finishing blow doesn't mean it wasn't designed to kill. Seeing as it takes 100 shields, I would say that blizzard proooobably meant for it to be a damage dealer.

Also, you know 65% of storm is still 52 damage right? As in, the terran is basically dead. And just because protoss can't use storms competently doesn't mean that it's terrans fault. Two storms will stop every bio advance outright, if not killing it immediately. Emp stops advancing protoss.

If I shoot you in the heart, it's fatal, and will kill.

If I shoot you in the leg, unless I hit the artery, while it does damage to you, it's not going to kill you.

"Doing the finishing blow" is the act of killing, which EMP can NEVER do, in ANY engagement or scenario. That 52 hypothetical damage? You have units floating overhead that heal during, and after the Storm, Protoss does not have that luxury.

You're blaming Protoss players for ineffectively using Storm? Are you really that blind that you can say EVERY Terran player is smart enough to use EMP effectively, and the reason Protoss players can't use Storm as effectively is because of user error? Sorry, I can speak for the entire Protoss player-base when I apologize for our slow, defenseless, uncloaked, damage over time spellcaster isn't as effective as your cloaked, longer ranged, attacking, spammable, instantaneous spellcaster.


Probably because you didn't have the micro to pull off using warp prisms in your play, or more likely haven't even tried it yet.

Those units overhead? The cost army supply and money. And guess what?? They get the crap beaten out of them with storm too. And if you're really going to pull that card, do you want me to bring up the fact that you regenerate any lost health to emp over time, the same as medivacs, except without having to buy units?

And I'll give you that it isn't the killing blow, but I'll bring up a better point: why does your point even matter? So emp and storm have different uses. The units aren't designed to be identical.
Help!
love4every1
Profile Joined September 2011
United States37 Posts
September 26 2011 08:49 GMT
#2435
On September 26 2011 17:44 VirgilSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:38 Thrombozyt wrote:
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.

Storm has a guaranteed effect:
It does initial damage - usually around 20, because even if you storm while they are already running, you will hit them.

After that storm always has one of two effects:
1) It deals more damage.
2) It prevents damage as the opponent is running

So yes, the opponent can choose between eating damage and not dealing damage... but storms have a guaranteed effect.

The other two "similar" spells don't allow a choice, you either:

a) Disengage after taking the full effect of the spell
b) Continue to engage after taking the full effect of the spell.

Storm results in:

a) Disengaging after taking partial effects of the spell
b) Eating the full effect of the spell
c) Engaging after taking partial effects of the spell

See the difference?


Yes, I do.

Storm will do the same percentage damage to my units in one second that emp will do, except storm has the option of doing even more damage and providing positional advantage. So... ?
Help!
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
September 26 2011 08:50 GMT
#2436
On September 26 2011 17:46 love4every1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:37 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:28 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:15 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:11 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:09 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:05 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.


You also don't die from emp. You die from the follow up. Which is the same with storm.

Any good storm will either punish the terran from entering close enough to attack, or delay the engagement.

The difference is EMP isn't designed to kill. Storm is.


Seeing as it does shield damage, which is basically health, I'd say it is very much is designed to kill. Also, I'm trying to gauge why you posted that? O_o

You said it yourself "You also don't die from EMP."

Storm is a spell designed to kill enemy units. EMP is a spell designed to neutralize enemy casters, and lessen the effectiveness of the Protoss army.

If we're comparing similar spells here, short of the AoE, Feedback is a closer spell to EMP than Storm is. However, that was not the intended design. EMP is not designed to be a killing blow, while Storm is, however EMP does its job easily, while any competent player can negate ~35%+ of the designed effectiveness of Storm.


What??

Just because it doesn't do the finishing blow doesn't mean it wasn't designed to kill. Seeing as it takes 100 shields, I would say that blizzard proooobably meant for it to be a damage dealer.

Also, you know 65% of storm is still 52 damage right? As in, the terran is basically dead. And just because protoss can't use storms competently doesn't mean that it's terrans fault. Two storms will stop every bio advance outright, if not killing it immediately. Emp stops advancing protoss.

If I shoot you in the heart, it's fatal, and will kill.

If I shoot you in the leg, unless I hit the artery, while it does damage to you, it's not going to kill you.

"Doing the finishing blow" is the act of killing, which EMP can NEVER do, in ANY engagement or scenario. That 52 hypothetical damage? You have units floating overhead that heal during, and after the Storm, Protoss does not have that luxury.

You're blaming Protoss players for ineffectively using Storm? Are you really that blind that you can say EVERY Terran player is smart enough to use EMP effectively, and the reason Protoss players can't use Storm as effectively is because of user error? Sorry, I can speak for the entire Protoss player-base when I apologize for our slow, defenseless, uncloaked, damage over time spellcaster isn't as effective as your cloaked, longer ranged, attacking, spammable, instantaneous spellcaster.


Probably because you didn't have the micro to pull off using warp prisms in your play, or more likely haven't even tried it yet.

Those units overhead? The cost army supply and money. And guess what?? They get the crap beaten out of them with storm too. And if you're really going to pull that card, do you want me to bring up the fact that you regenerate any lost health to emp over time, the same as medivacs, except without having to buy units?

And I'll give you that it isn't the killing blow, but I'll bring up a better point: why does your point even matter? So emp and storm have different uses. The units aren't designed to be identical.

The entire point I'm making is that they AREN'T identical.

Why should I be forced to devote extra APM to Warp Prism dropping, unit selecting, and Storm casting when you just hit Shift + E and blanket my whole army?

Protoss units don't regenerate shields in combat, while Medivacs heal damage at a greater rate during combat. I'm sure if Protoss could invest Army Supply and Money into a regenerating unit they would do so in every matchup.

The point I'm trying to make is that Storm and EMP are two completely different spells, and one is significantly less effective, while the INTENDED DESIGN is for them to be very close to equally effective.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
Destructicon
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
4713 Posts
September 26 2011 08:51 GMT
#2437
I only see you assuming the best case scenario for your Protoss point of view. The one big thing you keep forgetting is that Vikings have a range of 9. They can go in, snipe the WP closest to the front and then get out before you're storm can catch them.

Because of the long range of vikings they can even snipe of of range of stalkers, and if the stalkers risk going too close or blinking forward they get EMPed in the face and a group of marauders with stim jumps forward to kill them.

The Vikings will keep doing this until you have no more WP left and all the HT are on the ground.

You're also assuming 1 storm will change the outcome, if the terran has his army split up in anticipation of a storm drop on his infantry, 1 storm will do noth and you've lost a fleet of WP. If you think storming vikings is going to get results you are mistaken, vikings have big range and can also be repaired.

The fact of the matter is, you need 2 or 3 storms on the main terran bio ball, you don't want position with it, you want it to do DPS, and this is because the terran bio ball is so cost effective, so strong together and so well supported by medivacs, that it can destroy the basic GW force of zealots and stalkers.

Again once your Colossus is dead, HT neutralized and WP destroyed the terran can force the engagement and win.

I find it funny that you mentioned threatening a terran's natural so he can't run away. Terran's army is more mobile, its more likely he can chose to fight you somewhere in the middle so he has a place to fall back on, at least any smart terran will do so. Its more likely he will force the engagement on the protoss by constantly dropping on the protoss' bases and killing workers/buildings.
WriterNever give up, never surrender! https://www.youtube.com/user/DestructiconSC
BoBiNoU
Profile Joined March 2011
France181 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-26 08:56:17
September 26 2011 08:53 GMT
#2438
how can you possibly argue against the fact that the ghost is too good of a unit with its ability to hard counter so many units ( meaning all toss units except colossi ) and tier3 zergs :|

I found kinda ridiculous that the solution to prevent carpet emp ( yeah cause terrans dont just build one or two ghosts eh ) is to ask for more micro to toss army than they already have.

In addition to spread the units in order to reduce massive damage of emps and making the army weaker in the process, toss should now deal with 1 or 2 WP micro ?!?

Ghost needs to be nerfed in some way, rather not taking shield with energy at the same time or a change in the spell : instant energy drain but same kind of effect as storm for the shield so at least toss army can be microed out of shield draining. Range can be reduced too to 9 at least.

I dont see what can be done on Templar side other than increasing its speed or acceleration.
go m00
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
September 26 2011 08:53 GMT
#2439
On September 26 2011 17:49 love4every1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:44 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:38 Thrombozyt wrote:
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.

Storm has a guaranteed effect:
It does initial damage - usually around 20, because even if you storm while they are already running, you will hit them.

After that storm always has one of two effects:
1) It deals more damage.
2) It prevents damage as the opponent is running

So yes, the opponent can choose between eating damage and not dealing damage... but storms have a guaranteed effect.

The other two "similar" spells don't allow a choice, you either:

a) Disengage after taking the full effect of the spell
b) Continue to engage after taking the full effect of the spell.

Storm results in:

a) Disengaging after taking partial effects of the spell
b) Eating the full effect of the spell
c) Engaging after taking partial effects of the spell

See the difference?


Yes, I do.

Storm will do the same percentage damage to my units in one second that emp will do, except storm has the option of doing even more damage and providing positional advantage. So... ?

At this point I'm going to stop acknowledging your posts because it's obvious now that you're trolling.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
love4every1
Profile Joined September 2011
United States37 Posts
September 26 2011 08:54 GMT
#2440
On September 26 2011 17:50 VirgilSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 26 2011 17:46 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:37 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:28 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:15 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:11 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:09 VirgilSC2 wrote:
On September 26 2011 17:05 love4every1 wrote:
On September 26 2011 16:48 VirgilSC2 wrote:
....if only Storm did guaranteed effects like Fungal and EMP, it might be worth comparing the two.

You can't micro out of EMP, or Fungal, but you can micro out of Storm. I think that's the biggest discrepancy between the spells.


You also don't die from emp. You die from the follow up. Which is the same with storm.

Any good storm will either punish the terran from entering close enough to attack, or delay the engagement.

The difference is EMP isn't designed to kill. Storm is.


Seeing as it does shield damage, which is basically health, I'd say it is very much is designed to kill. Also, I'm trying to gauge why you posted that? O_o

You said it yourself "You also don't die from EMP."

Storm is a spell designed to kill enemy units. EMP is a spell designed to neutralize enemy casters, and lessen the effectiveness of the Protoss army.

If we're comparing similar spells here, short of the AoE, Feedback is a closer spell to EMP than Storm is. However, that was not the intended design. EMP is not designed to be a killing blow, while Storm is, however EMP does its job easily, while any competent player can negate ~35%+ of the designed effectiveness of Storm.


What??

Just because it doesn't do the finishing blow doesn't mean it wasn't designed to kill. Seeing as it takes 100 shields, I would say that blizzard proooobably meant for it to be a damage dealer.

Also, you know 65% of storm is still 52 damage right? As in, the terran is basically dead. And just because protoss can't use storms competently doesn't mean that it's terrans fault. Two storms will stop every bio advance outright, if not killing it immediately. Emp stops advancing protoss.

If I shoot you in the heart, it's fatal, and will kill.

If I shoot you in the leg, unless I hit the artery, while it does damage to you, it's not going to kill you.

"Doing the finishing blow" is the act of killing, which EMP can NEVER do, in ANY engagement or scenario. That 52 hypothetical damage? You have units floating overhead that heal during, and after the Storm, Protoss does not have that luxury.

You're blaming Protoss players for ineffectively using Storm? Are you really that blind that you can say EVERY Terran player is smart enough to use EMP effectively, and the reason Protoss players can't use Storm as effectively is because of user error? Sorry, I can speak for the entire Protoss player-base when I apologize for our slow, defenseless, uncloaked, damage over time spellcaster isn't as effective as your cloaked, longer ranged, attacking, spammable, instantaneous spellcaster.


Probably because you didn't have the micro to pull off using warp prisms in your play, or more likely haven't even tried it yet.

Those units overhead? The cost army supply and money. And guess what?? They get the crap beaten out of them with storm too. And if you're really going to pull that card, do you want me to bring up the fact that you regenerate any lost health to emp over time, the same as medivacs, except without having to buy units?

And I'll give you that it isn't the killing blow, but I'll bring up a better point: why does your point even matter? So emp and storm have different uses. The units aren't designed to be identical.

The entire point I'm making is that they AREN'T identical.

Why should I be forced to devote extra APM to Warp Prism dropping, unit selecting, and Storm casting when you just hit Shift + E and blanket my whole army?

Protoss units don't regenerate shields in combat, while Medivacs heal damage at a greater rate during combat. I'm sure if Protoss could invest Army Supply and Money into a regenerating unit they would do so in every matchup.

The point I'm trying to make is that Storm and EMP are two completely different spells, and one is significantly less effective, while the INTENDED DESIGN is for them to be very close to equally effective.



You would ue the extra APM because though you know emp is easier, the reward for storm is much, much greater. As in, you would do it because you would want to win. Mark my words, you're going to see warp prisms ht play in pro games in the not too distant future.

Healing a unit only works if it isn't dead.

Also, those spells aren't designed to be equally effective. The units are.
Help!
Prev 1 120 121 122 123 124 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
herO vs CureLIVE!
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena10599
ComeBackTV 2394
TaKeTV 726
Hui .556
3DClanTV 393
EnkiAlexander 269
Rex204
CranKy Ducklings180
mcanning172
UpATreeSC160
Reynor121
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena10599
Hui .556
Rex 204
mcanning 172
UpATreeSC 160
Reynor 121
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 2125
Barracks 1090
Jaedong 1026
BeSt 842
Mini 840
EffOrt 563
Stork 218
Soulkey 187
Snow 154
Dewaltoss 113
[ Show more ]
Hyun 64
TY 56
sas.Sziky 35
Aegong 34
scan(afreeca) 31
Yoon 20
soO 19
Sacsri 16
yabsab 11
Bale 7
JulyZerg 6
Dota 2
syndereN680
420jenkins308
Counter-Strike
fl0m2885
sgares369
flusha251
byalli220
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor176
Other Games
FrodaN1015
Fuzer 189
ArmadaUGS110
KnowMe105
QueenE56
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH227
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 6
• FirePhoenix5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21185
• WagamamaTV727
League of Legends
• Nemesis2574
• TFBlade1065
Other Games
• Shiphtur260
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
16h 57m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 17h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.