| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
L3gendary
Canada1470 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:02 Kisezik wrote: i dont get why everyone wants lurkers. lurkers are shit, we already have the units we need Clearly you didn't play bw. The game needs more positional and micro intensive units like the lurker and reaver. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On May 20 2011 01:32 ch4ppi wrote: Yeah thats what I love to do... Send in Lings/Banes/Mutas... oh pull back Mutas...oh ground army dead mutas are fine... but wait there is still a fucking army of terran... Most terrans float loads of Gas anyway... not because they are bad... because they dont need it in TvZ, since so few terrrans understood that Ghosts are pretty good... as well as Ravens... theres no good excuse for floating gas, ever | ||
|
tyCe
Australia2542 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:07 Endymion wrote: Lurkers were one of the most interesting SC1 units in the entire game, if you think that banelings "replace" them then you're sorely mistaken. It allowed zerg to take and have a position on the map, rather than having a completely mobile force. Blings fill the role, although they are way less interesting because they suicide.. Lurkers were nowhere near the most interesting units in BW. That role comfortably belongs to the Defiler - the most imba unit to ever exist in SC. Lurkers were just the zerg version of siege tanks + DTs - sneaky and sometimes devastating but never that "interesting". They were used for positional play and stationary defence. Other interesting units in BW include the Arbiter and the Queen (omg, spawn broodlings!). | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:02 Kisezik wrote: i dont get why everyone wants lurkers. lurkers are shit, we already have the units we need guess which unit can attack under and through forcefields and which can't? | ||
|
Kisezik
Australia70 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:18 L3gendary wrote: Clearly you didn't play bw. The game needs more positional and micro intensive units like the lurker and reaver. i was b- in bw on iccup if u know wat that means. This game is not bw, this is sc2. Both games are different in their own way. Someone like you, who isnt good at either game shouldn't talk | ||
|
R0YAL
United States1768 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:18 L3gendary wrote: Clearly you didn't play bw. The game needs more positional and micro intensive units like the lurker and reaver. As well as mines. If reapers got spider mines then this game would be so much better. | ||
|
stormchaser
Canada1009 Posts
| ||
|
Kisezik
Australia70 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:21 a176 wrote: guess which unit can attack under and through forcefields and which can't? zvp is not all about roach hydra idiot, watch players like nestea who have adapted a new style in zvp, which is pressure with roach ling into muta ling. User was warned for this post | ||
|
Tabbris
Bangladesh2839 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:21 Kisezik wrote: i was b- in bw on iccup if u know wat that means. This game is not bw, this is sc2. Both games are different in their own way. Someone like you, who isnt good at either game shouldn't talk I agree with this guy. I was a C zerg but I dont really want lurkers. We got banelings and infesters so I dont know where the lurker would even fit. Yeah they are different because they can hold things postionaly and make bases really strong defensivly but then there would be no reason for going banelings. And if they make lurkers T3 then thats just retarded | ||
|
ilmman
364 Posts
| ||
|
archonOOid
1983 Posts
So my idea is that terran buildings crash lands after a 5 minutes. They can still be used for scouting as normal but we won't see lucky terran draws. That would be great to see in HOTS and in WOL | ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
 | ||
|
JKira
Canada1002 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:20 turdburgler wrote: theres no good excuse for floating gas, ever Well he's right though. If you watch most lategame TvX minerals are actually the limiting factor, and they'll have literally over 1k gas. It really makes me think they can get away with taking less gas geysers actually. | ||
|
Tabbris
Bangladesh2839 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:23 Kisezik wrote: zvp is not all about roach hydra idiot, watch players like nestea who have adapted a new style in zvp, which is pressure with roach ling into muta ling. User was warned for this post Hahaha! People are crediting Nestea for inventing Roach/ling pressure now?!?! | ||
|
Walls
United States172 Posts
| ||
|
Walls
United States172 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:38 Tabbris wrote: Hahaha! People are crediting Nestea for inventing Roach/ling pressure now?!?! that doesnt mean that nestea has not done things that people did not know about. He is a beast sorry... | ||
|
Kisezik
Australia70 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:38 Tabbris wrote: Hahaha! People are crediting Nestea for inventing Roach/ling pressure now?!?! *into mutaling, read the whole thing before making a comment | ||
|
Zerothegreat
United States787 Posts
| ||
|
illmanic
United States58 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:50 Zerothegreat wrote: I thought Blizzard stated they wouldn't add new units like they did to the old starcraft? Is there a statement by Blizzard saying they will be changing the multiplayer? They said they wouldn't just add units. | ||
|
trikshun
United States437 Posts
On May 22 2011 10:21 Kisezik wrote: i was b- in bw on iccup if u know wat that means. This game is not bw, this is sc2. Both games are different in their own way. Someone like you, who isnt good at either game shouldn't talk He isn't even saying hes good. And yeah Lurkers actually make sense in this game and its not as different as people say it is you probably were not b- | ||
| ||
|
|
SC Evo League
ByuN vs Classic
Cure vs Solar
IPSL
Dragon vs Ret
Patches Events
RSL Revival
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
Bonyth vs Hawk
GSL
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
