• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 03:15
CET 09:15
KST 17:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational4SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)16Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey! SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list? Starcraft 2 will not be in the Esports World Cup When will we find out if there are more tournament
Tourneys
$70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC2 AI Tournament 2026 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Gypsy to Korea BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Navigating the Risks and Rew…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1711 users

Calling MULES On Close Patches is Bad - Page 7

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
Gnax
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden490 Posts
June 26 2011 03:52 GMT
#121
On June 26 2011 12:50 Flavor wrote:
Also, when you get into a habbit of calling down mules on the close patches, they tend to get mined out first making your scv's less efficient


Why do people keep saying this. You realize you can transfer workers right? and that you get a message when mineral patches are mined out?
btlyger
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States470 Posts
June 26 2011 03:53 GMT
#122
Posts like the OPs is why I came to team liquid.

Great find man this will help a lot as I see 90% of terrans muleing close patches.
"Minerals being mined. Minerals being mined. Minerals being mined." Learn how to post: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
June 26 2011 03:54 GMT
#123
On June 26 2011 08:15 hoot00 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 26 2011 07:54 Kiarip wrote:
On June 26 2011 07:53 latan wrote:
On June 26 2011 07:48 dhe95 wrote:
It's also better to not constantly call upon on the same patch. Think about it, if you have 5 patches with 800 minerals each, you'll get only a total of 25 minerals per trip, since unless you have mules scvs will mine one at a time. If instead you had 8 patches with 500 minerals each, you'd get a total of 40 minerals per trip.


however, less patches means you can saturate with less workers. which gives saves you some workers to use in your expansion.

yeah I agree with this


Would you rather have 8 patches with 1500 minerals each, or 1 patch with 12000 minerals? To get the same income you would have to have 7 other bases


Ok, while this is true I don't really feel like mineral income is such a huge issues for terran. I mean a huge portion of Terran's income comes from mules and having 1 patch less isn't gonna affect your ability to mule, on the other hand I feel like Terran's design kind of promotes low worker count end-games in favor of free'ing up more supply for the main army, so while I'm sure it makes a very small difference I feel like it plays better into the grand plan for Terran late-game where you only have like 35 SCVs total, and can have 165 supply dedicated to the army or something like that you know?
almond
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
115 Posts
June 26 2011 03:58 GMT
#124
I wouldn't be surprised if the haters split workers in the beginning of the game. Lol.
Thx OP.
SayHello
Profile Joined December 2010
Czech Republic147 Posts
June 26 2011 04:02 GMT
#125
The real pro will stop the mule before it mines it's last 30 minerals. You need it on close patch to mine faster...
JustinHit
Profile Joined October 2010
United States196 Posts
June 26 2011 04:07 GMT
#126
No one noticed that by just playing?
-_- oh team liquid.
For the swarm for life!
Warble
Profile Joined May 2011
137 Posts
June 26 2011 04:09 GMT
#127
The OP's experiences differ from my own, as I have done some tests in previous patches and my results agreed with Liquipedia.

It is possible that Blizzard changed some mechanics in recent patches or there may be quirks in map layouts since Blizzard tweaks them every so often.

This thread needs more replays. I am more inclined to believe that Cheec's thread, Liquipedia and my own experiences are correct until the OP provides evidence otherwise.
Nexic
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States729 Posts
June 26 2011 04:12 GMT
#128
Man, now reading through the last couple pages I'm even more confused with all the conflicting reports being posted... I guess I will continue MULEing on close patches till a more conclusive solution is reached, mining 270 minerals and dieing with 30 is probably better than only mining 240.
Seeker *
Profile Blog Joined April 2005
Where dat snitch at?37058 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-26 04:17:26
June 26 2011 04:15 GMT
#129
How about instead of aruging who's right who's wrong. We all just try it out for ourselves. I guarantee we will all have people saying they got the same results AND people saying they got different results.

Bottom line: This probably depends on what map/mineral positioning/where you put your mule.

Just play the game, and switch your mule positioning to the further patches at your own discretion.
I agree with Xapti, 4 POSSIBLITIES:

Close patches:
300
270 (30 loss)

Further patches:
270
240 (30 loss)
ModeratorPeople ask me, "Seeker, what are you seeking?" My answer? "Sleep, damn it! Always sleep!"
TL+ Member
Ketara
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States15065 Posts
June 26 2011 04:33 GMT
#130
Whole lot of misinformation in this thread.

The OP is basically a generalization. While not untrue, it depends on the individual map and the individual patches. There are clearly some patches on some maps where you only get 240 and lose 30.

There are so many people on every page though replying and just saying "Thanks OP, this is why Team Liquid is great!" that it is clear they are not reading the thread through, and that this is causing a lot of misinformation.

Pretty upsetting, really.
http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/lol-general/502075-patch-61-league-of-legends-general-discussion?page=25#498
dave333
Profile Joined August 2010
United States915 Posts
June 26 2011 04:39 GMT
#131
guess this makes mules balanced

jk but this is pretty important. You end up calling a lot of mules....thats a lot of money being killed. I know myself I usuallly call mules onto close patches out of habit from mineral micro.
kidcrash
Profile Joined September 2009
United States623 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-26 04:58:35
June 26 2011 04:46 GMT
#132
If you call down 20 mules in the course of an entire game that's 600 minerals that you are losing out on. I don't see how 600 minerals is negligible by any means.

Edit: Wow 4 possibilities... hmm well that complicates things a bit. Getting 240 minerals while losing 30 would be very bad. I guess memorizing the differences in map mining is only solution.
vogonpoet
Profile Joined May 2011
United States5 Posts
June 26 2011 05:13 GMT
#133
I tested this extensively during the beta, and all of my results agreed with Liquipedia.

I just tried it on Metalopolis, and the OP's claim is correct on this map: mules mined 270 from all patches, but close patches ended up losing the last 30 minerals mined without returning them to the base. Strange, because I'm sure I tested the mule on this map during beta. Probably just another unmentioned patch change at some point.

I'm sure some enterprising soul will break this down for each of the maps and update the LP entry.
Oh freddled gruntbuggly, Thy micturations are to me As plurdled gabbleblotchits On a lurgid bee
Genome852
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States979 Posts
June 26 2011 05:16 GMT
#134
On June 26 2011 12:52 Gnax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 26 2011 12:50 Flavor wrote:
Also, when you get into a habbit of calling down mules on the close patches, they tend to get mined out first making your scv's less efficient


Why do people keep saying this. You realize you can transfer workers right? and that you get a message when mineral patches are mined out?


No... the point is, you want your minerals to be mined out evenly, so your SCVs are always working at their highest possible efficiency.

That is why dropping MULEs on the same mineral patch every time is bad (it will get mined out really fast, meaning the SCVs will end up mining from 7 instead of 8 patches way earlier than they should be). You should alternate between the mineral patches.
Dimagus
Profile Joined December 2010
United States1004 Posts
June 26 2011 05:17 GMT
#135
Just don't do what I saw on KOTH last night. Specifically, don't call down 15 mules to the same base. A mule will not mine over top of another mule, so the max you ever want to do is 1 per mineral patch.
Riot Janook
Profile Joined August 2010
United States112 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-26 05:27:31
June 26 2011 05:27 GMT
#136
OP is incorrect.
MULEs mine 270 minerals on close patches.
240 minerals on far patches.
Existor
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation4295 Posts
June 26 2011 05:58 GMT
#137
I'm glad, that someone find way for buff mules.
almond
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
115 Posts
June 26 2011 06:00 GMT
#138
Sad that this turned into an ego stroking, OP bashing thread instead of useful mining efficiency discussion.
barneycast
Profile Joined June 2011
United States38 Posts
June 26 2011 06:01 GMT
#139
this is assuming that you aren't saturated correct? Because mules change mining positions all the time from my experience.
Sovetsky Soyuz
Profile Joined May 2011
Russian Federation905 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-06-26 06:03:16
June 26 2011 06:02 GMT
#140
sorry wrong thread
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 102
StarCraft: Brood War
actioN 292
Movie 101
Killer 94
Shinee 81
Hm[arnc] 71
EffOrt 63
JulyZerg 61
ZergMaN 44
Shine 29
Nal_rA 27
[ Show more ]
Mong 20
Bale 16
NotJumperer 16
Sacsri 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
League of Legends
JimRising 696
C9.Mang0425
Other Games
summit1g6507
WinterStarcraft342
XaKoH 160
Mew2King107
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1083
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 62
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1158
• Jankos474
• Stunt373
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
1h 45m
OSC
2h 45m
Clem vs Cure
ByuN vs TBD
TBD vs Solar
MaxPax vs TBD
Krystianer vs TBD
ShoWTimE vs TBD
Big Brain Bouts
2 days
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
3 days
BSL 21
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-20
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.