• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:50
CEST 10:50
KST 17:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202557RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 902 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 1205

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1266 Next
sibs
Profile Joined July 2012
635 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-13 17:41:01
November 13 2014 17:35 GMT
#24081
On November 11 2014 22:01 pure.Wasted wrote:
In case anyone's curious, the first three Hot6ix groups results are in.

In games: 21:20 for Terran. In series: 7:14 for Zerg.

Obviously we're missing the most important factor, the context of what those games actually looked like. But the numbers alone aren't troubling, at the very least.


Interesting we ended with:
Qualified from Online Qualifier (10)
1 Zerg, 4 Terran , 5 Protoss

Edit: ahh I can see why, theres some pretty low level players there.

I was very surprised Life was able to mindfuck opponents to win blizzcon.

http://aligulac.com/players/5011-Guilty/
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
November 13 2014 17:47 GMT
#24082
On November 14 2014 02:35 sibs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:01 pure.Wasted wrote:
In case anyone's curious, the first three Hot6ix groups results are in.

In games: 21:20 for Terran. In series: 7:14 for Zerg.

Obviously we're missing the most important factor, the context of what those games actually looked like. But the numbers alone aren't troubling, at the very least.


Interesting we ended with:
Qualified from Online Qualifier (10)
1 Zerg, 4 Terran , 5 Protoss

Edit: ahh I can see why, theres some pretty low level players there.

I was very surprised Life was able to mindfuck opponents to win blizzcon.

http://aligulac.com/players/5011-Guilty/

Quickly glanced over the results as well as the overall winrates. All 3matchups were within 50+/-2%.
The top Zergs fell to other top-players from all 3 races, not really anything to see here besides standard deviation.
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
November 14 2014 00:45 GMT
#24083
On November 14 2014 02:47 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 14 2014 02:35 sibs wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:01 pure.Wasted wrote:
In case anyone's curious, the first three Hot6ix groups results are in.

In games: 21:20 for Terran. In series: 7:14 for Zerg.

Obviously we're missing the most important factor, the context of what those games actually looked like. But the numbers alone aren't troubling, at the very least.


Interesting we ended with:
Qualified from Online Qualifier (10)
1 Zerg, 4 Terran , 5 Protoss

Edit: ahh I can see why, theres some pretty low level players there.

I was very surprised Life was able to mindfuck opponents to win blizzcon.

http://aligulac.com/players/5011-Guilty/

Quickly glanced over the results as well as the overall winrates. All 3matchups were within 50+/-2%.
The top Zergs fell to other top-players from all 3 races, not really anything to see here besides standard deviation.


Yup. Here are the full results:

TvZ: 35-34 in games and 12-21 in series.

ZvP: 27-27.

PvT: 27:22. (45%)

It seems very improbable that with a record in series like that, Zerg should only get 1 player through the qualifiers, but they did. Looking at all the Zergs who had a legitimate chance of qualifying for, say, Ro32 Code S this season, they lost a combined 9 series to Protoss, 5 to fellow Zergs, and 5 to Terran. There were 30 Terrans at this event and 27 Zerg, so the 5 critical ZvZs is actually pretty bad luck, as there were only 4 critical TvTs despite more Terrans in attendance.

Not a lot we can conclude from games we haven't seen, but the numbers are, if nothing else, very encouraging.
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
Samx
Profile Joined August 2013
Singapore149 Posts
November 15 2014 20:28 GMT
#24084
Watching mc vs Taeja was just sad.
MC played superbly. But bio too strong.
Our enemies are a legion and STILL you procrastinate
PinheadXXXXXX
Profile Joined February 2012
United States897 Posts
November 15 2014 21:19 GMT
#24085
On November 16 2014 05:28 Samx wrote:
Watching mc vs Taeja was just sad.
MC played superbly. But bio too strong.

Yeah, bio is strong when you allin, don't kill your opponent, don't get upgrades other than blink, delay your splash forever (and can't build up a critical mass of it), and consistently trade cost-inefficiently with only a portion of your entire army.

That kind of counterswing pressure is part of an allin like that. You sacrifice tech in exchange for army and gateways, and as a result, Terran is miles ahead in tech. If Terran bio didn't trade efficiently immediately after an attack like that then there would be something wrong. MC didn't kill Taeja, Taeja was left with an advantage in tech and subsequently army, and he pushed it to a win. If he couldn't do that then that would be a sign that Protoss would be OP. An attack that strong has clear weaknesses, and for this, it is namely that you will lose to terran bio until you get splash out. And if you delay it like MC, it doesn't turn out that well.
Taeja the one true Byunjwa~
royalroadweed
Profile Joined April 2013
United States8301 Posts
November 15 2014 22:11 GMT
#24086
On November 16 2014 05:28 Samx wrote:
Watching mc vs Taeja was just sad.
MC played superbly. But bio too strong.

If by "superbly" you mean a failed all-in. Then yes I agree.
"Nerfing Toss can just make them stronger"
The_Templar
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
your Country52797 Posts
November 15 2014 22:13 GMT
#24087
On November 16 2014 07:11 royalroadweed wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2014 05:28 Samx wrote:
Watching mc vs Taeja was just sad.
MC played superbly. But bio too strong.

If by "superbly" you mean a failed all-in. Then yes I agree.

The one super-allin he did he won with
Moderatorshe/her
TL+ Member
royalroadweed
Profile Joined April 2013
United States8301 Posts
November 15 2014 22:15 GMT
#24088
On November 16 2014 07:13 The_Templar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2014 07:11 royalroadweed wrote:
On November 16 2014 05:28 Samx wrote:
Watching mc vs Taeja was just sad.
MC played superbly. But bio too strong.

If by "superbly" you mean a failed all-in. Then yes I agree.

The one super-allin he did he won with

Yes he did. Guess its ok to use that series to bitch about balance then. MC is literally x10 the player taeja is herp derp.
"Nerfing Toss can just make them stronger"
Samx
Profile Joined August 2013
Singapore149 Posts
November 16 2014 08:23 GMT
#24089
If anything, the game mc won show how ridiculous the balance was.
For the majority of the game, mc was in taeja's base with at least 2 stalkers plus an air unit either 1 or 2 oracle, or at least a void ray. What did Taeja have? Units streaming out of production 1 by 1. Throughout that game, at all time mc had double or triple the unit supply in taeja's base and Taeja nearly made a hold.

Game 3. After doing critical damage, Taeja had half the worker count of mc, supply was about 80:50. Equal tech, MC had robo already. ToD made a superb point, you leave a terran alone for 2 minutes. You are screwed.
All Taeja did was parade push into MC's second base. Didn't matter with overcharge and collosus. Each fight was progressively in favour of Taeja. MC defended until he died.

Our enemies are a legion and STILL you procrastinate
keglu
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland485 Posts
November 16 2014 08:57 GMT
#24090
On November 16 2014 05:28 Samx wrote:
Watching mc vs Taeja was just sad.
MC played superbly. But bio too strong.



He was actually trading pretty well but lost both games economically
Green_25
Profile Joined June 2013
Great Britain696 Posts
November 16 2014 09:02 GMT
#24091
On November 16 2014 17:23 Samx wrote:
If anything, the game mc won show how ridiculous the balance was.
For the majority of the game, mc was in taeja's base with at least 2 stalkers plus an air unit either 1 or 2 oracle, or at least a void ray. What did Taeja have? Units streaming out of production 1 by 1. Throughout that game, at all time mc had double or triple the unit supply in taeja's base and Taeja nearly made a hold.

Game 3. After doing critical damage, Taeja had half the worker count of mc, supply was about 80:50. Equal tech, MC had robo already. ToD made a superb point, you leave a terran alone for 2 minutes. You are screwed.
All Taeja did was parade push into MC's second base. Didn't matter with overcharge and collosus. Each fight was progressively in favour of Taeja. MC defended until he died.


For game 3 it was all about Taeja's control in the fight. Its not like he just a-moved. Would be interesting to see how many other terrans could win with that push, I'm guessing almost none. Of course, with MC's tech, it all came down to Taeja's control, nothing MC could do really.
starslayer
Profile Joined August 2011
United States696 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-16 09:04:24
November 16 2014 09:03 GMT
#24092
On November 16 2014 17:23 Samx wrote:
If anything, the game mc won show how ridiculous the balance was.
For the majority of the game, mc was in taeja's base with at least 2 stalkers plus an air unit either 1 or 2 oracle, or at least a void ray. What did Taeja have? Units streaming out of production 1 by 1. Throughout that game, at all time mc had double or triple the unit supply in taeja's base and Taeja nearly made a hold.

Game 3. After doing critical damage, Taeja had half the worker count of mc, supply was about 80:50. Equal tech, MC had robo already. ToD made a superb point, you leave a terran alone for 2 minutes. You are screwed.
All Taeja did was parade push into MC's second base. Didn't matter with overcharge and collosus. Each fight was progressively in favour of Taeja. MC defended until he died.



can we stop trying to talk balance with teaja lol this guy is insane, he was winning when terran was at its lowest and hes going to dominate when things are balance or even a bit terran favored. i mean the kid is a freak it doesnt matter about balance when it comes to him. if you were talking about someone like idk yoda or someone else then ok maybe sure but teaja next level good.
i came here to kickass and chew bubblegum and i'm all out of bubble gum
Tyrhanius
Profile Joined April 2011
France947 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-16 09:55:39
November 16 2014 09:54 GMT
#24093
On November 10 2014 21:18 Enigmasc wrote:
tbh i think the most frustrating thing about ZvT atm isnt so much its unwinable but thats its very difficult to end the game if terran doesnt want it to
3/3 muta/ling bane can definatley hold its own on creep
but off of creep or trying to push into bases against pre-laid mines? not gona happen

makes it a bit annoying to have suhc a mobile army composition but with no ability to push unless the terran messes up ( ie steps onto creep where you can take a good fight

Yeah exactly, you need to stay patient and keep your advantage, while as soon as Terran gets an advantage vs Zerg he kills you 100%. If you attack and Terran can hold with a limited army/PF/WM/repair, and while you was ahead with superior army, you fail behind and 100% lose.

The only way you can play is defensive, while you limit the number of his base, and you wait until he has no money anymore. Or when he attacks, you trade base, kill his production building, while you sacrify your base, but you massing thousands banelings. If you manage to clean his army even uncost effectivly, he can't rebuild and you have won.

But frontal assault only work if you just clean his army and you rush in his base, before he can rebuild, but you have only a 5-10s window.
Estancia
Profile Joined July 2011
Korea (South)335 Posts
November 16 2014 10:18 GMT
#24094
On November 16 2014 18:54 Tyrhanius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2014 21:18 Enigmasc wrote:
tbh i think the most frustrating thing about ZvT atm isnt so much its unwinable but thats its very difficult to end the game if terran doesnt want it to
3/3 muta/ling bane can definatley hold its own on creep
but off of creep or trying to push into bases against pre-laid mines? not gona happen

makes it a bit annoying to have suhc a mobile army composition but with no ability to push unless the terran messes up ( ie steps onto creep where you can take a good fight

Yeah exactly, you need to stay patient and keep your advantage, while as soon as Terran gets an advantage vs Zerg he kills you 100%. If you attack and Terran can hold with a limited army/PF/WM/repair, and while you was ahead with superior army, you fail behind and 100% lose.

The only way you can play is defensive, while you limit the number of his base, and you wait until he has no money anymore. Or when he attacks, you trade base, kill his production building, while you sacrify your base, but you massing thousands banelings. If you manage to clean his army even uncost effectivly, he can't rebuild and you have won.

But frontal assault only work if you just clean his army and you rush in his base, before he can rebuild, but you have only a 5-10s window.


3/3 muta ling definitely can't push into terran's base with mine pre-laid, bio with 3/3 upgrade, turrets and thors, but I'm pretty sure the zerg can tech switch to swarm hosts to start seiging the terran in that case? If the game has been even I don't see a problem of zerg slowly switching tech to swarm hosts. Mutas and lings can keep the terran in the base (lings can even free up supply) while you switch tech to swarm hosts.
brickrd
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States4894 Posts
November 16 2014 10:58 GMT
#24095
On November 16 2014 19:18 Estancia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2014 18:54 Tyrhanius wrote:
On November 10 2014 21:18 Enigmasc wrote:
tbh i think the most frustrating thing about ZvT atm isnt so much its unwinable but thats its very difficult to end the game if terran doesnt want it to
3/3 muta/ling bane can definatley hold its own on creep
but off of creep or trying to push into bases against pre-laid mines? not gona happen

makes it a bit annoying to have suhc a mobile army composition but with no ability to push unless the terran messes up ( ie steps onto creep where you can take a good fight

Yeah exactly, you need to stay patient and keep your advantage, while as soon as Terran gets an advantage vs Zerg he kills you 100%. If you attack and Terran can hold with a limited army/PF/WM/repair, and while you was ahead with superior army, you fail behind and 100% lose.

The only way you can play is defensive, while you limit the number of his base, and you wait until he has no money anymore. Or when he attacks, you trade base, kill his production building, while you sacrify your base, but you massing thousands banelings. If you manage to clean his army even uncost effectivly, he can't rebuild and you have won.

But frontal assault only work if you just clean his army and you rush in his base, before he can rebuild, but you have only a 5-10s window.


3/3 muta ling definitely can't push into terran's base with mine pre-laid, bio with 3/3 upgrade, turrets and thors, but I'm pretty sure the zerg can tech switch to swarm hosts to start seiging the terran in that case? If the game has been even I don't see a problem of zerg slowly switching tech to swarm hosts. Mutas and lings can keep the terran in the base (lings can even free up supply) while you switch tech to swarm hosts.
same problem as teching to ultras, brood lords or infestors. your mobility suffers and cheap terran drops/runbys shred your economy
TL+ Member
VegaMatt
Profile Joined April 2014
United Kingdom11 Posts
November 16 2014 11:09 GMT
#24096
On November 16 2014 19:58 brickrd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2014 19:18 Estancia wrote:
On November 16 2014 18:54 Tyrhanius wrote:
On November 10 2014 21:18 Enigmasc wrote:
tbh i think the most frustrating thing about ZvT atm isnt so much its unwinable but thats its very difficult to end the game if terran doesnt want it to
3/3 muta/ling bane can definatley hold its own on creep
but off of creep or trying to push into bases against pre-laid mines? not gona happen

makes it a bit annoying to have suhc a mobile army composition but with no ability to push unless the terran messes up ( ie steps onto creep where you can take a good fight

Yeah exactly, you need to stay patient and keep your advantage, while as soon as Terran gets an advantage vs Zerg he kills you 100%. If you attack and Terran can hold with a limited army/PF/WM/repair, and while you was ahead with superior army, you fail behind and 100% lose.

The only way you can play is defensive, while you limit the number of his base, and you wait until he has no money anymore. Or when he attacks, you trade base, kill his production building, while you sacrify your base, but you massing thousands banelings. If you manage to clean his army even uncost effectivly, he can't rebuild and you have won.

But frontal assault only work if you just clean his army and you rush in his base, before he can rebuild, but you have only a 5-10s window.


3/3 muta ling definitely can't push into terran's base with mine pre-laid, bio with 3/3 upgrade, turrets and thors, but I'm pretty sure the zerg can tech switch to swarm hosts to start seiging the terran in that case? If the game has been even I don't see a problem of zerg slowly switching tech to swarm hosts. Mutas and lings can keep the terran in the base (lings can even free up supply) while you switch tech to swarm hosts.
same problem as teching to ultras, brood lords or infestors. your mobility suffers and cheap terran drops/runbys shred your economy

This is why i always hated the medvac speed boost, you're bottle necked into going muta every single game
brickrd
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States4894 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-16 11:15:18
November 16 2014 11:14 GMT
#24097
On November 16 2014 20:09 VegaMatt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2014 19:58 brickrd wrote:
On November 16 2014 19:18 Estancia wrote:
On November 16 2014 18:54 Tyrhanius wrote:
On November 10 2014 21:18 Enigmasc wrote:
tbh i think the most frustrating thing about ZvT atm isnt so much its unwinable but thats its very difficult to end the game if terran doesnt want it to
3/3 muta/ling bane can definatley hold its own on creep
but off of creep or trying to push into bases against pre-laid mines? not gona happen

makes it a bit annoying to have suhc a mobile army composition but with no ability to push unless the terran messes up ( ie steps onto creep where you can take a good fight

Yeah exactly, you need to stay patient and keep your advantage, while as soon as Terran gets an advantage vs Zerg he kills you 100%. If you attack and Terran can hold with a limited army/PF/WM/repair, and while you was ahead with superior army, you fail behind and 100% lose.

The only way you can play is defensive, while you limit the number of his base, and you wait until he has no money anymore. Or when he attacks, you trade base, kill his production building, while you sacrify your base, but you massing thousands banelings. If you manage to clean his army even uncost effectivly, he can't rebuild and you have won.

But frontal assault only work if you just clean his army and you rush in his base, before he can rebuild, but you have only a 5-10s window.


3/3 muta ling definitely can't push into terran's base with mine pre-laid, bio with 3/3 upgrade, turrets and thors, but I'm pretty sure the zerg can tech switch to swarm hosts to start seiging the terran in that case? If the game has been even I don't see a problem of zerg slowly switching tech to swarm hosts. Mutas and lings can keep the terran in the base (lings can even free up supply) while you switch tech to swarm hosts.
same problem as teching to ultras, brood lords or infestors. your mobility suffers and cheap terran drops/runbys shred your economy

This is why i always hated the medvac speed boost, you're bottle necked into going muta every single game

yeah. its possible to play defensive with mass ling/bane and/or infestors and/or static defense in the midgame but terran doesn't get weak in the late game and you can't really ever counterpush without ling/bane/muta or roaches which is necessary in the matchup to prevent terran from rallying before you have more banelings
TL+ Member
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
November 16 2014 11:40 GMT
#24098
It's like you haven't seen a high level TvZ in the last couple of months...
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1338 Posts
November 16 2014 12:45 GMT
#24099
On November 16 2014 20:40 Ghanburighan wrote:
It's like you haven't seen a high level TvZ in the last couple of months...


you mean all those games Z went muta or did all ins? i havent seen many ling bane infestor games (actually none...) or roach hydra recently or ling bane SH pr ling bane hydra or even roach bane (other than all in). so yes its always mutas because bio with medivacs in dropships are that potent. no balance complain there its just boring to watch and play and with buffed thors, mines and hellbat (timings) ling bane muta got even worse.

just hope in lotv this gets fixed and losing bases becomes not that big of a deal as long as you can safe your workers. especially since less minerals per base will mean you cant afford 20 spines/spores per base to be safe from just 2 medivacs with 16 marines.
Awin
Profile Joined June 2014
France65 Posts
November 16 2014 13:41 GMT
#24100
On November 16 2014 18:03 starslayer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 16 2014 17:23 Samx wrote:
If anything, the game mc won show how ridiculous the balance was.
For the majority of the game, mc was in taeja's base with at least 2 stalkers plus an air unit either 1 or 2 oracle, or at least a void ray. What did Taeja have? Units streaming out of production 1 by 1. Throughout that game, at all time mc had double or triple the unit supply in taeja's base and Taeja nearly made a hold.

Game 3. After doing critical damage, Taeja had half the worker count of mc, supply was about 80:50. Equal tech, MC had robo already. ToD made a superb point, you leave a terran alone for 2 minutes. You are screwed.
All Taeja did was parade push into MC's second base. Didn't matter with overcharge and collosus. Each fight was progressively in favour of Taeja. MC defended until he died.



can we stop trying to talk balance with teaja lol this guy is insane, he was winning when terran was at its lowest and hes going to dominate when things are balance or even a bit terran favored. i mean the kid is a freak it doesnt matter about balance when it comes to him. if you were talking about someone like idk yoda or someone else then ok maybe sure but teaja next level good.




Yeah guys, please stop arguing about balance in games involving Taeja, Maru, Flash or Innovation. Those players are SO much better than every other zerg and protoss players that your disussion is irrelevant : )
Prev 1 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 10m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Creator 99
ProTech75
StarCraft: Brood War
Nal_rA 6103
BeSt 572
ToSsGirL 499
Larva 259
ggaemo 70
JulyZerg 68
Backho 67
Pusan 43
Dewaltoss 38
ZerO 21
[ Show more ]
NotJumperer 14
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
yabsab 9
Britney 0
Dota 2
XaKoH 740
XcaliburYe232
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1301
Other Games
summit1g7047
ceh9606
singsing296
Fuzer 184
SortOf69
Beastyqt32
ZerO(Twitch)2
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 29
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 47
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt943
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
2h 10m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
5h 10m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 1h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 5h
CSO Cup
1d 7h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 9h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.