EPTSeason 3 Ladder Map Changes (Official) - Page 50
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Bluerain
United States348 Posts
| ||
|
ShadeOfMcLovin
1 Post
And not to mention the coolest looking too. | ||
|
happyness
United States2400 Posts
On July 27 2011 08:52 ShadeOfMcLovin wrote: Damn Metalopolis was one if not THE most balanced and versatile maps in the entire pool. And not to mention the coolest looking too. Except for close positions, which sucked balls. Plus idk, I don't think it was that versatile, but still a solid map | ||
|
bluQ
Germany1724 Posts
On July 27 2011 08:50 Dexxy wrote: Who isnt? This shit just keep getting worse and worse. What's so damn annoying is that Blizzard wants to attend to the "casual community" that doesn't want to play games for more then 15 minutes. That's just wrong in my eyes. Do you know anyone that play SC2 and doesn't watch streams and pro-matches? I guess blizzard just looks into their forum and not on TL. Just reading trough the linked post *sigh* | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
Backwater gulch is still here? WTF! And a change that i saw coming: %$#@ING delta is gone! User was warned for this post | ||
|
Rassy
Netherlands2308 Posts
hope we get another map with a similar city theme, loved the looks of metalopolis | ||
|
Fanatic-Templar
Canada5819 Posts
| ||
|
cilinder007
Slovenia7251 Posts
On July 27 2011 09:16 GhandiEAGLE wrote: GOODBYE METALOPOLIS, NOW THERE ARE ONLY MORE OP FOR TERRAN MAPS IN THE POOL Backwater gulch is still here? WTF! And a change that i saw coming: %$#@ING delta is gone! wow you just can't stop whining no matter what can you ? | ||
|
La1
United Kingdom659 Posts
Abysaal caverns - not a huge fan of this map i actually really dislike it and i guess i will have to play half map vs t and z to win :\ if you spawn same side in pvz its impossible to get a 3rd, and it would be impossible to snipe or put pressure on their 3rd as they can run right to your base.. i really dont like how it plays as it feels like it has 2 lanes and your forced to go down 1 or the other.. i can see alot of 2 base all ins on this map and the only really good spawns would be cross pos. nerazim crypt pvz will be a nightmare on this map, its SO wide that if you push out your basically asking to be surrounded by lings.. getting a gold as a 3rd is pretty good also however i cant see how i would push z. Pvt again will be very hard, tanks on high grounds, bushes outside your base are all just asking to be abused by t :\ really dont like it. Antiga shipyard played it once in pvp seems insanely small with lots of ramps, can see this being protoss biased but i need to play more to see :x seering - once again in pvp, very rampy and no comments on it | ||
|
harhar!
Germany190 Posts
On July 27 2011 08:59 happyness wrote: Except for close positions, which sucked balls. thats bullshit. there was 1/3 chance of close position favoring terran and 1/3 far position favoring zerg. how could it be balanced without possibility for close posi? i hate it when zerg whine about close posi even though its actually only 33% of the games. | ||
|
BreakfastTea
United States184 Posts
How about this: Fuck the GSL maps. Seriously, if you're not on a team and playing tournaments, who cares if you play on them? Because it makes you "cool" to play on the maps "that the pros play"? Give the new maps a chance. Some of them are actually fun--I particularly like Abyssal Caverns. Getting a third will be easy, just which expansion you get will change due to spawn positions. And Metalopolis was only considered good because it was the least shitty map to make it out of the beta. | ||
|
Icekommander
Canada483 Posts
| ||
|
windsupernova
Mexico5280 Posts
Also, I love how they said they are adressing the close positions issue. This is needed. From my PTR experience the new maps are not bad at all I think I won't veto anything for a while until I see how stuff works. Edit: Oh yeah and Delta Quadrant is gone, that one needed to leave. I didn't mind scrap station that much unless it was a PvP but meh it was also a pretty old map. | ||
|
hmunkey
United Kingdom1973 Posts
| ||
|
zhurai
United States5660 Posts
On July 27 2011 12:42 BreakfastTea wrote: How about this: Fuck the GSL maps. Seriously, if you're not on a team and playing tournaments, who cares if you play on them? Because it makes you "cool" to play on the maps "that the pros play"? I'm not one of the ones bitching, but I like the GSL maps more than the "new" maps they put into the pool. | ||
|
Danners933
Canada76 Posts
 | ||
|
skr0n
Canada7 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On July 27 2011 11:58 harhar! wrote: thats bullshit. there was 1/3 chance of close position favoring terran and 1/3 far position favoring zerg. how could it be balanced without possibility for close posi? i hate it when zerg whine about close posi even though its actually only 33% of the games. Because most people dont enjoy knowing its an almost instant loss to be close positions. Terran can still win at cross, but close its almost impossible for Z to win | ||
|
Noobivore36
United States13 Posts
| ||
|
Rasun
United States787 Posts
On July 27 2011 12:42 BreakfastTea wrote: Wow, with the way people bitch here, it's amazing to think that this is the foreign center for BW and SC2. I wonder what people who actually don't like the game think. How about this: Fuck the GSL maps. Seriously, if you're not on a team and playing tournaments, who cares if you play on them? Because it makes you "cool" to play on the maps "that the pros play"? Give the new maps a chance. Some of them are actually fun--I particularly like Abyssal Caverns. Getting a third will be easy, just which expansion you get will change due to spawn positions. And Metalopolis was only considered good because it was the least shitty map to make it out of the beta. People don't like the GSL maps because we "think it makes us cool" to play on them, its cause they are good fuckin maps that we have watched amazing games played on. | ||
| ||
